• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Next-generation Intel Xeon Scalable Processors to Deliver Breakthrough Platform Performance with up to 56 Processor Cores

Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
887 (0.17/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name Cubed
Processor R7 1800X
Motherboard ASRock X370 Gaming Pro
Cooling Custom 3 radiator loop for CPU and GPUs, D5 pump
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB) Team 4000MHz @ 3200MHz
Video Card(s) 2 x Vega 64 with single slot full cover blocks
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 512GB NVMe
Display(s) BenQ BL3200
Case Corsair Carbide 540
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Corsair HX1200i
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99 or 2000 or one of those, at one point back in the day. :)
Re-read what he said, it sounded like he wants ALL of the vendors to have good products so we the consumer win, which is the sane way to look at it.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
99 (0.11/day)
Re-read what he said, it sounded like he wants ALL of the vendors to have good products so we the consumer win, which is the sane way to look at it.
Yes and that's how I interpreted it. In which case would it not have made sense stating that he's pulling for AMD to offer more competition to Nvidia, thus offering more competitive pricing and better innovation?
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
118 (0.33/day)
What do you mean by pulling for Nvidia? AMD is the inferior product line :confused:
I'm pulling for AMD and Intel in the CPU space and Nvidia, AMD and Intel in the GPU Space. Which should be the way everyone looks at it, but we all know that it isn't.

I would list the MB, RAM, SSD, PSU and case manufacturers, but for some reason people don't have allegiances in those markets (if they do, I havent seen it yet.)
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
364 (0.26/day)
System Name Baxter
Processor Intel i7-5775C @ 4.2 GHz 1.35 V
Motherboard ASRock Z97-E ITX/AC
Cooling Scythe Big Shuriken 3 with Noctua NF-A12 fan
Memory 16 GB 2400 MHz CL11 HyperX Savage DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black @ 1950 MHz
Storage 1 TB Sabrent Rocket 2242 NVMe SSD (boot), 500 GB Samsung 850 EVO, and 4TB Toshiba X300 7200 RPM HDD
Display(s) Vizio P65-F1 4KTV (4k60 with HDR or 1080p120)
Case Raijintek Ophion
Audio Device(s) HDMI PCM 5.1, Vizio 5.1 surround sound
Power Supply Corsair SF600 Platinum 600 W SFX PSU
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G613 and Microsoft Media Keyboard
AMD is after Intel's golden goose. Gotta love the drama. It wasn't long ago that Intel barely had to lift a finger in the server space, other than beating their old processors by 5%. I don't know if AMD has the institutional support to get their EPYC chips in mainstream server parts yet, but there is some toe-dipping happening. As long as AMD makes an unbeatable value proposition, either the enterprise space will have to start offering products, or Intel will start slashing prices to keep them happy. I hope it's the former.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
99 (0.11/day)
I'm pulling for AMD and Intel in the CPU space and Nvidia, AMD and Intel in the GPU Space. Which should be the way everyone looks at it, but we all know that it isn't.

I would list the MB, RAM, SSD, PSU and case manufacturers, but for some reason people don't have allegiances in those markets (if they do, I havent seen it yet.)
I don't pull for one brand over another. I look out with baited breath every time a high end AMD GPU is announced, only to be disappointed. I don't have an allegiance to one brand over another, I'm open to competition and think it's great for the consumer, but if one consistently outperforms the other then it's clear which is going to get the nod.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
6,000 (6.19/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio (waiting for RX 5950XT)
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
In this scenario cores are king.
not if the chip has some sort of case-specific hw accelerator like nvidia's tensor/rt cores.I think intel realized what nvidia did too
56 processor cores per socket and built-in AI training acceleration in a standard, socketed CPU
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,510 (2.00/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
I don't think anyone can deny that AMD has made huge progress with their recent designs. I guess my biggest point of contention is the notion that Intel is doomed. There is no doubt their backs are up against a corner, but they have been there before and we all know what the result was. I personally am pulling for both companies (Nvidia too), because customers win when there is strong competition.



Agreed that is impressive. Just want to point out that the price isn't really that big of deal when you compare it to total cost of ownership. Things like RAM, Software and Service dwarf the cost of the CPUs.

Please don't infer things I didn't say, I never said Intel was doomed. Don't fearmonger or use overblown thoughts on your own part to inject ideas into a conversation.
 
