NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Planned with 24 GB of GDDR7 Memory

[wolf]

Wait, didn't everyone understand this? This was known last year.

I thought so, and maybe some still do but want to be obtuse about it and just take their jab.

I'm fairly upfront that I was gifted my 5080 because I wouldn't have bought one with my own money (would have been a 5070Ti or 9070XT, most likely the latter with hindsight because it just appealed to me more from a tinkering perspective), but I am not even slightly concerned with it having 16GB, it'll last another 4 or so years easily, well into the cross gen period for next gen consoles.

 

[cinemaware]

Trending Topics: "5070 Ti SUPER has 24GB memory"
The article: "5070 Ti SUPER Planned 24GB memory"
The source: somebody from the internet

 

[user-009]

Trending Topics: "5070 Ti SUPER has 24GB memory"
The article: "5070 Ti SUPER Planned 24GB memory"
The source: somebody from the internet

kimi should be a reliable source

 

[bonehead123]

Can we please stop with this worthless crap? Good grief...

No, we can NOT....

A) Because it's still relevant, as they are & have been exploiting the lack of viable competition (except for the 2 high-end cards from Jacket Lady) for quite some time now, and

B) Because it's funny IMHO, and makes me chuckle, and,

C) I like poking fun at soulless, blood-sucking vampires like them, hahahahaha.....

 

[Guwapo77]

Your belief does not reality make.. They are in fact very narrow and exclude entire market sectors. From a business standpoint, that is just terrible thinking.

What? You could have saved that reply... I was clearly talking about gaming GPUs hence the word GAMES.

 

[Rover4444]

Would love to see this happen. FINALLY a real 3090 replacement.

 

[Guwapo77]

Just because VRAM isn't expensive doesn't mean all GPUs need 16GB or more.
There are valid arguments for equipping a card with only 8GB or 12GB if you can justify the use case and the price, since there are plenty of purposes for GPUs outside just gaming. The underlying problem isn't the amount of memory they're given, it's the way they're marketed and priced.

In the gaming market there are Zero arguments to have justifying 8GB GAMING GPUs

 

[Rover4444]

Wouldn't you want the 5080 to have more VRAM?

Don't let the copium-fuelled crabs in a bucket see this!

 

[Panther_Seraphin]

Video editing, scientific compute, 3D modeling, that list could keep going. Additionally, there are a few games which are pushing beyond the 16GB limit at ultrahigh def resolutions and there are more coming..

I know but from a gaming perspective I believe the 5070ti is going to run out of Raster performance way before you get to the need beyond 16Gb especialy with the fact there is no more resources being activated on the Super variants

 

[lexluthermiester]

No, we can NOT....

A) Because it's still relevant, as they are & have been exploiting the lack of viable competition (except for the 2 high-end cards from Jacket Lady) for quite some time now, and

B) Because it's funny IMHO, and makes me chuckle, and,

C) I like poking fun at soulless, blood-sucking vampires like them, hahahahaha.....

Then expect me to call you out on that junior-high-school tom-foolery everytime I see it.

I know but from a gaming perspective

Gaming is not the only perspective. That was the point.

the 5070ti is going to run out of Raster performance way before you get to the need beyond 16GB

You're forgetting RTRT, resolution and other features which factor into how much VRAM is used.

the fact there is no more resources being activated on the Super variants

That is an opinion not supported by historical evidence or current gaming trends.

 

[igormp]

A 24GB 5070Ti Super, given a price between the current 5070Ti and the current 5080, would be a nice GPU to replace one of my 3090s.
I could either shove it into my 2nd desktop for inference only, or use it as my primary GPU (alongside another 3090), and shove one of the 3090s in the 2nd setup. Lower power consumption, more raw compute perf and 24GB GDDR7 that can be easily pushed to ~1TB/s.
A dual-slot option would be a bonus, but I don't think any AIB will go down that path.

 

[Panther_Seraphin]

Gaming is not the only perspective. That was the point.

I know but its probably the main thing for the majority of people is caring about here.

You're forgetting RTRT, resolution and other features which factor into how much VRAM is used.

The resoloution is the big one for me, pushing 4k out of this card with all settings maxed (where the VRAM is going to make a key difference) performance is already borderline with 16Gb and very few scenarios will benefit AND attain playable framerates with 24Gb

Spoiler: Daniel Owen Video

Clair Obscur - 47FPS 10GB of VRAM being used
MH Wilds - 45FPS 13GB VRAM used
Oblivion - 35FPS 11GB VRAM used
Doom Dark - 53FPS 12Gb VRAM used
and it goes on in the video

The only scenario he had that showed potential benefit was Spiderman 2 4k max settings which was right up against that 16GB limit but again was only getting 37FPS where as the AMD card WAS getting bottlenecked by the 16GB and was down at 25FPS and half the 1% lows performance in comparison.

