NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Reference Design Graphics Card Pictured

wolf · Nov 1, 2010

wile e said:
i don't. As long as my psu is up to the task, i don't care. I only care about it's performance, then price is next. heat and power consumption on a top tier card mean absolutely nothing to me.

Now, go down a notch, and power becomes an issue, but if i'm paying over $400 for a card, it's no concern. Only performance.

+1

pantherx12 · Nov 1, 2010

Wile E said:
You didn't pay over 400 for a single card. There is a big difference. And your 2 5850s consume more than a single 480 anyway. But enough about that.

You can't call Fermi a failure because it consumes more for the same performance, when it excels in other areas that AMD can't begin to compete, like GPGPU or heavy tessellation. i7 quads run hotter than Phenom X6 for similar performance, yet aren't considered a failure. You aren't taking into account all aspects of the cards.

Run milky-way @ home on an nvidia card and on a ati card.

Generally Ati come out on top.

ATI just needs some dev support :laugh:

the54thvoid · Nov 1, 2010

the54thvoid said:
The 480 underperforms on account of it's power requirement. It SHOULD perform better.
That is the entire goal of the GF 110 - to make it perform better for lower power consumption

Wile E said:
You didn't pay over 400 for a single card. There is a big difference. And your 2 5850s consume more than a single 480 anyway. But enough about that.

You can't call Fermi a failure because....

Read my post again Wile E. I didn't call Fermi a failure. I'm saying it should perform better for it's power usage. NVidia thinks the same that's why they're doing the GTX 580. They knew there were power issues from the problems in it's manufacture. Now they are going to fix it.

I chose not to buy a 5870 and go for two 5850's because i wanted super performance. 5870 wasn't enough. I spent £400 on a gfx solution - don't think that doesn't make it any less than buying one single card. You're logic is irrelevant. If i bought 2 x 5770's then yeah, big diff. But i bought 5850's in Nov 09 when they were the 2nd fastest single chip solutions. I couldn't buy a GF 100 because well, someone forgot how to make them on time.

You seem to miss that I'm not slagging off GF 100. I'm simply saying it should perform better and the GF110 is exactly that fix. It's also where NV want to go with Kepler and Maxwell. They have stated they want to produce 'x' times performance gains with a marked improvement in efficiency.

And on power - going by W1zz's readings:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/Radeon_HD_6870/27.html
One 5850 = 150 Watts (two even doubled = 300)
One 480 = 320 Watts.
Comparison on max power.
Now i'm not arguing on that point anymore, take it up with W1zz.

As for i7's consuming more power than phenom x6:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3674/amds-sixcore-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-1055t-reviewed/10
Yeah, my 920 conumes 2 Watts more on this test yet performs:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3674/amds-sixcore-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-1055t-reviewed/9
3 wins for i7 920, 2 draws and one loss.
And we all know clock speeds mean jack between AMD and Intel.

I spent £1500 on my self built rig. I get to call myself an enthusiast. I'm not a water cooler or into shiny neon. My money goes on quality for noise/performance optimisation as i watch TV through my PC. For me, performance must be met with acceptable noise levels. I had to use rivatuner on my GTX 295 to lower idle fan speeds. I dont on my crossfire set up. People have different priorities - accept it, enthusiasts dont all care about pure power at the expense of everything else.

So, if you're going to quote me again, quote this:

GF100 isn't a failure - it should have performed better, even JSH said so in his modest interview. GTX 580 is to fix that. That's what i've been posting all along.

mdsx1950 · Nov 1, 2010

nvidiaintelftw said:
now for those who think the GTX480 is still only a little bit better then the 5870? Well you wrong. now that nvidia has been pushing out performance like bunny off spring the GTX480 is quite a bit faster then a 5870 now and can play in HD5970 territory when overclocked. That being said even the GTX470s are now faster then the 5870 in almost every game other then Vantage and Crysis (Crysis by like 4%)

Are you talking about the 2GB HD5970? Because i highly doubt an overclocked GTX480 can reach the performance of a 4GB 5970.

