• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Back to Dirty Tricks with GTX 900M Series Overclocking

Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
86 (0.04/day)
upload_2015-5-22_4-4-2.png


ahahahahaha,
so much fail in one comment.
Until next time fellows.... roflmao
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,985 (1.03/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.92/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Beyond that this really doesn't affect me at all so. /shrug
Me either and I have Nvidia dGPU laptops. I have/will overclock just about every piece of hardware I've ever owned, but I will only do so with components I've completely checked out personally. I don't overclock any all-in-one design assembled by low-wage semi-skilled labour at the behest of an OEM that often built its fortune on turning a blind eye to supporting its own products as soon as they were out the door.
For those who do overclock then it sucks royally, but I'm pretty sure those people number a fraction of a percentage point of the total customer base. If I were someone that overclocked gaming laptops I'd probably gravitate to the premiere ODMs, and thus look to pressure them to bring the change - after all, some of these companies need every opportunity to differentiate themselves from the HP's and Dell's of this market.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
40 (0.02/day)
I would rather prefer undervolting methodes than overclocking. Anyway it is not nice from Nvidia closing users freedom.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,407 (2.03/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
After some jokes about burning things down, it occurred to me its actually a valid point. I work in the public service sector and the facility I work within is required by law to be safe for its users.
If a laptop is over clocked it generally has poorer heat management than a desktop. If there is a recorded and known risk of devices heating up to the point of combustion, or even non ignition burning, it is required by the manufacturer to mitigate that risk.
In a desktop, you might fry a card but it is not known to cause combustion. In a confined compartment space like a laptop, that risk is known.
The comment made about "checks lawyer to see if I can sue" is relevant in this respect. If I know I provide a product which when over clocked or over volted may cause harm to persons, I am vulnerable to legal action. Saying that overclocking is 'not allowed' doesn't remove the risk.
I am not defending Nvidia. It would be easier to say to the consumer that certain devices aren't designed for over clocking.
As for myself, it would never ocurr to me to overclock a laptop for performance increase and I run a custom water loop with over clocked CPU and twin gpu's with flashed BIOS'.
You want a fast gaming laptop? Then splash out some serious cash and be happy. Leave the over clocking to desktops.
One last point. I put everything under water to overclock. Even if I was on air I'd buy a substantial air cooler. You don't get that inside a laptop. Nvidia are covering their asses and then looking like tools (sorry, are being tools) by not being honest about it (no surprise there).
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
12,088 (2.69/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Intel i9 9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3200 @ 13-13-13-33-2T
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW2
Storage Mushkin Pilot-E 2TB NVMe SSD w/ EKWB M.2 Heatsink
Display(s) LG 32GK850G-B 1440p 32" AMVA Panel G-Sync 144hz Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) Onboard TOSLINK to Schiit Modi MB to Schiit Asgard 2 Amp to AKG K7XX Ruby Red Massdrop Headphones
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova T2 850W 80Plus Titanium
Mouse ROCCAT Kone EMP
Keyboard WASD CODE 104-Key w/ Cherry MX Green Keyswitches, Doubleshot Vortex PBT White Transluscent Keycaps
Software Windows 10 x64 Enterprise... yes, it's legit.
Back to dirty tricks? Pretty sure they never left from doing dirty tricks.
Careful, remember if you call nvidia out too much, you'll lose all that money they pay you for FUD and drivel!

(If you are uncertain as to what I mean, check the catalyst editorial thread. Some fun accusations there...)
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.92/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Careful, remember if you call nvidia out too much, you'll lose all that money they pay you for FUD and drivel!
But conspiracy theories and a well maintained persecution complex are so much more entertaining than common sense. Besides, I think some communities must use a loyalty points system to get discounts on subscriptions. Three inclusions of the word "kickbacks" probably gets you a certificate...maybe even a ribbon!
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
473 (0.24/day)
System Name Diablo | Baal | Mephisto | Andariel
Processor i5-3570K@4.4GHz | 2x Xeon X5675 | i7-4710MQ | i7-2640M
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth Z77 | HP DL380 G6 | Dell Precision M4800 | Lenovo Thinkpad X220 Tablet
Cooling Swiftech H220-X | Chassis cooled (6 fans + HS) | dual-fanned heatpipes | small-fanned heatpipe
Memory 32GiB DDR3-1600 CL9 | 96GiB DDR3-1333 ECC RDIMM | 32GiB DDR3L-1866 CL11 | 8GiB DDR3L-1600 CL11
Video Card(s) Dual GTX 670 in SLI | Embedded ATi ES1000 | Quadro K2100M | Intel HD 3000
Storage many, many SSDs and HDDs....
Display(s) 1 Dell U3011 + 2x Dell U2410 | HP iLO2 KVMoIP | 3200x1800 Sharp IGZO | 1366x768 IPS with Wacom pen
Case Corsair Obsidian 550D | HP DL380 G6 Chassis | Dell Precision M4800 | Lenovo Thinkpad X220 Tablet
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi HomeTheater HD | None | On-board | On-board
Power Supply Corsair AX850 | Dual 750W Redundant PSU (Delta) | Dell 330W+240W (Flextronics) | Lenovo 65W (Delta)
Mouse Logitech G502, Logitech G700s, Logitech G500, Dell optical mouse (emergency backup)
Keyboard 1985 IBM Model F 122-key, Ducky YOTT MX Black, Dell AT101W, 1994 IBM Model M, various integrated
Software FAAAR too much to list
Nvidia are covering their asses and then looking like tools (sorry, are being tools) by not being honest about it (no surprise there).
What would you say they could do? the backlash over them disabling overclocking when they very deliberately stated that it was done for safety reasons to fix a bug (a bug, not a feature!) got so much backlash that they re-enabled it. No matter what they say, people will still spread the FUD (see GTX 970 memory configuration as an example of insane circlejerk FUD-spreading) and be whiny arseholes about it.
 
