• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Is it Safe to get XFX RX5700 XT?

Joined
Dec 8, 2019
Messages
32 (0.02/day)
So i am deciding to Replace my Broken GPU ( Current is MSI RX 580)

My Friend Recommend me the Latest XFX 5700 XT Thicc Ultra III

But when i see there are Problem with RX 5700 XT in General and some Also said that New Driver Solve almost everything.

So I'm kinda Confuse if i should Gambling for it or just get RTX 2060 Super? ( my budget cannot afford 2070 Super here.

Mostly using my PC for Gaming and light Stream ( 1440p)
 
So i am deciding to Replace my Broken GPU ( Current is MSI RX 580)

My Friend Recommend me the Latest XFX 5700 XT Thicc Ultra III

But when i see there are Problem with RX 5700 XT in General and some Also said that New Driver Solve almost everything.

So I'm kinda Confuse if i should Gambling for it or just get RTX 2060 Super? ( my budget cannot afford 2070 Super here.

Mostly using my PC for Gaming and light Stream ( 1440p)
Streaming is much better on Nvidia GPUs. Nvenc is a masterpiece, broadcast engine and the new RTX Voice are pretty handy too.
 
The 5700XT from a performance perspective is a very good card. I would just make sure to purchase from somewhere that has a very good return policy just in case you do have issues. When you say stream do you mean Netflix or broadcast yourself playing games?
If it's the later RTX 2070 super is the way to go.
 
Yeah just take a quick look at AMD Help on Reddit if you think new driver fixed almost everything, in a 24 hours period there always are around 10 or more posts complaining about 5700/ 5700XT.
 
Yeah just take a quick look at AMD Help on Reddit if you think new driver fixed almost everything, in a 24 hours period there always are around 10 or more posts complaining about 5700/ 5700XT.

10 or more means what exactly?
 
10 or more means what exactly?

Meaning people are still getting blackscreens, shuttering, hard lockup, etc...with their 5700/ 5700XT. I don't want to cherry pick anecdotal evidences, just look it up.
 
Meaning people are still getting blackscreens, shuttering, hard lockup, etc...with their 5700/ 5700XT. I don't want to cherry pick anecdotal evidences, just look it up.

So 10+ from the 1000s of people that own 5700s and 5700Xts on one of the most popular social media sites for tech means that it is still a no buy? Even though it is based on price the best performing brand new GPU you can buy bar none?
 
So 10+ from the 1000s of people that own 5700s and 5700Xts on one of the most popular social media sites for tech means that it is still a no buy? Even though it is based on price the best performing brand new GPU you can buy bar none?

Yeah you get exactly what you pay for buddy, 10% more perf than 2060 Super at what cost ? driver instabilities, worse video encoder, not supporting DX12 Ultimate.
The amount of people who bought Turing easily >10x the number of Navi buyers, yet you don't see 10+ posts everyday for the past 10 months complaining about Turing driver issues anywhere.
if you want statistic, mindfactory.de post their GPU sale for the 1Q 2020 and Turing sales are 2x Navi sales.
If you want pure price/perf, might as well buy the RX580, RX580 has about as much features as 5700XT, minus the driver instabilities....
 
Last edited:
The reality is, few are having these problems... but it is also reality they exist and people are still having issues... and more so than nvidia at this time.

Though chances are you will be fine, I'd still go Nvidia for now. Since Navi's release, and in particular Adrenalin 2020, things haven't been polished on the driver side for AMD.
 
Yeah you get exactly what you pay for buddy, 10% more perf than 2060 Super at what cost ? driver instabilities, worse video encoder, not supporting DX12 Ultimate.
The amount of people who bought Turing easily quadruple the number of Navi buyers, yet you don't see 10+ posts everyday for the past 10 months complaining about Turing driver issues anywhere.
if you want statistic, mindfactory.de post their GPU sale for the 1Q 2020 and Turing sales are 2x Navi sales.
If you want pure price/perf, might as well buy the RX580, RX580 has about as much features as 5700XT, minus the driver instabilities....

This is my issue. You are making a statement that held some water months ago. December has come and gone. The 2060 Super is not a good card to tout for DX12 Ultimate. Don't spout data that you are just reading somewhere. No one on this thread thinks that or has claimed that Navi outsells Turing and to quote the RX580 as a price/performance was from 2018. In no way is the 580 a better card than the 5700XT which is faster than a Vega 64. The OP is asking if he should get a 5700XT today and with the much publicized driver updates i don't see why not.
 
So i am deciding to Replace my Broken GPU ( Current is MSI RX 580)

My Friend Recommend me the Latest XFX 5700 XT Thicc Ultra III

But when i see there are Problem with RX 5700 XT in General and some Also said that New Driver Solve almost everything.

So I'm kinda Confuse if i should Gambling for it or just get RTX 2060 Super? ( my budget cannot afford 2070 Super here.