Wile E said:
I don't. As long as my psu is up to the task, I don't care. I only care about it's performance, then price is next. Heat and power consumption on a top tier card mean absolutely nothing to me.

Now, go down a notch, and power becomes an issue, but If I'm paying over $400 for a card, it's no concern. Only performance.

Agreed! You pay for performance! :rockout:

Except i do care about heat because i usually tend to pair up cards

the54thvoid said:
You'd expect the GTX 480 to perform better than a HD 5970 when it consumes more power.

Exactly what i thought when i heard about the power consumption of the GTX480.

Wile E · Nov 1, 2010

the54thvoid said:
Read my post again Wile E. I didn't call Fermi a failure. I'm saying it should perform better for it's power usage. NVidia thinks the same that's why they're doing the GTX 580. They knew there were power issues from the problems in it's manufacture. Now they are going to fix it.

I chose not to buy a 5870 and go for two 5850's because i wanted super performance. 5870 wasn't enough. I spent £400 on a gfx solution - don't think that doesn't make it any less than buying one single card. You're logic is irrelevant. If i bought 2 x 5770's then yeah, big diff. But i bought 5850's in Nov 09 when they were the 2nd fastest single chip solutions. I couldn't buy a GF 100 because well, someone forgot how to make them on time.

You seem to miss that I'm not slagging off GF 100. I'm simply saying it should perform better and the GF110 is exactly that fix. It's also where NV want to go with Kepler and Maxwell. They have stated they want to produce 'x' times performance gains with a marked improvement in efficiency.

And on power - going by W1zz's readings:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/Radeon_HD_6870/27.html
One 5850 = 150 Watts (two even doubled = 300)
One 480 = 320 Watts.
Comparison on max power.
Now i'm not arguing on that point anymore, take it up with W1zz.

As for i7's consuming more power than phenom x6:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3674/amds-sixcore-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-1055t-reviewed/10
Yeah, my 920 conumes 2 Watts more on this test yet performs:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3674/amds-sixcore-phenom-ii-x6-1090t-1055t-reviewed/9
3 wins for i7 920, 2 draws and one loss.
And we all know clock speeds mean jack between AMD and Intel.

I spent £1500 on my self built rig. I get to call myself an enthusiast. I'm not a water cooler or into shiny neon. My money goes on quality for noise/performance optimisation as i watch TV through my PC. For me, performance must be met with acceptable noise levels. I had to use rivatuner on my GTX 295 to lower idle fan speeds. I dont on my crossfire set up. People have different priorities - accept it, enthusiasts dont all care about pure power at the expense of everything else.

So, if you're going to quote me again, quote this:

GF100 isn't a failure - it should have performed better, even JSH said so in his modest interview. GTX 580 is to fix that. That's what i've been posting all along.

The fact that you brought up an ATI card as a comparison in the original post I quoted suggested to me you were comparing the two in terms of power consumption, painting NV in a negative light.

I think I would've understood your point better if ATI was left out of the original comment altogether.

Meh. Whatever. It's over and done. Point taken.

mdsx1950 said:
Agreed! You pay for performance!
Except i do care about heat because i usually tend to pair up cards

Meh. I water cool. Total non-issue for me.

Benetanegia · Nov 1, 2010

mdsx1950 said:
Are you talking about the 2GB HD5970? Because i highly doubt an overclocked GTX480 can reach the performance of a 4GB 5970.

The 4GB HD5970 are a bad comparison. They're nothing but overclocked HD5970 with more vram, and he was talking about a OC GTX480 being close to reference HD5970. When OCed nothing can touch the HD5970, but with a drawback, I think that power consumption scales horribly, even more so than the GTX480. 4GB HD5970 consume 50% more than reference HD5970, in Wizzard's review the Asus ARES consumed 436 Watts!

mdsx1950 · Nov 1, 2010

Benetanegia said:
The 4GB HD5970 are a bad comparison. They're nothing but overclocked HD5970 with more vram

Not exactly true. The VRAM plays a part when it comes to high resolutions. And the 4GB HD5970 has more room to OC.