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
374 (0.12/day)
Location
Netherlands
Processor Core i5 4690K @ 3.5 GHz \\ C2Q Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 SLI \\ Asus P5K Deluxe
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 Performer \\ Xigmatek Dark Knight
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport 2x 4GB \\ Corsair XMS2 2x 2 GB
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX 970 G1 Gaming v1.1 (Hynix) \\ Sapphire HD 6850
Storage Kingston SV200, 3 TB Seagate 7200.14 \\ 2x 320 GB WD Blue
Display(s) LG 24MP56HQ
Case Corsair Carbide 200R Windowed \\ CM 690
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 \\ Audigy 2 ZS
Power Supply Adata HM850 \\ Corsair HX520
Mouse Logitech G602, SteelSeries Sensei Raw Frostblue, Corsair M65
Keyboard Logitech Media Keyboard Elite
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 \\ Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I guess Nvidia may ask premium for overclock-able (mobile) GPUs in the near future (kinda equivalent to Intel Core i5/7 K series processors)...
 
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
538 (0.13/day)
System Name HTPC whhaaaat?
Processor 2600k @ 4500mhz
Motherboard Asus Maximus IV gene-z gen3
Cooling Noctua NH-C14
Memory Gskill Ripjaw 2x4gb
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 FTW @ 2037/11016
Storage 2x512GB MX100/1x Agility 3 128gb ssds, Seagate 3TB HDD
Display(s) Vizio P 65'' 4k tv
Case Lian Li pc-c50b
Audio Device(s) Denon 3311
Power Supply Corsair 620HX
I guess Nvidia may ask premium for overclock-able (mobile) GPUs in the near future (kinda equivalent to Intel Core i5/7 K series processors)...
More likely scenario imho: nvidia will release higher-clocked and/or reconfigured parts that are higher performance than current mobile parts, but within range of their overclocking ability. They cleary don't like when that happens. On the surface the rationalization (QA) seems fair enough, until you realize it's an excuse, and the reason why Greenlight came into existence is so that no company made a '770' out of a '680'. They really would like to sell you the same part again, if they can.

This has been my personal theory since the last go-round on this topic.

I think a plausible scenario is that at some point nvidia realized 16nm wasn't going to make the mobile refresh cycle, said something collectively to the effect 'oh shit', and then did everything possible to make sure those 'new' gpus will look like some kind of masterful efficiency/performance boost.

I'm not saying they ever intended overclocking to available in the first place, but with how badly they've handled the situation and clearly have gone out of their way to prevent people from doing it even in spite of tremendous outcry for 'removing a feature', there has to be a motive...

....and with nvidia, the Occam's razor usually points to it involving green.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,626 (5.19/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 9900K@5.0GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I think nVidia out themselves between a rock and a hard place. They have given the option to allow overclocking to the manufacturer of the card. The manufacturer decided if they want to set the lock bit in the BIOS or not. However, nVidia's driver team then screwed up and allowed overclocking on all cards. When they found the bug, they fixed it. But it pissed off users. So they went back to allowing all cards to be overclocked. But now the manufacturers are probably bitching because they don't want to allow overclocking, that is why they set the lock bit in the BIOS. After all, the laptop manufacturers are the ones that have to deal with RMAs if anything goes wrong, not nVidia. And I believe nVidia has more legal requirements to the manufacturers(nVidia's direct customer) than they do to the end user(nVdia's indirect customer).
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
5 (0.00/day)
lmao.. dirty tricks? Its THEIR card. you screw it up under warranty THEY pay not you. You have a simply little web site have no clue how the real world works. When YOU have to fork out hundreds of thousands because the few feel they have some right to over clock.. lol

back to your world.. oh its just TEXT..nothing personal
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,626 (5.19/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 9900K@5.0GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Its THEIR card. you screw it up under warranty THEY pay not you.
Technically, it is the manufacturers card(ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, Lenovo, Dell, etc.), and the manufacturer pays if it screws up under warranty not nVidia.

