Intel to Push for Higher Resolution PC Displays, Arrive in 2013

[Completely Bonkers]

+1 that Intel is finally driving standards so that "PC" OEMs will keep up with Apple products.

Using a PC for reading text and DTP and viewing pictures will improve significantly with High resolution displays. Hell, 12 years ago IBM did this with the T210 display. Display: 20.8-inch TFT LCD with CCFL Backlight and Fan, Resolution: 2048 x 1536, Aspect Ratio: 4:3, Connectivity: VGA, DVI, S-Video, Composite. FINALLY, we will get consumer products at this resolution and better.

 

[Maban]

3840x2400 in a 30-36 inch please.

 

[techtard]

Gimme a projector that displays directly into my eyeballs.

 

[NHKS]

realistic roadmap from Intel?

Courtesy:3Dcenter

 

[ensabrenoir]

Gimme a projector that displays directly into my eyeballs.

Google already working on it sorta......

 

[Mega-Japan]

Is it me or is the whole 3D hype dying? I know most folks here consider it to be gimmick blah blah, but I thought that 3D everything was to become standard at some point, no?

 

[Fourstaff]

Intel pushing HDD to 5mm they are fucking bastards, Intel pushing for higher res they are geniuses. Regardless, all forms of tech advancement (drive to widespread adoption or something else) should be welcomed.

 

[ensabrenoir]

Is it me or is the whole 3D hype dying? I know most folks here consider it to be gimmick blah blah, but I thought that 3D everything was to become standard at some point, no?

If they can do it without the glasses and economically then I believe it will spread

 

[Benetanegia]

If they can do it without the glasses and economically then I believe it will spread

I don't think it's ever going to be posible without glasses unless you can live with 0º viewing angles.

 

[Mega-Japan]

I don't think it's ever going to be posible without glasses unless you can live with 0º viewing angles.

If angles is the concern, then display should be switched to 2D. But I thought eventually displays with 2D/3D option would become mainstream. Those who not like it can simply keep it off.

 

[mastrdrver]

This opens floodgates of pee on EIZO's $35,000 4K monitor media event at NAB'12. Let's hope by 2013, Intel has an IGP that's capable of smooth 4K (four TMDS links) video playback.

Oh wait! Your serious.................................................................

 

[Kaleid]

So this is awesome... Maybe this will get video card manufacturers to increase the tech without much price increase....

LOL, that's funny.

 

[acerace]

What? I'm not even out of my 1280x1024 res yet.

 

[dj-electric]

realistic roadmap from Intel?
http://www.3dcenter.org/dateien/abbildungen/Intel-Roadmap-to-4K.vorschau2.png

Courtesy:3Dcenter

If ill have a 24" 4800X2700 monitor, I think ill puke rainbows to death...

 

[Aquinus]

The current revision of DisplayPort is rated to run at a maximum of 3840 × 2160 × 30 bpp @ 60 Hz.

 

[NHKS]

If ill have a 24" 4800X2700 monitor, I think ill puke rainbows to death...

quite!..
but it will be in 2015 at earliest & of course in the premium segment.. as for me i will be content if good quality 2560x1440 monitors(like this) come down to mainstream prices next year, as my monitor upgrade is loong overdue!... keeping my fingers(or eyes ) crossed until then

 

[n-ster]

OMG I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!

imagine these monitors in.... EYEFINITY

 

[NHKS]

OMG I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!

imagine these monitors in.... EYEFINITY

& running something like Metro 2033...

 

[n-ster]

& running something like Metro 2033...

6 screen eyefinity and 32x SSAA for good measure

Would have to measure by frames per minute or hour

 

[ensabrenoir]

OMG I JUST THOUGHT OF SOMETHING!

imagine these monitors in.... EYEFINITY

Total brain damage from the coolness.....and slippery floors from all the drool

 

[semantics]

Ill take more pixel density then just more pixels on a larger screen, i don't think i need anything larger then 26" when i'm only sitting a foot or so away from the screen.

 

[Deleted member 67555]

I really wish we had a resident Optometrist so he could explain why this is pointless...

Fuck 4k as the human eye can't distinguish the difference somewhere between 1080p and before 4k..

Give me Holographic displays or fuck off!

 

[n-ster]

I really wish we had a resident Optometrist so he could explain why this is pointless...

Fuck 4k as the human eye can't distinguish the difference somewhere between 1080p and before 4k..

Give me Holographic displays or fuck off!

Dude, even true 4K (4096x2304) only gives 174 PPI @ 27"

For comparision the 3.2" 320x480 Galaxy Gio is 180 PPI. The Sony X1 has a 3" 800x480 (312 PPI) display. If you can't distinguish between the 2 of those, well, you need glasses man

 

[Frick]

Soon I can replace my monitors then.

 

[hellrazor]

I really wish we had a resident Optometrist so he could explain why this is pointless...

Fuck 4k as the human eye can't distinguish the difference somewhere between 1080p and before 4k..

Give me Holographic displays or fuck off!

I wish we had a resident optometrist so he can tell you WTF is wrong with your vision, next you're gonna tell me we can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 FPS.