Benetanegia said:
and he was talking about a OC GTX480 being close to reference HD5970. When OCed nothing can touch the HD5970, but with a drawback, I think that power consumption scales horribly, even more so than the GTX480. 4GB HD5970 consume 50% more than reference HD5970, in Wizzard's review the Asus ARES consumed 436 Watts!

That's the ARES. Not all 4GB HD5970s consume so much. Anyways i don't care about the power consumption as I only care about the performance.

Benetanegia · Nov 1, 2010

mdsx1950 said:
That's the ARES. Not all 4GB HD5970s consume so much. Anyways i don't care about the power consumption as I only care about the performance.

Well I've been looking at reviews of the Sapphire and XFX ones and they also consume like 100++ watts more than the 2 GB version, but I don't want to argue about this. You are right, people buying such high-end cards don't care about power consumption anyway, but my comment was just following the context in which Fermi and now this GTX580 are mostly judged: performance-per-watt.

CDdude55 · Nov 1, 2010

We should be seeing much better efficiency from GTX 580, Nvidia is already aware of the power and heat complaints that have been perpetually complained and whined about since Fermi's launch. I have no doubts that the 580 should have much better performance per watt and a decent decrease in heat output.(or at least i hope)

Bjorn_Of_Iceland · Nov 1, 2010

Ive got a gut feeling this would perform very much like a gtx 460 1GB sli

mdsx1950 · Nov 2, 2010

Benetanegia said:
... but my comment was just following the context in which Fermi and now this GTX580 are mostly judged: performance-per-watt.

Fermi (mainly GTX 480) is a great card, yet it couldn't deliver HD5970 performance with the same or lower power consumption. If there was no HD5970 card, there wouldn't have been so many complaints about the GTX480 and it's power consumption.

Jiraiya · Nov 3, 2010

GTX 580

http://itbbs.pconline.com.cn/diy/12074471.html

HTC · Nov 3, 2010

mdsx1950 said:
If there was no HD5970 card, there wouldn't have been so many complaints about the GTX480 and it's power consumption.

Quoted for truth.

mdsx1950 · Nov 3, 2010

HTC said:
Quoted for truth.

Thanks bro!

motasim · Nov 3, 2010

mdsx1950 said:
Fermi (mainly GTX 480) is a great card, yet it couldn't deliver HD5970 performance with the same or lower power consumption. If there was no HD5970 card, there wouldn't have been so many complaints about the GTX480 and it's power consumption.

... using your same reasoning; if nVidia did their job on Fermi properly in the first place, and weren't in rush to send their product to the market regardless of its clear issues, "there wouldn't have been so many complaints about the GTX480 and it's power consumption" ... nVidia should have waited a bit further and issued the proper GTX 480 (i.e. GTX 580), but this is just another evidence of their bad management :shadedshu ...

Tatty_Two · Nov 3, 2010

motasim said:
... using your same reasoning; if nVidia did their job on Fermi properly in the first place, and weren't in rush to send their product to the market regardless of its clear issues, "there wouldn't have been so many complaints about the GTX480 and it's power consumption" ... nVidia should have waited a bit further and issued the proper GTX 480 (i.e. GTX 580), but this is just another evidence of their bad management :shadedshu ...

Or good management if in fact it will now, some months on be the right product that actually manages to compete with AMD's "new" high end offering, may well have actually served a very strategic purpose.

Benetanegia · Nov 3, 2010

It's all part of the same management mistake with the fabric thing, one mistake lead to another mistake, but most of them imposible to avoid back then.

