• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

NVIDIA Accuses Intel of Anti-Competitive Pricing for Atom Processor

Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,786 (0.61/day)
Likes
435
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
Processor i7 4770K Haswell, watercooled
Motherboard Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, 3× D12SL-12, liquid metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) between GPUs
Storage Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech PM MX / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech diNovo Edge / Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006
Software W10 x64
Benchmark Scores yes
#26
lol is this anti-competitive? sure. breaking any laws? certainly not.
Durrr...
Anti-competive actions like "dumping", "entry barring", "price limiting" and "coercive monopoly" are illegal as they breach anti-trust laws.

Atom+chipset rebate vs. Ion has features from all those.

it's called surviving tough economy 101.
I think you, and many more in this thread need to attend "Economy 101".
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Messages
608 (0.16/day)
Likes
66
Location
São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Processor Q6600 @3.6
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
Cooling Xigmatek S1283
Memory 8gb Crucial Red Tracer
Video Card(s) ASUS TOP HD 4850 512
Storage Seagate 160GB 7200.11 / 320GB 7200.10 / 500GB 7200.11 / 1TB 7200.12
Display(s) 17" AOC
Audio Device(s) ESI Julia -> Zero DaC -> Senn HD650
Power Supply 550W Seven team
#27
Many of you guys just doesn't have a clue about market rules (laws).
Intel made Atom (yes)
Intel made 945 (yes)
Intel can sell Atom for whatever price they want (yes)
Intel can sell 945 for whatever price they want (yes)

Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it lower than (Atom + 945) costs (No)
Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it lower than (Atom) costs (No)
Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it for a little more than (Atom - $45.05 for example) costs (Yes, I guess), as it's just giving it chipset for free. But offering a rebate just to people buy their chipset rather than ION (or any other developed), is something really wrong and must be against any market law, because once again (as with AMD), a free market is (must be at least, even in face of intels economic force), ruled by costumers, therefore competition.
Something similar to this is: Your energy company just can't sell you energy for whatever price it want, just because it's the only provider of the service.

As for the guys that think: Why don't nvidia just buy the bundle pack to take ATOM out ? Well, easy answer... Production cost, and many other problems that will come with it.... maybe it would be even higher than buying ATOM for $45.00 . And also because it isn't just right for Intel to do that.
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
1,062 (0.31/day)
Likes
68
System Name REBEL R1
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard ASUS P6T
Cooling Stock
Memory 6GB OCZ GOLD TC LV Kit 1866MHz@1.65V 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) Two Sapphire HD 5770 Vapor-X Xfire'd and OC'd (920/1330)
Storage Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 PCI Sound Card
Power Supply OCZ StealthXStream 500W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Benchmark Scores 16585 Performance Score on 3DMark Vantage
#28
Nvidia should continue shooting off the limbs of Intel, this anti-competition thing is definitely getting noticed.
 

iStink

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
648 (0.19/day)
Likes
49
System Name The beast
Processor E6600@ 3.4
Motherboard P5W DH Deluxe
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory 3GB G.Sill DDR2-800
Video Card(s) 8800GT @ 700/975
Storage (1)80GB With XP, (1) 320GB storage
Display(s) 205BW & 710N
Case XClio Windtunnel (I love it)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Platinum
Power Supply OCZ gamerXStream 700W
#29
Many of you guys just doesn't have a clue about market rules (laws).
Intel made Atom (yes)
Intel made 945 (yes)
Intel can sell Atom for whatever price they want (yes)
Intel can sell 945 for whatever price they want (yes)

Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it lower than (Atom + 945) costs (No)
Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it lower than (Atom) costs (No)
Intel can put 945 + Atom and sell it for a little more than (Atom - $45.05 for example) costs (Yes, I guess), as it's just giving it chipset for free. But offering a rebate just to people buy their chipset rather than ION (or any other developed), is something really wrong and must be against any market law, because once again (as with AMD), a free market is (must be at least, even in face of intels economic force), ruled by costumers, therefore competition.
Something similar to this is: Your energy company just can't sell you energy for whatever price it want, just because it's the only provider of the service.

As for the guys that think: Why don't nvidia just buy the bundle pack to take ATOM out ? Well, easy answer... Production cost, and many other problems that will come with it.... maybe it would be even higher than buying ATOM for $45.00 . And also because it isn't just right for Intel to do that.
Its a good thing none of you people tried to be lawyers. The outcome of a lot of cases would infuriate you because "it's something really wrong."

