• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

NVIDIA Kepler Tech-Demo Called "New Dawn"

Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
#26
Just because it took insane hardware setups to run Crysis doesn't mean it had better graphics. It simply means that the code is horribly optimized.
Obviously Crysis is poorly optimized... I think that is obvious to all (especially anyone who has played the last level and experienced the joys of a memory leak that kills your framerate into the single digits regardless of your hardware...)

However, my point stands that Crysis compared to other 2007 games shows Crysis in a FAR more impressive light than BF3 compared to 2012 games. There are several games that are on the same tier graphically as BF3, even if BF3 might be a bit better (and guess what - the original Crysis is on that list).

Nothing was anywhere close to Crysis when it was released; not by a long shot. The reason we haven't had anything like that happen since is because of the console cycle - 99% of games are either developed with the consoles in mind first, or even though they are designed for PC they have to be able to be ported to console, limiting what can be done graphically on the PC.
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2007
Messages
233 (0.06/day)
Likes
18
Location
Australia, SA
System Name Computer MkVIII
Processor 2500K @ 4.5ghz
Motherboard ASUS Sabertooth P67
Cooling CPU: 212+ EVO GPU: Stock
Memory 16gb G.Skill Ares @2133mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 980 SC
Storage 1x Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
Display(s) 24" Asus VE248
Case Corsair Carbide 300R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX-650
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
#27
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
765 (0.31/day)
Likes
160
Location
Pocomoke, MD
System Name Good Enough
Processor Intel G3258 @ 3.8ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H81M-H
Cooling Stock
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 8gb
Video Card(s) MSI 650 ti Boost
Storage Crucial MX100 128gb SSD
Display(s) ASUS VN248
Case Coolermaster Ammo 533
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC887
Power Supply Antec BP550
Mouse G502
Keyboard Sidewinder x4
Software Windows 7
#28
Just because it took insane hardware setups to run Crysis doesn't mean it had better graphics. It simply means that the code is horribly optimized.
I hate when people saying this. Of course it doesn't have better graphics it was made 4 years before. And how is the code "horrible optimized"? Have you see the distance that it renders graphics?? Did you write the code yourself?
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.22/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#29
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
2,165 (0.56/day)
Likes
361
Location
Wallingford, CT
Processor Intel i7-5930k
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X99
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 4x8GB HyperX FURY DDR4-2666 15-17-17-15
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G
Storage 1x Plextor PX-512M6S SSD, 1x WD 750gb HDD, 2x Hitachi 2TB HDD, 1x Seagate 4TB HDD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2314H
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse ROCCAT Kone Pure Color White
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB - Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#30
I hate when people saying this. Of course it doesn't have better graphics it was made 4 years before. And how is the code "horrible optimized"? Have you see the distance that it renders graphics?? Did you write the code yourself?
It's pretty easy to say - the engine is HORRIBLY coded. It's a fact. Why argue? There are engines out there with equal if not better graphics that are way more efficient.
 
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
7,325 (1.91/day)
Likes
995
Location
C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
System Name Unknown
Processor AMD Bulldozer FX8320 @ 4.4Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V
Cooling XSPC Raystorm 750 EX240 for CPU
Memory 8 GB CORSAIR Vengeance Red DDR3 RAM 1922mhz (10-11-9-27)
Video Card(s) XFX R9 290
Storage Samsung SSD 254GB and Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB 64MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s
Display(s) AOC 23" @ 1920x1080 + Asus 27" 1440p
Case HAF X
Audio Device(s) X Fi Titanium 5.1 Surround Sound
Power Supply 750 Watt PP&C Silencer Black
Software Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
#31
Hey as poorly coded you want to call Crysis, that game looked amazing guys. Get the photoreal mod and I mean dam, that game looks great. Aside from its lack of tessellation I'd still favor that engine over many others and this was back in 2007.

