• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Ice Lake" IPC Best-Case a Massive 40% Uplift Over "Skylake," 18% on Average

Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,511 (1.68/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG C7 Cu
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
7NM doesn't really help Intel with what they're struggling with, Performance.
It should be worse in fact...
Intel does not need help with performance. Skylake (and all the minor modifications to it) are competitive if not faster than Zen. Sunny Cove based CPUs seem to be competitive enough with Zen2 based on early information and the architectural changes in both that seem to mirror each other.

What Intel needs help with is power efficiency that 10nm/7nm does bring to the table. Smaller dies may be helpful or harmful but we do not know that yet for sure.
Especially when you take in to account the complete butchering of Intel CPU performance over the last year. You would need a lot more than a 40% improvement to make up for the loss of Hyperthreading, as well as the Spectre and Meltdown "fixes".
Some Intel CPU's will have lost more than 50% of their performance under some circumstances, so a poultry 18% (average) improvement on average is simply not enough.
Intel CPUs with Meltdown and L1TF fixed in hardware are already shipping. No doubt things like MDS will get fixes soon given Intel has been aware of these for almost a year now. It takes about year or year and a half to get fixed CPUs into mass production and out on shelves if this is done in a hurry.
Intel has other plans. At least thats what it told its investors this year.
This is an old roadmap slide. Newer one shows 10nm quickly replaced with 10+nm and then with 7nm less than a year after. Product roadmap at the same time only has 10nm CPUs for mobile by end of this year and for servers early next year. Desktop does not have anything at 10nm on roadmap.
Those numbers are questionable to me. Ryzen 2600X (4250MHz) - 480 points in CPU-Z test, Ryzen 3600X (4500MHz) - 609 points. That's ~28% increase. I wish it was truth though..
There is about 6% from faster clocks, making the increase by IPC raise 19%. That is feasible enough even if it would mean CPU-Z bench is pretty much the best case scenario for Zen2 (benefitting directly from massive L3 cache maybe).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
4,468 (1.51/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill
Processor 5960X @ 4.20Ghz @ 1.06v - For Crunching!!
Motherboard MSI X99 Titanium Gaming
Cooling Custom loop with old bits and pieces that I need to replace
Memory G Skill TridentX 3466 non RGB..
Video Card(s) 2 x EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black Edition
Storage Sandisk 120Gb SSD, 2 x 2Tb Sammy 3.5" drives - Need more drives!!
Display(s) 3 x 23" LG IPS panels (can't remember model!!)
Case 10mm thick MDF on plastic risers.. It's kinda a case??
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA T2 1200w
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Corsair thingy
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores It's not to bad.. More importantly, it works!!
I'll wait for the reviews and see what comes :) As pretty and nice as the slides are, I'll believe it when we see the reviews :)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,304 (1.25/day)
This is an old roadmap slide. Newer one shows 10nm quickly replaced with 10+nm and then with 7nm less than a year after. Product roadmap at the same time only has 10nm CPUs for mobile by end of this year and for servers early next year. Desktop does not have anything at 10nm on roadmap.
Intel investor day was May 8, 2019. Your confusing Intel with the Dell Leak Roadmap.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
1,841 (1.25/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
18% over four years is pretty terrible, especially if you consider how much performance was lost because of security mitigations.
I wonder what is used as a base here.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Messages
100 (0.16/day)
my 8700k has a 565 single core score for cpu z, now at 5,2 magically rise at 635?
 
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
463 (0.58/day)
I can bet by the year 2023, 3nm will be here as 5nm is more or less already here.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
603 (0.64/day)
This is so funny!!

AMD shows the most biased and misleading benchmarks -> "yes!! Intel is done!! AMD will conquer the world!!"

Intel has leaked benchmarks where 5,2 ghz = the new 3,6ghz, wich is amazimg -> "lol intel. Lol this is fake. Lol only 18% improvement. Lol this is never coming to desktop"

Seriously you guys are annoying. If this IPC improvements are true, oh boy, they gonna rip AMD apart on mobile and they will on desktop once they cam do it. I am for sure gonna be waiting.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
957 (0.25/day)
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 3 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R9 3900| R7 1700 3.75 | Xeon 2680v2
Motherboard Asrock AB350M Pro 4 | b350m-a | HP Z620
Cooling Water1x360,1x240 | Air | air
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX 3200mhz CL16 | 64gb | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | server | GTX970
Storage 960 Evo 500gb, 860 evo 1tb, Intel 660P 1tb PM871 256gb | various intel ssd's.
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something + 1440p 144hz something.
Case Phanteks EvolvX M-Atx
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse G402
Keyboard TT Meka G1
This is so funny!!

