• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Rocket Lake-S CPU Benchmarked: Up to 22% Faster Compared to the Previous Generation

Joined
Jul 18, 2016
Messages
307 (0.17/day)
Location
Indonesia
System Name Nero Mini
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 3900X EDC Bug+101MHz BCLK 4.3GHz Multi/4.74GHz Single
Motherboard Gigabyte X570i Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S+3x Noctua IPPC 3K
Memory Team Dark 3770MHz CL16 2x16GB 65.7ns
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 2060 Super JS Shunt Mod 2130MHz/1925MHz + 2x Noctua 120mm IPPC 3K
Storage Adata XPG Gammix S50 1TB + Samsung SM961 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD68W
Case Lian-Li TU-150
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Gold
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/submission/4581602_nero10578_cinebench___r20_ryzen_9_3900x_7740_marks
userbenchmark...nuff said. take this with an ocean of salt.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,012 (1.88/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) Geforce RTX 3070 FE
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
userbenchmark...nuff said. take this with an ocean of salt.
That is a very short-sighted statement. Their benchmark results have been rather solid on almost all fronts. All the controversy is about interpreting and presenting them.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,497 (0.78/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
That is a very short-sighted statement. Their benchmark results have been rather solid on almost all fronts. All the controversy is about interpreting and presenting them.

The professionals say otherwise:


Even the Intel subreddit has banned Userbenchmark as a source.

Their scoring is unreliable and as independent and trustworthy as a suggestion from a fanboy.
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
4,226 (1.02/day)
Location
Gougeland (NZ)
System Name Cumquat 2021
Processor AMD RyZen R7 3700X @4400MHz 1.325V
Motherboard Asus Strix x570-F Gaming
Cooling Cryorig R1 Universal
Memory 16GB GSkill TridentZ DR4-3200 16-18-18-38 1.35V
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ OC RX6800 16GB DDR6 1980Cclk / 2000Mclk
Storage 1x Adata SX8200PRO NVMe gen3 x4 1X Samsung 860 EVO 500GB, 12TB of HDD Storage
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2457 MHD 75Hz FreeSync 1920x1080p
Case SilverStone Raven RV02B-W + 3x SS AP181 + USB3.0 upgrade
Audio Device(s) RX6800 via HDMI + Pioneer VSX-531 amp Technics 100W 5.1 Speaker set
Power Supply Enermax RevolutionXT II 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10 X64 PRO (build 20H2)
Benchmark Scores it sucks even more less now ;)
I thought Intel didn't like benchmarks claiming they were an unreliable way to measure real world performance but here they are using an intel favouring benchmark program and trying to tell us gee look at all our newer faster whizbang cpu speed yeah fuck intel off ya hypocrites either use real world aps or GTFO you can't have it both ways and expect us to believe a word your saying
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,012 (1.88/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) Geforce RTX 3070 FE
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
The professionals say otherwise:


Even the Intel subreddit has banned Userbenchmark as a source.

Their scoring is unreliable and as independent and trustworthy as a suggestion from a fanboy.
Now, please read again what I wrote and then the links.
I said results vs interpreting and presenting them. Links talk about CPU rankings and CPU score weights - all about interpretation and presentation.
From all the controversies I do not remember critique about the results themselves.

Basically when you run that benchmark the results you get for 1-core, 2-core, 4-core, 8-core and 64-core have been the same all this time, never changed and that was never the problem.

only mobile still?
Rocket Lake is desktop, LGA1200, Q1-2021 (March, probably).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
128 (0.21/day)
That is a very short-sighted statement. Their benchmark results have been rather solid on almost all fronts. All the controversy is about interpreting and presenting them.

Well, so far Intel wasn't exactly representing them good. Maybe they are representative in general, maybe not.

