• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA's AIC Partners to Launch GTX 1080, 1060 With Faster GDDR5, GDDR5X Memory

Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
10,715 (1.99/day)
System Name Desktop / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 6700K @ 4.5GHz (1.270 V) / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz CL15 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 850 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p + 21.5" LG 22MP67VQ IPS 60Hz 1080p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX Onboard / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10
Confusing, because I'm sure a 9Gbps GTX 1070 would sell well.
The vram on my GTX1070 runs already over 9600MHz when OC'd with benchmarking.

But yeah I agree, 9Ghz stock speed vram would be cool, you should be able to OC it to 10GHz then!:pimp:
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (2.36/day)
RE7 on very high uses about 7.5GB@1080p. But that's largely attributed to the shadow cache. Turning that off just about halves the memory usage.
Halves the memory usage at NO performance or visual penalty. In fact I don't even know what's the purpose of this stupid setting. If you leave it on, it makes things so much worse on 4GB cards because it has NO VRAM usage check. The stupid cache will use all memory and it'll just stutter like insane. Turning this off on 4GB card and you can still have EVERYTHING else on max and it'll work smoothly.
 
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
427 (0.13/day)
Processor Core i5 3470 (3.20 GHZ)
Cooling Intel OC27vv
Memory 16 GB DDR3 667mhz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 5670
Storage Seagate - 500GB | 7200RPM | 32MB Cache | Sata-3G
Display(s) BenQ RL2455
Case Dell Tower
Audio Device(s) On-board
Power Supply Corsair 600w
Whatever happened to HBM? I thought NVidia was working on alternative to compete against it.... or may be GDDR5X is it??
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,280 (1.02/day)
Whatever happened to HBM? I thought NVidia was working on alternative to compete against it.... or may be GDDR5X is it??
They already use HBM2 on their lower yield high-end HPC parts such as the GP100, but I guess they don't consider it particularly viable or rewarding yet bringing it to consumer parts, maybe HBM2 production is one reasons why Vega hasn't shown up yet.

GDDR5X is a nice middle ground approach especially when combined with their shiny memory compression tech.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,588 (1.94/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Whatever happened to HBM? I thought NVidia was working on alternative to compete against it.... or may be GDDR5X is it??
memory standard isn't really what either amd or nvidia does. amd had a(n exclusive) partnership with hynix for hbm. at the same time, another potential similar standard in form of hybrid memory cube was being developed/considered by a bunch of memory makers. at this point, hbm seems to have won and is a standard for stacked, tsv-connected kind of memory.

gddr5x significantly increases the bandwidth over gddr5 while remaining a cheaper option. memory configurations on different gpus appear to indicate, that hbm-s bandwidth bonus is not as significant as expected when compared to what can be done with gddr5x. it'll get there, it just will take some more time and refinement.

hynix's specs were in the news recently, hbm2 bandwidth is 1.6 Gbps (204.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth) per stack plus they confirmed this will be used in vega. so far, the pictures we have seen of vega show it has 2 stacks of hbm, that's a bandwidth of 409,6 GB/s. vega might turn up with 4 stacks of hbm but at this point in the game it doesn't seem realistic.

this is an impressive number but smaller than fiji's 512 GB/s and not too much ahead of 390x's 384 GB/s and actually behind titanxp/1080ti's 480 GB/s.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,191 (1.71/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 7.0
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max.
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 blowing in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600, CL16-19-19-32-48-1T, 1.4 V
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti FTW3 // ~2000 MHz Core / 1476 MHz G5X
Storage Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C, inverted design case
Audio Device(s) HX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Teufel Concept F / Sony HD AVR @ PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ // semi-passive mode on
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // XBox 360 Wireless Controller for Windows
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB Mechanical Keyboard /w Cherry MX Brown switches
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 10.498 Time Spy | P24.796 Firestrike | P31.547 3DM11 | X56.401 3DM Vantage Extreme
memory standard isn't really what either amd or nvidia does. amd had a(n exclusive) partnership with hynix for hbm. at the same time, another potential similar standard in form of hybrid memory cube was being developed/considered by a bunch of memory makers. at this point, hbm seems to have won and is a standard for stacked, tsv-connected kind of memory.

gddr5x significantly increases the bandwidth over gddr5 while remaining a cheaper option. memory configurations on different gpus appear to indicate, that hbm-s bandwidth bonus is not as significant as expected when compared to what can be done with gddr5x. it'll get there, it just will take some more time and refinement.

hynix's specs were in the news recently, hbm2 bandwidth is 1.6 Gbps (204.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth) per stack plus they confirmed this will be used in vega. so far, the pictures we have seen of vega show it has 2 stacks of hbm, that's a bandwidth of 409,6 GB/s. vega might turn up with 4 stacks of hbm but at this point in the game it doesn't seem realistic.

this is an impressive number but smaller than fiji's 512 GB/s and not too much ahead of 390x's 384 GB/s and actually behind titanxp/1080ti's 480 GB/s.
At least HBM2 still has less power consumption compared to G5/G5X.

I think the original plans for HBM2 were to run with 2 Gbps, but there were issues and it was reduced to 1.6 Gbps. Well, but maybe it will run with 2 Gbps after all, so that Vega has enough bandwidth.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,360 (6.06/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
there are alredy games that use around 6gb, and some use even more than that, its not that hard to imagine that in a year or so we will be getting games that require close to 8gb, especially because xbox scorpio has 12gb of memory so developers will have to take advantage of that creating high-res textures for games
Meanwhile I'm still running everything on my 3GB 780ti... and it works perfectly.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
27,306 (5.03/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 9900K@5.0GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Halves the memory usage at NO performance or visual penalty. In fact I don't even know what's the purpose of this stupid setting. If you leave it on, it makes things so much worse on 4GB cards because it has NO VRAM usage check. The stupid cache will use all memory and it'll just stutter like insane. Turning this off on 4GB card and you can still have EVERYTHING else on max and it'll work smoothly.
Yep, that's why I said I still think 8GB is overkill, and I'd be just as happy on a 4GB RX 480 as a 8GB.

My point was that game devs are starting to do things that use a large amount of VRAM that aren't overwhelming the GPUs. It used to be that you had to crank up settings to the point that the game was a slideshow to overwhelm 4GB of VRAM. But that isn't the case anymore.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
18,512 (4.71/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I think 8GB vram on a RX480 is overkill for gaming since it's an 1080p card.
I don't. There are already several titles (more monthly) which can use 4GB of vram at 1080p. Imagine in 2-3 years at the 'end' ofits life?
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
13,360 (6.06/day)
Location
The Kitchen Table
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Yep, that's why I said I still think 8GB is overkill, and I'd be just as happy on a 4GB RX 480 as a 8GB.

My point was that game devs are starting to do things that use a large amount of VRAM that aren't overwhelming the GPUs. It used to be that you had to crank up settings to the point that the game was a slideshow to overwhelm 4GB of VRAM. But that isn't the case anymore.
8GB RX480 does indeed show tangible performance boosts in quite a few games.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
680 (0.26/day)
something which was particularly hard to do on conventional 10 Gbps-equipped GTX 1080's, which showed atypically low memory overclocking headroom.
How so?

Most 1080's i've seen can achieve 11Gbps. I'd say that's pretty good. Only way the new stock 11Gbps G5X is better if this too can go to (say for example) 12Gbps.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
27,306 (5.03/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 9900K@5.0GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
8GB RX480 does indeed show tangible performance boosts in quite a few games.
Yes, but only because of a few settings that drastically increase VRAM usage and give no real visual benefit.
 
Top