• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intels Xeon Phi looks to demote GPGPU

Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,703 (2.24/day)
Likes
5,955
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti (Heatkiller WB) @ 2Ghz core/1.5(12)Ghz mem
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp 27" (2560x1440)
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
#1
An article popped up at S|A that announced Intel's former Knights Corner (Larabee) project was now in fruition of sorts in Xeon Phi cards. Due to the coding simplicity of the architecture it may do less work than a gpgpu but it is very much easier to code for. As such CD at S|A said it was the death knell for Nvidia's HPC dominance (and kyboshing AMD too).

I thought it was a CD rant and paid no attention.

But i just read a second article there from Anandtech and it kinda summarises the same thing. In other words, the raw power of gpu compute is no match for the coding simplicity of the Intel coprocessor Xeon Phi (which is no slouch).

This could dent Nvidias market quite a bit.

S|A article:
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/11/13/what-will-intel-xeon-phi-do-to-the-gpgpu-market/
Anandtech article:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6451/the-xeon-phi-at-work-at-tacc
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,260 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,370
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#2
Yeah, I'd believe it. x86 is far more flexible than CUDA and Streams. It also has the advantage of better error checking and that's very important for scientific computations. There's a lot of scenarios where GPGPU couldn't be used because of error checking that Xeon Phi can do.

There may be a few applications where GPGPU will still be used but I think the TOP500 will be flooded by AMD CPUs (because they're cheap) + Xeon Phi cards in the coming years.
 

Cortex

New Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
44 (0.02/day)
Likes
2
#3
Hopefully compute Maxwell (Tesla) will be a homogenous GPU - all shaders can execute 2 prim/clk FP32 or FP64 (or 2 SP or 1 DP). I think intel cannot match that kind of performance (up to 4xDPof GK110 [or 2x] - 2880 FP32 SP and 2880/3 FP64 SP), even with smaller production process. Also a special GPU only for compute without TMUs (GPU version with TMU for visualizations).
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
752 (0.28/day)
Likes
152
Processor Intel Core i7-4790K
Motherboard Intel Board DZ87KLT-75K
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX {F3-2400C11D-16GXM x 2 [32GB]}
Video Card(s) Nvidia Geforce GTX 970
Storage Samsung EVO 250GB mSATA SSD + Seagate 3TB HDD
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2718Q
Case In Win F430
Power Supply Seasonic Platinum 660
Mouse Dell KM714 Wireless
Keyboard Dell KM714 Wireless
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#4
Hopefully compute Maxwell (Tesla) will be a homogenous GPU - all shaders can execute 2 prim/clk FP32 or FP64 (or 2 SP or 1 DP). I think intel cannot match that kind of performance (up to 4xDPof GK110 [or 2x] - 2880 FP32 SP and 2880/3 FP64 SP), even with smaller production process. Also a special GPU only for compute without TMUs (GPU version with TMU for visualizations).
I don't think Intel will sit back with only the current line of Xeon Phi. They will offer something even more powerful at that time to compete.

Honestly I think things will go more as the OP has stated. Intel Killing them with simplicity,...
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,260 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,370
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#5
Flexibility would probably be the better word. There's not much an x86 processor can't do in reasonable time. It's what they've been largely using for the past two-three decades.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,995 (2.22/day)
Likes
2,354
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#6
I want to see a F@H benchmark compared to new GPU cards.

In Intels own words they only expect 2-2.5X increase in performance. Its just this can happen in standard CPU tasks instead of GPGPU code.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,260 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,370
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#7
F@H is one of the rare instances where x86 will not be faster because there's very little logic and it is almost entirely composed of physics calculations (formula). The only benefit F@H would see from Xeon Phi is a reduction in errors.

F@H was always intended to be distributed computed though. Xeon Phi will see virtually no deployment to home computers so it makes no sense for them to target them anyway. GPUs are far more common in desktop computers than co-processors and that will remain the case for the forseeable future.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,662 (1.29/day)
Likes
1,011
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#8
Don't they make those decisions based on factors other than initial cost? One look at the power consumption and they'd figure out Intel is more cost effective.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,260 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,370
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#9
Like most of us, it likely comes down to preference/who offers the better deal.