Low quality post by jaggerwild
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,738 (0.42/day)
Processor 5930K
Motherboard MSI X99 SLI
Cooling WATER
Memory 16GB DDR4 2132
Video Card(s) EVGAY 1080 nilla
Storage SEVERAL SSD"S
Display(s) Catleap/Yamakasi 2560X1440
Case D Frame MINI drilled out
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse DEATH ADDER
Keyboard Razer Black Widow Tournament
Software W10HB
Benchmark Scores PhIlLyChEeSeStEaK
Yeah I love overclocking with nothing lolz AMFAILS! AMD advertised Higher OVER CLOCKS where are they? LOLZ! PEople bought them cause they though it would over clock higher then realized AMD LIED no4.6Mhz as advertised. But thanks for bring down prices....................
ALL you get with AMD is a server chip, no overclocking room FULL of issue's. They gonna update it so it overclocks loolz!
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
745 (0.20/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
not if the chip has some sort of case-specific hw accelerator like nvidia's tensor/rt cores.I think intel realized what nvidia did too
Vnni is already out in cascade lake, it's helpful for inferencing more than training, gpus are still king.... Same with AVX 512, the drawbacks outweigh the gains.
Intel is just competing with themselves on fpgas with vnni... they are going for an accelerated ecosystem where you have to use all things intel. Intel vnni cpus,fpgas, Xe, onmipath, etc etc.... (though they just killed off 200gbit omnipath)

Intel's challenge to cuda is one api

Intel has a hard 2-3yrs ahead of it, but it should rebound, they do have Zen's architect on their payroll afterall... looking forward to buying their stock on discount down the road.
AMD has been maintaining a good cadence with these impressive releases...but they are going to burn out of roadmap after Zen 4/5... and then what?
Hoping they can remain competitive and not make another bulldozer, It's kinda crazy that Keller gets to compete with his own designs...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,539 (0.47/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X@95W
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Zalman CNPS5X PERFORMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G373C7K@3200MT-c16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, INTEL 540S SSDSCKKW180H6 180GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) LG IPS235
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Zalman Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 163p, multicore 1223p
The security problems of Intel CPUs along with the much great er efficiency and scalability and price advantage of Rome from AMD will turn the tables sooner than expected in the server market as well. Almost all the critical aspects for a server are in favor of AMD atm. My 5 cents.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
6,000 (6.19/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio (waiting for RX 5950XT)
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
The security problems of Intel CPUs along with the much great er efficiency and scalability and price advantage of Rome from AMD will turn the tables sooner than expected in the server market as well. Almost all the critical aspects for a server are in favor of AMD atm. My 5 cents.
you mean compared to current intel cpus or the next gen ?
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
228 (0.15/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
Not every bit of performance depends on core counts.
it does when you are comparing against possibly 2 64 core CPUs. That have 128 PCIe lanes each. Cough cough upcoming epyc. 112 vs 256 threads, which one would you take? Not to mention they don’t take a butt load of energy (400W vs 180W x2). Essentially that’s 7.14W vs 2.81W per core respectively. So um, intel’s chip sucks.
 
D

Deleted member 158293

Guest
It's kinda crazy that Keller gets to compete with his own designs...
Of all the skilled engineers in the world, yes it is very crazy that only Jim Keller could out engineer the design he was previously lead Engineer on.

Are there so few x86 engineers out there even with Intel flaunting their tens of thousands of engineers can't compete with him?

And can only imagine the NDA nightmares...
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
887 (0.17/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name Cubed
Processor R7 1800X
Motherboard ASRock X370 Gaming Pro
Cooling Custom 3 radiator loop for CPU and GPUs, D5 pump
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB) Team 4000MHz @ 3200MHz
Video Card(s) 2 x Vega 64 with single slot full cover blocks
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 512GB NVMe
Display(s) BenQ BL3200
Case Corsair Carbide 540
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Corsair HX1200i
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99 or 2000 or one of those, at one point back in the day. :)
JK may actually be working on AI (as he did at Tesla) and other things at Intel.

There were quite a few others (who are still at AMD) in the Zen team. A team builds things these days, generally not one person, although one person may have a lot of influence.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,952 (0.92/day)
Of all the skilled engineers in the world, yes it is very crazy that only Jim Keller could out engineer the design he was previously lead Engineer on.

Are there so few x86 engineers out there even with Intel flaunting their tens of thousands of engineers can't compete with him?
I seriously doubt that "rock stars" like Keller, Raja etc. are doing any actual engineering these days.
While managers with a technical background is generally much better suited to do good management decisions than non-technical managers, they are still probably limited to "high-level" architectural features, resource prioritization etc.
The people who do the hard work are the core team of engineers below them, but their ability to do their job is of course dependent on good management.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
118 (0.33/day)
Please don't infer things I didn't say, I never said Intel was doomed. Don't fearmonger or use overblown thoughts on your own part to inject ideas into a conversation.
If you thought I was talking about you in particular, I wasn't. It was a comment about an overall general tone on this forum. No need to get so excited.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,168 (1.88/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
it does when you are comparing against possibly 2 64 core CPUs. That have 128 PCIe lanes each. Cough cough upcoming epyc. 112 vs 256 threads, which one would you take? Not to mention they don’t take a butt load of energy (400W vs 180W x2). Essentially that’s 7.14W vs 2.81W per core respectively. So um, intel’s chip sucks.
You know, Rome is doing just fine without exaggerations.
- Power-wise the thread count comparison might be apt but leaving that aside for the moment even current Xeon 9200 do work with 2-socket resulting in 224 threads.
- According to the leaked list, 64-core Romes are 200W and 225W. Hopefully AMD is not doing the same thing as Ryzen 3000 series has on the desktop where default settings are +35% to that.
- 128 PCI-e lanes each means 128 PCI-e lanes total for dual-socket configuration or as servethehome speculates, perhaps 160 with generational improvements. Intel is not doing better - usual, up to 28 core, Xeons have 48 lanes per CPU (96 lanes for dual) and Xeon 9200 has 40 lanes per CPU (80 lanes for dual).

