• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA to Try and Develop x86 CPU in Two to Three Years

Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,838 (0.55/day)
Likes
528
System Name Computer
Processor 1700X
Motherboard CH6
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Msata
Display(s) LG 23" IPS
Power Supply Seasonic 760 Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 64-Bit
#26
Go Go nvidia
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,794 (5.13/day)
Likes
5,195
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#27
Intel slapped a lawsuit against AMD, I wonder what they gonna do about it against NV?
 
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
1,003 (0.24/day)
Likes
156
System Name [Primary Workstation]
Processor Intel Core i7-920 Bloomfield @ 3.8GHz/4.55GHz [24-7/Bench]
Motherboard EVGA X58 E758-A1 [Tweaked right!]
Cooling Cooler Master V8 [stock fan + two 133CFM ULTRA KAZE fans]
Memory 12GB [Kingston HyperX]
Video Card(s) constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer nVidia]
Storage constantly upgrading/downgrading [prefer Hitachi/Samsung]
Display(s) Triple LCD [40 inch primary + 32 & 28 inch auxiliary displays]
Case Cooler Master Cosmos 1000 [Mesh Mod, CFM Overload]
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D1 + onboard Realtek ALC889A [Logitech Z-5300 Spk., Niko 650-HP 5.1 Hp., X-Bass Hp.]
Power Supply Corsair TX950W [aka Reactor]
Software This and that... [All software 100% legit and paid for, 0% pirated]
Benchmark Scores Ridiculously good scores!!!
#28
They will probably be CPU's targeted at low to mid range notebooks or netbooks, at first at least. Intel can't be too happy about this or AMD for that matter. While more competition is usually good for the consumer, these corporations generally do not like competition in any form. Even incompetent competition is usually considered dangerous.

Also, this is not that big of a surprise. There have been rumors about this going back at least 2-3 years, back to autumn of 2006 when it was even rumored that nVidia might be buying AMD. Instead nVidia around that time hired a bunch of former Stexar (ex-Intel) x86 engineers. I'm guessing around this same time period is when nVidia started tinkering with x86 architecture, behind closed doors at least.
 

TooFast

New Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
391 (0.09/day)
Likes
6
Location
montreal quebec
System Name OVERKILL
Processor INTEL I7 965@ 3.6
Motherboard ASUS RAMPAGE 2
Cooling STOCK
Memory 6GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) ATI HD 5970
Storage 4X 60GB SSD RAID 0
Display(s) 30 INCH DELL
Case ANTEC 1200
Audio Device(s) XFI-PCI-E
Power Supply CORSAIR 1000WATT
Software WIN 7
Benchmark Scores netcore.24 COD4 server 76.65.250.134:28960
#29
lol...........they will fail.:D
 

bryan_d

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Likes
4
Processor Intel E4300 @3GHz
Motherboard Abit IP35-E
Cooling RevA Scythe Ninja, Zalman ZM-NBF47, Accelero S1
Memory A-Data DDR2 800MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 8800GS 384MB OC
Storage Seagate SATA 320GB Perp
Display(s) Planar PL1910M
Case Cooler Master Centurion 5, Yate-Loons
Audio Device(s) Sounblaster Audigy 2ZS
Power Supply Sparkle FSP400-B204
Software Enslaved
#30
Interesting article,

But I too agree that all will be in vain due to the x86 licensing. If game developers all jump to the x86 ship, nVidia is pretty much DEAD. AMD/ATI have their hands on the license, and hence can make C/GPU cards, but nVidia will be left drowning in an abandoned architecture. :(

I bet nVidia is sweating with their efforts in 3D gaming, only to be swept away from them with the coming of Larrabee.


Why is Intel scared??

Well first of all, considering the power of computers today and the usage that most people do of the PCs, every nettop sold is one less "high-end" desktop CPU that Intel sells, and don't fool yourself, Intel's market is and always has been the high-end market.
Seriously? I hope you are being sarcastic.

The High-End market might be the main market here in TPU, but Intel is not stupid enough to believe that is what makes them rich! :) Do you really believe that the 40,590 members of TPU even have X-editions of Intel's line-up? Heck no. Intel ripens itself with CPUs that sell; AKA Atoms, e1/2/4/5/700 series CPU, and some lower Q's. Period.