They should have revised the fabric thing when they received A1 and go directly to B1 revision instead of doing metal respins that didn't really fix anything or very little? That would have made them be 4 months late or so instead of 6 months and have a much better product. But it is very easy to judge that right now that we know where the error was made. At the time all they knew was that the fabric which is in fact nothing but a metal layer didn't work, so a metal respin was what made most sense: 2 months late and hopes of fixing it. A metal respin takes less than 2 months so it just made sense to try to fix the management mistake in a metal respin. The error was deeper than they thought and the rest is history left for prosperity. Should they have went to B1 after A2 didn't fix anything, being 8 months late but with a card that could potentially destroy Cypress like the alleged GF110 is apparently going to? Again, maybe they should have, but that was probably too much pressure for partners and it's again a decision that is too easy to make now that we have all the responses...

EDIT: tbh if GF110 turns out to be just GF100 made right, and it seems most likely to, I'm going to be dissapointed, regardless of how it does in comparison to Cayman. Because even though I think it's going to be very competitive against Cayman, I'm 99% sure they could have made a much better card if they had used the 48SP SMs instead of the 32 in GF100. In fact, IMO if they wanted to release another 512 SP chip, they could have taken GF104 and add another 16 SP. The architecture must be able to handle it, because in GF104 2 dispatchers are working with 3 SIMDs with no performance penalty at all, so every dispatcher can surely dispatch to 2 SIMDs, so 2x2=4= 64 SP. And since GF104 has 2x the TMU/SFU/load/store of CF100 per SM, they would end up with a card with almost same specs as GF100 but with a sub 400mm^2 area (instead of the rumored 460-480 mm^2 of GF110). The only drawback would be tesselation, because with half the clusters it would have half the tesselation capabilities. Still considering that even the GTX460 (or GTS450 if you stretch it) annihilates Cypress and Barts when it comes to tesselation it would be a good compromise.

CDdude55 · Nov 3, 2010

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 priced at US$599, to be available November 9th?

Supposed GTX 580 price($599) and availibilty info coming from VRzone..

VRzone said:
However, in an unexpected twist, we stumbled upon an online posting made no more than just a few hours ago, which suggests the GeForce GTX 580 is expected to cost US$599, and will be available on November 9th. These GeForce GTX 580 cards will come from a number of NVIDIA's partners, but all are reference boards.

http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-...-599-to-be-available-november-9th-/10222.html

That price is actually a big far out of reach for me unfortunately(especially for a single GPU card).

erocker · Nov 3, 2010

CDdude55 said:
Supposed GTX 580 pice($599) and availibilty info coming from VRzone..

http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-...-599-to-be-available-november-9th-/10222.html

That price is actually a big far out of reach for me unfortunately(especially for a single GPU card).

I hope that isn't true. :ohwell:

wolf · Nov 3, 2010

CDdude55 said:
Supposed GTX 580 pice($599) and availibilty info coming from VRzone..

http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-...-599-to-be-available-november-9th-/10222.html

That price is actually a big far out of reach for me unfortunately(especially for a single GPU card).

especially with no job yet

but still $599 seems steep given what you can get a GTX480 for, and it's only rumored to be ~20% faster.

dir_d · Nov 3, 2010

That cant be true...Nvidia would be shooting themselves in the foot.

CDdude55 · Nov 3, 2010

wolf said:
especially with no job yet but still $599 seems steep given what you can get a GTX480 for, and it's only rumored to be ~20% faster.

Exactly, i have no job right now and at that price it just pushes me away even more. Even if i had the money i still wouldn't drop that much for a single GPU card unless it's giving me ungodly performance.

I hope it's not that much and if so, i hope the 6900's are cheaper.

wolf · Nov 3, 2010

CDdude55 said:
Exactly, i have no job right now and at that price it just pushes me away even more. Even if i had the money i still wouldn't drop that much for a single GPU card unless it's giving me ungodly performance.

I hope it's not that much and if so, i hope the 6900's are cheaper.

If Nvidia just waited till the 6900's were out, they could judge performance of the 580 vs the 6970 and price accordingly.

hec if AMD does what they did with the 5870 and go for roughly a ~$399 price point Nv may have screwed themselves, if they wait they will know what they can price them at to sell as many as possible.

