• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Likely to Start 40nm GPU Conquest with GT218

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
As the industry moves closer to implementation of the 40nm silicon technology on graphics processors, some of the most complex electronic devices, both AMD and NVIDIA have their offerings in the works. While AMD already has prototypes taped out, NVIDIA seems to be taking its time, perhaps to perfect its products.

The green camp, as Hardware-Infos finds out, is likely to start its 40nm lineup with the GT218 graphics processor. With NVIDIA's internal coding scheme, the GT218 is an entry-level GPU. In its generation hierarchy, would be the GT215, GT216 (mainstream) and GT212 (high-end). The GT218 will succeed the G98 GPU that went into making the GeForce 9300 series. It will have 32 stream processors, 8 texture memory units, and 4 raster operations pipelines. It will continue to have a 64-bit wide memory bus. Despite the increase in transistor counts, the GPU ends up with a lower TDP, expected to be around 22W, as against the roughly 30W for the G98. The GT218 is slated for April, later this year.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
bring on teh GT212 already, who cares about the GT218.
Normaly we get the top card first, then the lowend ones, not sure why its going the other way this time.
IF they wait to long on the highend card, the GTX300s will be to close behind to bother with.
 
They care. Because they're going to make more money off of the GT218 than the GT212.
 
That's some low power consumption!! Can't wait till GT300.
 
40nm now eh? I wonder how long till they bring out lower size chips than that from 65nm...
 
Doesn't seem like a big improvement overall. 32 shaders will make this card a good second for PhysX though, maybe that's their goal.
 
I think it's so that when the GT212, 384sp/2TF, launches, they can say that have a product that is 12x faster than it's entry level, with every space filled in the center, including the presumably 6x faster GT216 (192sp) and 9-10x faster GT212gt (288-320sp?)...with maybe a nice little gt214 (96sp?) thrown in for good measure. That could be quite a well-spaced stack...in theory, ranging from 32-384sp, 8-96TMU, 64-bit - 384-bit, 14.4gbps-192gbps, 150gflops-2TF, and most importantly...chip sizes from 8^2 (64mm2) to 19^2 (361mm2).

:roll:


Ah, I dream of a simplified product stack. How lovely it would be. :cry:
 
Last edited:
nvidia try catch ATI in GPU technology
 
i think they're starting with entry level this time so that when they produce their flagship they can use 40nm with most if not all bugs figured out from producing a smaller chip(GTX218) first then moving up in chip size with the process, instead of starting out their flagship with a common manufacturing process or soon to be outdated process.
 
:eek: NVIDIA actually might get to a lower process than Intel is at? That in itself is remarkable.
 
:eek: NVIDIA actually might get to a lower process than Intel is at? That in itself is remarkable.

It's AMD before NVIDIA and Intel, but yes. Intel will be demonstrating 32nm SSDs at CeBIT though.
 
To be more precise TSMC is, but yeah both Ati and Nvidia are apparently going to have a chip in a smaller fab process than 45nm before Intel. Probably Ati a little bit sooner.
 
Back
Top