• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Lakefield Core i5-L16G7 Performance Benchmarks Leak

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,090 (2.17/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Performance benchmarks have started leaking for Intel-s upcoming Lakefield CPUs - low-power SoCs designed with Intel's latest technology. The Lakefield family of CPUs will make use of an Arm-similar big.LITTLE design, where this particular CPU, the Core i5-L16G7, will ship with four low-power "Tremond" cores and one large, high-performance "Sunny Cove" core for peak workloads. Built using Intel's Foveros stacking technology, these are the first chips to be built on Intel's modular platform, which should allow for pairing of I/O dies, chiplet-like CPU arrangements and memory in a 3D package. Physical distance reductions impact latency and power consumption, which should allow for an interesting design result.

Notebookcheck has tested an Intel Lakefield Core i5-L16G7 CPU that's being deployed on upcoming Samsung's Galaxy Book S, and the results are sort of a mixed bag. For one, Intel's Lakefield seems to be around 67% slower than the company's previous ultra-low-power architecture, Amber Lake. Something of this might have been caused by the fact that the Lakefield CPU didn't boost towards its advertised 3.0 GHz; it only managed to reach 2.4 GHz, which obviously hampered performance. Perhaps pre-release silicon is the culprit, or perhaps it's the galaxy Book S that's been configured with more restrictive thermal and power characteristics than the chip was actually designed to run at. The chip did manage to run the FireStrike test beating the Amber Lake-based Acer Swift 7 by 23%, though, so not all is looking bleak.





Looking at the screenshots, it does seem that most load is being distributed to the low power Tremond cores, which is obviously the idea in such a low-power design such as this (this assumes that the high-performance Sunny Cove core is last on the Task manager). It remains to be seen if hardware scheduling is being optimal, or if there is some sort of workload shuffle between cores due to OS mismanagement of the SoC - it is a possibility, perhaps, that the OS is shuffling data between cores, thus affecting performance benefits of L1 and L2 caches too aggressively, in an attempt to keep hotspot operating temperatures in check.



There is a moment in the first benchmark though where the fifth core sees a surge in workload, moving up to 100% utilization, and then declines, giving way to more work on two other cores. This looks well in line with the expected use cases for the Sunny Cove core and Intel's thoughts on designing these chips: most users only require high performance in short bursts that need to provide as much system responsiveness as possible, such as web page loading and other similar workloads.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,545 (5.92/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
OK. So this really looks like a combination of bad things, if you ask me. Yes, we have a tiny perf/watt jump if you have no substantial workload to offer the machine... :ohwell:

There is no peak or burst performance to be had beyond whatever Intel already offered. Low power core does not enable higher power other core. So effectively the ceiling has just been lowered a bit.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
7,974 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name _
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 4000 Mhz DDR4 17-18-18-34-400 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 2080 Ti Windforce (Undervolted OC 1905MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) Alienware 34" 3440x1440 120hz, G-Sync
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Bose Solo
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse logitech hero
Keyboard tenkeyless
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores pretty fast!
looks not great.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,066 (6.75/day)
System Name ARF System 1 (retro build) | Portable 1 (energy efficient and portable)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2 | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX SATA2 |
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13 | Dual-fan, dual heat-pipe Acer inbuilt
Memory 4 x 1GB DDR-400 | 2 x 8GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3 | Radeon RX 560X 4G & Vega 8
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128GB SATA3@SATA2 SSD | Western Digital Blue 3D NAND M.2 SSD 500GB
Display(s) | LG 24UD58-B & Panasonic TX-50CX670E
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus | 15-inch notebook chassis
Audio Device(s) Superlux HD681 EVO
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X | Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard | Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7U SP1| Windows 10 Pro 2004
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 17.01.64 - ST: 387.3, MT: 2060.6 CPU-Z 15.01.64 - ST: 2044, MT: 7766

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
770 (0.43/day)
what is the point when the only Sunny cove core sits in 90% idle mode.Apparently cinebench distributes the tasks evently, so unless this is fixed we will get some ridiculous results for Alder Lake. where the weak cores will hold the Ocean Cove cores to 50% of their capacity or something.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
407 (0.81/day)
Tried the Book S in the shop.
Open windows's setting page takes 10 second.