Mostly using my PC for Gaming and light Stream ( 1440p)

I'm not sure about the THICC III, but the previous iterations had contact issues with the heatsink, creating high temperatures over time as the heatsink started to sag away from the pcb. Not sure if that's an issue with the III (I would assume they made the III to address this). But in general 5700 xts are great for price to performance.
 
This is my issue. You are making a statement that held some water months ago. December has come and gone. The 2060 Super is not a good card to tout for DX12 Ultimate. Don't spout data that you are just reading somewhere. No one on this thread thinks that or has claimed that Navi outsells Turing and to quote the RX580 as a price/performance was from 2018. In no way is the 580 a better card than the 5700XT which is faster than a Vega 64. The OP is asking if he should get a 5700XT today and with the much publicized driver updates i don't see why not.

Nope, RX580 still has better price to performance than 5700XT circa 2020, feature-wise RX580 is equivalent to 5700XT, so your point of 5700XT being the best perf/price is moot
performance-per-dollar_2560-1440.png

I wasn't talking about the driver issue some months ago, I was talking about in the past 24h there are still many complains about 5700/ 5700XT driver instabilities. AMD Navi driver is still pretty much a work in progress, might as well buy a cheap RX580 and hold on to it until Navi 2 arrive if people care about price/perf that much (in fact they did according to Mindfactory sale figure :D)
 
Navi gen 1 without any of the performance enhancing features of DX12 Ultimate is a tough sell, especially considering its questionable stability.

Unless you are a diehard ATi / Radeon fan, I would not recommend Navi gen1
 
Nope, RX580 still has better price to performance than 5700XT circa 2020, feature-wise RX580 is equivalent to 5700XT, so your point of 5700XT being the best perf/price is moot

I wasn't talking about the driver issue some months ago, I was talking about in the past 24h there are still many complains about 5700/ 5700XT driver instabilities. AMD Navi driver is still pretty much a work in progress, might as well buy a cheap RX580 and hold on to it until Navi 2 arrive if people care about price/perf that much (in fact they did according to Mindfactory sale figure :D)

I'd say it's the best price to performance if you want quality 1440p gaming, especially when looking at the 300-500 range. That being said the 570/580 are still wonderful cards if you're only gaming at 1080.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure about the THICC III, but the previous iterations had contact issues with the heatsink, creating high temperatures over time as the heatsink started to sag away from the pcb. Not sure if that's an issue with the III (I would assume they made the III to address this). But in general 5700 xts are great for price to performance.

The Thic III remedied all the faults of the previous two versions. It's a much better release than the previous two. I've always been nVidia until I sold my 9600k/RTX 2060 system and got an RX570 with Xeon W3680 combo and its been rock solid. If I were to go AMD then the RX 5700XT would be a good buy, if you experience any of the issues mentioned above then just RMA it and grab an nVidia card, that way you can choose which one suits you the most without having to be stuck to the RX 5700XT if there are any issues.
 
Navi gen 1 without any of the performance enhancing features of DX12 Ultimate is a tough sell, especially considering its questionable stability.

Unless you are a diehard ATi / Radeon fan, I would not recommend Navi gen1



I Love me some AMD as you can see from my systems but even I can't recommend Navi without the seller having an amazing return policy.

Screenshot (165).png
 
I Love me some AMD as you can see from my systems but even I can't recommend Navi without the seller having an amazing return policy.

View attachment 152259

Is your 5700XT graphic score a good result ? I could get 9900 Timespy graphic score with my 2060 Super overclocked (top 100 results for 2060 Super).
My bet is 2060 Super once overclocked is just indistinguishable from 5700XT from a performance standpoint.
 
Is your 5700XT graphic score a good result ? I could get 9900 Timespy graphic score with my 2060 Super overclocked.

All systems are stock out of the box for the gpu except for the fan profiles other than the 2080 ti which is my main system.


That 1080 ti system OC vs OC trashes the 5700XT in most games though.
 
If we're going to help this dude, we gotta start properly. I have my fair share of RX 5700 XT woes, but it is generally a good card when the drivers work.

So i am deciding to Replace my Broken GPU ( Current is MSI RX 580)

My Friend Recommend me the Latest XFX 5700 XT Thicc Ultra III

But when i see there are Problem with RX 5700 XT in General and some Also said that New Driver Solve almost everything.

So I'm kinda Confuse if i should Gambling for it or just get RTX 2060 Super? ( my budget cannot afford 2070 Super here.

Mostly using my PC for Gaming and light Stream ( 1440p)

What particular games are you aiming to play?

Also, by streaming, do you mean you will be streaming to an audience or you will just watch some streams?
 
So 10+ from the 1000s of people that own 5700s and 5700Xts on one of the most popular social media sites for tech means that it is still a no buy? Even though it is based on price the best performing brand new GPU you can buy bar none?



@ 1440p, The 5700 XT is % faster .... but not the way most of us use it.

