• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Microsoft to Ban Unsupported Machines from Windows 11 Updates

Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
298 (0.06/day)
Location
Wasteland
System Name Cast Lead™
Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600 CPU @ 3.50GHz
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX H270F GAMING
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 LED
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon RX 480 GAMING X 8G
Storage Seagate 1TB 7200 rpm
Display(s) LG 24MP59G
Case Green Z4
Audio Device(s) Realtek High Definition Audio
Power Supply Green 650 UK Gold
Software Windows 10™ Pro 64 bit
so i stick with 10
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
167 (0.10/day)
System Name Linotosh
Processor Dual 800mhz G4
Cooling Air
Memory 1.5 GB
No automatic updates for systems that don't meet their system requirements doesn't bother me as long as I can update manually. Then I can wait and see of the updates cause problems for others before updating!
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
487 (0.14/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R5 3600
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) RX580 Armor w/ Accelero Mono
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply SS G-650
Rejoice, ransomware is upon you.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
298 (0.10/day)
microsoft needs to be clear about which machines can receive updates.
like asus just released z270 boards with support 6th and 7th gen cpu and enable tpm 2.0, these machine qualify for updates?
but microsoft websites only states 8th gen and upwards support windows updates from what i can understand

Microsoft doesn't care what MB you are running and if it supports tpm 2.0 or not. They just care what CPU you have for their "stability" to be as desired. According to them, the approved CPU list have 99.8% stability, but not approved CPU have 50% more crashes. So non approved CPU are 99.7% stable which is not enough for MS.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
6,008 (1.02/day)
Location
Whatever my internet protocol shows I guess O.o
System Name Lynni The Dragon
Processor Intel Core i7-11700K "Rocket Lake"
Motherboard Gigabyte Z590 Vision G
Cooling Fractal Design Celsius S24
Memory Geil Dragon 4x8GB@3000mhz 15-17-17-35 (GWW416GB3000C15DC)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G OC | Sapphire Radeon RX 590 Nitro+ Special Edition 8GB
Storage OS/Games:Samsung 970 EVO 1TB|Sabrent Rocket 2TB|Data: 850EVO 1TB, 3xWD 4TB, 1xWD 10TB & WD 1TB
Display(s) Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ 4K@144hz | LG 55UK6100PLB IPS 4K HDR | LG 48CX OLED 4K HDR
Case Fractal Design Meshify 2 Tempered Glass White/Black
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1200 watt 80Plus Platinum
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeedy Wireless
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma X UK
VR HMD No not gonna sell myself to FB!i!i!
Software Win10 Pro UK x64 (21H1) / Win11 Pro 21H2 UK (Build 22000.100)
Benchmark Scores Time Spy: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33868867? GPU-Z: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/h93ag
Lol so if Microsoft "choose" not to open up for 6 and 7gen Intel CPU's some of us will be screwed (facepalm).

My Dell Latitude E7470 got like a 6th gen i5 and earlier this year Dell upgraded the TPM module via firmware to be 2.0 which was nice but again maybe "The Verge" as @londiste says has misunderstood something because they are famous for even their bad computer building video :roll:
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
16,107 (5.30/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Software Android 4.4.4R5 Custom
Lol so if Microsoft "choose" not to open up for 6 and 7gen Intel CPU's some of us will be screwed (facepalm).
No, you'l just have to use the work-arounds, and there will be many, to install Windows 11.

Rejoice, ransomware is upon you.
Total rubbish comment. I literally NEVER use automatic updates. Ever. Have never been a victim of ransomware. Ever. Please stop with the fearmongering.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
9,332 (2.20/day)
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel Xeon X3470
Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. P55A-UD3R (Socket 1156)
Cooling Enermax ETS-T40F
Memory Samsung 8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3
Video Card(s) NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Storage V-GEN03AS18EU120GB, Seagate 2 x 1TB and Seagate 4TB
Display(s) Samsung 21 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case Icute Super 18
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply Silverstone 600 Watt
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Sades Excalibur + Taihao keycaps
Software Win 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
why i feel like M$ has right to tell you what spec you need to have to run their OS, for the next OS they gonna state you need to have mid range processor with 16GB RAM, 4TB storage as minimum or you can't install the new OS
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
12,369 (3.47/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Full Size Wireless Apple Magic Keyboard
Software MacOS 10.15.7
why i feel like M$ has right to tell you what spec you need to have to run their OS, for the next OS they gonna state you need to have mid range processor with 16GB RAM, 4TB storage as minimum or you can't install the new OS
I need a "laughs in POSIX" meme. I'll stick with OS X and Linux as I see very little in W11 that would entice me to come back. The only reason would be for games and Wine/Proton support gets better with every update. I'm actually not sure what would need to happen to convince me to go back beyond being forced to become a .NET engineer.
 