N3M3515 · Nov 3, 2010

Well that's not to far from reality GTX 480 is at 489 USD on average, so 20% more is 586 USD.

HD5870 is at 360 USD, speculated 40% increase of HD6970 will take it to 504 USD BUT, that won't be the case because people will prefer to buy 2x HD6870 for 480 USD and 20% more performance.
Then i guess it will be at 450USD.

Mussels · Nov 4, 2010

dir_d said:
That cant be true...Nvidia would be shooting themselves in the foot.

remember what half the nvidia fanboys on the forum repeat over and over:

'i dont care about price, power, heat or noise so long as its the fastest!'

nvidia knows that their fanboys (not their regular users) only care because they have the FASTEST, not about any other category.

System Name	MightyX
Processor	Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard	Gigabyte B650I AX
Cooling	Scythe Fuma 2
Memory	32GB DDR5 6000 CL30 tuned
Video Card(s)	Palit Gamerock RTX 5080 oc
Storage	WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s)	LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case	Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s)	LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply	Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse	Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard	Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD	Meta Quest 3
Software	case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores	4k120 OLED Gsync bliss

System Name	My pc
Processor	Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard	Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling	Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory	16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s)	MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage	2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s)	Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case	Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply	650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse	Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard	Generic mechanical keyboard
Software	Windows ten

Processor	Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard	MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling	be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory	32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s)	MSI RTX 5080 Vanguard SOC
Storage	Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s)	LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case	Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s)	On Board
Power Supply	be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software	W10

System Name	Knight-X
Processor	Intel Core i7-980X [4.2Ghz]
Motherboard	ASUS P6T7 WS
Cooling	CORSAIR Hydro H70 + 2x CM 2000RPM 120mm LED Fans
Memory	Corsair DOMINATOR-GT 12GB (6 x 2GB) DDR3 2000MHz
Video Card(s)	AMD Radeon HD6970 2GB CrossFire [PhysX - EVGA GTX260(216SP) 896MB]
Storage	2x Corsair Perf. 512GB \| OCZ Colossus 1TB \| 2xOCZ Agilities 120GB SSDs
Display(s)	Dell UltraSharp™ 3008WFP [2560x1600]
Case	Cooler Master HAF-X + NZXT Temp LCD
Audio Device(s)	ASUS Xonar D2X \| ONKYO HTS9100THX 7.1
Power Supply	Silverstone ST1500 1500W [80 PLUS Silver]
Software	Windows 7 Ultimate X64 (Build 7600)
Benchmark Scores	Heaven 2.0 with Extreme Tessellation at 1080p - 96FPS

System Name	The ClusterF**k
Processor	980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling	MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory	3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s)	Evga GTX 580
Storage	Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s)	HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case	Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s)	Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply	ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software	Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4

System Name	CDdude's Rig!
Processor	AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling	Corsair H70
Memory	8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s)	XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage	OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s)	ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case	Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s)	Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply	Corsair 850TX
Software	Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1

System Name	Thakk
Processor	9800X3D
Motherboard	MSI B650M Gaming Wifi
Cooling	Id Cooling A410 + P12 Max 3300 RPM
Memory	32GB DDR5 6000 C30
Video Card(s)	Zotac RTX3080 Trinity
Storage	Crucial NVME 512 / Intel 250GB SSD / Samsung Pro 512 SSD / SanDIsk 1TB SSD / WD Black 6TB
Display(s)	Acer Predator X34 100hz IPS Gsync
Case	Generic mATX
Audio Device(s)	Hyper X 7.1 USB Soundcard
Power Supply	Corsair CV750 Bronze
Mouse	Logitech G304
Keyboard	Monsgeek MG75S Hall Effect + XDA Keycaps + Holee Mod
VR HMD	HTC Vive
Software	Windows
Benchmark Scores	https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/123890762?