He had RT cranked, 4k Res settings maxed, lumen on if availble etc etc etc so where VRAM was at its highest requirement bar DLSS but personally DLSS/FSR numbers are irrelevant as I only care about native performance.

That is an opinion not supported by historical evidence or current gaming trends.

Every single 40 series super had a bump in shaders/rt/TMUs etc vs its vanilla variant and its not like the GB203 is maxed out with the 5070ti so it seems like a kick in the teeth IMO.

 

[bug]

Any hint about the super-prices?

 

[ARF]

How did Nvidia suddenly realise that its cards needed more VRAM ?
Maybe the sales are too poor, no ?

1. Maybe they plan changes in Windows / DirectX / future games that will need more VRAM;
2. It's a fact that all cards should start from 12 GB and up - GT 5050 - 12 GB, RTX 5060 - 16 GB, RTX 5060 Ti - 18 GB, RTX 5070 - 20 GB, RTX 5070 Ti - 24 GB, RTX 5080 - 32 GB, RTX 5090 - 64 GB.

 

[Chris_Ramseyer]

Waste of money, just make a 5070 Super have 16GB (256-bit bus) or 18GB (if 3GB module rumor works out).

There are several AI applications for 20 and 24GB of memory. This will be great for inference with 8B size models.

 

[QUANTUMPHYSICS]

The "Super" upgrade to 24GB will finally make the 5080 noteworthy.

Of course, I'm more anxious to see the 5090 Super or Ti.

Because 5090 prices are still so ridiculously high that a new 5090 is $3000, I can sell my 5090FE for the same $2000 I bought it (or get greedy and aim for $2500) and not lose a dime if it's worth the upgrade (which it probably isn't).

If they really want to make them "Super" reduce the prices and make them easily available to regular consumers by forcing buyers to preorder and then using AI to crush scalpers.

That would be Super.

 

[tpa-pr]

Don't let the copium-fuelled crabs in a bucket see this!

I'm not trying to be cheeky though, I'm genuinely curious. Is the idea they might do a 5080 with 28/30GB of VRAM or something? Why target the lower SKU for the VRAM bump?

 

[Panther_Seraphin]

I'm not trying to be cheeky though, I'm genuinely curious. Is the idea they might do a 5080 with 28/30GB of VRAM or something? Why target the lower SKU for the VRAM bump?

I suspect there is little noise about a 5080/5090 super variants is because AMD doesnt have something to compete with current offerings.

There should be a "refresh" very easily possible with just swapping the 2Gb modules with 3Gb

 

[Taisho]

I've said it before, the most Urgent GPU for nGreedia to give the 24Gb Treatment to is the 5060. With 12GB of RAM it would actually be worth buying

Not really, the leaks are already out about the 5060 Super. With 12 GB VRAM it will be $50 more expensive than the regular 5060. With close to none increase in shaders, I can't see any reason to buy it over the 5060 Ti 16 GB what is a very bad value itself.

 

[Krit]

Waste of money, just make a 5070 Super have 16GB (256-bit bus) or 18GB (if 3GB module rumor works out).

RTX 5070 Ti 16GB already is the sweet spot gpu but for the wrong price. 24GB VRAM will raise the prices and it will be even worse for gaming p/p wise.

 

[sudothelinuxwizard]

Not really, the leaks are already out about the 5060 Super. With 12 GB VRAM it will be $50 more expensive than the regular 5060. With close to none increase in shaders, I can't see any reason to buy it over the 5060 Ti 16 GB what is a very bad value itself.

If those leaks are accurate, yes, but let's hope Nvidia isn't that idiotic.

 

[Grimling]

actually 24gig of vram should be standard by now for middle-class gpus, 16gig should be entry level.
i am struggling with 16gb right now using AI-models like the stable diffusion 3.5 big model (has like 28gig). so for me the 5080 should have at least 32gig, not 16, that is a joke.

 

[Panther_Seraphin]

actually 24gig of vram should be standard by now for middle-class gpus, 16gig should be entry level.
i am struggling with 16gb right now using AI-models like the stable diffusion 3.5 big model (has like 28gig). so for me the 5080 should have at least 32gig, not 16, that is a joke.

nVidia AMD and Intel would go, your doing professional work, use professional cards.

 

[mago4]

SUPER = 8GB more Vram​

makes sense

 

[Taisho]

SUPER = 8GB more Vram​

makes sense

There is no performance uplift, and 16GB is already more than enough for everything. So yeah, you wait and pay extra only for some future-proofing.