If intel wanted to throw atom processors from the sky, attached to little miniature parachutes and notes that say "Free Atom processor!" guess what, THEY CAN. I mean, maybe not to that extend as that would be littering, but you get my point. They put the money into the product, they can price it however they want.

It's wrong, but people, we don't live in a world filled with soft kittens, rainbows, and hugs. Just because you think something is wrong doesn't mean it's illegal. Case in point: Abortion.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
1,675 (0.36/day)
Likes
149
Location
Minneapolis, Mn
System Name Livingston
Processor i7-4960HQ
Motherboard macbook prp retina
Cooling Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta (240mm x 120mm x 80mm)
Memory 16Gb
Video Card(s) Zotac Arctic Storm Nvidia 980ti
Display(s) 1x Acer XB270HU, 1x Catleap, 1x Oculus
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/770087
#30
It's wrong, but people, we don't live in a world filled with soft kittens, rainbows, and hugs. Just because you think something is wrong doesn't mean it's illegal. Case in point: Abortion.
Nvidia is being hurt by intel, all they can do about it is bring it to the public's attention, as things stand now your right, they cant get anything out of intel. But they can try, stranger rulings have happened.
 
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,786 (0.61/day)
Likes
435
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
Processor i7 4770K Haswell, watercooled
Motherboard Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, 3× D12SL-12, liquid metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) between GPUs
Storage Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech PM MX / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech diNovo Edge / Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006
Software W10 x64
Benchmark Scores yes
#31
i see a Stink-ing trollercoaster!
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,274 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,361
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#32
If ASUS wants to make an Atom motherboard, all it has to pay Intel is $25, in return for processor and chipset (higher margins). Now if it wants NVIDIA Ion, it will either have to pay $25 (for Intel processor + chipset) and an additional amount for NVIDIA's Ion chipset, or take the more expensive route of $45 + Ion's price. In each case, Intel is making Ion seem a bad expenditure.
To me, that means the processor is $25, and you get a free Intel Chipset with it. You can choose to use the chipset, or put out the extra money for something better...

Though, I have to agree that it Intel shouldn't be charging more for the processor alone than it does for the processor and chipset.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
731 (0.22/day)
Likes
102
Processor Intel Core i5-3470 3.2 GHz Quad-core Ivy Bridge
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-M Z77
Cooling ID-COOLING IS-50 TDP 130W
Memory Kingston HyperX Genesis 2x4 GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz 9-11-9-27-1T
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 1070 AMP Edition (ZT-P10700C-10P)
Storage WD SiliconEdge Blue 64 GB SSD, Kingston SSDNow! 240 GB SSD, WD RE4 1 TB HDD
Display(s) LN-T4065F FullHD LCD TV
Power Supply Raidmax RX-1000AE 1000W 80 Plus Gold
Mouse Logitech G402 Hyperion Fury FPS Gaming Mouse (Defective MOUSE3)
Keyboard Logitech K120
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#33
Though, I have to agree that it Intel shouldn't be charging more for the processor alone than it does for the processor and chipset.
I agree as well, but again, it's not illegal for them to do that.

What would be retarded is if they require you to actually use the 945 chipset with the Atom if you buy the bundle.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Messages
608 (0.16/day)
Likes
66
Location
São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Processor Q6600 @3.6
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
Cooling Xigmatek S1283
Memory 8gb Crucial Red Tracer
Video Card(s) ASUS TOP HD 4850 512
Storage Seagate 160GB 7200.11 / 320GB 7200.10 / 500GB 7200.11 / 1TB 7200.12
Display(s) 17" AOC
Audio Device(s) ESI Julia -> Zero DaC -> Senn HD650
Power Supply 550W Seven team
#34
Its a good thing none of you people tried to be lawyers. The outcome of a lot of cases would infuriate you because "it's something really wrong."

If intel wanted to throw atom processors from the sky, attached to little miniature parachutes and notes that say "Free Atom processor!" guess what, THEY CAN. I mean, maybe not to that extend as that would be littering, but you get my point. They put the money into the product, they can price it however they want.