But alas due to consoles they've had to dumb down their engine and even though they have added modern technology to it, Cryengine 3 just wasn't the improvement it should have been from 2.
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2060243#post2060243
 

Badelhas

New Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
47 (0.02/day)
Likes
1
Location
Braga, Portugal
System Name 3D Vision MegaRIG
Processor i5 2500k@4.3ghz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Cooling Mine Rev. B
Memory 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX570 in SLI (Core@850+Mem@2050)
Storage Vertex 3 120Gb SSD + 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 1100MB CRT & Benq W700 3D Vision Projector
Case Case CoolerMaster Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX
Power Supply Corsair Tx750w
Software WIN 7 64bits
Benchmark Scores P10.780 3DMark 11 at 24/7 OC. 6500 PCMark 11.
#32
I dont agree Crysis 1 engine was porly optimized, it was just very ahead of its time. They decided to render a lot of goodies, even though they knew there was no pc capable of rendering it with max settings at the moment. Crysis 1 was the reason I payed 400€ for a Nvidia 8800Gts 640Mbs at that time and I dont regreat a bit. Battlefield single player does look good but I say it again: They could have done it much better and just didnt! Look at how much GPU tech has evolved (see the Tech Demos) and you will agree with me. That Tech Demos was what Crysis looked like when it came out. Or are you guys too young to have experience it at that time? ;)

Cheers,
Andre
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
#33
Wow this discussion got off track. Crysis only was brought up because someone mentioned "why hasn't there been anything like Crysis [in terms of graphical leap forward]" and then someone else replied (very wrongly) that "battlefield 3 is an equivalent leap forward in terms of graphics"
 
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
2,165 (0.56/day)
Likes
361
Location
Wallingford, CT
Processor Intel i7-5930k
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X99
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 4x8GB HyperX FURY DDR4-2666 15-17-17-15
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G
Storage 1x Plextor PX-512M6S SSD, 1x WD 750gb HDD, 2x Hitachi 2TB HDD, 1x Seagate 4TB HDD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2314H
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse ROCCAT Kone Pure Color White
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB - Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#34
I find it amusing that people still defend that Crysis is not poorly coded...hell modern cards still struggle to keep it above 40fps average @ 1080p. Yes, the game looks great, I can easily admit that. I built a rig just to play Crysis when it came out. The fact still stands it is a horribly optimized game.

Wow this discussion got off track. Crysis only was brought up because someone mentioned "why hasn't there been anything like Crysis [in terms of graphical leap forward]" and then someone else replied (very wrongly) that "battlefield 3 is an equivalent leap forward in terms of graphics"
BF3 is a great leap in graphics...why? Because it can be ran on this generations hardware, unlike Crysis (in relation to the generation of hardware at its release). To have those kind of graphics run on last gen's hardware is much more than Crysis can attest to.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
#35
Crysis is 5 years old and still comes close to comparing with BF3 in terms of graphics (even though not perhaps in performance). Crysis 2 certainly compares with BF3.

Therefore: BF3 is NOT in any way the leap forward graphically that Crysis was.

When Crysis was released, it blew everything else out of the water and was in a class of its own entirely. No game currently can say that.

I dunno why this is such a controversial thing.
 
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
2,165 (0.56/day)
Likes
361
Location
Wallingford, CT
Processor Intel i7-5930k
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X99
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 4x8GB HyperX FURY DDR4-2666 15-17-17-15
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X 8G
Storage 1x Plextor PX-512M6S SSD, 1x WD 750gb HDD, 2x Hitachi 2TB HDD, 1x Seagate 4TB HDD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2314H
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse ROCCAT Kone Pure Color White
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB - Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
#36
Crysis is 5 years old and still comes close to comparing with BF3 in terms of graphics (even though not perhaps in performance). Crysis 2 certainly compares with BF3.

Therefore: BF3 is NOT in any way the leap forward graphically that Crysis was.

When Crysis was released, it blew everything else out of the water and was in a class of its own entirely. No game currently can say that.