The Book S itself is well built, good keyboard , feather light , good screen .
But the CPU is a total drawback.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
8,586 (4.12/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel i5-9600KF
Motherboard NZXT N7 Z370 Black
Cooling Cooler Master 240 RGB AIO / Stock
Memory Thermaltake Toughram 16GB 4400MHz DDR4 or Gigabyte 16GB 3600MHz DDR4 or Adata 8GB 2133Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus Dual 1060 6GB
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
Wow, barely better than the Celeron, and beaten by a Pentium.
At least it can run Firestrike. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,787 (0.73/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 250GB 860Evo SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) 15" IPS
Mouse G703
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
Software W10
So it's a Bulldozer of low power chips. Nice.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
414 (0.15/day)
System Name Potato PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar MAX
Cooling All stocks
Memory 16GB Team Delta RGB DDR4 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT Mech OC + AMD Radeon Pro W5100
Storage Samsung 850 Evo 500GB + 10TB Toshiba
Display(s) Viewsonic XG3240C
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) SMSL SD-793II + ATH M20X || Optical to heavily modded Logitech z5500
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Mouse Logitech G304
Keyboard Logitech G613
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
Now we know why Apple switch to ARM :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,834 (0.82/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
3,334 (1.26/day)
Now we know why Apple switch to ARM :rolleyes:
Apple, ARM has had experience with Big Little for close to a decade now. Intel or MS' failure in matching that doesn't represent anything about how the upcoming Mac OS on ARM will behave.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,834 (0.82/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Apple, ARM has had experience with Big Little for close to a decade now. Intel or MS' failure in matching that doesn't represent anything about how the upcoming Mac OS on ARM will behave.
Keep prices the same and save money making a cheapo chip/board. Their customers are happy to be swindled. Pump those margins, baby!
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
3,334 (1.26/day)
Not an Apple user so can't say how much they're swindled but you have to give credit to the innovation ARM, or Apple, brought in this space especially with the stagnation we saw with Intel. Without AMD on the one side & ARM on another, Intel may well have stopped caring even marginally for general users.
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
426 (0.15/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R5 3600
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) RX580 Armor w/ Accelero Mono
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply SS G-650
A: the scheduler still has no idea was it's supposed to do with a hybrid design and it will get patched

B: it's working as intended and the big core isn't for any kind of sustained but only for ultra short and bursty workloads
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,066 (6.75/day)
System Name ARF System 1 (retro build) | Portable 1 (energy efficient and portable)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2 | AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX SATA2 |
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13 | Dual-fan, dual heat-pipe Acer inbuilt
Memory 4 x 1GB DDR-400 | 2 x 8GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3 | Radeon RX 560X 4G & Vega 8
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128GB SATA3@SATA2 SSD | Western Digital Blue 3D NAND M.2 SSD 500GB
Display(s) | LG 24UD58-B & Panasonic TX-50CX670E
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus | 15-inch notebook chassis
Audio Device(s) Superlux HD681 EVO
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X | Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard | Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7U SP1| Windows 10 Pro 2004
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 17.01.64 - ST: 387.3, MT: 2060.6 CPU-Z 15.01.64 - ST: 2044, MT: 7766
Tried the Book S in the shop.
Open windows's setting page takes 10 second.

The Book S itself is well built, good keyboard , feather light , good screen .
But the CPU is a total drawback.

Yes looks like a repeat of the old Atom/netbooks disaster :shadedshu:

Wow, barely better than the Celeron, and beaten by a Pentium.
At least it can run Firestrike. :rolleyes:

Now we know why Apple switch to ARM :rolleyes:


Mmmkay, Intel.

Yeah, guys, I don't know why they keep making so lacklustre CPUs.
Why don't the users object and sue Intel for making Celeron and Pentium, and this Core i5 ? :confused:

You know some people sue the coffee company for making too hot coffee that burns their hands........

Don't worry, once AMD reaches the end of road for the Zen development, AMD will be the same as Intel is today.

ARM and RISC is the future.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
414 (0.15/day)
System Name Potato PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar MAX
Cooling All stocks
Memory 16GB Team Delta RGB DDR4 3000Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT Mech OC + AMD Radeon Pro W5100
Storage Samsung 850 Evo 500GB + 10TB Toshiba
Display(s) Viewsonic XG3240C
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) SMSL SD-793II + ATH M20X || Optical to heavily modded Logitech z5500
Power Supply Seasonic X650 Gold
Mouse Logitech G304
Keyboard Logitech G613
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
Apple, ARM has had experience with Big Little for close to a decade now. Intel or MS' failure in matching that doesn't represent anything about how the upcoming Mac OS on ARM will behave.
If I remembered correctly, the first big.LITTLE design that shape into market was LG Nexus 5X and Huawei Nexus 6p, that only 4 years ago. Considering the same year there was also Intel Atom Cherrytrail powering chinese Android tablet Chuwi, I seriously doubt that Qualcomm or Apple had a head start.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
2,772 (0.49/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
On one hand, ouch.

On the other hand, Cinebench is hardly this chip's intended use-case.

So I'm still going to hold off judging this one until reviewers have final silicon in hand.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
213 (2.15/day)
I feel critically, what this short review did not mention is the battery life between this and the Snapdragon version of the Galaxy Book. At the end of the day, people who buy this niche laptop is most likely one that needs the portability/ long battery life. Performance looks pretty close between the 2, so it really boils down to whether Intel can offer better performance + maintain a good battery life.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,545 (5.92/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Wow, barely better than the Celeron, and beaten by a Pentium.
At least it can run Firestrike. :rolleyes:
Don't ask what settings & FPS though lol

This is a pretty sad display of ingenui... err desperation

I feel critically, what this short review did not mention is the battery life between this and the Snapdragon version of the Galaxy Book. At the end of the day, people who buy this niche laptop is most likely one that needs the portability/ long battery life. Performance looks pretty close between the 2, so it really boils down to whether Intel can offer better performance + maintain a good battery life.
Yes, so then you take a low power chip, they've had that since forever and they mostly perform better. Higher performance is more time in idle, so its really more of the same.
See, the fact is, this design is also not cheaper than a single low power equivalent... so they've just added complexity for what exactly?

I mean... a full day of battery life... I might be stupid, but isn't the key then to improve the battery a little bit? This is just an awful race to the bottom just to maintain some silly form factor.
 
Top