AMD shows the most biased and misleading benchmarks -> "yes!! Intel is done!! AMD will conquer the world!!"

Intel has leaked benchmarks where 5,2 ghz = the new 3,6ghz, wich is amazimg -> "lol intel. Lol this is fake. Lol only 18% improvement. Lol this is never coming to desktop"

Seriously you guys are annoying. If this IPC improvements are true, oh boy, they gonna rip AMD apart on mobile and they will on desktop once they cam do it. I am for sure gonna be waiting.
I expect Ice lake to either dominate or be highly competitive in laptops, but Intel is quite doomed on desktop(because of 10nm performance).

Intel does not need help with performance. Skylake (and all the minor modifications to it) are competitive if not faster than Zen. Sunny Cove based CPUs seem to be competitive enough with Zen2 based on early information and the architectural changes in both that seem to mirror each other.

What Intel needs help with is power efficiency that 10nm/7nm does bring to the table. Smaller dies may be helpful or harmful but we do not know that yet for sure.
Intel CPUs with Meltdown and L1TF fixed in hardware are already shipping. No doubt things like MDS will get fixes soon given Intel has been aware of these for almost a year now. It takes about year or year and a half to get fixed CPUs into mass production and out on shelves if this is done in a hurry.
This is an old roadmap slide. Newer one shows 10nm quickly replaced with 10+nm and then with 7nm less than a year after. Product roadmap at the same time only has 10nm CPUs for mobile by end of this year and for servers early next year. Desktop does not have anything at 10nm on roadmap.
There is about 6% from faster clocks, making the increase by IPC raise 19%. That is feasible enough even if it would mean CPU-Z bench is pretty much the best case scenario for Zen2 (benefitting directly from massive L3 cache maybe).
Intel needs PERFORMANCE on 10NM, performance on nodes means frequency!
Skylake, CFL and sunny cove is 14NM , 10NM = low clocks hence the reason why they will be on 14NM for desktop because performance is LOWER for 10nm!.
On the bright side for Intel!
I see no issues with Intel with 10nm for laptops, quite the contrary if they can get the chips out the door and I see no way amd's design will create big wins in the 7-25W space Intel wins, 25->45W Amd wins.

I may be mistaken by amd on low power laptops.

Bottom Line, Intel will struggle till 2021 on the cpu side but carried by low power cpu's and datacenter for AVX512 implementations, but I'm optimistic about their gpu and I hope they are back in 2021 with promising new designs :)
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,511 (1.68/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG C7 Cu
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
I wonder what is used as a base here.
Skylake.

Intel needs PERFORMANCE on 10NM, performance on nodes means frequency!
Skylake, CFL and sunny cove is 14NM , 10NM = low clocks hence the reason why they will be on 14NM for desktop because performance is LOWER for 10nm!.
On the bright side for Intel!
Intel has a slide where they admitted 10nm does not clock as high as 14nm(++) does. Their approach to that problem is two-fold. This shortcoming is one of the big reasons for skipping desktop SKUs at 10nm for now. The other thing is architectural changes for increased IPC in Sunny Cove cores - larger caches, improved frontend etc. I am not even sure 10nm on desktop would have a noticeable performance problem, the problem is much more likely in the size and yield side of Intel's 10nm chips.

This is not that different from what AMD is doing by the way. AMD does not have the frequency problem as Zen - or rather, GF/TSMC 14nm/12nm process - never clocked that high. At the same time Zen2 architectural changes have a lot in common with Sunny Cove changes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
243 (0.16/day)
This is so funny!!

AMD shows the most biased and misleading benchmarks -> "yes!! Intel is done!! AMD will conquer the world!!"

