• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Puts Out Benchmarks Showing Minimal Performance Impact of MDS Mitigation

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
36,830 (8.67/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Intel Tuesday once again shook the IT world by disclosing severe microarchitecture-level security vulnerabilities affecting its processors. The Microarchitectural Data Sampling (MDS) class of vulnerabilities affect Intel CPU architectures older than "Coffee Lake" to a greater extent. Among other forms of mitigation software patches, Intel is recommending that users disable HyperThreading technology (HTT), Intel's simultaneous multithreading (SMT) implementation. This would significantly deplete multi-threaded performance on older processors with lower core-counts, particularly Core i3 2-core/4-thread chips.

On "safer" microarchitectures such as "Coffee Lake," though, Intel is expecting a minimal impact of software patches, and doesn't see any negative impact of disabling HTT. This may have something to do with the 50-100 percent increased core-counts with the 8th and 9th generations. The company put out a selection of benchmarks relevant to client and enterprise (data-center) use-cases. On the client use-case that's we're more interested in, a Core i9-9900K machine with software mitigation and HTT disabled is negligibly slower (within 2 percent) of a machine without mitigation and HTT enabled. Intel's selection of benchmarks include SYSMark 2014 SE, WebXprt 3, SPECInt rate base (1 copy and n copies), and 3DMark "Skydiver" with the chip's integrated UHD 630 graphics. Comparing machines with mitigations applied but toggling HTT presents a slightly different story.



In the second graph (above), you'll see a comparison between two machines, both of which have the MDS mitigations, but one machine has HTT enabled, and the other has HTT disabled. The selection of tests is the same as the first graph. Here, you'll see performance either drop by 8 percent on SYSmark 2014 SE, and by 9 percent on SPECInt rate base (n copy), to practically no difference in 3DMark "Skydiver." and a negligible 2 percent gain with WebXprt 3 (less parallelized tests tend to benefit from HTT being disabled). Intel put out a similarly extensive selection of Data Center-relevant tests showing negligible performance impact with its MDS mitigation and recommended HTT setting on Xeon enterprise processors released after 2017.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,041 (4.66/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Aren't all these "minimal" performance impacts addding up to something not that minimal?
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,554 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Aren't all these "minimal" performance impacts addding up to something not that minimal?
My thoughts exactly.

By themselves, each security issue fix isn't that impactful but once all of them are added up, they make quite a dent.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,676 (1.15/day)
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
Why are they showing us just HT on/off? Should be HT on pre-patch then HT off+patch to see the full effect on 9900k.
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Messages
25 (0.41/day)
System Name NEO
Processor i9-7940X All cores @ 4.8GHZ
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme
Cooling MO-RA 420 Pro Radiator Stainless Steel, EK X-TOP Revo Dual D5,EK Velocity, Phanteks 1080Ti GPU Block
Memory 64GB Trident Z RGB 3600 Quad Kit
Video Card(s) Asus Strix 1080Ti OC
Storage Samsung 960Pro, WD Gold 10TB, 2X WD Red 4TB
Display(s) Benq SW320 32" 4k, Samsung 24" Full HD
Case Coolermaster Cosmos 2 (Mod)
Power Supply Corsair AX1500i
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2s, Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech
Software Windows 10 Pro
This is getting way out of line.....bravo Intel! At the end of the day you managed to keep IPC performance stable for the last 10 years after all these "patches"..
Makes me wonder if one of the reasons AMD was behind was because they are more cautious with security.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
4,882 (1.46/day)
Location
Visca la Terra Lliure!
System Name Oh the name!
Processor i7 7700K
Motherboard MSI Z270 Xpower
Cooling EK 360 Extreme
Memory 16Gb G.Skill TridentZ 3866
Video Card(s) nVidia 1080 Ti Flanders Edition
Storage 1 Intel PCIE SSD750, 2 Sam 840Evo 1TB SSD, WD Black 2TB, Toshiba 3TB
Display(s) Acer Predator X1 (32")
Case Rajintek Paean
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860
Mouse Mad Catz Pro X
Keyboard Corsair K70
Software W10Pro
Today's winupdate installed right now
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,320 (1.88/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R5 2600X@4.1
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2203
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Gigabyte Aurus Rgb 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, samsung 840 basic ,primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8056 vega 3dmark timespy
Aren't all these "minimal" performance impacts addding up to something not that minimal?
Indeed, where did the prior 27% performance uplift of HT go, and when.
What's the point of HT if it only gains 2% yet costs so much in security term's.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
158 (0.04/day)
Location
Augsburg, Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor I5-8400 | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | HMD
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | Passive
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 32GB uSD
Display(s) Fujitsu 24" TN LED (boo) | 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 120W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 9.0
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
909 (0.24/day)
Location
I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
System Name 2 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R7 1700 @ 3.9| Xeon 2680v2
Motherboard Asrock B350M Pro 4 | HP Z620
Cooling Water1x360,1x240 | Air
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX 3200mhz CL16 | 128 gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | GTX970
Storage 960 Evo 500gb, 860 evo 1tb, Intel 660P 1tb PM871 256gb | various intel ssd's.
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something + 1440p 144hz something.
Case Phanteks EvolvX M-Atx
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse G402
Keyboard TT Meka G1
My thoughts exactly.