I dunno why this is such a controversial thing.
I still disagree with you. It is a leap when you consider the graphics/performance ratio. What good is a great looking game if you can't run it? Also, the fact you only have 5 posts and they are all to this thread make it seem like you are trolling...
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
#37
You can check my profile over @ toms hardware (same name) - I'm not a troll. Crysis runs about 25% slower on my 7970 than does BF3 mp or Crysis 2 SP. So, after 5 years we have games that look a little better and perform slightly better to boot.

Not very impressive when you compare Crysis to games 5 years previous to it (2002) and see how amazing the difference is...
 

Badelhas

New Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
47 (0.02/day)
Likes
1
Location
Braga, Portugal
System Name 3D Vision MegaRIG
Processor i5 2500k@4.3ghz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Cooling Mine Rev. B
Memory 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX570 in SLI (Core@850+Mem@2050)
Storage Vertex 3 120Gb SSD + 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 1100MB CRT & Benq W700 3D Vision Projector
Case Case CoolerMaster Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX
Power Supply Corsair Tx750w
Software WIN 7 64bits
Benchmark Scores P10.780 3DMark 11 at 24/7 OC. 6500 PCMark 11.
#38
You can check my profile over @ toms hardware (same name) - I'm not a troll. Crysis runs about 25% slower on my 7970 than does BF3 mp or Crysis 2 SP. So, after 5 years we have games that look a little better and perform slightly better to boot.

Not very impressive when you compare Crysis to games 5 years previous to it (2002) and see how amazing the difference is...
I, once again, totally agree.
And I dont know why someone said "this has gone off track". I think this has everything to do with the topic.

Cheers
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
#39
BF3 today is nowhere near what Crysis was in 2007. Not even close. It's better than what's out there, but not by far. It's also arguably not much better than Crysis 2. It also runs fine maxed out on today's hardware - it took years (or crazy multi-GPU setups) to run Crysis maxed out.

To compare BF3 in 2011/12 to Crysis in 2007 is complete ignorance. The answer is very simple - we don't have better looking games because all the $$$ is in console development, so even for a PC-first game, the graphics are limited because they have to make sure the game will run on 7 year old consoles.
I'm wondering if you've even played BF3. Have you played the Jet or Tank mission in single player? It seems not. In multiplayer it's the same story... Your argument is rather silly because it's entirely subjective. I could say that Crysis was nothing in terms of what it brought compared to Half Life 2. It's a stupid argument. Half Life 2 was ground-breaking, the original Half Life was also, Crysis was also ground-breaking in what it gave us. A vast outdoor world with destructable scenery. You need to get over your Crysis thing because it makes you sound like a fanboy and no one wants that.

Crysis gave us a large outdoor world with a new level of super-destructo phyics.

Half-Life 2 gave us the same.

Battlefield 3 couldn't introduce super-destructo physics because it was already done, what it did give us was a new level of character animation realism. New levels of lighting realism, new levels of post effects and yes it was very much optimised for PC. It sounds to me like you haven't even played it or if you have, perhaps all you saw was crysis because you're so in awe of it. Crysis hasn't aged well. It looks a bit shit now unless you mod it and from what I've seen it still looks a bit shit compared to Crysis 2 DX11 and certainly BF3.

Retarded argument and you picked on the wrong game with BF3 because it shows you don't know the game or the tech that went into it. I assume you didn't see the DICE lectures either.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
#40
You can check my profile over @ toms hardware (same name) - I'm not a troll. Crysis runs about 25% slower on my 7970 than does BF3 mp or Crysis 2 SP. So, after 5 years we have games that look a little better and perform slightly better to boot.

Not very impressive when you compare Crysis to games 5 years previous to it (2002) and see how amazing the difference is...
Totally stupid argument.

BF3 is ground-breaking in so many ways and it doesn't need a set quota of improvements in order to reach your pedestal where it can be classed as worthy.

BF3 is a great PC game and many people have built PC's just so they can play it. You may think you have an opinion that's better than all those people who rate BF3 but it's just an opinion and a MINORITY opinion.