LutinChris

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
8 (0.01/day)
Win 7 for web?

What are you browsing for? Ransomware?
Another fearmongering. I have never been a victim of a ransomware attack on Win 7. Also, I prefer to use Win 7 on my Kaby Lake system instead of Win 10 and its messy updates.
It's simple: I will never let software companies force me to use my hardware or purchase a new one at their discretion just because they need more money.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,968 (3.97/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Let's say that the whole TPM business is understandable because security, whatever. However, I still can't quite comprehend their claims about unsupported CPUs and crashes, some of the compatible CPU have identical architectures with some of those that aren't. Yet they say those that aren't supported crash a whopping 40% more (whatever that even means), how is that possible ? I can't even remember the last time I came across a piece of software that crashed depending on the CPU used. What can even cause that, they share the same ISA and feature sets. I can guarantee you that you can compile software with the most ill advised flags and it will still run just fine on 99.9% CPUs.

So the question is what are they really aiming to achieve with these bizarre and outright idiotic claims ?
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
2,152 (1.52/day)
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / WD20EZRX / MKNSSDTR256GB-3DL / LG BH16NS40 / ST10000VN0008
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Mouse Microsoft Trackball Optical 1.0
Keyboard HP Vectra VE keyboard (Part # D4950-63004)
Software Whatever build of Windows 11 is being served in Dev channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
I already totally lost my interest in W11 since I watched LTT's video about the UI and user experience. One major step backward is the "show more options" menu in almost every right click menu which shows the old W10 right click menu such as zipping or extracting. I don't appreciate extra unnecessary mouse movement for such a simple task.
Yeah, that sucks. As a workaround you can use the context menu key on your keyboard to bring out the old menu straight away, without going through "show more options", but if you're used to relying more on the mouse it goes against old habits.
And it's unacceptable how Microsoft is forcing its paying users to use Edge. Changing the default browser looks more difficult and time consuming more than ever with W11.
Yep, this sucks too.

like asus just released z270 boards with support 6th and 7th gen cpu and enable tpm 2.0, these machine qualify for updates?
but microsoft websites only states 8th gen and upwards support windows updates from what i can understand
Only Kaby Lake, Zen 2 and newer processors support Mode Based Execution Control. For all the other supported processors that do not have this feature, Windows 11 will emulate it, but diminished performance is to be expected. Hence why Microsoft is severely limiting the number of CPUs supported.
I have to wonder if there will be a simple bypass for this.
Probably. I imagine someone is working on one as we speak.
I find it odd that governments are not up in arms over this because technically the big restrains on system requirements, of otherwise perfectly fine components, that are fast enough to last another decade, will now be E-waste.
Ironically, most of these new requirements were brought up with the US Department of Defense's requirements in mind.
Seriously, I know is too early to ask, but what will Win11 bring over Win10 that is such a big deal?
Hardly anything, aside from the UI changes. The exact same security features can be enabled on Windows 10 if you have supported hardware for it. So really, a lot of people in an uproar over nothing.

In all seriousness, this is just more motivation to run Windows 11 on a non-compliant system!
As said above, Windows 11 will rely on Mode Based Execution Control. For all the other supported processors that do not have this feature, Windows 11 will emulate it, but diminished performance is to be expected. Then again, if you know what you're doing, I doubt it's gonna be a problem.