It is like saying that Dodge was only successful because of the Viper... it was the Neons that fattened the pockets. :D

PowerVR HSR FTW!

Bryan d
 

3nd0

New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2007
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
Location
Bandung, Indonesia
#31
WoW??

I really don't know why they(nVIDIA) want to destroying their reputation by competing in developing x86 CPU..(I'm not trying to offend any one but nVIDIA is doing a good job by just developing GPU's!!) b'cause ATI still my fav.. :rockout:
 

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#32
Interesting article,

But I too agree that all will be in vain due to the x86 licensing. If game developers all jump to the x86 ship, nVidia is pretty much DEAD. AMD/ATI have their hands on the license, and hence can make C/GPU cards, but nVidia will be left drowning in an abandoned architecture. :(

I bet nVidia is sweating with their efforts in 3D gaming, only to be swept away from them with the coming of Larrabee.




Seriously? I hope you are being sarcastic.

The High-End market might be the main market here in TPU, but Intel is not stupid enough to believe that is what makes them rich! :) Do you really believe that the 40,590 members of TPU even have X-editions of Intel's line-up? Heck no. Intel ripens itself with CPUs that sell; AKA Atoms, e1/2/4/5/700 series CPU, and some lower Q's. Period.

It is like saying that Dodge was only successful because of the Viper... it was the Neons that fattened the pockets. :D

PowerVR HSR FTW!

Bryan d
Those lower Q's as you named them are indeed high-end market forced to lower prices by competition. And all those e1/2/4/... are no different, Core2 flavours that Intel had NO CHOICE but to create to compete with AMD's offerings and potentially Via. If you don't believe me, just look back and tell me how many sub $100-150 CPUs they did in the past?? They used to do the least Celerons they could. Period.

Anyway if you read better my post, and don't try to understand it from your ass, this same thing is explained in the post itself, when I say "high-end" (with quotes), $100-500 CPUs, $30-100 chipsets... I think it's clear that I'm talking about "high-end" CPUs as opposed to cheap embedded solutions like Atom, Nano, etc. I think that the fact that I didn't talk about $300-1500 CPUs (half the people in TPU are in that range...) already contadicts your stupid reply. I can stand critics, but from someone that didn't bother to read and understand my post NOPE.

Really, I don't know how to explain to you, that from a modern market point of view even a cheap $50 e1/2/4 CPU is already high-end compared to $10 Atom. << Atom is way overpriced now, competition and simple market trends wil bring it down there soon.

On a $50 CPU intel can have $10 for themselves, on a $500 they can have $100-200 (does it matter if they sell 50 flod less of them? NO), on a $10 CPU they can't have a shit in comparison, and as I said the market is not growing at a pace enoubh to fight that fact.

Nettops are going to cannibalize the market that feeds Intel. I repeat: Intel owns the market already and a change doesn't benefit them, just as the previous trend change towards cheaper CPUs didn't benefit them neither. On the other hand a new market trend favours almost every other manufacturer, because it's a mean of scape from a market where they cannot compete to one where the field is even for everybody. AMD, Via, Nvidia (if they finally do a CPU) can't compete in the desktop market (AMD does it's best, but hardly) and nettop, ulpcs, and all can save them. Intel is scared by the fact that with the current trend "only" enthusiast will buy their desktop CPUs in a not so far future and that includes $50 CPUs. How did you say? Ah, PERIOD.
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
1,777 (0.50/day)
Likes
163
Location
South Australia
System Name QUACK
Processor Intel i7 2600K (3.4 GHz, 8 threads)
Motherboard Asus P67P8-V3
Cooling Xigmatek Balder 120mm (4x120,1x140mm case)
Memory Patriot 2 Viper Sector 5, 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce GTX 960 G1 4GB
Storage 1x Samsung EVO 850 (500GB) SSD, 1x Fujitsu 256GB SSD
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2311h 23" (so sexy)
Case CoolerMaster Gladiator RC-600
Audio Device(s) Onboard 5.1
Power Supply Antec 850w with yellow racing stripes
Software Windows 7 HP 64 bit
#33
If they incorporate Stream Processing Units into this CPU that can accelerate x86 instructions, it would be a truly epic CPU. I hope they can pull this off, the Ion platform looks like a great chipset for any low to mid ranged PC/notebook/netbook, and an nVidia CPU in it would mean nVidia could sell these competitively against Intel.
I want nVidia CPUs, especially if they can be overclocked!
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,794 (5.13/day)
Likes
5,195
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#34
they way you are Praising NV for such practice makes me think why are you using an Intel product if you dont like it very much?
 