Intel has leaked benchmarks where 5,2 ghz = the new 3,6ghz, wich is amazimg -> "lol intel. Lol this is fake. Lol only 18% improvement. Lol this is never coming to desktop"

Seriously you guys are annoying. If this IPC improvements are true, oh boy, they gonna rip AMD apart on mobile and they will on desktop once they cam do it. I am for sure gonna be waiting.
Yes there is a huge difference between "Showing" official slide and "leaking". İf these leaks are true it'd be amazing indeed. But if not would Intel be punished? No the Chinese leaker would be blamed
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,511 (1.68/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG C7 Cu
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Intel investor day was May 8, 2019. Your confusing Intel with the Dell Leak Roadmap.
This slide was also in investor meeting (via Anandtech):

as well as this one:


10nm++ will exist but effectively will be overcome by 7nm in 2021. The second slide's "10nm Client Systems on Shelf for 2019 Holiday Season" matches Dell leak's mobile 10nm - and there was a passing mention of mobile in Intel's meeting - as well as servers in 1H'20 matches what I said above (and Dell's leak).

Whether Intel will be able to make their roadmap a reality is a separate discussion but they are quite clear about their plans.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,182 (4.53/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Intel has other plans. At least thats what it told its investors this year.



Intel will be using Arizona and Ireland for 7nm. Expansion at those fabs is expected to be completed late 2021 for Arizona, Ireland est sometime in 2022.

I too love a graph with no numbers marked on the y axis. This is hilariously bad.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
188 (1.24/day)
Indeed, since we know that new 10nm for mobile at 15W can only clock upto 3.9~4.1Ghz while current 8th gen Wiskey 15W U models boosts upto 4.8Ghz, even with IPC uplift it's doesn't look so great.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
1,841 (1.25/day)
System Name My all round PC
Processor i5 750
Motherboard ASUS P7P55D-E
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire 380 OC... sold, waiting for Navi
Storage 256GB Samsung SSD + 2Tb + 1.5Tb
Display(s) Samsung 40" A650 TV
Case Thermaltake Chaser mk-I Tower
Power Supply 425w Enermax MODU 82+
Software Windows 10
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,511 (1.68/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG C7 Cu
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
With or without security patches.
Without.
Keep in mind though that both compared CPUs are Intel's and security patches' performance hit is definitely bigger on Skylake with mitigations enabled.
Yeah, Intel's testing without security mitigations is shady.

On the other hand, these new cores definitely have fixes for Meltdown/L1TF in hardware and at least hardware-assisted mitigations for other Spectre-likes. And they are comparing these against Skylake which has none of that. When this is tested without security mitigations, Skylake should get a bigger boost than Ice Lake, making the uplift from new cores even bigger when taking security mitigations into account.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
226 (0.19/day)
Nothing more than Intel (unofficially of course) trying to steal thunder from AMD. Especially when you take in to account the complete butchering of Intel CPU performance over the last DECADE. You would need a lot more than a 40% improvement to make up for the loss of Hyperthreading, as well as the Spectre and Meltdown "fixes".

Some Intel CPU's will have lost more than 50% of their performance under some circumstances, so a poultry 18% (average) improvement on average is simply not enough.

Too little, too late Intel.
Fixed for clarity.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,376 (0.65/day)
Location
Czech republic
Processor Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon Rx 580 Nitro+ 8GB
Storage Samsung 850 PRO 256GB + Samsung 970 PRO 1TB
Display(s) Dell U2415
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME Ultra 650W Gold
Mouse Roccat Kone EMP
Software Windows 10 x64
Ice Lake (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ice Lake is Intel's codename for the 10th generation Intel Core processors based on the new Sunny Cove microarchitecture.

WTF????

someone explain this shit to me, because I am completely perplexed.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,086 (0.55/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Kingstone 60gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
This is so funny!!

AMD shows the most biased and misleading benchmarks -> "yes!! Intel is done!! AMD will conquer the world!!"

Intel has leaked benchmarks where 5,2 ghz = the new 3,6ghz, wich is amazimg -> "lol intel. Lol this is fake. Lol only 18% improvement. Lol this is never coming to desktop"

Seriously you guys are annoying. If this IPC improvements are true, oh boy, they gonna rip AMD apart on mobile and they will on desktop once they cam do it. I am for sure gonna be waiting.
yes it is amazing.... hence fake.... and what misleading/biased benchmarks has AMD shown (also biased...can anything be biased when its representing itself...what?)
Salty Intel fanboy is salty seemingly.

