"Puritans are people who are intensely concerned that someone somewhere might be having fun."
I don't remember who said that but it has always made me laugh and seemed apropos. I don't think policing people's fantasies, which came up immediately in the comments here, is a useful way to spend one's time. I care a lot more about real-world problems (like the record number of anti-environment actions that have been taken by a certain administration. It's helpful to have a non-polluted functioning biosphere to be able live — something that's rather more basic than most concerns). People read novels like 50 Shades that glorify beating women. People read and watch horror, in which bad things happen to good people. Fictional products are fictional, right?
I think it's absurd to police fictional images, whether they're AI-generated or drawings of various deities. There is a long history of rhetoric around that kind of thought control, from the time of mothers being turned into salt pillars for looking at something those in power said is for their eyes only, to arguments about censoring AI for adults today. These things are fully interwoven and should be looked at critically. Anyone who thinks pointing this out is "off topic" especially needs to think about this issue. Book banning is picking up a lot of steam again right now. There are a lot of people who want to control even others' fantasies and thoughts. The glib censorship of AI shows how little respect many have for others' adulthood and agency. The terminology is flawed, like "Not Safe For Work." Among the problems with that invention is the idea that the erotica industry doesn't involve a lot of livelihoods and a lot of work.
I've read Stephen King novels in which horrific things happen to good people. They were sold in supermarkets. I read some of his books when I was 12. How is that okay? Shouldn't that have been censored, too?
Don't violent video games promote asocial acts? It's fascinating to see how quickly and glibly people are content to censor AI but not other things, like video game violence. I found it strange and disconcerting that so many people thought of drowning their Sims in pools and seeing how many they could catch on fire intentionally but if that's how so many people want to play the game that's their business. One of the keys to liberty is the realization that different people want different things in their fantasy life.
Knowledge is also power so it's unsurprising that some of the censorship pressure on AI is designed to limit the ability of ordinary people to work with knowledge those in power want to keep for themselves. Overclassification is a real problem and that mentality extends to overzealous censorship in all formats. As AI becomes more developed, I expect this issue to become more pressing. The energy and water use are already important issues. There is also the issue of
noise pollution and biosphere degradation from things like habitat loss from sprawling "development." There are so many already polluted urban spaces and yet people keep destroying good soil and wildlife habitat because of perverse incentives. Land that is forested carries a lower real estate value than acres of 1/2" chemically-barren lawn.
For the "think of the children" crowd, start caring about things like
this. Congential syphilis should not be happening in a "rich" nation.
There is also the issue of using AI to dehumanize/randomize policing, as with AI-guided drone bombings of people and their structures and dystopian AI "dogs." And, the health industry has shown itself to be capable of being
extremely irresponsible with faulty AI as a method of trying to justify denying treatments to people who need them.
Blame the AI not I might become the next "I don't recall" defense.