• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

onboard lan vs lan card and onboard sound vs sound card.

spectre440

New Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2005
Messages
937 (0.14/day)
Location
Israel
Processor Athlon 64 x2 4000+ (65nm Brisbane)
Motherboard Abit AN-M2 (AM2) nForce 630a
Cooling Stock everything (for the time being), 2x120mm fans (intake & exhaust)
Memory 2GB (2x1024) OCZ Platinum PC2-6400 (4-4-4-15, 2T)
Video Card(s) PowerColor ATI HD 2600XT 256mb GDDR4 PCI-e
Storage Hitachi Deskstar 160GB SATA 3.0G/s, External USB2.0 WD 160GB
Display(s) LG 17' LCD (L1753TR)
Case HEC-Compucase 6A, black & grey
Audio Device(s) On-Board 7.1 (realtek)
Power Supply Spire Zeno 650W
Software WinXP Pro SP2 (32-bit, for the time being)
i use an epox 8kda3j board on my system (socket 754, nforce 3 250gb set).
ever since i built this system of mine (which was about half a year ago) i've been using my old system's pci lan card (a 3com card) instead of the onboard 1gbe lan, and my old system's sound pci sound card (some old creative card...) instead of the onboard 8.1ch audio.

now, what im asking is, is this wise?
does this make my system perform less efficently?
would it be wiser for me to use the onboard stuff instead or the old stuff? (it probably would, but i still feel like asking)

my system now works pefectly fine, and it will probably work perfectly fine if i do the switch, im just thinking if its worth the hassle?

now regarding to the 8.1ch audio, it really dosent matter, since i only have a pair of smallish speakers and a rather weak sub i pathced together. and i dont intend to replace that anytime soon. so what im asking is basically, would my system's overall performance be improved if i used the onboard sound instead of this old pci card?
same pretty much goes for the lan card/onboard lan issue. i dont run a lan, and im only using this lan card as a connection between the computer and my adsl switch/router.

err.... i've rambled long enough about this...

feedback, please. :)
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,722 (0.39/day)
Location
Canada
Processor AMD 5800x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero
Cooling Custom Water Loop
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z neo
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64
Storage Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMEs / SSDs
Display(s) 27" AOC AG271QX
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolve
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster AE-7
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 750
Software Windows 10
I don't think it really matters with the onboard lan. If anything its better cause your not using more power with an add on card. But with sound, the onboard stuff usally ins't that great. If you put a Creative Agility 2 ZS, its going to out perform almost everything you throw at it. I use onboard lan, and it works great for me. But a add on sound card, if you get a good one that is, is way better than onboard.

-Dan
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,807 (0.26/day)
Location
Hamburg
Processor Intel I7 2600k@ 4.5
Motherboard Gigabyte p67 ud4 b3
Cooling AC Cuplex kryos Hf
Memory 8096 Exceleram 1600@ 1333 Cl9 1.35v
Video Card(s) Palit Gtx570@950/1900@1.063v
Storage Ocz Vertex 3 120gb, 2tb Seagate 7200rpm s-ata3
Display(s) Asus 24inch Lcd
Case Coolermaster Cosmos S
Audio Device(s) Creative X-fi with Teufel Magnum Power Edition
Power Supply Coolermaster 700W Silent Pro Gold
Software Linux?^^ ;P Windows 7 64bit
hm the onboard lan might be better but on sound you should check yourself maybe with rightmark??
 

Nyte

New Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
181 (0.03/day)
Location
Toronto ON
Processor i7 x980
Motherboard Asus SuperComputer
Memory 3x 2GB Triple Channel
Video Card(s) 2x Tahiti
Storage 2x OCZ SSD
Display(s) 23 inch
Power Supply 1 kW
Software Win 7 Ultimate
Benchmark Scores Very high!
Any onboard peripherals will take up more CPU resources because some part of them will eventually be using the clocks of the CPU.

An add-in card will almost always sport their own processing chip (the only exceptions were the software and hardware 56k modems they had oh-so-many years ago).
 
Top