also if nothing else, I would think you would be pissed off knowing Intel was comfortably sitting on that "5.2 - 3.6 ghz" improvement but the bosses saying "no dont push that out now, spread if over many years of full price products, more money for us".
Its would be only now that Intel is being pushed by some competition that they get off their lazy greedy selfish behinds.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
603 (0.64/day)
yes it is amazing.... hence fake.... and what misleading/biased benchmarks has AMD shown (also biased...can anything be biased when its representing itself...what?)
Salty Intel fanboy is salty seemingly.

also if nothing else, I would think you would be pissed off knowing Intel was comfortably sitting on that "5.2 - 3.6 ghz" improvement but the bosses saying "no dont push that out now, spread if over many years of full price products, more money for us".
Its would be only now that Intel is being pushed by some competition that they get off their lazy greedy selfish behinds.
Sure, only AMD leaks are accurate. Ive seen the picture now :)

As for the question about AMd misleading benchmarks, ask Steve Burke from GamersNexus.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,511 (1.68/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG C7 Cu
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Ice Lake (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ice Lake is Intel's codename for the 10th generation Intel Core processors based on the new Sunny Cove microarchitecture.
WTF????
someone explain this shit to me, because I am completely perplexed.
Ice Lake is CPU, Sunny Cove is the core.
 
Joined
May 11, 2018
Messages
31 (0.07/day)
Ice Lake (microarchitecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ice Lake is Intel's codename for the 10th generation Intel Core processors based on the new Sunny Cove microarchitecture.

WTF????

someone explain this shit to me, because I am completely perplexed.
You can look at it this way. Sunny Cove is the core architecture. Ice Lake denotes architecture (Sunny Cove) + process (10 nm).
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
480 (0.22/day)
Processor delidded i7-8700K @ 5.1Ghz + NB @ 4.9Ghz 1.408V / 1.104V IO 1.152V SA + Koolance CPU-380i
Motherboard Asrock Z370 Taichi P4.00
Cooling HWlabs Nemesis GTS 360 and GTX 240 / 3x Gentle Typhoon AP-15 1850 RPM / 3x EK Vardar / SC600 pump
Memory 2x8GB 2133Mhz OEM SK Hynix RAM (dual ranks AFR) @ 3500Mhz 16-18-18-36-360-2T 1.408V with 60mm fan
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 + universal waterblock underclock @ 1721Mhz 0.8V 12488 mem(140W during gaming)
Storage Transcend PCIE 220S 1TB / WD Blue 1TB HDD / WD Black 2TB HDD
Display(s) Dell S2716DG A08 2560 x 1440 144Hz (fixed deep sleep , fixed coronas , fixed color banding)
Case NZXT H440 White modded front and top panel for better airflow.
Power Supply Corsair HX 750W 80+ Silver
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 2016 LTSB (1607 inside)
Benchmark Scores 1838 FIDE rating.
my 8700k has a 565 single core score for cpu z, now at 5,2 magically rise at 635?
635 for 5.2 seem legit. Here is mine at 5.4

125204
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,086 (0.55/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Kingstone 60gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Sure, only AMD leaks are accurate. Ive seen the picture now :)

As for the question about AMd misleading benchmarks, ask Steve Burke from GamersNexus.
No Im asking you, you brought it up, you made the claim so the burden of proof lies with you Im afraid.

And no, AMD leaks are pretty much never accurate, thats the reason why this is probably fake as well...
In fact Im kinda convinced AMD leaks are done by anti AMD people to get people hyped up about improbable products so they are disappointed when the final products dont live up to that hype, hence attempting to damage the image.

For example the 5ghz claim, or that Ryzen 3000 would all be one tier difference, like this nonsense: https://eteknix-eteknixltd.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/AMD-Ryzen-3000-Singapore-Leak.jpg
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
15,791 (3.23/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Cherry MX-Board 3.0
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
This is so funny!!

AMD shows the most biased and misleading benchmarks -> "yes!! Intel is done!! AMD will conquer the world!!"

Intel has leaked benchmarks where 5,2 ghz = the new 3,6ghz, wich is amazimg -> "lol intel. Lol this is fake. Lol only 18% improvement. Lol this is never coming to desktop"

Seriously you guys are annoying. If this IPC improvements are true, oh boy, they gonna rip AMD apart on mobile and they will on desktop once they cam do it. I am for sure gonna be waiting.
The rhethoric is the same from both, ugh, "sides". Entertaining in some ways, but sad when you realize it's just how the world works now.
 
Top