I am actually sick of hearing the crysis bollocks now. It was a great game in it's time and I was one of the ones who spoke out against the numpties who said it was "badly coded" because it wouldn't run ultra on their 8600gt's.

I tried to explain that the game was designed for current and future hardware and just because a numpty has an 8600 or lower he shouldnt insist the game be limited to his hardware. I was wasting my time. So many numpties complained that Crytek aimed Crysis 2 at consoles.

Crysis was great! It's old, move on.

BF3 is revolutionary in the way it raises the bar for graphical realism. Doesn't matter one crap that it doesn't meet your personal list of ground-breaking innovations.
 
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
523 (0.25/day)
Likes
122
Processor Intel Core i7-5930k @ 4.6 GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99-A
Cooling Corsair H110
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP DDR4-2666
Video Card(s) 2x Titan X @ 1450/8000
Storage WD Black 4TB + Agility 3 240GB + Seagate 600 240GB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos 4k LC-60UD27U
Case Corsair Obsidian 450D
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Z
Power Supply Corsair AX1200
#41
http://www.gamespot.com/best-of-2011-special/awards/index.html?page=4

The very existence of something like this invalidates everyone's claims saying BF3 is as revolutionary as Crysis. In 2007, there were no other viable options for technical graphics superiority - Crysis was THAT far ahead of the pack.

In 2012, rather you agree or not with which is #1, there are other viable options.

The only thing REVOLUTIONARY that BF3 brings to the table is destructibility in multiplayer (and this may even have been done elsewhere, but I haven't played anything with this level of destructibility before). The graphics are great, but they are not revolutionary - they are an evolution of what was already present in Bad Company 2.

Never thought I'd see so many crazed BF3 fanboys on here. :shadedshu
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,129 (4.55/day)
Likes
3,697
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310 w/ QCK Mass mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
#42

Badelhas

New Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2012
Messages
47 (0.02/day)
Likes
1
Location
Braga, Portugal
System Name 3D Vision MegaRIG
Processor i5 2500k@4.3ghz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Cooling Mine Rev. B
Memory 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) 2x GTX570 in SLI (Core@850+Mem@2050)
Storage Vertex 3 120Gb SSD + 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster 1100MB CRT & Benq W700 3D Vision Projector
Case Case CoolerMaster Storm Scout
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX
Power Supply Corsair Tx750w
Software WIN 7 64bits
Benchmark Scores P10.780 3DMark 11 at 24/7 OC. 6500 PCMark 11.
#44
I'm wondering if you've even played BF3. Have you played the Jet or Tank mission in single player? It seems not. In multiplayer it's the same story... Your argument is rather silly because it's entirely subjective. I could say that Crysis was nothing in terms of what it brought compared to Half Life 2. It's a stupid argument. Half Life 2 was ground-breaking, the original Half Life was also, Crysis was also ground-breaking in what it gave us. A vast outdoor world with destructable scenery. You need to get over your Crysis thing because it makes you sound like a fanboy and no one wants that.

Crysis gave us a large outdoor world with a new level of super-destructo phyics.

Half-Life 2 gave us the same.

Battlefield 3 couldn't introduce super-destructo physics because it was already done, what it did give us was a new level of character animation realism. New levels of lighting realism, new levels of post effects and yes it was very much optimised for PC. It sounds to me like you haven't even played it or if you have, perhaps all you saw was crysis because you're so in awe of it. Crysis hasn't aged well. It looks a bit shit now unless you mod it and from what I've seen it still looks a bit shit compared to Crysis 2 DX11 and certainly BF3.

