• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your SteamVR Performance result!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 50521
  • Start date Start date
Here's mine with a 2500K OC to 4.3Ghz, DDR3 2133 Mhz, and an MSI GTX 970 ME OC +110 core/ +495 mem.

Untitled.png
 
i7 6700k OC @ 4.6Ghz / 980 Ti / 32GB DDR4 @ 3000 Mhz

Untitled.png
 
tHUETP3.jpg
hCW20Rh.jpg

CPU overclocking makes little to no difference in this one(for me anyway). Here I was at 4.3 GHz, but even at 3.7 GHz I got a 10.

GPU is at 1931 boost but in the real world it goes to 2126, and with my cooling solution it rarely(if ever) drops below 2.1 GHz.
 
Last edited:
i5 6500 @ stock
MSI GTX1070 Gaming X @ stock
vr ready.JPG
 
Xeon V3 1231
GTX 970

7m7TE0Q.png
 
Last edited:
What about the quality?

The quality? I'm not sure I understand what you mean, the only thing I noticed different from mine was the drop-down arrow in the picture of the results so I retook the test and included it drop down

I'm assuming you mean the details with the quality results etc. yeah I accidentally missed that part of the results first time around, I've never seen or taken the test before so I'm unfamiliar with it till today

Your blue line was like an arrow straight as could be, mine was a little bit up-and-down it swayed between high very high, I suppose that's the difference between the 1070, and the 970.... also my RAM is from before Sandy Bridge was , released :)
 
Last edited:

Ran it again after installing the Crimson ReLive drivers. The arrow and graph from the previous test have been placed on the new test to show the increase.

steam-vr-after-crimson-relive.png


Like the drivers, the test seems to have gotten tuned as well. No longer am I given the reassuring result of "VR Capable", but rather the cautionary "Upgrade Recommended".

Starting to feel inadequate, must buy new hardware... :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: xvi
Back
Top