• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Haswell" GT3 Graphics Twice as Fast as "Ivy Bridge"

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
14,414 (3.53/day)
Likes
4,275
System Name VHOST01 | Desktop
Processor i7 980x | i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard Gigabyte x58 Extreme | AsRock MicroATX Z170M Exteme4
Cooling Prolimatech Megahelams | Stock
Memory 6x4 GB @ 1333 | 2x 8G Gskill Aegis DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GT 210 | Nvidia GTX 970 FTW+
Storage 4x2 TB Enterprise RAID5 |Corsair mForce nvme 250G
Display(s) N/A | Dell 27" 1440p 8bit GSYNC
Case Lian Li ATX Mid Tower | Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) NA | On Board
Power Supply SeaSonic 500W Gold | Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse N/A | Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard N/A | Posiden Z RGB Cherry MX Brown
Software Centos 7 | Windows 10
#26
another integrated graphics solution is great news. too bad this is going to keep pushing amd products into the dustbin of history.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
317 (0.13/day)
Likes
83
System Name scrapper
Processor Intel i5-6600k @ 4.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Z-170A
Cooling H100i
Memory Corsair Vengence 16gb ddr4 @3000
Video Card(s) GTX 1070 EVGA SC
Storage 2x 500GB Samsung 850 SSD
Display(s) CrossOver 27" 1440p LG IPS @ 120Hz
Case Corsair 650D
Power Supply AX-850W
#27
AMD is doing fine.... they are finally back on track competing with Intel on the main desktop CPU front (performance not units sold.... yet) now they have to jump on marketing and let people know its good to buy AMD again. it is going to take a while but i expect to see more and more AMD pre-builts and custom builts popping up in the next few years as they maximize the FX line. their graphics division is strong and can support their CPU division for the mean time.

don't give up on AMD yet
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
335 (0.13/day)
Likes
57
Location
London, England, UK
System Name Devil's Canyon PC build
Processor Intel i7-4790K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97X-G1 Gaming WIFI-BK
Cooling Prolimatech Megahalems Black Edition Air Cooler, 2x Akasa 120mm PWN Piranha Fans (push-pull config)
Memory Patriot Viper 3 "Black Mamba" 32GB (4x8GB), 2133MHz, C11-11-11-30, 1.5v
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Windforce X3 GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB GDDR5 (Non-Pascal)
Storage Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD, 1TB Samsung 840 EVO SSD, Seagate 8TB Archive HDD, 2TB Samsung M9T HDD
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift 27" 144Hz G-Sync Gaming Monitor
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D Midi Tower - Black, 3x230mm Bitfenix SPECTRE PRO, 1x120mm Bitfenix PWN (SP)
Power Supply Seasonic 660W Platinum Certified Modular
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
#28
Rather than getting ahead of ourselves I believe we should just wait and when the product comes out the facts should be known by then (such as benchmarks and other tests on engineering samples that come out before the release). I'm sure that the integrated graphics in the new Haswell CPUs will be better than both Sandybridge and Ivybridge, and there will probably be improvements in general performance too.

For now it is best to not rely on what has been said so far as quite a few things have been exaggerated as a result of what people have claimed to have seen at CES; we only have to look at SteamBox (hence Xi3 Piston which was really Xi3's X7A micro PC which can run Steam on its Big Picture mode and as for Xi3 Piston that hasn't even been made and was not at CES, and no this wasn't SteamBox as Valve hasn't decided or announced what SteamBox will be) to know that.

All I can hope from the Haswell series is that it is not half-baked like Sandybridge or Ivybridge where Sata III and USB 3 isn't fully integrated yet and I hope that they integrate PCI-E 3.0 a little better into the new chipset too as I don't think it has been covered properly (just for the fact there is the Ivybridge CPUs which supports it and also the PLX PEX8747 chipset which also supports PCI-E 3.0); lastly all I would like Intel to do with Haswell is to drop the cheap thermal materials they used in Ivybridge and use the right ones like they did in Sandybridge as that can definitely be done.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,909 (3.43/day)
Likes
5,425
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#31
Can you play Crysis with everything set on Ultra yet with this series of Intel graphics?
I dont think you can do that on any IGP, unless on 320x240 or something.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
746 (0.20/day)
Likes
88
#32
I can play far cry 3 with low settings on my HD4000. Textures and such I can even bump to high. There are the occasional shadow bugs etc., but that is understandable and Intel should hopefully fix them in an upcoming release.