Swansen

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
182 (0.05/day)
Likes
9
#35
Why is Intel scared??
Well first of all, considering the power of computers today and the usage that most people do of the PCs, every nettop sold is one less "high-end" desktop CPU that Intel sells, and don't fool yourself, Intel's market is and always has been the high-end market.
Um, Intel has a HUGE hand in the nettop market, are you kidding me??? THE FRIGGIN ATOM IS ALL THAT IS USED CURRENTLY. That said, no one ever realises that even though the consumer market is large, the corporate market is MUCH larger, as well as the server market. All desktop CPUs are spin-offs of server CPUs.

On Nvidia, everyone is freaking out over nothing, if and when Nvidia gets into the CPU market, it will be cell phones, smart phones, things like that, 20 or so years as we'll probably see a Nvidia CPU.
 

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#36
Um, Intel has a HUGE hand in the nettop market, are you kidding me??? THE FRIGGIN ATOM IS ALL THAT IS USED CURRENTLY. That said, no one ever realises that even though the consumer market is large, the corporate market is MUCH larger, as well as the server market. All desktop CPUs are spin-offs of server CPUs.

On Nvidia, everyone is freaking out over nothing, if and when Nvidia gets into the CPU market, it will be cell phones, smart phones, things like that, 20 or so years as we'll probably see a Nvidia CPU.
Please read the post before posting. For Gods sake!!

O K. For the nth time. And traduced according to "THE FRIGGIN ATOM IS ALL THAT IS USED CURRENTLY.":

- Every nettop sold with an Atom, is one less e7200 + G31 mobo sold by Intel.

Which at the same time can be traduced as:

- Every 30$ given to Intel is one less $150 given to Intel.

Do any of you guys understand this simple thing yet? Because I have no other damn way of saying it...
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (2.04/day)
Likes
799
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
#37
I understand what your talking about.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
4,870 (1.35/day)
Likes
681
Location
Joplin, Mo
System Name Ultrabeast GX2
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4.0GHZ 24/7
Motherboard Gigabit P35-DS3L
Cooling Rosewill RX24, Dual Slot Vid, Fan control
Memory 2x1gb 1066mhz@850MHZ DDR2
Video Card(s) 9800GX2 @ 690/1040
Storage 750/250/250/200 all WD 7200
Display(s) 24" DCLCD 2ms 1200p
Case Apevia
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Digital on-board, 5.1 digital hooked up
Power Supply 700W RAIDMAXXX SLI
Software winXP Pro
Benchmark Scores 17749 3DM06
#38
NV might be making their first move in filing an anti competitive complaint:
1. Try to gain a license for x86.
---a. Success! start making money competing in both markets! GO TO 2.
---b. FAIL! file anti competition complaint. GO TO 3.
2. Make money and compete directly on both fronts with their rival AMD. END.
3. Complaint filed in courts.
---a. Success! start competing with AMD on both fronts. END.
---b. FAIL! AMD 5xxx series GPU > NV GTX 300 series. CEO commits suicide, NV files bankruptcy.
 