It's wrong, but people, we don't live in a world filled with soft kittens, rainbows, and hugs. Just because you think something is wrong doesn't mean it's illegal. Case in point: Abortion.
Never mind my post, you just couldn't understand it (or didn't want to).
You took this quote:
And also because it isn't just right for Intel to do that.
and trashed everything else I said.

If intel wants to "burns" atom supply, they can, as long as it won't affect any other company (which obviously it's not the case, here), nvidia spent "some" money into making ION, as a bunch of "guys" did designing atom based solutions.

And why it can't affect other companies ? By doing that Intel would probably make some competition to "close doors", after that it would bring everything back again, higher price for the lack of competition.
Then just imagine ION was a big thing for Nvidia......... nvidia goes out of business, so long for Geforce and Hello expensive Larrabee.

It's like a GAS station selling much cheaper gasoline (at cost price or lower), side by side with another gas station.... as the guy of the cheaper gas station had more money he could support more time taking loss than the other guy (which eventually goes out of business), the one that survived will now rise prices even more because it's the only gas station of the neighborhood.

It happened on my block. It had 3 gas stations, one new (from a big supermarket), came with lower prices, closed all 3 other gas stations then raised prices.


Easy thing to do, isn't it ? So easy and so common that a bunch of laws exists to make sure a fair competition is held on the market. Intel just got fined by EU, don't you remember ?

Before you talk about rainbows or whatever, take a look at the far sight of this type of thing.
And yet if you couldn't understand, sorry, I just don't have the necessary brain to talk about this matter more simple than that.

PS: I'm no Trade Commission, neither lawyer, judge or international trade specialist, I just can't know If I'm 100% right, but at least I try to defend my point of view with solid (maybe hypothetically sometimes) arguments.
 
Last edited:

HolyCow02

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,638 (0.47/day)
Likes
109
Location
New York
System Name Shredder
Processor Phenom II 955 @stock (for the time being)
Motherboard MSI 790FX-GD70
Cooling Noctua U12P
Memory 8 GB muskin DDR3 1600 @ 7-7-6-18
Video Card(s) 2x Sapphire 4870 1GB
Storage 64 GB Super Talent UltraDrive SSD | 2 x WD Caviar Black 500GB in RAID1
Display(s) Samsung 22" 2ms GTG
Case Thermaltake Spedo Advanced Package
Power Supply Corsair HX1000
Software Vista Business 64-bit
#35
More people jumping on the 'F Intel' bandwagon. I like it! :D
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,481 (0.63/day)
Likes
340
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
#36
I agree as well, but again, it's not illegal for them to do that.

What would be retarded is if they require you to actually use the 945 chipset with the Atom if you buy the bundle.
I'm quite certain it's illegal. Why? Because the government in charge has chosen to say it's illegal.

That's what makes something "illegal." If you're going to talk about whether it's "moral" or "ethical," that's a completely different argument, but the "legality" of what Intel's doing is hardly in question.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,398 (5.83/day)
Likes
8,921
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name The Mailbox 4.5
Processor Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling Scythe Katana 4
Memory G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD, 500Gb WD (7200) 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080
Case Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) and a Wacom Intuos 4 tablet.
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#37
TheMailMan78 Accuses Intel of cock-blocking him during high school. Seeks billions in retribution. News at 11pm.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
976 (0.27/day)
Likes
82
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700 @ 3.825ghz 1.36v
Motherboard ASRock x370 Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-C14s
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 16gb 3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1080 ti
Display(s) LG 4k IPS
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 + more fans
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply EVGA P2 750w
Mouse G900
Keyboard G810
Software Windows 10 Pro
#38
Come on everyone! Step right up and get on the bandwagon!
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
1,675 (0.36/day)
Likes
149
Location
Minneapolis, Mn
System Name Livingston
Processor i7-4960HQ
Motherboard macbook prp retina
Cooling Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta (240mm x 120mm x 80mm)
Memory 16Gb
Video Card(s) Zotac Arctic Storm Nvidia 980ti
Display(s) 1x Acer XB270HU, 1x Catleap, 1x Oculus
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/770087
#39
It seems there are 2 bandwagons in this thread from the redundancy of the 2nd bandwagon.
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
1,062 (0.31/day)
Likes
68
System Name REBEL R1
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard ASUS P6T
Cooling Stock
Memory 6GB OCZ GOLD TC LV Kit 1866MHz@1.65V 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) Two Sapphire HD 5770 Vapor-X Xfire'd and OC'd (920/1330)
Storage Seagate 7200.11 500GB 32MB
Case Antec Three Hundred
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 PCI Sound Card
Power Supply OCZ StealthXStream 500W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Benchmark Scores 16585 Performance Score on 3DMark Vantage
#40
Nvidia is seriously the good guy, Intel has been cheating away (despite that I like their processors :D), and AMD has declared war in Intel too. If this continues with Intel getting caught in a crossfire, AMD and Nvidia may simply just naw away Intel's market share.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,481 (0.63/day)
Likes
340
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
#41
TheMailMan78 Accuses Intel of cock-blocking him during high school. Seeks billions in retribution. News at 11pm.
Once again, don't blame the government if you're held back a few grades in high school and suddenly find yourself older than 18 and thus unable to legally date most girls.

