• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel "Ice Lake-Y" MCM Pictured Up Close

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,863 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Here are some of the first pictures of the 10th generation Core "Ice Lake-Y" multi-chip module, designed for ultra low-power platforms, such as notebooks and 2-in-1 convertibles. These chips have a TDP target as low as 8W to 15W, are built in a BGA (ball-grid array) MCM (multi-chip module) to minimize Z-height and conserve mainboard PCB real-estate, respectively. The larger dies of the two of course is the 10 nm "Ice Lake" SoC with 4 "Sunny Cove" CPU cores, and a Gen11 GT2 iGPU. The smaller die is the PCH (platform controller hub), or chipset. The RVP (reference validation platform) is a motherboard that lets you test every possible connectivity option of the platform, by manually switching around PCIe lanes, SATA links, GPIO, LVDS, and TMDS lanes via jumpers. Intel usually hands these out to OEMs, system integrators, and system software developers. We also spotted the "Ice Lake" 4-core wafer.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,343 (2.12/day)
Location
USA
15 watts and it still boosts to 4.1 ghz... honestly could be a game changer in high end gaming laptops, tiny heatsink on cpu, will allow for full fledged rtx 2080's non-max q design, because all the cooling can be diverted to the gpu.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
3,197 (1.23/day)
They haven't actually disclosed which models boost to 4.1 Ghz, because they've listed 3 TDP numbers 9/15/28W which could be significant.
Also 8665u already boosts to 4.8Ghz so this is a slight downgrade for single core boost.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
397 (0.84/day)
15 watts and it still boosts to 4.1 ghz... honestly could be a game changer in high end gaming laptops, tiny heatsink on cpu, will allow for full fledged rtx 2080's non-max q design, because all the cooling can be diverted to the gpu.
May I ask where did they show the "Boost to 4.1GHz" variant is a 15W part?
From Intel's PPT there is a 28W part, I have to assume the "Up to 4.1GHz" goes to the 28W part.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.50/day)
They haven't actually disclosed which models boost to 4.1 Ghz, because they've listed 3 TDP numbers 9/15/28W which could be significant.
Also 8665u already boosts to 4.8Ghz so this is a slight downgrade for single core boost.
You obviously missing the 18% IPC increase part, but Im not surprised tbh.

Plus the ram got a boost from 2400 to 3733/3200 wich alone will provide way more performance. We all making jokes about Intel in the last days, but these mobile chips are really really and I mean really interesting. Low power with thunderbolt 3 and great performance for gamers on a go, light video editing etc.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,042 (6.13/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 8 GiB
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 VGA)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
And what's the nominal clock? 2.4 GHz? Boost is mostly marketing fluff...especially in low power environments where power and/or heat will forbid it 99% of the time. They fact they're unwilling to reveal the nominal clock speed is quite telling...they're embarrassed by it.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,618 (1.23/day)
You obviously missing the 18% IPC increase part, but Im not surprised tbh.

Plus the ram got a boost from 2400 to 3733/3200 wich alone will provide way more performance. We all making jokes about Intel in the last days, but these mobile chips are really really and I mean really interesting. Low power with thunderbolt 3 and great performance for gamers on a go, light video editing etc.
Ram is DDR4 2400 to LPDDR4 3733. All Intels ICL units as per disclaimer "Assumptions" and "Preproduction" system are noted as LP with a TBD on clocks.

And what's the nominal clock? 2.4 GHz? Boost is mostly marketing fluff...especially in low power environments where power and/or heat will forbid it 99% of the time. They fact they're unwilling to reveal the nominal clock speed is quite telling...they're embarrassed by it.
Intel didn't disclose it cause they don't know yet

Intel said:
Intel preproduction system, ICL-U, PL1 15w, 4C/8T, Turbo TBD
 
Last edited:

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,863 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
They haven't actually disclosed which models boost to 4.1 Ghz, because they've listed 3 TDP numbers 9/15/28W which could be significant.
Also 8665u already boosts to 4.8Ghz so this is a slight downgrade for single core boost.
ICL-U are 25W. ICL-Y are capped at 15W.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,145 (5.83/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
And what's the nominal clock? 2.4 GHz? Boost is mostly marketing fluff...especially in low power environments where power and/or heat will forbid it 99% of the time. They fact they're unwilling to reveal the nominal clock speed is quite telling...they're embarrassed by it.
This. People who think laptops are all of a sudden going to be gaming monsters because the CPU can be lower power are going to have a hard time with this...