Architecture is not the problem. Power and 14nm is Intel's problem today. If they are stuck with this until they can figure out how 10nm works or if they have another approach, we'll see.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
745 (0.20/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
You know, Rome is doing just fine without exaggerations.
- Power-wise the thread count comparison might be apt but leaving that aside for the moment even current Xeon 9200 do work with 2-socket resulting in 224 threads.
- According to the leaked list, 64-core Romes are 200W and 225W. Hopefully AMD is not doing the same thing as Ryzen 3000 series has on the desktop where default settings are +35% to that.
- 128 PCI-e lanes each means 128 PCI-e lanes total for dual-socket configuration or as servethehome speculates, perhaps 160 with generational improvements. Intel is not doing better - usual, up to 28 core, Xeons have 48 lanes per CPU (96 lanes for dual) and Xeon 9200 has 40 lanes per CPU (80 lanes for dual).

Architecture is not the problem. Power and 14nm is Intel's problem today. If they are stuck with this until they can figure out how 10nm works or if they have another approach, we'll see.

Couple of notes:
Rome boards are designed with expectation of 250w/socket, either for milan or for turbo, reviews will tell.
128 lanes of PCIE 4 per cpu, or when configured in dual cpu mode half the lanes are coordinated as XGMI links which are x16 links but a more efficient protocol giving lower latency and higher bandwidth.

Server makers can opt to use 3 or 4 XGMI links giving an extra possible 32 lanes but that would sacrifice inter-socket bandwidth while increasing the needs for it. I think its a bad play as 128 pcie 4 lanes is a shitton of bandwidth...

Intel 9200 is BGA and boards and chips have to be bought from intel its a 200k sort of play without ram... and almost no one is buying first gen. It draws too much power, there is no differentiation to be had between vendors... it's just not a good thing. Intel has sort of listened and made a gen2 with cooperlake being socketed and upgradable to icelake.

Comparing 9200 and rome is not useful as it's not really in the market. Intel having 96 pcie 3.0 lanes vs 128-160 pcie 4.0 lanes is just an insane bandwidth difference. As far as server config is concerned I expect many single proc rome servers, and most dual proc to be configured with 3 xgmi links.

Intel will retail single threaded performance advantage in the server realm most likely, but will be dominated in anything that can use the insane amount of threads AMD is offering.

As far as what Keller is working on... he is VP of SOC and is working on die stacking and other vertical highly integrated density gains...
He claiming 50x density improvements over 10nm and it is "virtually working already"
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
587 (0.16/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Another empty Lake?
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,510 (2.00/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
If you thought I was talking about you in particular, I wasn't. It was a comment about an overall general tone on this forum. No need to get so excited.

No worries, I was just responding to your statement under where you quoted me.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,617 (1.73/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
I wonder how much glue Intel is using on this.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,827 (4.10/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
Not every bit of performance depends on core counts.
Well these exist and they clearly serve a purpose. So yes, here every bit of performance depends on core counts.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
228 (0.15/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1465 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
You know, Rome is doing just fine without exaggerations.
- Power-wise the thread count comparison might be apt but leaving that aside for the moment even current Xeon 9200 do work with 2-socket resulting in 224 threads.
- According to the leaked list, 64-core Romes are 200W and 225W. Hopefully AMD is not doing the same thing as Ryzen 3000 series has on the desktop where default settings are +35% to that.
- 128 PCI-e lanes each means 128 PCI-e lanes total for dual-socket configuration or as servethehome speculates, perhaps 160 with generational improvements. Intel is not doing better - usual, up to 28 core, Xeons have 48 lanes per CPU (96 lanes for dual) and Xeon 9200 has 40 lanes per CPU (80 lanes for dual).

Architecture is not the problem. Power and 14nm is Intel's problem today. If they are stuck with this until they can figure out how 10nm works or if they have another approach, we'll see.
No, it is 128 PER CPU. AMD confirms it on their website. You have a total of 256 with 2 Epyc CPUs. Though, finding a way to USE all 256, that’ll require lots of hardware (but I’m sure some server users will find a way to use that many). Plus for second gen, its 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes per cpu. That’s yummy. Also, intel’s 56 core cpu is soldered, meaning you have to buy the motherboard. Can’t swap the cpu in case something happens. Even intel is making custom cooling solutions for it, depending on the U size of the server chassis. Whereas Epyc can be used in much more places.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,168 (1.88/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
No, it is 128 PER CPU. AMD confirms it on their website. You have a total of 256 with 2 Epyc CPUs.
No, you don't. With the same configuration as Naples you get 128 lanes for 2 CPUs. This is the default configuration. With additional configuration allowed for system builders you can have 128-160 lanes for 2 CPUs.
 
Top