On second thought, yes you can blame the government for that. :laugh:
 

iStink

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
648 (0.19/day)
Likes
49
System Name The beast
Processor E6600@ 3.4
Motherboard P5W DH Deluxe
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory 3GB G.Sill DDR2-800
Video Card(s) 8800GT @ 700/975
Storage (1)80GB With XP, (1) 320GB storage
Display(s) 205BW & 710N
Case XClio Windtunnel (I love it)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Platinum
Power Supply OCZ gamerXStream 700W
#42
i see a Stink-ing trollercoaster!
Yeah, I have an opinion different than yours, I must be trolling.
Never mind my post, you just couldn't understand it (or didn't want to).
You took this quote:

and trashed everything else I said.

If intel wants to "burns" atom supply, they can, as long as it won't affect any other company (which obviously it's not the case, here), nvidia spent "some" money into making ION, as a bunch of "guys" did designing atom based solutions.

And why it can't affect other companies ? By doing that Intel would probably make some competition to "close doors", after that it would bring everything back again, higher price for the lack of competition.
Then just imagine ION was a big thing for Nvidia......... nvidia goes out of business, so long for Geforce and Hello expensive Larrabee.

It's like a GAS station selling much cheaper gasoline (at cost price or lower), side by side with another gas station.... as the guy of the cheaper gas station had more money he could support more time taking loss than the other guy (which eventually goes out of business), the one that survived will now rise prices even more because it's the only gas station of the neighborhood.

It happened on my block. It had 3 gas stations, one new (from a big supermarket), came with lower prices, closed all 3 other gas stations then raised prices.


Easy thing to do, isn't it ? So easy and so common that a bunch of laws exists to make sure a fair competition is held on the market. Intel just got fined by EU, don't you remember ?

Before you talk about rainbows or whatever, take a look at the far sight of this type of thing.
And yet if you couldn't understand, sorry, I just don't have the necessary brain to talk about this matter more simple than that.

PS: I'm no Trade Commission, neither lawyer, judge or international trade specialist, I just can't know If I'm 100% right, but at least I try to defend my point of view with solid (maybe hypothetically sometimes) arguments.
Wow, nothing more irritating than when someone sees you disagree with them, then they write you off as a moron.

Your gas station story was heart breaking, it really was. Let me tell you about another gloomy rainy day story with a bad ending. There once was this company, lets call them Bal-Mart! And this company, they saw a way to be highly competitive. They would use extensive foreign product sourcing and low employee benefits to drive the pricing on products in their store so low that poor ol mom and pop stores simply couldn't afford to compete. Mom and pop stores all over started closing as more and more people flocked to the big bad Bal-Mart. In the end, nothing was done about Bal-Mart, because what they were doing was completely legal. People wanted to buy jeans for 6 bucks, and 5 gallon buckets of mayonnaise for a few dollars more. They wanted to save money, go figure. In he end, Bal-Mart and consumers with a Bal-Mart in their town lived happily ever after while local competing stores were forced to compete or close.

Some stores in my town are still open because they have learned to compete. I don't like that wal mart has transformed small town this way, but I understand what they did and see why it was ok from a business perspective.

Intel is playing the business game, and in any game, there's winners and losers.

Nobody is saying that what they are doing is right. I think they should offer the two things with vise versa pricing. What I'm saying is, what I think doesn't matter. What you think doesn't matter. That's the world we live in. Sorry.

