• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA's BFGD Solutions Delayed to Q1 2019, Will Cost an Awful Penny

Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,953 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
The point of this 1000 nits target is for advertising. They want their flash flash flash ads to really sear into you.

edit: It's also potentially a great way to turn over OLED sets more quickly, since those pixels will wear out faster, especially as the ridiculous 8K craze becomes the standard. People will "discover" problems like gamut shrinkage (especially in the blue shades) and contrast reduction and offer upgrades to fix the problem. "Old set looking washed-out, the new-and-improved sets not only have 10K resolution, they have a wider color gamut than sRGB!"

What gamers and video watchers need more than 1000 nits is better static contrast (except for OLED) and a vastly wider color gamut than the ancient sRGB. The new HDR standard is going in that direction but too much emphasis is being placed where it shouldn't be (pixel shrinkage and, especially, excessive eye-searing brightness). I have no doubt that the primary factor behind the brightness marketing is advertising. Ad companies have already discovered the trick of turning the screen black periodically during commercials to make people think the ad is over.

The 1000 nit HDR spec and the VESA specs are not for OLED but for LCD.

OLED doesnt need this peak brightness to achieve HDR ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: bug
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Messages
222 (0.10/day)
Ok so the latest LG 65" 4K OLED can be bought for around £2500. A g-sync module to go in it has been reported to cost around £500, then there's a built-in Nvidia Shield which costs £200. Add another £200 for the implementation of HDMI 2.1 sockets and you have a price of roughly £3400. Don't know where nvidia are pulling this extra £1600 from to make it £5000. Probably out of their arses as usual...
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,244 (1.34/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Ryzen 5800x
Motherboard Gigabyte x570 Gaming X
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 4x8GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6800 XT (reference)
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 2TB
Display(s) Samsung CFG70, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
Vega + new Samsung TV's with Freesync for less than half.

You won't get 120hz 4k though (not that I know of). Then again, can Nvidia even do that themselves (honest question)?
 
Top