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#39

crazy pyro

New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
1,662 (0.48/day)
Likes
118
Location
Newcastle
System Name The neighbour of the beast|NC10
Processor Q6600 GO|Atom N270
Motherboard Asus P5QSE/R
Cooling Stock|Stock
Memory 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer Red @800|1GB@533
Video Card(s) Palit HD4850|Intel GMA 945
Storage Maxtor 500GB 32 MB Cache|160GB IDE 2.5"
Display(s) 15.4" touchscreen, 15.4" Digimate LCD| 10.2"
Case Coolermaster Elite 330|Black NC10 case
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD audio|Integrated
Power Supply Corsair 650W TX|6 Cell battery
Software Vista Home Premium, Win 7| Win XP
Benchmark Scores Benches will be taken on the main rig soon. (AKA never)
#40
I understand what you're talking about too Dark Matter, I'm damn impressed with the performance of my atom so intel won't be selling me a desk-top CPU if the machine's only gonna be used for web browsing.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
4,870 (1.35/day)
Likes
681
Location
Joplin, Mo
System Name Ultrabeast GX2
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4.0GHZ 24/7
Motherboard Gigabit P35-DS3L
Cooling Rosewill RX24, Dual Slot Vid, Fan control
Memory 2x1gb 1066mhz@850MHZ DDR2
Video Card(s) 9800GX2 @ 690/1040
Storage 750/250/250/200 all WD 7200
Display(s) 24" DCLCD 2ms 1200p
Case Apevia
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Digital on-board, 5.1 digital hooked up
Power Supply 700W RAIDMAXXX SLI
Software winXP Pro
Benchmark Scores 17749 3DM06
#41
I think darkmatter hit it on the spot with his novel on p1. However, Intel is safe, they know it, they have no reason to be scared. why?
I work in the US army 5th special forces group in FT Campbell kentucky. We have contracts with both dell and intel worth more than the consumer market demands by far, and we overpay, drastically. Intel likes dabbling in the consumer market, but it is contracts like these that make them money. Our contracts with AMD are only for server processors, and only dual cores at that, which hold only ~10% of the share.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
423 (0.13/day)
Likes
122
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#42
I understand what you're talking about too Dark Matter, I'm damn impressed with the performance of my atom so intel won't be selling me a desk-top CPU if the machine's only gonna be used for web browsing.
Don't forget VIA's nano. While it does use slightly more power than atom, it's still aimed at atom's market and does perform alot better, including handling 1080p fine, whith atom can't do. And also, it doesn't have to be lumped together with an old, power hungry chipset, unlike atom.

I wonder if nvidia are still considering ION but with the VIA nano instead.
 

KBD

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
2,477 (0.62/day)
Likes
275
Location
The Rotten Big Apple
Processor Intel e8600 @ 4.9 Ghz
Motherboard DFI Lanparty DK X48-T2RSB Plus
Cooling Water
Memory 2GB (2 x 1GB) of Buffalo Firestix DDR2-1066
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon HD 4870 1GB OC (820/950) & tweaking
Storage 2x 74GB Velociraptors in RAID 0; 320 GB Barracuda 7200.10
Display(s) 22" Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070SB
Case Silverstone TJ09-BW
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Profesional
Power Supply Ultra X3 800W
Software Windows XP Pro w/ SP3
#43
Don't forget VIA's nano. While it does use slightly more power than atom, it's still aimed at atom's market and does perform alot better, including handling 1080p fine, whith atom can't do. And also, it doesn't have to be lumped together with an old, power hungry chipset, unlike atom.

I wonder if nvidia are still considering ION but with the VIA nano instead.
While VIA Nano is a nice little chip and a direct competitor to the Atom it is nowhere to be found. Try buying one or a nettop based on it. It will be very, very hard. But Atom is so commonplace its ridiclous. So the Nano is really out of the equation until VIA makes this chip and Nano-based nettops widely available.
 

crazy pyro

New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
1,662 (0.48/day)
Likes
118
Location
Newcastle
System Name The neighbour of the beast|NC10
Processor Q6600 GO|Atom N270
Motherboard Asus P5QSE/R
Cooling Stock|Stock
Memory 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer Red @800|1GB@533
Video Card(s) Palit HD4850|Intel GMA 945
Storage Maxtor 500GB 32 MB Cache|160GB IDE 2.5"
Display(s) 15.4" touchscreen, 15.4" Digimate LCD| 10.2"
Case Coolermaster Elite 330|Black NC10 case
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD audio|Integrated
Power Supply Corsair 650W TX|6 Cell battery
Software Vista Home Premium, Win 7| Win XP
Benchmark Scores Benches will be taken on the main rig soon. (AKA never)
#44
Also there are no nano netbooks with the battery life of the NC10 out yet, well except for possibly the NC20 when it comes out.
 