Its just a small step forward nothing more. And... its a quad core. Not exactly the optimal core count in 2019.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
624 (0.28/day)
Processor i7-4790K 4.4GHz @1.18v
Motherboard ASUS Maximus Hero VII Z97
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory G. Skill Trident X 2x8GB 2133MHz
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX 980 Ti Classified ACX 2.0 w/ EVGA HB SLI bridge
Storage OS on 120GB Kingston SSDNow V300, Samsung 850 Pro 512GB , 3TB Hitachi HDD, 2x5TB Toshiba X300
Display(s) Lenovo y27g
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) AKG Q701's w/ O2+ODAC (Sounds a little bright)
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 850w
Mouse OG Steelseries Rival
Keyboard Rosewill Full Size. Red Switches. Blue Leds. RK-9100xBRE - Hate this. way to big
Software Win10
Benchmark Scores 3DMark FireStrike Score : 10299
They prob trashed that wafer right?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
38,863 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
They prob trashed that wafer right?
Yes, every uncut wafer that ever made it out of a cleanroom or an argon-filled container is trashed.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
360 (0.28/day)
System Name Sillicon Nightmares
Processor Intel i7 9700KF 5ghz (no avx offset), 4.7ghz ring 1.374 vcore
Motherboard Asus Z390 Strix F
Cooling DEEPCOOL Gamer Storm CAPTAIN 360
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3733 16,18,18,36 2T
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Strix 6GB OC, Core: 2202/2215, Vcore: 1.075v, Mem: 4909mhz (Sillicon Lottery Jackpot)
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD, WD Blue 1TB, Seagate 3TB, DoA PoS Nvme that makes me cry
Display(s) BenQ XL2430 1080p 144HZ + (2) Samsung SyncMaster 913v 1280x1024 75HZ + A Shitty TV For Movies
Case Deepcool Genome ROG Edition
Audio Device(s) Bunta Sniff Speakers From The Tip Edition
Power Supply Corsair AX860i/Cable Mod Cables
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Shitty Dell Office Keyboard
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores ~`13500 Firestrike (1st for my hardware, *De Ja Fool can s\/ck me softly)
15 watts and it still boosts to 4.1 ghz... honestly could be a game changer in high end gaming laptops, tiny heatsink on cpu, will allow for full fledged rtx 2080's non-max q design, because all the cooling can be diverted to the gpu.
14nm++ is doing 4.8ghz in that bracket just saying, id sacrafice a bit of cpu perf in that segment for igp perf
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,047 (0.25/day)
Location
I live in Norway
System Name 3 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R9 3900x| R7 1700 @3.75 | 4800H
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 64gb | 16gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | server | RTX2060M
Storage MP510 2TB, 660P 2TB, 2x860 evo 1tb | 960 500gb Intel 660P 1tb PM871 4x256gb ++| 1TB 660+ 1tb A1000
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something + 1440p AOC 144hz something.
Case Phanteks EvolvX M-Atx
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard TT Meka G1
14nm++ is doing 4.8ghz in that bracket just saying, id sacrafice a bit of cpu perf in that segment for igp perf
In laptops I believe these new ones are a step forward.
I've used these T480's from Lenovo, 15W chips with MX150 gpu, and my god they are slow, our users are complaining and once you have a chrome window open, ms teams, outlook, and join a meeting they are loading all threads and you have a lovely 2 ghz frequency so I'd gladly give up 400 mhz boost from 4ghz(i5-8550u) to 3.6 and gain the ipc + some frequency at all core load.

Desktop and server: intel is skrewed!
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,343 (2.12/day)
Location
USA
14nm++ is doing 4.8ghz in that bracket just saying, id sacrafice a bit of cpu perf in that segment for igp perf
at 15 watts its doing 4.8ghz? i find that hard to believe. did you even read my post? >.> it had nothing to do with igp
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
704 (0.13/day)
The TDP is configurable, but I don't think 4,8 GHz is impossible at 15 W. It will definitely run at 4.8 GHz for 0.03 seconds and then throttle badly in your ultrabook.. :D

 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,688 (3.84/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.6Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-2T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898, FIIO Alpen 2 Headphone DAC + Amp
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100, Cherry MX Blues with O-rings
Software Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (Stock 5.4.0-33 kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
And what's the nominal clock? 2.4 GHz? Boost is mostly marketing fluff...especially in low power environments where power and/or heat will forbid it 99% of the time. They fact they're unwilling to reveal the nominal clock speed is quite telling...they're embarrassed by it.
This. I have a 8550u in my HP Spectre for work and I can tell you that this is probably the most accurate statement I've seen in this thread so far. Let me tell you something about this CPU, which really isn't a bad CPU, but when it boosts up to 4Ghz is what you should be aware of. I typically don't see 4Ghz on this CPU unless the CPU temperature is on the lower side. 3.8Ghz is normal with no more than one core loaded. If I load two cores, it's closer to 3Ghz. With all 4 cores loaded, it's more like 2.0-2.3Ghz and that's with the upper-bound of the configurable TDP of 25 watts.

With that said, it's not a bad CPU. It actually performs quite well for my use case (with writing software, some of which is multi-threaded.) It's just that it almost never runs at full boost. However, if you can keep the CPU cooled, it will do 3.0-3.6 on all 4 cores for very short durations, but once a steady state temperature is reach, you'll be seeing <=2.3Ghz again.