By themselves, each security issue fix isn't that impactful but once all of them are added up, they make quite a dent.
Phoronix have done extensive testing!
It may be less on Windows, sometimes it's the same.
Linux usually is a good representation of potential theoretical performance for cpu and drives.
Gpu not so much yet but we're getting there

But yes! It absolutely does add up, gaming performance is adding up to 4% only at this point but usually 2-3..
Stil I think its all noteworthy.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
100 (0.31/day)
Processor Intel i7 2600k
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Pro4
Cooling Cooler Master evo 212
Memory Corsair DDR 3 - 16 Gb
Video Card(s) Nvidia GForce GTX 960
Storage Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB + Toshiba 3TB
Display(s) Dell U2412M - 24" IPS
Case Cooler Master CM690
Audio Device(s) Audio Kontrol 1
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G2 650W
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000
I would say that almost 20% less performance in certain scenarios is not "minimal".
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
33 (0.05/day)
I would say that almost 20% less performance in certain scenarios is not "minimal".
Key word here is "certain". If it is a process that you rarely, if ever use, then yes it is certainly minimal.

I am not defending Intel as it does look like they have cut some corners with their security. But gamers wont notice a 1% difference in fps. That only shows up in a benchmark. m
 

P4-630

The Way It's Meant to be Played
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
9,534 (1.95/day)
Location
Vinewood
System Name Desktop / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 6700K @ 4.3GHz (1.180 V) / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz CL15 / 6GB DDR4 Samsung 2400MHz CL15
Video Card(s) MSI GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 850 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p + 21.5" LG 22MP67VQ IPS 60Hz 1080p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX Onboard / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system
Power Supply Be quiet! Straight Power 10 500 Watt CM / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
472 (0.35/day)
Location
In the middle of nowhere
System Name Scrapped Parts, Unite !
Processor i5-2500 @ 3.3 Ghz//Q9300 @ 2.5 Ghz
Motherboard GA-H67MA-USB3-B3// P35 Neo2-FR
Cooling Stock
Memory 10 GB DDR3 1333 // 3 GB DDR2
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GeForce GTX1060 Vulcan U 6G // ASUS ENGT 220 1GD3
Storage Hitachi 500 GB, Sony 1TB, KINGSTON 400A 120GB // Samsung 160 GB
Display(s) HP 2009f
Case Xigmatek Asgard Pro // Cooler Master Centurion 5
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply OCZ ModXStream Pro 500 W
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Minesweeper 30fps, Tetris 40 fps, with overheated CPU and GPU
Intel Puts Out Benchmarks Showing Minimal Performance Impact of MDS Mitigation
FTFY
Intel Puts Out Damage Control Slides to Minimize Impact of MDS Bugs on CPU sales.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2016
Messages
68 (0.07/day)
System Name RED
Processor Intel Core i5 2500
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 2x8GB 1600MHz DDR3 @1333 [Avexir]
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Windforce 2X OC
Storage 1*Samsung 840 Series SSD 250GB, 2*Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDDs
Display(s) LG W1934S
Case Aerocool X-Warrior Red Devil Edition
