• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

PSUs exploding during water loop test.

The ATX12VO was too not well considered given the growing power consumption in processors and graphics devices

Devices long ago reached the reticle limit so chiplet designs overcome foundry limitations. More and more L3 cache comes at a cost.
 
The ATX12VO was too not well considered given the growing power consumption in processors and graphics devices

Devices long ago reached the reticle limit so chiplet designs overcome foundry limitations. More and more L3 cache comes at a cost.
Higher power consumption is exactly WHY ATX12VO is better. There's more 12V leads on the main connector (24-pin only has 2 vs. 3), more room on the board for additional connectors (like the 6-pin PCIe they're putting on boards for slot power) and a load sense pin on the PSU that tells the board what the load is so the board can load balance. New builds almost always use M.2, which makes the requirement for a SATA/PATA power and data cables obsolete.

So, what part of ATX12VO makes it not well for growing power consumption?
 
Even with dual M.2 slots the power is minimal compared to the CPU

Graphics cards are the power pig in machines today
 
Inb4 the first gamer PSU with IP67 rating
 
Inb4 the first gamer PSU with IP67 rating

"Introducing the Corsair CUM-SEAL" but I'm not sure there are games on the horizon gamers are that hyped up about
 
Yeah, I know this isn’t what the thread is about, but my mind immediately went to this ridiculous thing:
Judging by comments above, guess I wasn’t the only one.
 
"Introducing the Corsair CUM-SEAL" but I'm not sure there are games on the horizon gamers are that hyped up about
Put a rubber on it
 
So, what part of ATX12VO makes it not well for growing power consumption?
In my opinion, the missing part: adjustable voltage. 12 V would be the voltage always present on a lower-power line, to be fed directly to 75 W to PCIe slots and SATA connectors. For a separate high-power line, the PSU and the consumer would either stay at 12 V or negotiate a higher voltage (and maybe current limit too).
 
In my opinion, the missing part: adjustable voltage. 12 V would be the voltage always present on a lower-power line, to be fed directly to 75 W to PCIe slots and SATA connectors. For a separate high-power line, the PSU and the consumer would either stay at 12 V or negotiate a higher voltage (and maybe current limit too).
That's not how it works.

You're moving larger D2D from inside the PSU to dedicated, appropriately sized, thus more efficient, D2D regulators on the motherboard. Your motherboard already has D2D that regulates lower voltages. What changes is you're regulating from 12V which is lower current and therefore more efficient in that respect as well.
 
Idk, used both RX850 and HX1200 to fill loops. Paper clip on black and green wires (same as the connector they give out). After filling the loop I usually leave it running for 30mins. Can't see how a single D5 is enough to blow any rail unless the unit was already defective. Which would mean didn't matter what you did, it was going to die at some point either way.
I had the same issue as @sblantipodi, but with a CM V1300.
As for the psu, the 10 year warranty they advertise is pure oil snake, because when that happened to me, I tried to fill a rma ticket an the website didn't allowed, the I wrote an email to cm europe customer service, and, guess what, I didn't got any reply.

My question is where it says, in spec sheet the minimum wattage required to work properly, it is 23 watt from a D5 not enough?
 
Back
Top