Now this might be tricky from an ethical and legal perspective.
Doubt that in the legal perspective. Microsoft states a series of requirements, and you accept an EULA that you will use the software according to whatever that EULA states. I think you're bound to lose your case, when Windows 10 is still around and there's nothing exclusive to Windows 11 that can't be run on W10.
Rejoice, ransomware is upon you.
Bs, good security practices when using the Internet make it a nearly non-issue.
why i feel like M$ has right to tell you what spec you need to have to run their OS, for the next OS they gonna state you need to have mid range processor with 16GB RAM, 4TB storage as minimum or you can't install the new OS
And who designed the OS? Pretty sure it was Microsoft. So obviously they will state requirements for it to run correctly. Aside from the processor controversy, everything else is pretty normal.
Of course, if you want to run it on a potato, do so. Don't complain about potato performance later, though.
However, I still can't quite comprehend their claims about unsupported CPUs and crashes, some of the compatible CPU have identical architectures with some of those that aren't
Not sure about DIY land, because it's DIY land. But on OEM land, maybe they have pushed them into a tighter compliance with some specification?
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
16,107 (5.30/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Software Android 4.4.4R5 Custom
So the question is what are they really aiming to achieve with these bizarre and outright idiotic claims ?
One of the main reasons? It's a blatant money grab. Picture in your minds eye, if you will, that everyone obeys these requirements. This means that a very large portion of the populace will need to upgrade their hardware to get Windows 11 and escape the poopoo-show of Windows 10. Most people buy a prebuilt OEM system(such as Dell, HP, Lenovo, ETC). The result of THAT dynamic is that microsoft will sell OEM copies of Windows 11 in mass quantities. This will generate 10's of billions over the next 18months. And because the over-all vibes about Windows 11 are very positive(except for these limitations), this scenario is likely to play itself out to a significant degree. There you go.

They claim it's for "security" reasons, but that is a smoke-screen. TPM and SecureBoot do little for overall system security, so little that the hacker's of the world are likely laughing their collective asses off at microsoft.

As said above, Windows 11 will rely on Mode Based Execution Control. For all the other supported processors that do not have this feature, Windows 11 will emulate it, but diminished performance is to be expected. Then again, if you know what you're doing, I doubt it's gonna be a problem.
Nope! The Core 2 Duo system I've been testing with benchmarks within a reasonable margin of error when compared to Windows 7. So, no, microsoft is either blatantly lying(wouldn't THAT be a shocker) or the feature set that you're referencing has yet to be implemented as of 22k.160. I've not had a chance to test 22k.168 yet, been busy.
Doubt that in the legal perspective.
Oh let's not start that...
Microsoft states a series of requirements, and you accept an EULA that you will use the software according to whatever that EULA states.
Once again, what an EULA states and what is lawfully enforceable are different.
I think you're bound to lose your case
LOL! Haven't lost one yet.
there's nothing exclusive to Windows 11 that can't be run on W10.
We'll see...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,968 (3.97/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
One of the main reasons? It's a blatant money grab. Picture in your minds eye, if you will, that everyone obeys these requirements. This means that a very large portion of the populace will need to upgrade their hardware to get Windows 11 and escape the poopoo-show of Windows 10. Most people buy a prebuilt OEM system(such as Dell, HP, Lenovo, ETC). The result of THAT dynamic is that microsoft will sell OEM copies of Windows 11 in mass quantities. This will generate 10's of billions over the next 18months. And because the over-all vibes about Windows 11 are very positive(except for these limitations), this scenario is likely to play itself out to a significant degree. There you go.

Microsoft makes money from selling OEM copies of their OS anyway, what difference does this make ? And even if this was true this still doesn't explain the idiotic line they draw on the supported hardware, why not just say that you need the absolute newest hardware from the get go if that's your goal ?
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,856 (0.58/day)
Microsoft makes money from selling OEM copies of their OS anyway, what difference does this make ? And even if this was true this still doesn't explain the idiotic line they draw on the supported hardware, why not just say that you need the absolute newest hardware from the get go if that's your goal ?
What difference? Car makers sell cars no matter what, but the introduction of a facelift causes a huge surge of sales. This applies to literally any product on the market. The new shiny makes $$$$. MS screwed up on giving away 10 too easily.