All the following hardware needs good and solid 3rd party testing, apart from producers claim, too:
- Zen3 (this we'll hopefully get very soon - days, I hope)
- RDNA2
- 3600 Ti
- Intel Xe (all variants)
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
804 (0.19/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Is that with the chiller hidden behind the wall on or off?
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,196 (1.35/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Is that with the chiller hidden behind the wall on or off?
Chiller? No, no, that's for noobs, this is on liquid Helium...
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
202 (0.05/day)
179 / 4.2 = 42.619
152 / 5.3 = 28.679

equals to 48.6% IPC improvement.

I guess the research days in area 51 finally pays off.

Only goes to show what could have been possible a couple of generations ago. They made this move now, only because AMD came strong from the back. Otherwise you would have gotten your 1 to 3% perfomance improvement between generations. This is the reason i despise Intel and NVIDIA. theyre only purpose is to milk the plebs. not to advance technology or whatever theyr trying to sell us. No, pure milking as usual.

See the example in GPU. AMD made a GPU that they will sell for 999USD and has the same performance as the Nvidia 1500 dolar gpu. And please remeber they are going to make profit even selling the cheap 999 dolars cpu. whats above that is simply greed. Which is even more compeling on those multi thousand enterprise gpus, when they should cost but a couple of hundred dollars at most.

Capitalism at its best. If we want this trend to dissapear, wed need to make money dissapear. Just like in star trek. Otherwise this will alwayshappen
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,454 (0.95/day)
179 / 4.2 = 42.619
152 / 5.3 = 28.679
equals to 48.6% IPC improvement.
I guess the research days in area 51 finally pays off.
It doesn't work that way.
The clock speed needs to be locked (and far away from power limits) in order to approximate IPC. Reported clock speeds of engineering samples are all over the place, and even for retail products rated clock speeds are not actual clock speeds.

Intel was talking about double digits IPC gains, this is around 50% more. This sounds highly unlikely, otherwise Intel would of course hinted to something like this and not to 10%+.
Rocket Lake is likely a Sunny Cove derivative, which probably will result in IPC gains at ~18%. (unless it has improvements beyond Sunny Cove)

AMD Drivers are still crap:p

My primary OS is Debian:
CPU = sometimes it cant boot, sometimes the OS crash if the SSD is on the Asmedia Chip
GPU = Vulcan dont work right, RX 5700 have a Hardwarebug with Audio via HDMI

There is only one reason to switch from Intel/Nvidia to AMD, u wanna pay a lot of cash to be a Beta tester.:laugh:
Unfortunately, this is true for Linux support, and is why my next workstation will be Intel/Nvidia based.
But I'll probably get an AMD system too, since I'm down one machine. But I'll wait for good reviews of motherboards, as I don't have time to be a beta tester.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,497 (0.78/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Now, please read again what I wrote and then the links.
I said results vs interpreting and presenting them. Links talk about CPU rankings and CPU score weights - all about interpretation and presentation.
From all the controversies I do not remember critique about the results themselves.

Actually they do say it's about the tests:
"Here you see that the previous rating was split with 60% of the score being tests of quad-core level performance, while the single-core comes in at 30% and higher than quad-core labeled 'multi-core' being 10%. Now we move right and find that the scoring has been adjusted as follows. Quad-core level performance drops to 58%, single-core jumps to 40%, while the multi-core falls to a mere 2%. This would make sense several years ago when frequencies were still growing, but now that it is increasingly more difficult to increase frequencies, scaling in cores has been having over the past 3+ years. I guess you could say that since Ryzen came onto the scene it has started the shift to many more cores on consumer-level CPUs."

If the results are biased, what is there to interpret? How it's not biased?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,012 (1.88/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) Geforce RTX 3070 FE
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
Actually they do say it's about the tests:
"Here you see that the previous rating was split with 60% of the score being tests of quad-core level performance, while the single-core comes in at 30% and higher than quad-core labeled 'multi-core' being 10%. Now we move right and find that the scoring has been adjusted as follows. Quad-core level performance drops to 58%, single-core jumps to 40%, while the multi-core falls to a mere 2%. This would make sense several years ago when frequencies were still growing, but now that it is increasingly more difficult to increase frequencies, scaling in cores has been having over the past 3+ years. I guess you could say that since Ryzen came onto the scene it has started the shift to many more cores on consumer-level CPUs."