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#45
I think darkmatter hit it on the spot with his novel on p1. However, Intel is safe, they know it, they have no reason to be scared. why?
I work in the US army 5th special forces group in FT Campbell kentucky. We have contracts with both dell and intel worth more than the consumer market demands by far, and we overpay, drastically. Intel likes dabbling in the consumer market, but it is contracts like these that make them money. Our contracts with AMD are only for server processors, and only dual cores at that, which hold only ~10% of the share.
Even then they are scared. Even if consumer market is smaller, it's still a very big portion of their revenue, and in reality even the smaller of the portions are very important. The PC bussiness is very harsh and the profits are not so big in comparison to the revenue, that is, expenses are big too. It's not unnusual to see tens of billions of dollars in revenue and still millions of losses. So if for any reason you loose 10% of the revenue (which doesn't seem too much at a first glance), that could very well mean you went from making profits to some worrying losses, and IMHO that's the reality that Intel could face. Because being the big company they are, they are much less flexible to restructuring it to lower the expenses. They depend on their revenues more than what most people think. And even if they are far from a difficult situation they just don't want to be there. And they are scared, their actions just show that they are.

EDIT: And don't subestimate Nvidia in that market you mentioned. Maybe not the army, but in medical environment or in topography CUDA has created a very good impression, doing things that Intel can never dream of, at least for now. CUDA is already being implemented there and as to the army, a GPGPU solution could make a lot of things better than a CPU like GPS image tracking, or pattern finding, for example. What you show is the CURRENT reality, but Intel is scared of the future. Things are bright for them now, and theywant them that way forever. Intel right now is that child that had not seen bad days (or are far forgotten) and is scared of what might be ahead.
 
Last edited:

Swansen

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
182 (0.05/day)
Likes
9
#46
Please read the post before posting. For Gods sake!!

O K. For the nth time. And traduced according to "THE FRIGGIN ATOM IS ALL THAT IS USED CURRENTLY.":

- Every nettop sold with an Atom, is one less e7200 + G31 mobo sold by Intel.

Which at the same time can be traduced as:

- Every 30$ given to Intel is one less $150 given to Intel.

Do any of you guys understand this simple thing yet? Because I have no other damn way of saying it...
Thats not how economics work, you make money on volume. Even then, your not understanding this, a side from everything else i said, just because the price is X amount higher doesn't mean there is more profit. High end parts are expensive because they are difficult to make and because there is a smaller market, which is vise versa for low end parts. Its that simple, i understand your point, but your logic, but it has wholes. Even then, Intel make a BOAT LOAD off licensing, they develop something, and then everyone else pays them to make what they developed, almost pure profit. Intel has ZERO reasons to be any kind of scared, Intel has an extreme amount of money, they will win any kind of suit against them, CHINA, as in the country, couldn't get an x86 license from them. Honestly 3870X2 pretty much nailed it, and on the nettops, they are a VERY small portion of the market, most people don't like them because they are to small. Intel is going anywhere, they aren't "scared" Nvidia is going to topple any mountains, and they are a LONG way off from creating a processor that would compete with AMD or Intel. Also there are a couple open source derivatives of CUDA, which do just as good of a job as CUDA does. On that, Intel is HUGE, they will have answer to CUDA soon enough.
 
Last edited:

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#47
High end parts are expensive because they are difficult to make and because there is a smaller market, which is vise versa for low end parts. Its that simple, i understand your point, but your logic, but it has wholes.
:roll: So let me undertand that. They told you that BS, marketing BS and you believed it????
My god. While that is true to a point, and was more true some time ago than it is today, it definately is not to the extent that prices show. The cheaper and the more expensive Quad (about $150 and $1500) costs exactly the same to develop (it's the same chip in the same waffer), almost exactly the same to test and the excuse to sell them high is because they are selected chips that can clock higher, have some better properties, etc. / end of theory

Now we take Core2 and it just happens to OC like a charm, to almost 3.8 GHz irregardless of what was it's original clock. Could have been clocked at 3 Ghz in the first place?? Of course my friend. Do they make a profit selling them at $130?? Of course my friend. Then could Intel sell $150 Quads clocked at 3Gz+ and still make a profit? Of course my friend. It's common bussiness, but in no way it is because they are harder to make. :laugh:

* higher end CPUs DO tend to OC better, but is trully because they are selected pieces or because they have a higher multiplier?? I just ask. :rolleyes:

Even then, Intel make a BOAT LOAD off licensing, they develop something, and then everyone else pays them to make what they developed, almost pure profit.
Yeah, agreed. And because of that, what happens when that IP starts losing it's value as is the case with x86 CPUs? :cry:

EDIT: You forgot to list "they force the adoption of that thing" and "they ensure the exclusivity, by not licensing to companies that can do it better" in that las sentence though.
 
