• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Intel Realizes the Only Way to Save x86 is to Democratize it, Reopens x86 IP Licensing

This is a great 1st April article. :respect: And it could be a really good idea, but I think it's too late for Intel to do something like this in reality. ARM is everywhere and I think no one would show real interest for an x86 license today. Risk-V is also a nice free alternative that could have some extra value in 5-10 years. Even Nvidia that was trying to get a license 15-20 years ago, is full ARM now and doubt they really care about whatever x86 has to offer. Their main game is GPUs with CPUs having a secondary role in their servers.
 
If Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite X is successful, that will probably ignite an ARM invasion.

Given the power efficiency we see from Apple Silicon, and likely Snapdragon X Elite, and given Microsoft is pouring a ton of development work into Windows on ARM, will prospective CPU vendors choose x86 or ARM?

But given that there is no citation to an Intel announcement and given that today is April 1, I would say: good one :p.
 
john_ said:
This is a great 1st April article. :respect: And it could be a really good idea, but I think it's too late for Intel to do something like this in reality. ARM is everywhere and I think no one would show real interest for an x86 license today. Risk-V is also a nice free alternative that could have some extra value in 5-10 years. Even Nvidia that was trying to get a license 15-20 years ago, is full ARM now and doubt they really care about whatever x86 has to offer. Their main game is GPUs with CPUs having a secondary role in their servers.
Click to expand...
That's not even funny. Most large corporations would kill to have an x86 license and produce processors with all the compatibility accumulated over decades by AMD and intel.
 
Thats Good Robert Deniro GIF
 
The way things are going and Intel getting more desperate you really got me on this one
 
R0H1T said:
Having an x86 license doesn't mean you'll get their latest designs so no it's not as easy as you think or indeed profitable!
Click to expand...
Large corporations like Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Google have the fuel to invest in risky products without destroying themselves. History is replete with examples of these companies investing billions in technologies that ultimately prove nonviable and are subsequently abandoned.

Qualcomm assumes considerable risk by competing with ARM design and its associated limitations against established players like AMD and Intel. Similarly, Intel's substantial investments in the GPU market without yielding significant returns serve as great examples of this phenomenon. :toast:
 
marios15 said:
The way things are going and Intel getting more desperate you really got me on this one
Click to expand...
They made like $1.5bn last year. I wish I was that desperate...
 
Not gonna lie, you got me lol. I had to do a triple take because I just couldn’t believe what I’m reading LMAO. Then I remembered the date.
 
Ow it's a joke?

Thought intel was doing custom designs for large customers, going a step beyond that was very plausible
 
You Got It Pointing GIF by GaryVee
almost got me Btarunr :)
 
Mannn this really had me 100% on the hook. Good one :laugh:
 
Well anyone who remembers VHS vs Betamax....................


errrrrrrr Aprils fools day?
 
Nice Aplil's fool exclusive guys!
 
Beside it´s 4-1 ... funny idea but Intel would´ve offered that probably when Nvidias ARM aquisition was deflected, ... Intel was not that broke.
 
Denver said:
That's not even funny. Most large corporations would kill to have an x86 license and produce processors with all the compatibility accumulated over decades by AMD and intel.
Click to expand...
I doubt. With all the rage lately being on AI and GPUs, big corporations will probably try to spent their money on building hardware accelerators for AI. The CPU today is secondary in many demanding tasks. And other than Apple which maintains a closed ecosystem and a huge loyal customer base, which other company can have the need to build their own CPU line?
 
P4-630 said:
CERN to change name for 70th Anniversary

View attachment 341575

home.cern

CERN to change name for 70th Anniversary

Update: Did you enjoy our April Fools’ day story? CERN is indeed celebrating its 70th anniversary, but without changing its name. For the complete CERN70 anniversary events and programme of activities, visit cern.ch/cern70. Since its inception in 1954, CERN has grown from a small group of...
home.cern home.cern
Click to expand...

A follow up on this: https://design-guidelines.web.cern.ch/guidelines/nerds-logo
 
Ok, THAT was good! haha :respect:

We expect the first contemporary non-Intel, non-AMD x86 processors to start selling by April 1, 2026.
Click to expand...
So not only did I forget today's date, but I read right through that sentence and still no lightbulbs went off :roll:

Pretty well written and convincing. You may have a potential side hustle available in fiction writing, or perhaps policies for political candidates :peace:
 
You had me, but the lack of quotes was weird and then the sales start day of 4/1 was too much. Check the post date and today 00:03.

Well done sir!
 
The patents for the basic x86-64 instruction set have expired anyway, so the joke may be all true!
 
I heard Intel finally decided to switch to DEC Alpha architecture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top