• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Post your 3dmark06 SCORES !!!! =p

Status
Not open for further replies.
considering my x1800 gets 20500 in 03, 11570 in 05, and 4960 in 06 on a single core cpu and you've a dual!
 
Yeah, but he's using the AIW version ,which is clocked down A LOT - only 500/960 vs 625/1450 for an XT/CE or 650/1500 for an XTX. Allow for a 20% or so drop in performance for the AIW, and if you add that back on to his ~5k you'll be in the 6k ballpark, which is where the standard X1900s live.
 
JDAdams said:
Yeah, but he's using the AIW version ,which is clocked down A LOT - only 500/960 vs 625/1450 for an XT/CE or 650/1500 for an XTX. Allow for a 20% or so drop in performance for the AIW, and if you add that back on to his ~5k you'll be in the 6k ballpark, which is where the standard X1900s live.
Exactly! AIW are way different, Correct you are. A Guy has almost exact same sys as I but with a Dual core proc and gets 6300 3dm06.
 
715/750
 

Attachments

  • 6471_06.JPG
    6471_06.JPG
    23.4 KB · Views: 479
My score for 3DMark06 is 16782, yeah, I have a powerful rig:
AMD Athlon64 FX-57
4GB Corsair DDR2 at 733 mhz
(beta, got it from the computer show as VIP) 4 7900GTX in Quad SLI
Audigy ZS 2 ( doesnt realy count, but meh)
ALL STOCK, got perfect frames in 3dMark06 on ALL tests except for CPU.

It cost me a fair bit :D
 
Last edited:
Get an FX-60 dude, with all that money what's another $800, and it should give you a much better score
 
Actually, I bought the FX-57, because it is faster than an FX-60. it's the best AMD chip available. The FX-57 is known as the fastest single chip in the world. It has the highest clock speed of 2.8ghz (about 4.0 ghz for Intel) FX-60 only has 2.6 ghz. I've tried both, so I know which one is better ;)

Soon I'm gonna try OC this rig to 3.2 ghz- thats around a 4.8 ghz Intel :D, I'm gonna need a top of the line water cooling system though.
 
Last edited:
If you have that high a score on 3DMark06, you should publish it, I think that's world record. Or you could at least post a screenshot, your score is like 4,000 over current record.
 
Last edited:
the_uber_rig said:
Actually, I bought the FX-57, because it is faster than an FX-60. it's the best AMD chip available. The FX-57 is known as the fastest single chip in the world. It has the highest clock speed of 2.8ghz (about 4.0 ghz for Intel) FX-60 only has 2.6 ghz. I've tried both, so I know which one is better ;)

Soon I'm gonna try OC this rig to 3.2 ghz- thats around a 4.8 ghz Intel :D, I'm gonna need a top of the line water cooling system though.
Also the FX60 would aid in getting a higher score in 3dmark06 but its your choice on what you want.

And please show us screenshots or a link. We need proof of this score.

the_uber_rig said:
4GB Corsair DDR2 at 733 mhz
DDR2?
 
yeah i want to see a screen shot!!!! Nice score if true. Also why not go phase change that would be way better than W/C.
 
and wtf? 200MHZ difference make the fx57 better than the dual core? I've seen an fx 60 clock just as high as the fx57 with both on water.and 3d06 is a multi threade app! dunno seems like this guy is full of crap to me.
 
Well, sure, I would get a higher score using the FX-60, but I didn't build a computer just to test 3DMark06, I built it for gaming, and the FX-57, is better for that. In about 2 years, FX-60 will be long gone, I'm gonna get the latest Am2 processor :D I also think that maybe 4 7900GTX's might have helped the score?:D, and yeah, It's 675mhz RAM OC'd to 733 :P
 
the_uber_rig said:
Well, sure, I would get a higher score using the FX-60, but I didn't build a computer just to test 3DMark06, I built it for gaming, and the FX-57, is better for that. In about 2 years, FX-60 will be long gone, I'm gonna get the latest Am2 processor :D I also think that maybe 4 7900GTX's might have helped the score?:D, and yeah, It's 675mhz RAM OC'd to 733 :P

dude there are SO MANY flaws in what you just said.