Last edited:

Swansen

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
182 (0.05/day)
Likes
9
#48
:roll: So let me undertand that. They told you that BS, marketing BS and you believed it????

Now we take Core2 and it ju
Yeah, agreed. And because of that, what happens when that IP starts losing it's value as is the case with x86 CPUs? :cry:
....... wow... first off, YOU MISSED HALF OF WHAT I'VE WRITTEN, so whatever we are even. What about the fall? everything currently is still based on a x86 architecture, so Intel has say. Right now the only reason Intel is allowing AMD to make processors is because of X86_64. In which case we are in a whole different ball game, in which if Nvidia wants in, they have to go through AMD and Intel, good luck. Yes, i understand that licensing doesn't help development, but again, thats a completely different conversation. I agree, i don't agree with current rules, they only hinder development, but we live in a world where they exists, in turn making Nvidia's climb to anything a very difficult one.
 

DarkMatter

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
1,714 (0.46/day)
Likes
182
Processor Intel C2Q Q6600 @ Stock (for now)
Motherboard Asus P5Q-E
Cooling Proc: Scythe Mine, Graphics: Zalman VF900 Cu
Memory 4 GB (2x2GB) DDR2 Corsair Dominator 1066Mhz 5-5-5-15
Video Card(s) GigaByte 8800GT Stock Clocks: 700Mhz Core, 1700 Shader, 1940 Memory
Storage 74 GB WD Raptor 10000rpm, 2x250 GB Seagate Raid 0
Display(s) HP p1130, 21" Trinitron
Case Antec p180
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi PLatinum
Power Supply 700W FSP Group 85% Efficiency
Software Windows XP
#49
....... wow... first off, YOU MISSED HALF OF WHAT I'VE WRITTEN, so whatever we are even. What about the fall? everything currently is still based on a x86 architecture, so Intel has say. Right now the only reason Intel is allowing AMD to make processors is because of X86_64. In which case we are in a whole different ball game, in which if Nvidia wants in, they have to go through AMD and Intel, good luck. Yes, i understand that licensing doesn't help development, but again, thats a completely different conversation. I agree, i don't agree with current rules, they only hinder development, but we live in a world where they exists, in turn making Nvidia's climb to anything a very difficult one.
I just answered to the points I wanted to make clear, but if you want:

Overall everything you said was only half true. Like that you make money on volume. You make money on volume and in margins. No margin = no profits. High-end parts have a much higher margin (like 10/20 to one) and even if by volume low-end is 10 times bigger, in profits it's only twice as big. And the most profitable segment is always the mainstream anyway, and it's that market segment which is in risk really. Ion while could be considered super-low-end does threaten some Intels mainstream solutions, because it has better graphics than the better Intel. If it was a success that could lead to Nvidia moving that scheme to higher levels and would, in fact, erase the need for ANY mainstream CPU. Intel then would be left with only the enthusiast segment (which will never dissapear, and no one neither Nvidia said so) and the new low segment, which would be the Atom (and sucessors) and not the $50-100 CPUs of today. Not the bright future Intel wants, that's for sure. That's the main reason they are trying their best to ban Ion, without making too much noise.
 

bryan_d

New Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
41 (0.01/day)
Likes
4
Processor Intel E4300 @3GHz
Motherboard Abit IP35-E
Cooling RevA Scythe Ninja, Zalman ZM-NBF47, Accelero S1
Memory A-Data DDR2 800MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 8800GS 384MB OC
Storage Seagate SATA 320GB Perp
Display(s) Planar PL1910M
Case Cooler Master Centurion 5, Yate-Loons
Audio Device(s) Sounblaster Audigy 2ZS
Power Supply Sparkle FSP400-B204
Software Enslaved
#50
Children in Forums=FTL!

I think Darkmatter needs to take a deep breath, and just step away from "Darkmatter land" for a moment.

If you really believe Intel only focuses on its high-end CPU's to drive its profits then you can go ahead and believe what you want. But the vast majority of Corporate environments, Home Business, Educational Institutes, and personal computers that I have seen with my own eyes do not use high-end; these are what make up Intel's profits.

Well I am finished here. If you will continue to spit and scream at your monitor, go ahead. :)

Darkmatter go see some family and loved ones,

Bryan D.