Now, given a choice, I will gladly pay an extra 20 bucks than I had to for the ion + atom setup. AND, if you noticed my post above, this sort of thing might not last forever because who is Intel going to turn to when AMD has a competitive product of their own (being that they own ati now.) atom + ion is inevitable to compete with whatever amd has up their sleeve (God I hope they have something cool.)

I'm quite certain it's illegal. Why? Because the government in charge has chosen to say it's illegal.

That's what makes something "illegal." If you're going to talk about whether it's "moral" or "ethical," that's a completely different argument, but the "legality" of what Intel's doing is hardly in question.
I don't know though. If it were illegal nvidia would take them to court. If you had proof that someone hit your car, why wouldn't you do anything about it? You think nvidia is ran by a bunch of pushovers?

Please can someone do some research and tell us if this is illegal!? LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,100 (1.18/day)
Likes
1,255
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 4790K 4.4GHZ turbo currently at 4.6GHZ at 1.16v
Motherboard MSI Z97-G55 SLI
Cooling Scythe Mugen 2 rev B (SCMG-2100), stock on gpu's.
Memory 8GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series DDR3 2400MHZ 10-12-12-31
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 760 Superclocked replaced HIS R9 290 that was artifacting
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, 4x ST31000524NS in Raid 10 Storage and Backup, external 2tb backup,
Display(s) BenQ GW2255 surprisingly good screen for the price.
Case Raidmax Scorpio 668
Audio Device(s) onboard HD
Power Supply EVGA 750 GQ
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
#43
I think largon, and many more in this thread need to attend "Economics 101". University of Phoenix has an online course largon and many other youngsters would greatly benefit from it.
fixed.

anti competitive laws were not broken here. pricing is set by the company that sells the product and bundles have always been a part of business.

obviously you've never run your own business, worked in marketing, sales, construction, in fact perhaps you've never worked at all.

at any rate. any time a company puts in a bid for job they do this. it's their product/labor and they are allowed to set the price.

Company A buys wire from company B, both bid on the same job.

Company A gives a bid of 1200$ wire + labor
plus 1800$ for fixtures (so 3000$) total.

Company B gives a bid of 1200$ wire + labor if you buy that alone. however if you also buy the fixtures from Company B the total bid is 1800$

Company A has 2 choices, refine their business to stay competitive with company B (may not be possible) or find a new supplier (happens most often)


I've also seen this with roofing manufacturers who also have spin off installers, housing companies, pool installers, computer retailers, and on and on and on.

its real life. I know you all think that capitalism is the bane of the world but it's how America operates. and while we have entered many socialist programs into our system, it doesn't change the base economy or how it operates.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Messages
608 (0.16/day)
Likes
66
Location
São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Processor Q6600 @3.6
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
Cooling Xigmatek S1283
Memory 8gb Crucial Red Tracer
Video Card(s) ASUS TOP HD 4850 512
Storage Seagate 160GB 7200.11 / 320GB 7200.10 / 500GB 7200.11 / 1TB 7200.12
Display(s) 17" AOC
Audio Device(s) ESI Julia -> Zero DaC -> Senn HD650
Power Supply 550W Seven team
#44
Stink-ing, man I'm done quoting LoL, we just write too much. :toast:
Anyway, I don't believe "it's the world were are living". It sure happens but it's bad commercial practice. Nothing wrong about x-Mart being a more efficient company than small old ones (big and better, I don't see any problem in that, I'm not a socialist thinking guy), the problem is not this here.

Intel know what it's doing, they're not naive, they are doing that to hold most share of the ATOM market, by reducing other non intel platform cost benefit. Intel doesn't plan to soon lunch a good chipset like ION to ATOM, just check the next one to come from it G40 ( is this right ??), same old shit 945.