Obviously the iGPU was never meant for hardcore gamers, but for casual games, it's O.K. And it's one of the few GPU's which does video playback RIGHT.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
733 (0.24/day)
Likes
367
System Name Current
Processor Intel Core i7 3770 @ 3.8GHz (4.3GHz Turbo)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme4
Cooling Cooler Master 212 Evo Push-Pull
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866MHz @ 9-9-9-24-1T
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Ti EX
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p
Case Thermaltake Urban S41
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Cougar CMX 700W v3
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro | Linux Mint
#33
This is great news for Ultrabooks and Windows 8 Pro tablets. I have an old HD 3000 and as long as can load up UT2K4 with decent graphics and frame rates, I'm not going to complain; and that is in an Ultrabook which I didn't expect to get any gaming out of.

AMD is doing fine.... they are finally back on track competing with Intel on the main desktop CPU front (performance not units sold.... yet)
I beg to differ. AMD need to do something radical to their architectures to compete with Intel heavyweights. Their latest bulldozer architecture improved in very few areas compared to the predecessing architecture, in fact, even went backwards in some. Pair that with higher latency memory architecture and relatively poor single threaded performance and you'll only see disappointment. Their top-tier FX CPUs only just manage to trade blows with Intels i5s. The only thing that is working for them is their prices, APU lineup, and AMD loyalists. Now don't take what I just said the wrong way, I want AMD CPU division to recover, and I'm not saying they won't either, they just need to pull something out of the hat as competition is good for consumers. Just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rebel333

New Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
29 (0.01/day)
Likes
6
#34
I beg to differ. AMD need to do something radical to their architectures to compete with Intel heavyweights. Their latest bulldozer architecture improved in very few areas compared to the predecessing architecture, in fact, even went backwards in some. Pair that with higher latency memory architecture and relatively poor single threaded performance and you'll only see disappointment. Their top-tier FX CPUs only just manage to trade blows with Intels i5s. The only thing that is working for them is their prices, APU lineup, and AMD loyalists. Now don't take what I just said the wrong way, I want AMD CPU division to recover, and I'm not saying they won't either, they just need to pull something out of the hat as competition is good for consumers. Just my 2 cents.
Who cares CPU? CPUs stopped being bottleneck for years, the GPU is more important. AMD is going on this track for years, while Intel just start realizing GPU is important too...
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
733 (0.24/day)
Likes
367
System Name Current
Processor Intel Core i7 3770 @ 3.8GHz (4.3GHz Turbo)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme4
Cooling Cooler Master 212 Evo Push-Pull
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866MHz @ 9-9-9-24-1T
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Ti EX
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p
Case Thermaltake Urban S41
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Cougar CMX 700W v3
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro | Linux Mint
#35
Who cares CPU? CPUs stopped being bottleneck for years, the GPU is more important. AMD is going on this track for years, while Intel just start realizing GPU is important too...
Not everyone will be too fussed about the performance of modern CPUs when it comes to games, most are more than adequate, but not everyone only cares about gaming performance. As for their APU line up, they offer great value if on a tight budget. I will ask you this though; what do most current games have in common? What is it they demand most from a CPU? Maybe this will give you an incite to what I was getting at: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6347/amd-a10-5800k-a8-5600k-review-trinity-on-the-desktop-part-2/6

Obviously not the most comprehensive list, but gives you an idea.

EDIT: Just want to apologize to the Tatty_One for the double post. I am aware of the edit button and did use it, but since I'm without internet, I've been using my phone and thus something odd must have happened. Sorry for that.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
151 (0.08/day)
Likes
26
#36
Not everyone will be too fussed about the performance of modern CPUs when it comes to games, most are more than adequate, but not everyone only cares about gaming performance.
True most of my friend are running Core 2 Duo's or Quads or Phenom processors and have no issues playing the latest games. Although they might up grade there graphics card once every few years there isn't much of a need to upgrade CPU's are programers are retarded and couldn't code anything that takes full advantage of a Core 2 quad lead alone any of the latest processors.

Less and less people care about gaming pcs as there are consoles and tablets.

