• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Is there a way to check monitor ms/second?

Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
9,019 (1.37/day)
System Name Black Panther
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO Wifi 1.0
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX2080 Ti Dual 11GB DDR6
Storage Samsung EVO 970 500GB SSD M.2 & 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm
Display(s) 32'' Gigabyte G32QC 2560x1440 165Hz
Case NZXT H710i Black
Audio Device(s) Razer Electra V2 & Z5500 Speakers
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 Gold 80+
Mouse Some Corsair lost the box forgot the model
Keyboard Motospeed
Software Windows 10
Supposedly I purchase a monitor with supposedly a response time of 2ms... is there any way I can check I wasn't spoofed?
 
Supposedly I purchase a monitor with supposedly a response time of 2ms... is there any way I can check I wasn't spoofed?

You will get 2ms response time...what they won't tell you is if it's grey to grey, black to black, or black to grey.

So no. I don't trust response time at all.
 
Look up the specs of the monitor online.

And if you can't tell, why would you care?

Exactly...

I really dont think that the typical gamer\user is really going to tell the differance
 
as long as there no ghosting to the image then every thing should kewl.:toast:
 
well if its advertised at 2ms then it should be 2ms. if you find out it isnt that you can sue them for breach of the descriptions act - here in the UK you can anyway, your country (no idea where you live) may have the same thing.
 
Look up the specs of the monitor online.

And if you can't tell, why would you care?


I care because I don't want to unjustly pay more for something I didn't get.

I'm planning to buy either a 20" or 22" LCD. I can't decide whether wide-view or normal square monitor would suffice. Honestly I can't find monitors which aren't wide-view.

But then there are price differences depending on whether the monitor is 2ms, 4ms or 6ms.
(Apart from the fact that I found a heftily priced Dell monitor 'boasting' a 16ms response time unless it's a gross typo? )

Would the human eye be detecting and hence appreciating such differences?
I currently have a 6ms monitor - I mean does one really see the difference between 2ms and 4ms?
Because otherwise I wouldn't be giving a damn to the problem, and I'd just purchase the cheaper 4ms model...

Also, now that I'm discussing this, are there some particular issues you would suggest in taking note of when purchasing a new LCD? Apart from ms/sec?

Thanks! :respect:
 
Last edited:
how many colours it can produce i think would be a good one to use as a compare factor.
also about wide or square i would go with the wide - there meant to replace dual screen.
 
Look at the whole picture: response time, contrast, brightness, etc. Compare all the specs and prices together. I bought a BenQ FP93GX which is 2ms gray to gray, but it has a really good contrast ratio, too.
 
well when monitor shopping the testing can be tweaked to make claims of performance so dont look at specs like ms to be all that accurate because you cant proove the numbers are wrong if you cant reproduce the exact testing methods and conditions. take it all with a grain of salt, besides 4ms or 8ms how can you ever tell because they are milli seconds so that means they are virtually undetectable differences unless maybe between the 2ms vs the 16ms.

the main important specs are colors, contrast, viewing angle, and resolution.
 
Back
Top