• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Enthusiast-Grade K Processors in the Comet Lake-S Family Rumored to Feature 125 W TDP

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
2,872 (2.27/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
This piece of news shouldn't surprise anyone, except for the fact that Intel is apparently signing on a TDP of 125 W for even its K-series unlocked processors for their next-generation Comet Lake-S family. Intel's current Comet Lake 9900K CPU features a TDP of "only" 95 W - when compared to the rumored 125 W of the 10900K), whilst their current top offering, the i9-9900KS, features a 127 W TDP. Remember that Intel's 10900K should feature 10 cores and 20 threads, two extra cores than their current 9900K - this should explain the increased TDP, a mathematical necessity given that Intel can only count on marginal improvements to its 14 nm fabrication process to frequencies and power consumption of its CPUs.

A leaked slide from momomo on Twitter shows, if real, that Intel's future enthusiast-grade CPUs (likely i5-10600K, i7-10700K and i9-10900K) will feature this 125 W TDP, while other launches in that family will make do with the more traditional 65 W TDP (interesting to see that Intel has some 10-core CPUs with 65 W TDP, the same as their current 9900, despite two more cores). A footnote on the leaked slide shows that these K processors can be configured for a 95 W TDP, but this would likely come at a significant cost to operating frequency. Intel seems to be bringing a knife to a gunfight (in terms of core counts and TDP) with AMD's Ryzen 3000 and perhaps Ryzen 4000 CPUs, should those and Intel's future offerings actually coexist in the market.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,117 (2.38/day)
It looks acceptable. With good pricing this will make Intel competitive in the mass "up to 8 cores" market for another year. That's all they can hope for until 7/10nm arrive.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
145 (0.08/day)
Location
Marabá - Pará - Brazil
System Name KarymidoN TitaN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H105 @ Push-Pull
Memory 4x Crucial BallistX 8GB 2666mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4GB (3,5gb lol)
Storage Corsair Force MP300 120gb | 4TB HDD
Display(s) 4X 1080P LG Monitors
Case Thermaltake Core V71
Power Supply Corsair TX 600
since neither intel/amd can be trusted on TDP if it follows the trend prepare youselves for a power hungry chip... geez
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
880 (0.27/day)
Misleading. Intel handles a different approach to calculating it's TDP in comparison to AMD. Intel's chips could easily exceed like 30 to 50% of it's TDP measured.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
145 (0.08/day)
Location
Marabá - Pará - Brazil
System Name KarymidoN TitaN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H105 @ Push-Pull
Memory 4x Crucial BallistX 8GB 2666mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4GB (3,5gb lol)
Storage Corsair Force MP300 120gb | 4TB HDD
Display(s) 4X 1080P LG Monitors
Case Thermaltake Core V71
Power Supply Corsair TX 600
Misleading. Intel handles a different approach to calculating it's TDP in comparison to AMD. Intel's chips could easily exceed like 30 to 50% of it's TDP measured.
AMD also does the same thing, the point is intel is way more blatant, i believe Linus Tech Tips has a video testing that...
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
20,800 (4.32/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: Athlon II x4 630 3.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 1866 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: none
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: something
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Again, TDP is measured at base clock. If it's 125w at 3.6GHz or something, expect that figure to double when Turbo is active.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
880 (0.27/day)
AMD also does the same thing, the point is intel is way more blatant, i believe Linus Tech Tips has a video testing that...
Hello Intel Defender. AMD's TDP is way more within specs compared to Intel. The 2700x for example is a 105W TDP chip but could exceed 140W once boost (unlimited) kicks in.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
145 (0.08/day)
Location
Marabá - Pará - Brazil
System Name KarymidoN TitaN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H105 @ Push-Pull
Memory 4x Crucial BallistX 8GB 2666mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4GB (3,5gb lol)
Storage Corsair Force MP300 120gb | 4TB HDD
Display(s) 4X 1080P LG Monitors
Case Thermaltake Core V71
Power Supply Corsair TX 600
Hello Intel Defender. AMD's TDP is way more within specs compared to Intel. The 2700x for example is a 105W TDP chip but could exceed 140W once boost (unlimited) kicks in.
i'm far from a intel defender, have you checked my system specs? i use a 3700x myself. AMD is not 100% honest with their TDP either, its not that bad as intel, but still not honest.
Compare it like those were crimes: what AMD does in TDP is like stealing candy from a grocery store. Intel is like robbing a bank and shooting the police. their both crimes! but one is worst than the other.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
lol,another tdp debate.
why doesn't anyone pay attention to what actually matters




K-series will be entusiast only,I like the mainstream ones though.
+4.5ghz out of the box,HT on every chip.fast,cool and quiet.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,117 (2.38/day)
Hello Intel Defender. AMD's TDP is way more within specs compared to Intel. The 2700x for example is a 105W TDP chip but could exceed 140W once boost (unlimited) kicks in.
TDP is calculated for cooling, not power consumption. You assume way too much and don't understand the idea you mock.