Retarded argument and you picked on the wrong game with BF3 because it shows you don't know the game or the tech that went into it. I assume you didn't see the DICE lectures either.
Fanboy, calm down, no one is beeing agressive, or are we? Probably you are playing too much Battlefield 3 and should play more of "The Sims" instead ;)


Crytek made a bold decision to do it the way they did it, and of course the guys with less money or without the will to upgrade got really frustrated but I believe it made Crysis even more known and gave them lots os publicity, Crytek got really big because of it. And if you think about it it is not really worth upgrading to a 1000€ dual GPU´s like yours back then except if you are playing in a 3 monitor setup. I have, as I did back then, my "upgrade demon" saying I should upgrade my pc but then I think: "Why? I do not need it and, for the look of it, will not needed for a couple of years more". It really makes me sad but it is the true: the GPU tech is years ahead of the game engine´s technology.
Not only that but I continue to believe that BF3 is a very good looking game (and the gameplay is great, as Crysis, in my opinion) but my jaws didnt fall when I first looked at it. With Crysis or, nowadays, when I watch the samaritan tech demo, my jaws do fall and I realize the tech they are holding back. And this because games are since crysis entirely made with consoles in mind and their 6 years old hardware capabilities. Even Crytek defrauded the Pc community when they promise Crysis 2 with Dx 11 support when they only did it months after the launch of the game.

Cheers,
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#45
Fanboy, calm down, no one is beeing agressive, or are we? Probably you are playing too much Battlefield 3 and should play more of "The Sims" instead ;)


Crytek made a bold decision to do it the way they did it, and of course the guys with less money or without the will to upgrade got really frustrated but I believe it made Crysis even more known and gave them lots os publicity, Crytek got really big because of it. And if you think about it it is not really worth upgrading to a 1000€ dual GPU´s like yours back then except if you are playing in a 3 monitor setup. I have, as I did back then, my "upgrade demon" saying I should upgrade my pc but then I think: "Why? I do not need it and, for the look of it, will not needed for a couple of years more". It really makes me sad but it is the true: the GPU tech is years ahead of the game engine´s technology.
Not only that but I continue to believe that BF3 is a very good looking game (and the gameplay is great, as Crysis, in my opinion) but my jaws didnt fall when I first looked at it. With Crysis or, nowadays, when I watch the samaritan tech demo, my jaws do fall and I realize the tech they are holding back. And this because games are since crysis entirely made with consoles in mind and their 6 years old hardware capabilities. Even Crytek defrauded the Pc community when they promise Crysis 2 with Dx 11 support when they only did it months after the launch of the game.

Cheers,
Brand X GPU fully optimized demo with prerendered scenes does NOT equal a game.


All else equal the CPU portion of any game and in place dependencies have more to do with what we see than GPU tech.

physxcooking.dll

Its great they want to move away from this, but as soon as they do they limit their game market penetration, or they have to spend hundreds of hours more writing code to optimize for EVERY GPU so they make sure it runs correctly.

In my humble opinion we are still four years away from having any sort of real time hardware accelerated true to life games, and then only if we are fortunate. So while demos like this are cool, they are not indicative of true performance.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
#46
Fanboy, calm down, no one is beeing agressive, or are we? Probably you are playing too much Battlefield 3 and should play more of "The Sims" instead ;)


Crytek made a bold decision to do it the way they did it, and of course the guys with less money or without the will to upgrade got really frustrated but I believe it made Crysis even more known and gave them lots os publicity, Crytek got really big because of it. And if you think about it it is not really worth upgrading to a 1000€ dual GPU´s like yours back then except if you are playing in a 3 monitor setup. I have, as I did back then, my "upgrade demon" saying I should upgrade my pc but then I think: "Why? I do not need it and, for the look of it, will not needed for a couple of years more". It really makes me sad but it is the true: the GPU tech is years ahead of the game engine´s technology.
Not only that but I continue to believe that BF3 is a very good looking game (and the gameplay is great, as Crysis, in my opinion) but my jaws didnt fall when I first looked at it. With Crysis or, nowadays, when I watch the samaritan tech demo, my jaws do fall and I realize the tech they are holding back. And this because games are since crysis entirely made with consoles in mind and their 6 years old hardware capabilities. Even Crytek defrauded the Pc community when they promise Crysis 2 with Dx 11 support when they only did it months after the launch of the game.