I just tried to defend my opinion:
The problem is intel selling something to Nvidia for $45 where it clearly could sell for under $25.00 (as it does with 945 combo), and still profit. Doing that is not being efficient at business, but doing bad commercial practices which sometimes are punished if some jury decide it's so.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2007
Messages
608 (0.16/day)
Likes
66
Location
São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Processor Q6600 @3.6
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P
Cooling Xigmatek S1283
Memory 8gb Crucial Red Tracer
Video Card(s) ASUS TOP HD 4850 512
Storage Seagate 160GB 7200.11 / 320GB 7200.10 / 500GB 7200.11 / 1TB 7200.12
Display(s) 17" AOC
Audio Device(s) ESI Julia -> Zero DaC -> Senn HD650
Power Supply 550W Seven team
#45
fixed.

anti competitive laws ............... I know you all think that capitalism is the bane of the world but it's how America operates. and while we have entered many socialist programs into our system, it doesn't change the base economy or how it operates.
The problem with this is that intel is the only atom supplier. Or there's somebody else making atom ?

and don't talk about via nano because ION is months ahead of it and was not made for it.
I also don't expect for it to change when AMD join this market, they also want to hold their own platform, so they won't "be nice" with nvidia as well... :laugh:
At least we will have something much better than 945 and probably ION. I also would like to see VIA on this......
Although as far as I understand it's not right (legal), I don't see Nvidia getting cheap prices to joining this club without a cpu of it own.
It's a fight that it won't take to courts for sure.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
6,560 (1.73/day)
Likes
835
System Name Vintage
Processor i7 - 3770K @ Stock
Cooling Scythe Zipang II
Memory 2x4GB Crucial DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970
Storage M4 124GB SSD// WD Black 640GB// WD Black 1TB//Samsung F3 1.5TB
Display(s) Samsung SM223BW 21.6"
Case Generic
Power Supply Corsair HX 520W
Software Windows 7
#46
Whilst i agree with the ruling on the Intels anti-competitive suit in the EU recently i disagree with this.

This is just under cutting the market, this is good business sense. They are not forcing people to purchase thier and only their products, just offering a "two4one" deal. I hope intel wins this one.
 

iStink

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
648 (0.19/day)
Likes
49
System Name The beast
Processor E6600@ 3.4
Motherboard P5W DH Deluxe
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory 3GB G.Sill DDR2-800
Video Card(s) 8800GT @ 700/975
Storage (1)80GB With XP, (1) 320GB storage
Display(s) 205BW & 710N
Case XClio Windtunnel (I love it)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Platinum
Power Supply OCZ gamerXStream 700W
#47
Whilst i agree with the ruling on the Intels anti-competitive suit in the EU recently i disagree with this.

This is just under cutting the market, this is good business sense. They are not forcing people to purchase thier and only their products, just offering a "two4one" deal. I hope intel wins this one.
actually it's a two for one, one for two deal :laugh:
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
1,675 (0.36/day)
Likes
149
Location
Minneapolis, Mn
System Name Livingston
Processor i7-4960HQ
Motherboard macbook prp retina
Cooling Alphacool NexXxoS Monsta (240mm x 120mm x 80mm)
Memory 16Gb
Video Card(s) Zotac Arctic Storm Nvidia 980ti
Display(s) 1x Acer XB270HU, 1x Catleap, 1x Oculus
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/770087
#48
If the bundle is not purchased it should still be $25, at the most you should get the chipset free. When you raise the cost for the developer if they want to use another product (the ION chipset) it is borderline unethical. But, keep in mind even though Intel is getting the market share because of this they are most likely losing money, they are subsidizing there own product. The lost funds may be all the 'punishment' they will get for their decision. also keep in mind I never said business was ethical.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,320 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,423
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#49
Please refrain from personal insults.
 

iStink

New Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
648 (0.19/day)
Likes
49
System Name The beast
Processor E6600@ 3.4
Motherboard P5W DH Deluxe
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory 3GB G.Sill DDR2-800
Video Card(s) 8800GT @ 700/975
Storage (1)80GB With XP, (1) 320GB storage
Display(s) 205BW & 710N
Case XClio Windtunnel (I love it)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Platinum
Power Supply OCZ gamerXStream 700W
#50
If the bundle is not purchased it should still be $25, at the most you should get the chipset free. When you raise the cost for the developer if they want to use another product (the ION chipset) it is borderline unethical. But, keep in mind even though Intel is getting the market share because of this they are most likely losing money, they are subsidizing there own product. The lost funds may be all the 'punishment' they will get for their decision. also keep in mind I never said business was ethical.
Yeah this kind of thing could come back and bite them in the butt in the future. Imagine what would happen if nvidia got so fed up with this, they invested a ton of money making their own cpu, and it ran just as good if not better than the atom processor? All it would take is for Microsoft to piss them off and have them run to android for two of the biggest giants to be pushed out of the market lol. I gotta get my head out of the clouds.