Also, AMD's cooling needs increased significantly in high core 7nm chips (because of concentration), while TDP stayed pretty much the same.
That's way more misleading than what Intel does.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
20,800 (4.32/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: Athlon II x4 630 3.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 1866 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: none
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: something
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Hello Intel Defender. AMD's TDP is way more within specs compared to Intel. The 2700x for example is a 105W TDP chip but could exceed 140W once boost (unlimited) kicks in.
You're... pretty much saying the same thing the guy you quoted said.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
198 (0.14/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
since neither intel/amd can be trusted on TDP if it follows the trend prepare youselves for a power hungry chip... geez
AMD can be trusted with TDP. What those reviewers are saying on how much power the 3950X takes, UNDER A STRESS TEST, is 140-150W. Note that normal users aren’t expected to peg that cpu at 100%, and that’s why amd rates the power it is designed to use at 105W. Threadrippers are designed with 100% usage in mind, and so they rate it at 280W, and the chips actually adhere close to that.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
AMD can be trusted with TDP. What those reviewers are saying on how much power the 3950X takes, UNDER A STRESS TEST, is 140-150W. Note that normal users aren’t expected to peg that cpu at 100%, and that’s why amd rates the power it is designed to use at 105W. Threadrippers are designed with 100% usage in mind, and so they rate it at 280W, and the chips actually adhere close to that.
both are off,amd is a lot closer if I'm not mistaken,in the end TDP is pretty meaningless and it's all about operating temperatures.
it'd be harder to cool a 65w 3700x than a 95w 9700k at cause the former runs 8-12 degrees warmer.I've been watching countless videos on YT of 3700x/9700k in game comparisons and the difference is always there.
9th gen K-chips are pretty cool when operating at stock voltages and I have even higher hopes for 10th gen.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
786 (0.26/day)
Location
Oregon
System Name Red 101
Processor 8th Gen Intel Core i3-8350k @5Ghz+
Motherboard EVGA Z370 Classified
Cooling Custom Primochill and Heatkiller water cooling loop
Memory 16GB of Gskill 3200Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 with Heatkiller block @2114Mhz
Storage 4- Samsung Evo 250GB, 1- Pro 512GB and 1-512GB M.2
Display(s) LG 34" UW 166hz
Case In Win 101 customized a lot and painted red
Audio Device(s) Razer Kraken 7.1 Chroma
Power Supply EVGA 850w G2
Mouse Razer DeathAdder
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Win10Pro and games
Benchmark Scores NA
I am so excited for another chipset and socket!!!!
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
You do know those are STOCK AMD CPU COOLERS vs intel non STOCK cooling... right???
lol,no they aren't

We used a Noctua NH-U12 to measure CPU temperature while running Blender. We picked an actual application as that better reflects real life than a stress-testing application like Prime95.
what are you crazy ? expect tpu to run a box cooler on ryzen and custom on intel :laugh:

I am so excited for another chipset and socket!!!!
yup it sucks,though in your position it might be a good idea to get a used 8th/9th gen i7/i9
I know I'll consider that too.I've never bought a cpu new actually.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Since when Intel bundled coolers with 8700K, 9700K and 9900K?
lol,what are you talking about ?
I just quoted the testing setup,why would any reviewer test cpus on different coolers ?

and if 3900x reaches 80 degrees on custom cooling,their box cooler would throttle all through the whole review.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
198 (0.14/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
both are off,amd is a lot closer if I'm not mistaken,in the end TDP is pretty meaningless and it's all about operating temperatures.
it'd be harder to cool a 65w 3700x than a 95w 9700k at cause the former runs 8-12 degrees warmer.I've been watching countless videos on YT of 3700x/9700k in game comparisons and the difference is always there.
9th gen K-chips are pretty cool when operating at stock voltages and I have even higher hopes for 10th gen.
Ok here is a problem. You aren’t comparing temperature at a given wattage. Also, who the f*ck runs a 9900K at 3.6 GHz? 4.7 GHz is the all core turbo and the TDP for that is 210W. Intel won’t tell you that but they will say “oh yea our balls are bigger and we can overclock past amd oh yea” meanwhile no one buys a 9350KF over a 9400 cus the extra cores are more helpful. Long story short, Intel’s performance numbers are super misleading.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Ok here is a problem. You aren’t comparing temperature at a given wattage. Also, who the f*ck runs a 9900K at 3.6 GHz? 4.7 GHz is the all core turbo and the TDP for that is 210W. Intel won’t tell you that but they will say “oh yea our balls are bigger and we can overclock past amd oh yea” meanwhile no one buys a 9350KF over a 9400 cus the extra cores are more helpful. Long story short, Intel’s performance numbers are super misleading.
how are temperature and performance numbers misleading ?
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
198 (0.14/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
lol,another tdp debate.
why doesn't anyone pay attention to what actually matters




K-series will be entusiast only,I like the mainstream ones though.
+4.5ghz out of the box,HT on every chip.fast,cool and quiet.
Temperature doesn’t matter if it doesn’t help bring better performance. Run a 3700X at 60C or 80C, you get about the same performance. Also, I guarantee you a 9900K doesn’t run lower temps than an 8700K.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,571 (6.16/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
198 (0.14/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
how are temperature and performance numbers misleading ?
Intel says their chips are better than AMD’s. Here’s the problem. NOT ONLY do they say in the footnotes that the apps are optimized for intel cpus, they ALSO won’t mention the TDP that is in place when running all that turbo stuff. 210W. Versus AMD’s 105W all-time TDP. For intel, in turbo mode they have a different TDP that they never mention in public docs, and the only way to truly find out is through XTU, and it shows how much more power intel cpus take for those performance numbers. Yes my AMG V12 Engine does 660hp. Peak. I don’t want to tell you how trash it is compared to a v8 for all other RPMs, cus we only focus on maximum performance right? (Btw i don’t have an AMG V12, it was just an example. Normally, V8s offer more consistent performance than V12s)
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,117 (2.38/day)
Ok here is a problem. You aren’t comparing temperature at a given wattage. Also, who the f*ck runs a 9900K at 3.6 GHz?
Quite a lot of people run these with no manual OC. The CPU takes care of itself pretty well.
4.7 GHz is the all core turbo and the TDP for that is 210W.
No. TDP is given in specs and that's it. It's measured by Intel for a non-overclocked processor under some "real life scenario".
The 210W figure at 4.7 GHz all core is power consumption.
 
Top