- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
- Messages
- 13 (0.01/day)
Does putting two HDD's with different cache sizes in RAID0 effect performance? Both drives are 2TB 7200RPM SATA III 6.0Gb/s except one has 64mb cache and the other has 128mb cache/buffer size.
-
Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
Putting two HDD's with different cache sizes in RAID 0. EDIT: Is PrimoCache worth it?
- Thread starter Hypnotized621
- Start date
INSTG8R
Vanguard Beta Tester
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2004
- Messages
- 8,150 (1.09/day)
- Location
- Canuck in Norway
| System Name | Hellbox 5.1(same case new guts) |
|---|---|
| Processor | Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
| Motherboard | MSI X570S MAG Torpedo Max |
| Cooling | TT Kandalf L.C.S.(Water/Air)EK Velocity CPU Block/Noctua EK Quantum DDC Pump/Res |
| Memory | 2x16GB Gskill Trident Neo Z 3600 CL16 |
| Video Card(s) | Powercolor Hellhound 7900XTX |
| Storage | 970 Evo Plus 500GB 2xSamsung 850 Evo 500GB RAID 0 1TB WD Blue Corsair MP600 Core 2TB |
| Display(s) | Alienware QD-OLED 34” 3440x1440 144hz 10Bit VESA HDR 400 |
| Case | TT Kandalf L.C.S. |
| Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster ZX/Logitech Z906 5.1 |
| Power Supply | Seasonic TX~’850 Platinum |
| Mouse | G502 Hero |
| Keyboard | G19s |
| VR HMD | Oculus Quest 3 |
| Software | Win 11 Pro x64 |
I have only ever used identical drives and currently do. I’m not sure TBH if you even can but no hurt in trying I don’t think the Cache would make any difference if you can in fact build an array with “different“ drives
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 58,412 (7.75/day)
- Location
- Oystralia
| System Name | Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load) |
|---|---|
| Processor | Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core) |
| Motherboard | Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded) |
| Cooling | Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate |
| Memory | 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V) |
| Video Card(s) | Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W)) |
| Storage | 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2 |
| Display(s) | Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144) |
| Case | Fractal Design R6 |
| Audio Device(s) | Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic |
| Power Supply | Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY) |
| Mouse | Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL |
| Keyboard | Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps) |
| VR HMD | Oculus Rift S + Quest 2 |
| Software | Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware! |
| Benchmark Scores | Nyooom. |
You can make arrays with different drive specs of any kind, its just that you may end up with weird side effects to performance by doing so.
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 9,206 (1.46/day)
| System Name | OrangeHaze / Silence |
|---|---|
| Processor | i7-13700KF / i5-10400 / |
| Motherboard | ROG STRIX Z690-E / MSI Z490 A-Pro Motherboard |
| Cooling | Corsair H75 / TT ToughAir 510 |
| Memory | 64Gb GSkill Trident Z5 / 32GB Team Dark Za 3600 |
| Video Card(s) | Palit GeForce RTX 2070 / Sapphire R9 290 Vapor-X 4Gb |
| Storage | Hynix Plat P41 2Tb\Samsung MZVL21 1Tb / Samsung 980 Pro 1Tb |
| Display(s) | 22" Dell Wide/24" Asus |
| Case | Lian Li PC-101 ATX custom mod / Antec Lanboy Air Black & Blue |
| Audio Device(s) | SB Audigy 7.1 |
| Power Supply | Corsair Enthusiast TX750 |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 Lightspeed Wireless / Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum |
| Keyboard | K68 RGB — CHERRY® MX Red |
| Software | Win10 Pro \ RIP:Win 7 Ult 64 bit |
Interesting question. It's my belief (and can't find anything to contradict it), that technically speaking, it shouldn't "affect performance" at all. It's not going to behave worse than a raid with 2 64-Mb cache drives. At worst, it won't respond as well as a 128Mb pair, but the OS really doesn't care about which drive the data comes from, more than "technically". The OS requests the data, the drive/RAID knows where the data is spread, it reads the data from the array, and maybe the caching lets it get the data a bit quicker from the 128Mb "side", but that just means it goes back for the next piece just a little quicker. I would expect, if the data is spread evenly (highly unlikely), that the 128mb drive will just spend milli/microseconds longer in idle than the 64mb. Otherwise, no real major effect. You'll still be limited by how fast the 64Mb drive can return its data.
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2020
- Messages
- 13 (0.01/day)
I found a program called PrimoCache.
I got these results using a 32GB USB 3.0 flash drive. But it eats up a lot of RAM to get this, 13.248GB's to be exact. I was waiting for AMD to update StoreMI to support RAID but this. Video games are pretty big in size right now so I'm waiting until next month before I install another game to test load times.