1. FX-60 is better for gaming (I know not right now, but 4x 7800gtx's are just a little overkill for gaming so that makes up for the next couple of months that dual-cores will still be behind), theoretically it's 2x FX-55's in one and you can easily overclock it to FX-57 (2 cores man, 2 CORES is DOUBLE the power of 1). Obviously this system is built for future gaming and a lot of future games are being optimized for dual-cores, so the FX-57 really isn't better for gaming.

2. As the guy before said, 3DMark 06 with dual-core helps scores a lot, it's very processor-reliant and it probably is multithreaded (I don't know)

3. Why the hell would you go AM2 over FX-60 if your MOTHERBOARD is quad-SLI? You realize that the AM2 will need a new motherboard right? Which makes your rig pointless for the AM2 and very impractical.

4. You do realize just 1 7800GTX will handle EVERY SINGLE game out there so the "this is built for gaming" stuff you're talkin about is completely off, you can run a Pentium 1 processor in there and outdo every single guy on the planet with your 4 graphics cards...

5. The 7900GTX compared to the FX-60 is incomparable, the 7900GTX is just a die-shrink and a slight upgrade in power, while the FX-60 is a totally new element in processors.

I don't wanna sound aggressive, I mean if you really do own this rig then CONGRATS man, who cares about an FX-60 with this thing, just telling you that it is more important than you are making it seem. OH YEAH, and get a screenshot or link PLEASE, cause that'll make my entire post pointless lol.
 
Last edited:
3DMark06 Score

I've scored 4065 in 3dMark06 with 625/670 on my Sapphire 1800xl. I've having trouble keeping things stable over those speeds. I'm running 1.2v gpu and 2.001v/2.001v mem. I'm just wondering how much voltage is too much voltage? Cuz I've seen people running memory at 730mhz.


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=197822
 
5267

Sm2.0 2314
Hdr/sm3.0 2595
Cpu 1169
 
Last edited:
Maybe you can at least provide a compare URL, man, that's way over the known world record!
 
the_uber_rig said:
My score for 3DMark06 is 16782, yeah, I have a powerful rig:
AMD Athlon64 FX-57
4GB Corsair DDR2 at 733 mhz

(beta, got it from the computer show as VIP) 4 7900GTX in Quad SLI
Audigy ZS 2 ( doesnt realy count, but meh)
I just can't believe people believe this BS...

S939 FX-57 and Corsair DDR2...
...Riiiight.
 
What's a rough cpu score on 3dmark06? I'm gonna give it a try in a min. I got my 3.2 clocked @ 4.67ghz, rock solid, but the ram's right on it's limits :(
 
largon said:
I just can't believe people believe this BS...

S939 FX-57 and Corsair DDR2...
...Riiiight.

YEAH YEAH!!!!! Largon, I caught a glimpse of that last time I read it but never thought about it. NICE CATCH! Oh yeah, and another thing, he said in a couple posts above that "4 7900GTX's would up the score a little too" to comeback the FX-60 statement, as if he had 7800GTX's, but he doesn't cause he said first post that he had 7900gtx's. And he said he "chose" the FX-57 over the FX-60, but he bought the Beta pre-built system from a computer show, so how did he choose it? This it a total lie, but lol, I love how even online, TYPING, his story changes.
 
Last edited:
The guy is obviously lying. He doesn't have a system specs list in his profile, he has three posts, his user name is made to make us think he has this rig, eventhough he doesn't, furthermore if he were to put DDR2 into his DDR1 slots he would fry the slots if not the whole motherboard.

Also, it looks like I need to update my drivers and re-run 3DM06. Last time I did it was when it came out and I got 3800. With the updated drivers I'm seeing people get a lot higher scores.

Ahh.. it sometimes sucks being a lazy person.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top