Though that made me just think of something else. This overclocking lock, if I read the original article correctly, reading a lock bit from the BIOS. So it can't be too long before someone figures out how to edit the BIOS to remove the lock bit and re-flash the unlocked BIOS. Granted, flashing a GPU's BIOS is a bit more risky with a laptop, but then again so is overclocking.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
332 (0.19/day)
Nvidia "back to" dirty tricks?

This just in... leopard back to being spotted.

I guess people are forgetting that the company still lists the 970 as having 4 GB of 224 GB/s VRAM, even though that is a 100% verifiable lie — according to their own information.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,626 (5.19/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 9900K@5.0GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I guess people are forgetting that the company still lists the 970 as having 4 GB of 224 GB/s VRAM, even though that is a 100% verifiable lie — according to their own information.
But it is a 4GB card with 224GB/s of total memory bandwidth. There is no lie there.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.92/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
More likely scenario imho: nvidia will release higher-clocked and/or reconfigured parts that are higher performance than current mobile parts, but within range of their overclocking ability.
...or someone in Nvidia's driver team was asleep at the wheel, y'know since Nvidia pretty much admitted the fact and already has a hotfix available to re-enable overclocking (available since about the same time you posted....now how suspicious is THAT!)
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,985 (1.03/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Well that was an anti-climax. :p
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.92/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
I switched to AMD to avoid Nvidia's hideous drivers many years ago.
I switched to TPU to avoid AMD shills many years ago....I guess all good things come to an end.

...although I guess AMD's drivers should be pretty polished given than they are coding for 4 year old parts getting their fourth name....HD 7870M > HD 8870M > R9 270X > R9 M370X. If the driver team can't get it right after four years of trying, maybe they should try another line of work...although given the protracted problems with Enduro and Switchable Graphics, I'm guessing the driver team possess a large cache of incriminating material against AMD's board members. :roll:
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,101 (0.63/day)
in the 1st place, they disabled it to ensure no one melts their GPU & now they re-enable it? what? o_O that kind of apology isn't gonna make any GTX900M users happy... IMO, keeping it stock for reliability is best since I know the risks of shortening the lifespan of the chip for a very small impact in which it won't reach desktop levels.
Think again. I get a 25% performance boost from overclocking my 765m. That puts it at or above the 650 Ti it is based off of. I would imagine that a fully overclocked 980m could easily reach a 970.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,101 (0.63/day)
I switched to TPU to avoid AMD shills many years ago....I guess all good things come to an end.

...although I guess AMD's drivers should be pretty polished given than they are coding for 4 year old parts getting their fourth name....HD 7870M > HD 8870M > R9 270X > R9 M370X. If the driver team can't get it right after four years of trying, maybe they should try another line of work...although given the protracted problems with Enduro and Switchable Graphics, I'm guessing the driver team possess a large cache of incriminating material against AMD's board members. :roll:
Wow did I hit a nerve? That is honest to god my experience.

Sure the 765m in my laptop's drivers have been WAY smoother than when I had a 560 Ti (So maybe Nvidia is improving), but honestly that might just be because I don't update the drivers as often as my desktop.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,724 (0.69/day)
Location
KL, Malaysia
System Name Rainbow RTX V2 (Spring/Summer 2020 WIP Upgrade Build)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 (stock)
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F Gaming ATX
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i Platinum RGB CLC (w/ included fan) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO 16GB DDR4 3200MHz (2 x 8GB kits, Black)
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 Twin Fan 6GB GDDR6 (stock)
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD + Kingston A2000 500GB M.2 PCIe SSD
Display(s) LG Flatron 29WK600 29 inch Ultrawide Monitor
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Mid-Tower + HD120 RGB Triple Fan Pack + Lighting Node PRO Kit
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX S1220A + Logitech Z337 w/ BT 4.0 + Corsair VOID Stereo Headset
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 750W 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Mouse (White)
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB Mechanical Keyboard (Cherry MX RGB Red Switches)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 November Update
I'm more towards running on stock speeds since mobile chips aren't design to be heavily OCed just to reach desktop class levels... unless it has some very sophisticated cooling system then bumping a few MHz is beneficial. My laptop's GTX860M boost clocks are sufficient as I dun expect much from mobile GPUs no matter how efficient they are. All I know is once you push it too much, the lifespan deteriorate much faster than your whole system's stated warranty e.g 2 years.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,101 (0.63/day)
I'm more towards running on stock speeds since mobile chips aren't design to be heavily OCed just to reach desktop class levels... unless it has some very sophisticated cooling system then bumping a few MHz is beneficial. My laptop's GTX860M boost clocks are sufficient as I dun expect much from mobile GPUs no matter how efficient they are. All I know is once you push it too much, the lifespan deteriorate much faster than your whole system's stated warranty e.g 2 years.
Dude my 765m is in a 13.3" netbook and shares its heatsink with a 56w i7. The GPU running full speed overclocked never goes above 81c, and is usually in the low 70's.
 
Top