Cheers,
Well, I take some of your points and I agree about the Samaritan demo. That is unquestionably something that raises the bar but I believe BF3 does also. The only issue here is when you believe subjectively that the bar has not been raised to your ideal. We all have different ideals. I appreciate BF3 for what it is, at least it is actually a PC optimised game, should it look like Samaritan? Well no, different type of game entirely. Does BF3 push current hardware in the same way Crysis did 5 years ago? Wrong argument. DICE tend to be more optimised if I can start throwing that word around. The Battlefield series has pretty much always raised the bar a little.

There has never been a Battlefield that I could run on max detail on day of release. Last year I purchased 2 x 560Ti 1gb. I figured since my system had hammered Bad Company 2 into the ground at 197 fps on max detail, I could get similar performance on BF3... Wrong! With 768 SLI cores I have the horsepower to run BF3, I don't have the GDDR. Thus at 1080 I am forced to play on High detail. The difference between high and ultra isn't that great on this game but don't forget I am running 2 x 560Ti even on high and the game would be much more demanding on a single 560Ti. So Dice have always pushed the envelope to some extent and just because your jaw didn't drop with the pre-release vids, I will say you are in a minority because everyone I know who saw the vids had the jaw dropping.

I think we are getting too caught up in comparing one game to another and saying one game beats all and what has come since hasn't raised the bar to the same level.

The hardware has moved on, BF3 has quite a lot of new developments in terms of lighting effects, physics etc. It doesn't have to raise the bar the same level as crysis did 5 years ago. That is irrelevant. Arguing that Bf3 didn't make your jaw drop is silly because it's purely subjective and a minority opinion at that.

I am actually sick of hearing about crysis in this thread now.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
#47
Actually I think something of interest to note is that if you take crysis without any bullshit mods and compare it to crysis 2 or BF3, you can really see how games have progressed graphically. Not just visuals but character animation and physics.

Certainly consoles have done a lot to damage pc gaming and I hate them.

Would not have a console in my tent.

The bar is being raised gradually. It's not always constant but the progress is there.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
313 (0.07/day)
Likes
69
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name Kablamo
Processor Some Intel i5
Motherboard some gigabyte board
Cooling h80i
Memory samsung sticks that got a good review a few years back
Video Card(s) 6950 acting like a 6970
Storage some solid state ocz drives
Display(s) Samsung T260HD (1920 x 1200)
Case bitfenix microatx case
Audio Device(s) hyperx cloud II
Power Supply corsair 750 or similar
Mouse M65
Keyboard g510
Software win 10
#48
Hate to break up the discussion but I'm looking forward to seeing the full demo and those well rendered boobs.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
Likes
1
#49
Hate to break up the discussion but I'm looking forward to seeing the full demo and those well rendered boobs.
Agree. I guess it will only run on 680 but I want to upgrade. Over at bit tech forum there is great controversy over the 2gb the new GPU has. For me it's enough at 1080 but some people running much higher res and say they're gonna wait for the 4gb.
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
776 (0.31/day)
Likes
844
Location
Omaha, NE
System Name "The Gift"
Processor Intel Core i5 2500k
Motherboard ASUS Maximus iV Gene-Z/Gen 3
Cooling Cryorig M9i
Memory G. Skill 8GB(2x4GB) Ripjaws "X" Series - DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) HIS HD 7950 IceQ Turbo 3GB
Storage WD Velociraptor Enterprise Edition - 300GB
Display(s) HP e232
Case Fractal Design - Arc Mini
Power Supply Corsair TX650W
Mouse Logitech T400 Zone Touch Mouse
Keyboard HP KBRF57711 Wireless Keyboard
Software Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS/Windows 7 Professional - 64 bit(GOG/Steam Only)
#50
Unfortunately...nVidia is speaking of a different new dawn. Figure it out for yourself at the end of Katy Perry's ET video.

I'll pass.

LC