The hardware is apparently determined by the execution mode (which, as other posters have noted, doesnt appear to cause any notable performance drop). If they went with only 10th gen and newer it would cause more uproar over why hardware currently sold (you can still buy 8th gen hardware brand new from dell/HP/ece) doesnt support 11.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Messages
395 (1.45/day)
For me, I am already using Edge as my default browser, so not much of an issue if I had to make a jump. But for me, there is little reason to make the jump. There are some new and useful features on W11, but not compelling for me to upgrade. In addition, I am more worried about MS messing up Windows updates as they always do. So while the UI has improved, it is mostly cosmetic changes.
Edge is a good browser but the point is they are making it hard(er) to use the browser you want, thats not ok.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
16,107 (5.30/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Software Android 4.4.4R5 Custom
Microsoft makes money from selling OEM copies of their OS anyway, what difference does this make ?
You're missing the point, while the PC market is generally on the up from the pandemic-effect, PC sales are still not where many want them to be. This push will motivate a great deal of new sales that otherwise would not happen.
And even if this was true this still doesn't explain the idiotic line they draw on the supported hardware
Agreed, it's idiotic.
why not just say that you need the absolute newest hardware from the get go if that's your goal ?
Because as unbelievable as it is to us tech-geek types, the general public is gullible enough to accept that new tech is required for new levels of security. WE know this is total nonsense. But the average user doesn't. However, if they were to claim that only the newest generation of hardware will work, that would set off everyone's bull-shit-o-meters.

Edge is a good browser
That's an opinion.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Messages
395 (1.45/day)
When i saw that i had a "but why?" moment.

I use the right click menu often for archiving and what not.
I can see this as being useful. It can be pretty easy to overload the context menu with a bunch of clutter that is sometimes used but not often so it would be kinda nice to have the ability to have a 2nd tier.

I find it odd that governments are not up in arms over this because technically the big restrains on system requirements, of otherwise perfectly fine components, that are fast enough to last another decade, will now be E-waste.

I am kinda the IT of my family, as Im sure we all are, my mother still uses my old PC which is a Q9550 based system, and guess what? its perfectly fine for what she does on the PC (browsing the news, some youtube vids, MS Teams, word processing) but she won't be able to hold on to that if we need to jump to windows 11.
And I cant even give her my current PC as that as well (2600k based) is too old to meet the requirements for windows 11.

So yeah sure we can stay on Windows 10 but to throw away perfectly fine hardware for the task....just because the new OS just says no....is rather crazy.
Governments and large corporations are pissed about it because as it stands now MS is forcing them to use MS encryption rather than their own, at least thats how I understand it. I imagine MS will have to walk this back too.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
16,107 (5.30/day)
Location
USA
System Name GPD-Q9
Processor Rockchip RK-3288 1.8ghz quad core
Motherboard GPD Q9_V6_150528
Cooling Passive
Memory 2GB DDR3
Video Card(s) Mali T764
Storage 16GB Samsung NAND
Display(s) IPS 1024x600
Software Android 4.4.4R5 Custom
Governments and large corporations are pissed about it because as it stands now MS is forcing them to use MS encryption rather than their own, at least thats how I understand it.
That is exactly correct. I have a government job and trust me, we're pissed as we do not and will not be using microsofts insecure security. You can bet money on the fact that governments and corps are going to tell microsoft to take a long walk off a short pier. It's already started.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Messages
395 (1.45/day)
No automatic updates for systems that don't meet their system requirements doesn't bother me as long as I can update manually. Then I can wait and see of the updates cause problems for others before updating!
Will you be able to install the updates manually on unsupported platforms? I already disable automatic updates on all my W10 machines and install them quarterly or whenever I'm doing other updates that need a system reboot so I think this options is fine for 'enthusiasts' if thats how its going to work.
 
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
291 (1.76/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard B550 Elite
Cooling Hyperx 212
Memory Hyperx fury 16Gb DDR4 3333Mhz
Video Card(s) 3060 ti gaming oc pro
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 1Tb plus some HDDs
Case Lian Li Lancool II performance
Power Supply MSI 750w
Mouse G502
This is such a shitty move, if people want to take the risk of not using TPM that's their problem, make a disclaimer and move on. Why force it on people.