As for intel IGP or integrated graphics they are okay if you want to play the odd game.
Hell most of the bleeding edge games aren't much fun. So why would people even bother?
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
733 (0.24/day)
Likes
367
System Name Current
Processor Intel Core i7 3770 @ 3.8GHz (4.3GHz Turbo)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme4
Cooling Cooler Master 212 Evo Push-Pull
Memory 16GB DDR3 1866MHz @ 9-9-9-24-1T
Video Card(s) Galax GTX 1070 Ti EX
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 EVO SSD + Seagate 2TB HDD
Display(s) 28" Asus PB287Q 3840x2160p
Case Thermaltake Urban S41
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Cougar CMX 700W v3
Mouse Razer DeathAdder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro | Linux Mint
#37
Interesting point raised there. It's true though, those CPUs still would be adequate for most games these days. We've seen so many poorly optimised console ports and the likes. I wouldn't blame the developers/programmers, but rather the publisher for strict deadlines and budgets, and possibly ourselves, as we are the ones buying a large variety of devices that stretch these publisher constraints even thinner (though you cannot excuse studios like Activision with games such as Call of Duty; they'd be raking in the cash). As for taking full advantage of a CPU, you'd probably need to be getting down and dirty with assembly :p. However, that may be counterproductive.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,410 (1.90/day)
Likes
1,096
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#38
Anyone care to explain why oh why an i7 needs strong GPU incorporated??? Is OK to have a crappy GPU core inside, just for the safety or safe mode, but why would I care if the GPU will be double as fast as prev gen.???
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
1,614 (0.74/day)
Likes
555
Location
Bulgaria
System Name RawRubberLook
Processor G4560
Motherboard Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS
Cooling Kraken X31
Memory 1 x 8GB Cruicial 2400 mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX970 4GB
Storage Cruicial M.2 275GB drive + WD black 500 GB + WD Blue 640 GB
Display(s) 2560x1080 LG 29" + LG 22mp67vq-p
Case Thermaltake Urban R31
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D
Power Supply Fractal Design IntegraM 650W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell Somethin wireless
Software Windows 10 x 64 bits
#39
Anyone care to explain why oh why an i7 needs strong GPU incorporated??? Is OK to have a crappy GPU core inside, just for the safety or safe mode, but why would I care if the GPU will be double as fast as prev gen.???
Well, Intel knows that a person buying a mid-high range CPU will most probably, almost certainly have a discrete GPU onboard- be it GT210, GS8400 or some other old low-profile card, just for the BOOT up. So why would they add up>?- because you are going to pay for the whole chip in package anyway. At least that's one reason in my opinion, of course they are many more decent ones. But cash is a factor here as well, I agree with other people on this.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#40
What's the worst that can happen for AMD? Mobile Trinity will get outperformed, but not desktop, because AMD and Intel work backwards here, AMD offers the faster variants for desktop, while Intel for mobile... And lastly, Richland APUs or on their way too, my guess they will make some headway with them, and take whatever they lost back, especially if they are 28nm and GCN (remember the vast driver improvements AMD did in regard to that architecture?).
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,286 (0.92/day)
Likes
528
Location
Burlington, VT
Processor Intel i5-2500k
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
Cooling Deep Cool Gammax 400
Memory 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) Acer GD235HZbid 120hz LCD
Case Rosewill Challenger Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650W 650-TX
Software Windows 10
#41
Well, Intel knows that a person buying a mid-high range CPU will most probably, almost certainly have a discrete GPU onboard- be it GT210, GS8400 or some other old low-profile card, just for the BOOT up. So why would they add up>?- because you are going to pay for the whole chip in package anyway. At least that's one reason in my opinion, of course they are many more decent ones. But cash is a factor here as well, I agree with other people on this.
I'm pretty sure even HD4000 is better than a GT210 or GS8400...
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
1,614 (0.74/day)
Likes
555
Location
Bulgaria
System Name RawRubberLook
Processor G4560
Motherboard Asus PRIME H270M-PLUS
Cooling Kraken X31
Memory 1 x 8GB Cruicial 2400 mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX970 4GB
Storage Cruicial M.2 275GB drive + WD black 500 GB + WD Blue 640 GB
Display(s) 2560x1080 LG 29" + LG 22mp67vq-p
Case Thermaltake Urban R31
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D
Power Supply Fractal Design IntegraM 650W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell Somethin wireless
Software Windows 10 x 64 bits
#42
I'm pretty sure even HD4000 is better than a GT210 or GS8400...
It's not. My parents PC is with HD4000 and is running Palit GT210. I have compared the two, by a small margin the GT is still better, allows for a few games more and the CUDA acceleration for the 1080p movies makes a difference too. But the difference is minimal- I mean if you are buying a new PC and had to choose between taking the onboard and shelling, let's say 50 euros for a brand new gt210, I wouldn't pay them either. I got that one a real bargain.