System Name	HTC's System
Processor	Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard	Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling	NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory	G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s)	Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage	1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s)	LG 27UD58
Case	Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s)	Onboard
Power Supply	Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse	Razer Deathadder Elite
Software	Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS

System Name	Micro Mule
Processor	Intel i7 950 Stock + Noctua NH-C14
Motherboard	Asus Rampage III Gene MicroATX
Cooling	Noctua 120mm/80m Fans
Memory	Crucial Ballistix 6GB DDR3 1600MHz
Video Card(s)	Asus nVidia GTX 580
Storage	Samsung 850 Pro SSD, WD Caviar Black 2TB HDD
Display(s)	LG 42LD650 42" LCD HDTV
Case	Silverstone Fortress FT03
Audio Device(s)	Creative SB X-Fi Titanium HD + Sennheiser PC360 Headset
Power Supply	Corsair AX850 - 850W Modular Gold
Software	Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit

Processor	Intel Core i9 11900KF @ -.080mV PL max @220w
Motherboard	MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK
Cooling	DeepCool LS520SE Liquid + 3 Phanteks 140mm case fans
Memory	32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel Bdie @ 3600Mhz CL14 1.45v Gear 1
Video Card(s)	Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC + 8% PL
Storage	WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS)
Display(s)	AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS
Case	Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1
Power Supply	Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular
Software	Win 11 Home x64

Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard	ASUS TUF x670e-Plus Wifi
Cooling	EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory	64GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s)	Asus RTX 4090
Storage	WD/Samsung m.2's
Display(s)	LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case	Fractal Design North
Audio Device(s)	Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Amp, Adam Audio T5V's, Hifiman Sundara's.
Power Supply	FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse	Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard	Epomaker 84 key
Software	Windows 11 Pro

System Name	4k
Processor	AMD 5800x3D
Motherboard	MSI MAG b550m Mortar Wifi
Cooling	ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 240
Memory	4x8Gb Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 bl8g36c16u4b.m8fe1
Video Card(s)	Nvidia Reference 3080Ti
Storage	ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s)	LG 48" C1
Case	CORSAIR Carbide AIR 240 Micro-ATX
Audio Device(s)	Asus Xonar STX
Power Supply	EVGA SuperNOVA 650W
Software	Microsoft Windows10 Pro x64

System Name	Little Boy / New Guy
Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X / Intel Core I5 10400F
Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate / Asus H410M Prime
Cooling	ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 280 A-RGB / ARCTIC Freezer 34 eSports DUO
Memory	TeamGroup Zeus 2x16GB 3200Mhz CL16 / Teamgroup 1x16GB 3000Mhz CL18
Video Card(s)	Asrock Phantom RX 6800 XT 16GB / Asus RTX 3060 Ti 8GB DUAL Mini V2
Storage	Patriot Viper VPN100 Nvme 1TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256GB Sata / Ultrastar 2TB / IronWolf 4TB / WD Red 8TB
Display(s)	Compumax MF32C 144Hz QHD / ViewSonic OMNI 27 144Hz QHD
Case	Phanteks Eclipse P400A / Montech X3 Mesh
Power Supply	Aresgame 850W 80+ Gold / Aerocool 850W Plus bronze
Mouse	Gigabyte Force M7 Thor
Keyboard	Gigabyte Aivia K8100
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64 Bits

System Name	Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor	Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard	Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling	Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory	2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s)	Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage	2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s)	Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) \| Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) \| Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case	Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s)	Logitech G560 \| Corsair Void pro RGB \|Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply	Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse	Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard	Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD	Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software	Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores	Nyooom.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Reference Design Graphics Card Pictured

Better Than Native

Super Intoxicated Moderator

New Member

Power User

New Member

New Member

New Member

Crazy 4 TPU!!!

New Member

New Member

New Member

Gone Fishing

New Member

Crazy 4 TPU!!!

*

Better Than Native

Crazy 4 TPU!!!

Better Than Native

Freshwater Moderator