The problem is they have a virtual monopoly and think they can get away with anything.
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
487 (0.14/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R5 3600
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) RX580 Armor w/ Accelero Mono
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply SS G-650
Total rubbish comment. I literally NEVER use automatic updates. Ever. Have never been a victim of ransomware. Ever. Please stop with the fearmongering.
"It never affected me, so it isn't real"

Bs, good security practices when using the Internet make it a nearly non-issue.
Yeah, but the problem is that the majority of users don't know of those practices or simply choose to ignore them. There is a reason why MS introduced the forced updates in the first place
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
1,221 (0.72/day)
Location
Tanagra
I find it odd that governments are not up in arms over this because technically the big restrains on system requirements, of otherwise perfectly fine components, that are fast enough to last another decade, will now be E-waste.

I am kinda the IT of my family, as Im sure we all are, my mother still uses my old PC which is a Q9550 based system, and guess what? its perfectly fine for what she does on the PC (browsing the news, some youtube vids, MS Teams, word processing) but she won't be able to hold on to that if we need to jump to windows 11.
And I cant even give her my current PC as that as well (2600k based) is too old to meet the requirements for windows 11.

So yeah sure we can stay on Windows 10 but to throw away perfectly fine hardware for the task....just because the new OS just says no....is rather crazy.
More and more old machines will just have to run Linux. Fortunately, Linux just keeps getting easier to install and use, and these days a good web browser is all most people in your example above really need. You can even run Teams in Linux, so that might be the easiest migration you can do for your mom. Install a LTS build, turn on updates and see how it goes. Probably way less likely to accidentally install a garbage app from a spam ad, too.
 
Joined
May 17, 2021
Messages
291 (1.76/day)
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard B550 Elite
Cooling Hyperx 212
Memory Hyperx fury 16Gb DDR4 3333Mhz
Video Card(s) 3060 ti gaming oc pro
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 1Tb plus some HDDs
Case Lian Li Lancool II performance
Power Supply MSI 750w
Mouse G502
Yeah, but the problem is that the majority of users don't know of those practices or simply choose to ignore them. There is a reason why MS introduced the forced updates in the first place

But the users should be the ones assuming the risk or not. And not be imposed by MS, that makes no sense.

And you speak like the TPM will make all PC's safe, that's absurd. People will still use shitty websites and apps, and there will always be other threats
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,856 (0.58/day)
This is such a shitty move, if people want to take the risk of not using TPM that's their problem, make a disclaimer and move on. Why force it on people.

The problem is they have a virtual monopoly and think they can get away with anything.
The concept of personal responsibility has by and large been replaced with group responsibility for an individual's problems. See not only computer security but everything else going on around us today. People have gotten used to being nannied. Those in charge think that they need to make the decisions for the plebs, and many plebs not only support the idea but outright demand they be told what to do by either government or corporations "for their own good" instead of taking charge of their own lives, as if those with power exist to support and benefit the average joe instead of it being the other way around, because making decisions and being responsible is HARD.

People are just plain terrified of using linux for the same reason.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2018
Messages
270 (0.20/day)
For Microsoft to say that users with unsupported hardware will be banned from receiving their bug filled, system breaking updates is among the best news I have heard in a long time. I just hope they finally mean that and leave us with with still fairly powerful computers the hell alone. I have an older Asus Rampage 5 extreme motherboard and the Intel core I7 5960X happily humming along at 5.00GHZ on Windows 10 pro Enterprise and and never any issues until Micro crap does its forcing bug filled updates on us and then almost every single time, it means spending the entire night reprogramming it. I have done the work around and tried running Windows 11 and it really is not much more than core Windows 10 files with a theme pack cramped on top of it, but now filled with even more bugs and even more forced updates. I would love to have Micro craps promise to ban me permanently in writing since they generally go back on their word. As far as their so called security and driver updates, Micro crap is living in a fantasy if it thinks there are not considerably better after market alternatives that actually work and not break hardware almost every time.

Yep. I'm running a 6950X and will continue to run Win10 as long as possible - if they want to make it so Windows Update doesn't annoy me, even better. I take my time in moving forward with both hardware and software, never in a hurry, just happy to wait for software to mature.

Quick side question on Win11 since I haven't followed it too deeply - is it forcing Bitlocker enabled or can we still opt out of drive encryption?
 
Top