Unfortunately I accidently broke my Intel Optane memory module. I was in a panic. Any SSD's I had, there was a very nasty virus/ransomware that was copying itself so that's gone.
I'm thinking of buying another 32GB's of memory and a cheap nvme SSD. That should cost around $150.
I got these results using a 32GB USB 3.0 flash drive. But it eats up a lot of RAM to get this, 13.248GB's to be exact. I was waiting for AMD to update StoreMI to support RAID but this. Video games are pretty big in size right now so I'm waiting until next month before I install another game to test load times.
Unfortunately I accidently broke my Intel Optane memory module. I was in a panic. Any SSD's I had, there was a very nasty virus/ransomware that was copying itself so that's gone.
I'm thinking of buying another 32GB's of memory and a cheap nvme SSD. That should cost around $150.
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2005
- Messages
- 28,473 (4.00/day)
- Location
- Indiana, USA
| Processor | Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | AsRock Z470 Taichi |
| Cooling | Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans |
| Memory | 32GB DDR4-3600 |
| Video Card(s) | RTX 2070 Super |
| Storage | 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache |
| Display(s) | Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28" |
| Case | Fractal Design Define S |
| Audio Device(s) | Onboard is good enough for me |
| Power Supply | eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3 |
| Software | Windows 10 Pro x64 |
I use Primocache, but I do not use the RAM cache. It puts your data a risk. However, I use the SSD caching for my hard drives and it works great. On my main rig I have a cheap 512GB SATA SSD caching my 8TB game hard drive and games load like they are on an SSD.
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 58,412 (7.75/day)
- Location
- Oystralia
| System Name | Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load) |
|---|---|
| Processor | Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core) |
| Motherboard | Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded) |
| Cooling | Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate |
| Memory | 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V) |
| Video Card(s) | Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W)) |
| Storage | 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2 |
| Display(s) | Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144) |
| Case | Fractal Design R6 |
| Audio Device(s) | Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic |
| Power Supply | Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY) |
| Mouse | Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL |
| Keyboard | Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps) |
| VR HMD | Oculus Rift S + Quest 2 |
| Software | Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware! |
| Benchmark Scores | Nyooom. |
caching with a USB drive doesnt work for writes, as you still have to wait for the cache to finish writing anyway - you could think its safe to remove when its not
i just want something that does read-caching in my RAM, but not writes
edit: hey primocache has a lot of features that we'rent obvious, such as setting read only caching.
i just want something that does read-caching in my RAM, but not writes
edit: hey primocache has a lot of features that we'rent obvious, such as setting read only caching.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2015
- Messages
- 2,970 (0.80/day)
- Location
- Long Island
I don't know the answer and I fear checking with the drive manufacture's will not be helpful. Drives of different sizes obviously limit your usage to the smaller of the two.
We test RAID in the desktop every 3 years or so .... outside of very specific applications, i.e. video editing and animation, we have never observed a performance gain in any application. Over the last 20 years, I have read every test I could find, but lately it's become dead issue and no one bothers any more.
In our last test we did twin SSDs (Samsung Pro) in RAID 0 and twin SSHDs (2 TB, 7200 rpm) in RAID 1 .... we did not see any performance improvements with the RAID ) setup ... Samsung Magician was not usable and whn we contacted Samsung TS for assistance they advised that "RAID 0" was neither recommeneded or supported on their products. The RAID 1 array did it's job but was problematic, every 9 or 10 boots one the the drives would disappear ... we broke the array and set up a free backup utility to mirror the second drive twice a day.
I have fiddled with RAM drives but with the apps we use (Primarily AutoCAD), never saw any benefits.
We test RAID in the desktop every 3 years or so .... outside of very specific applications, i.e. video editing and animation, we have never observed a performance gain in any application. Over the last 20 years, I have read every test I could find, but lately it's become dead issue and no one bothers any more.
In our last test we did twin SSDs (Samsung Pro) in RAID 0 and twin SSHDs (2 TB, 7200 rpm) in RAID 1 .... we did not see any performance improvements with the RAID ) setup ... Samsung Magician was not usable and whn we contacted Samsung TS for assistance they advised that "RAID 0" was neither recommeneded or supported on their products. The RAID 1 array did it's job but was problematic, every 9 or 10 boots one the the drives would disappear ... we broke the array and set up a free backup utility to mirror the second drive twice a day.
I have fiddled with RAM drives but with the apps we use (Primarily AutoCAD), never saw any benefits.