I'll give Intel this, boost on this laptop is quite frugal. If it has an opportunity to clock up because of less multi-core load or lower temperatures, it will take advantage of it rather quickly. To put this in perspective, a piece of software I work on will run tests on both my tower and this laptop in about the same amount of time and it's not I/O bound and is primarily single-threaded.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,343 (2.12/day)
Location
USA
This. People who think laptops are all of a sudden going to be gaming monsters because the CPU can be lower power are going to have a hard time with this...

Its just a small step forward nothing more. And... its a quad core. Not exactly the optimal core count in 2019.
to be fair, there are loads of great indie games these days that run 60 fps at 1080p on current intel graphics. i had a blast in grad school last 5 months playing: stardew valley, slay the spire, dead cells, night in the woods, hollow knight, owlboy, and my recent favorite Wizard of Legend has reminded me why I loved gaming. ^^ I had a long period of not being impressed by AAA gimmicks, but indie games have reborn my love for gaming.

@Manu_PT thanks for helping me the 4.1 ghz answer. i went to sleep right after he replied to me asking the question lol
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
544 (0.50/day)
System Name Blackbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Ultra
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill FlareX 3200Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 480 NITRO+ 4GB
Storage 250 GB Samsung 850 EVO + 1TB Samsung 860 QVO
Display(s) Asus MG248Q
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard MasterKeys Pro S White (MX Brown)
Software Windows 10
You obviously missing the 18% IPC increase part, but Im not surprised tbh.
That's a big number, for sure, but it's very deceiving as it's vs Skylake and without the security patches. Marketing doing marketing things. Amd threw a 15%, Intel needed a bigger number.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
550 (0.22/day)
You obviously missing the 18% IPC increase part, but Im not surprised tbh.

Plus the ram got a boost from 2400 to 3733/3200 wich alone will provide way more performance. We all making jokes about Intel in the last days, but these mobile chips are really really and I mean really interesting. Low power with thunderbolt 3 and great performance for gamers on a go, light video editing etc.
18% for which we only have Intel's word. In which workload against what model was this 18% achieved?
Also minus god knows how much percent IPC loss due to security mitigations.

2400 to 3200 RAM does not help much. Especially on CPU limited scenarios. Helps more on the iGPU side.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,343 (2.12/day)
Location
USA
18% for which we only have Intel's word. In which workload against what model was this 18% achieved?
Also minus god knows how much percent IPC loss due to security mitigations.

2400 to 3200 RAM does not help much. Especially on CPU limited scenarios. Helps more on the iGPU side.
there is no point in speculating. same reason AMD showed Navi 10% gain over 2070 at strange brigade which everyone knows is an AMD favored game. yet 95% of all games favor Nvidia... so... yeah... somethings tells me Navi only matches 2070 or loses to 2070 in vast majority of games.

just wait for benches.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
550 (0.22/day)
there is no point in speculating. same reason AMD showed Navi 10% gain over 2070 at strange brigade which everyone knows is an AMD favored game. yet 95% of all games favor Nvidia... so... yeah... somethings tells me Navi only matches 2070 or loses to 2070 in vast majority of games.

just wait for benches.
Yeah that was BS comparison by AMD. They are still far behind Nvidia. What we need is a 2080 Ti competitor not a lowly "matching 2070 in best case" card.
Navi gives me 0 reason to upgrade from GTX 1080.
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
4,343 (2.12/day)
Location
USA
Yeah that was BS comparison by AMD. They are still far behind Nvidia. What we need is a 2080 Ti competitor not a lowly "matching 2070 in best case" card.
Navi gives me 0 reason to upgrade from GTX 1080.
the fact they only showed one game was shady as crap lol.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
312 (0.67/day)
Intel already has i7-8569U [4.70 GHz boost] with Iris Plus Graphics 655[921.6 GFLOPS ] with same 28W TDP, so how much better the 10nm part looks like now[at least from 14nm++ down to 10nm]?

Edit:
Dell XPS 13 7390 Ice Lake Core i7-1065 G7 vs i7-8665U Geekbench

IMO AMD's Zen2.0 with 7nm shrink looks better improvement.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
934 (0.80/day)
Location
Tanagra
This. People who think laptops are all of a sudden going to be gaming monsters because the CPU can be lower power are going to have a hard time with this...

Its just a small step forward nothing more. And... its a quad core. Not exactly the optimal core count in 2019.
Hard to say. Doesn’t the A12X in the iPad have the same power as a launch XboxOne? I know that’s not ultra quality or anything, but certainly a more than livable situation for many gamers.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
5,028 (4.06/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Hard to say. Doesn’t the A12X in the iPad have the same power as a launch XboxOne?
Compared to an APU from 6 years ago ? That's not exactly ground breaking.
 
Top