If the results are biased, what is there to interpret? How it's not biased?
Test result is from single-core performance or quad-core performance or other tests, represented by specific measured number. These have not changed.
As you point out, aggregation has changed, the way they put together their own performance index or whatever they call it these days. This is interpretation and presentation.
The results of individual tests are not biased.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,101 (0.20/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4002 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch A
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 16GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/1bigrn
That is not a correct way to calculate IPC, yeah it scores higher results at lower clocks, however, we have to wait for benchmarks to see how much IPC increase is there actually.

Plus take into account that this may be a heavily optimized benchmark so not a real-world performance representation.

Not to mention don't take anything seriously from userbenchmark.

I will wait for an offical review in march 2021.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,012 (1.88/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) Geforce RTX 3070 FE
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
Not to mention don't take anything seriously from userbenchmark.
Again, very short-sighted statement.
You obviously did not understand what the problem with Userbenchmark was or what can or cannot be taken seriously from them.
Userbenchmark has been a pretty valuable resource for leaks and their measured numbers are not bad.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,101 (0.20/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4002 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch A
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 16GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/1bigrn
Again, very short-sighted statement.
You obviously did not understand what the problem with Userbenchmark was or what can or cannot be taken seriously from them.
Userbenchmark has been a pretty valuable resource for leaks and their measured numbers are not bad.

There is nothing you are going to post that will change my opinion on this.

Mastrdrver links which I read before he posted them speaks volumes on this topic.

If you want to use them all the power to you. I will wait for official reviews.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,311 (4.61/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
And what cooling solution are they using for that increase? What is the tdp? Unless we see that the rest is quite meaningless.
Air or an AIO...
Again, very short-sighted statement.
You obviously did not understand what the problem with Userbenchmark was or what can or cannot be taken seriously from them.
Userbenchmark has been a pretty valuable resource for leaks and their measured numbers are not bad.
Userbenchmark is MEH at best bud. Even with all the other nonsense Mak is talking about. I haven't touched it since a shit thread popped up here trying to use it, but I don't recall it showing actual clockspeeds and it was tough to compare. Also, results were not consistent in some things from run to run.

I'd stay away from it. Perhaps it's good in horseshoes, hand grenades, and nuclear warfare...but not sniping. :)
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,012 (1.88/day)
Processor R5 5600X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800
Video Card(s) Geforce RTX 3070 FE
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB
Keyboard Corsair K60
VR HMD HTC Vive
Userbenchmark is MEH at best bud. Even with all the other nonsense Mak is talking about. I haven't touched it since a shit thread popped up here trying to use it, but I don't recall it showing actual clockspeeds and it was tough to compare. Also, results were not consistent in some things from run to run.
Well, that is a reasonable standpoint. I don't exactly agree but at least you are judging this on merits (or flaws) of benchmark itself :)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
388 (0.22/day)
Still on 14nm in 2021....:eek:

The power draw and heat of these is going to be just as horrible as Comet Lake.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,101 (0.20/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4002 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch A
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 16GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) HP ZR24w + LG 24MB35 on Neo-Flex® Dual Monitor Lift Stand
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/1bigrn
Still on 14nm in 2021....:eek:

The power draw and heat of these is going to be just as horrible as Comet Lake.

That is why they are only going up to 8 c / 16 T.

And even if Rocket lake has equal or greater performance to Zen 3. They won't have an answer for the 12 and 16 cores parts.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,311 (4.61/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
That is why they are only going up to 8 c / 16 T.

And even if Rocket lake has equal or greater performance to Zen 3. They won't have an answer for the 12 and 16 cores parts.
They are going backwards? There is a 10c/20t part already on the mainstream from intel...
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,497 (0.78/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Test result is from single-core performance or quad-core performance or other tests, represented by specific measured number. These have not changed.

But they have by the very quote I used in my last post.

Why are you trying to make a distinction where there is not one?
 
Top