Numbers in ( ) are overclock achieved over referernce). I used MSI since TPU had the numbers for all 3 cards
Reference 5700 XT = 102 x (120.4 / 112.0) = 109 for MSI AIB
Reference 2060 S = 96 x (136.2 / 122.2) = 107 for MSI AIB
Reference 2070 = 100 x (144.5 / 128.3) = 113 for MSI AIB

So in reality, overclocked the way we use them, the 5700 XT sits between the 2060 S and the 2070. The problem is, as the big discounts that were applied after the S cards were released, the 2070 wsas the proverbial "no brainer" of late costs have been skyrocketing and the $400 price tags have become very scarce. If ya can still find one, that's the way to go. If ya can't look elsewhere

The AIB 2070 S comes in comes in at a 97 / 87 compared to the 5700 XT @ 1440p
MSI AIB 5700 XT = 87 x (120.4 / 112.0) = 93.52
MSI AB 2070 S = 97 x (162.2 / 145.8) = 111.25

2070S reference is therefore 11.5% faster than the Reference 5700 XT
AIB 2070S overclocked is therefore 19 % faster than the AIB 5700 XT

Cost of ownership for Gigabyte Windforce OC 5700 XT = $409.99
Cost of ownership for Gigabyte Windforce OC 2070 S = $499.99

19 % more performance for 22% increase in cost ... given the law of diminishing returns, sounds like a good deal

However judging by card cost is kinda a red herring ... the card doesn't do anything by itself. To do a real comparison, ya have to use a the whole box.

a $1200 build w/ 5700XT is $1200
A $120 build switched to the 2070 S is $1290 ....

$1290 / $1200 = 7.5% more cost of build for 19% more performance

So either way, it's hard to argue against either choice on a price / performance basis when we just consider base costs. But what about total costs ?

AIB 2070 S uses 217 watts in gaming on average, hits 72C at Load + OC and runs at 31 dbA.
AIB 5700 XT uses 270 watts in gaming on average, hits 71C at Load + OC and runs at 32 dbA.

The only number of significance here is the power. USe US average electric cost is $0.11 and 30 hours a week of gaming w/ 88% PSU Efficiency

Cost of Running AIB 2070 S = $169.84
Cost of Running 5700 AIB XT = $211.32

Cost of ownership for Gigabyte Windforce OC 5700 XT = $409.99 + $211.32 = $ 621.31
Cost of ownership for Gigabyte Windforce OC 2070 S = $499.99 + $169.84 = $ 669.83 ... that's 7.8% more costs for a 19% performance increase

Now for case cooling .... at the recommended 1 case fan per 50-75 watts, 1 extra case fan for the 5700 XT build is + $15 or $636.31 ... that's 5.3% more costs for a 19% performance increase

What about PSU, is it borderline ? Do you need to account for the extra 53 watts ? 500-550 ?

Now of course fanbois from both camps will argue why this factor should or should not matter... but costs must include all costs for a fair cpomparison or yu are ignoring advantages. Yeah, if ya live at home and Mom and Dad pay the bills, or if you live in a apartment and electric isn't included, maybe ya wanna leave that out .... but that's not apples and apples. However, when all is said and done the 2070 S is not 10% faster .... apples and apples with both cards OCd is 19% faster the way the majority of this audience uses their. And regardless of whether you go apples and apples and include total cost of ownership or bare costs, I'd find it hard to give up just under 20% performance advantage

The point here is not which card you pick ... only that you use a rational means of making the decision. If a user came in wanting to use a raden VII, Id' dtry and talkthem out of it... the card has no place in this world. But a 5700XT vs 2070 S, I'd choose the 2070 S but each individual's choice for any set of cards should depend on all relevant factors

If you overclock your cards, don't use "out of the box" performance comparisons to make your choice.
If your PSU is borderline, consider that the 207 S uses 53 watts less
If you pay utility bills, consider the power savings
If you are concerned about interior case temps, and impact on componentry, consider the cost of an extra fan to offset the extra heat.
If you are concerned about noise and heat, consider those

Because each person's needs are different, they best card for one may not be the best card for the other. All too often, he card is picked to satisfy brand loyalty, and then only the data that supports that decision is considered.
 
If everyone in the world had similar prices then I would promote 2070 Super. But here in Canada its $200 more expensive than the 5700 XT. It is probably similar in a lot of other countries. So the % increase vs cost increase is changed greatly.

Edit: thanks Joey, I was gonna post that video.
 
I don't think anyone is dismissing the value of the 5700XT... I think most are just saying they would rather spend an additional $100 to get slightly more performance probably 12% oc vs oc depending on resolution/game and not have to be an AMD navi beta tester.

if its more than 100 in someones local currency its for sure not worth it but they should still make sure that the seller has a very good return policy.

I'm not usually of huge fan of telling people to wait for next gen cards and you never know how much faster they will be or how much more they will cost but in this scenario if my choice was a 5700XT being the best card I could afford I would wait especially considering that an RDNA2 powered Xbox is going to be a decent amount faster later this year.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top