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC887
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 520W (80+ Bronze)
Mouse Cooler Master Devastator II Mouse
Keyboard Cooler Master Devastator II Keyboard
What a lame joke..
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
158 (0.04/day)
Location
Augsburg, Germany
System Name Clevo W650KK1 | Nokia 7 Plus
Processor I5-8400 | Snapdagon 660
Motherboard Clevo H170 | HMD
Cooling Stock w/ AC MX-2 | Passive
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 | 4GB LPDDR4
Video Card(s) GTX1050Ti uVolted | Adreno 512
Storage 275GB SSD + 500GB SSHD | 64GB int. + 32GB uSD
Display(s) Fujitsu 24" TN LED (boo) | 6" 18:9 1080p
Case Clevo W650 | Nokia 7 Plus
Power Supply 120W Delta Electronics | 3800mAh Battery
Mouse Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | -
Keyboard Fujitsu LX901 Wireless | GBoard
Software W10 Pro x64 | Android 9.0
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
2,430 (1.44/day)
Location
USA
System Name Obsidian Heliotropium
Processor i7-7820HQ
Memory 2x8GB (16GB) 2133
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 250GB 970 EVO, 2TB 860 EVO
Display(s) 17.3" 100hz IPS G-Sync
Audio Device(s) Schiit Asgard 2, Schiit Modi 3, Sennheiser HD58X
Mouse Logitech G303
Keyboard Logitech Cherry Mx Blue
Aren't all these "minimal" performance impacts addding up to something not that minimal?
well said. I hope @W1zzard does a 3700x or 3850x on x570 mobo review versus a 9700k/9900k with all these firmware updates including the latest ones for this issue whenever it comes out for mobo BIOS anyway.

I won't be surprised if we see a double whammy, aka, 3700x was going to win and beat out 9900k even at 1080p, but now we can slap on an extra 7% on top of that because of all these firmware updates.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
668 (0.19/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Anyone else note that v4 took less of a hit than scaleable?
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
207 (0.18/day)
So basically Intel's solution recommends that I can no longer play games that require 4 threads on my 2c/4t i3 CPU. I won't be buying another Intel CPU in a hurry.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
31 (0.04/day)
minimal performance impact!
just disable hyperthreading guys, the selling point of our upper-end processors, no big deal!

lmao, classic intel
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
1,918 (1.25/day)
Location
Long Island
Well the reality is Intel and AMD sold us a phony bill of goods as outside benchmarks, productivity is rarely enhanced by the extra cores / threads. Mostly affects bragging rights. Of course there are systems that CAN use more cores such as video editing, animation and rendering but the reality is, there's more folks complaining about problems than there are folks actually affected.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
797 (0.20/day)
System Name Raptor
Processor Core i7 3930K@4.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 4*4GB Gskil RipjawsDDR3 @2133MHz 1.6v
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX980 SC
Storage Vertex 3 SSD 120GB + SanDisk Ultra II 480GB +1TB seagate
Display(s) ACER-H243HX 24"
Case HAF-X
Audio Device(s) on board Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 850HX
Software Windows 10 & 7 dual boot .
So if someone want to avoid any performance loss what he should avoid updating ? Both Intel microcode updates and OS updates ? Does updating the OS alone will still cause performance loss?
 
Top