• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Question test HDD files

Status
Not open for further replies.
AusWolf said:
A fair point. That advantage is still outweighed by the drawbacks, imo.
Click to expand...
One has to pick and choose based on the pros and cons and resources manageable by the user.
 
A Computer Guy said:
One has to pick and choose based on the pros and cons and resources manageable by the user.
Click to expand...
For long term storage, I'd choose safety over transfer speed / minimising file system overhead, but each to their own.
 
A Computer Guy said:
Multiple copies.
Click to expand...
Sure, but with 4 copies on 4 drives, you just need a random single corrupted bit on each drive to lose all of your data forever.

By keeping files separate (uncompressed), you need the exact same bit to be corrupted on each drive to lose just one of your files.

Needless to say, the second option is infinitely safer.
 
Last edited:
AusWolf said:
Sure, but with 4 copies on 4 drives, you just need a random single corrupted bit on each drive to lose all of your data forever.

By keeping files separate (uncompressed), you need the exact same bit to be corrupted on each drive to lose just one of your files.

Needless to say, the second option is infinitely safer.
Click to expand...
The risk of that is mitigated by the number of copies one is willing to keep. One can go down an infinite rabbit hole of scenarios for safety but most people have to stop at what is practical for them in terms of risk management, cost, and time. I can't approach the probability of the scenario you described but I would say it could be managed in a way one would be likely to never encounter it.
 
When a large file (150GB) rar zip or 7z is created, is it possible to use another alternative tool (or Winrar itself) to create a recovery record to repair in case any bit becomes corrupted and renders the entire compressed file useless? If the need arises and it takes a long time to unpack all the files that are inside the larger file? What are the possibilities for protection without internally modifying the compressed file created?

Is it easy to corrupt files on 2.5" HDDs even during storage of a HDD that will be used rarely?
 
nandobadam said:
When a large file (150GB) rar zip or 7z is created, is it possible to use another alternative tool (or Winrar itself) to create a recovery record to repair in case any bit becomes corrupted and renders the entire compressed file useless? If the need arises and it takes a long time to unpack all the files that are inside the larger file? What are the possibilities for protection without internally modifying the compressed file created?
Click to expand...
The best recovery record is another copy of the file on another drive, imo. Although, there are tools that create checksums to check for data integrity. I'm not really an expert on those, to say the least, so I'll stop here.

nandobadam said:
Is it easy to corrupt files on 2.5" HDDs even during storage of a HDD that will be used rarely?
Click to expand...
This question has been answered multiple times. :confused:

HDDs aren't meant for long-term storage, they have to be turned on and their data read regularly to avoid demagnetisation of the discs. Do that every couple of months, and you're fine.

Please, don't keep asking the same thing again and again. :(
 
AusWolf said:
HDDs aren't meant for long-term storage, they have to be turned on and their data read regularly to avoid demagnetisation of the discs.
Click to expand...
Any references to that?

I think HDDs are pretty fine for archival storage.
Yeah, don't leave them in a drawer for 15 years, but I wouldn't be too worried about a year or two or three.
They don't "demagnetize". And even if they did, turning them on doesn't refresh the data.
The main reason I see for turning them on would be the motor.

Do that every couple of months, and you're fine.
Click to expand...
No need to turn on every few months.

nandobadam said:
When a large file (150GB) rar zip or 7z is created
Click to expand...
I think 150GB is larger than practical, except in special circumstances.

What are the possibilities for protection without internally modifying the compressed file created?
Click to expand...
As mention before: PAR.

multipar_5.png

https://github.com/Yutaka-Sawada/MultiPar
http://www.quickpar.org.uk/
 
Last edited:
nageme said:
Any references to that?

I think HDDs are pretty fine for archival storage.
Yeah, don't leave them in a drawer for 15 years, but I wouldn't be too worried about a year or two or three.
They don't "demagnetize". And even if they did, turning them on doesn't refresh the data.
The main reason I see for turning them on would be the motor.
Click to expand...
Here is a random article I just found. I haven't read on the topic recently, so I don't know any other references from the top of my head.

Turning a HDD on won't remagnetise every sector, that's true. That's why I'd at least do a full surface scan every now and then.

nageme said:
No need to turn on every few months.
Click to expand...
Better safe than sorry, imo.

nageme said:
As mention before: PAR.

multipar_5.png

https://github.com/Yutaka-Sawada/MultiPar
http://www.quickpar.org.uk/
Click to expand...
That looks like a great tool! Is there a Linux equivalent by any chance? :)
 
AusWolf said:
HDDs aren't meant for long-term storage, they have to be turned on and their data read regularly to avoid demagnetisation of the discs. Do that every couple of months, and you're fine.
Click to expand...

How does turning on help, the drive would just sit there.
 
Shrek said:
How does turning on help, the drive would just sit there.
Click to expand...
AusWolf said:
HDDs aren't meant for long-term storage, they have to be turned on and their data read regularly to avoid demagnetisation of the discs. Do that every couple of months, and you're fine.
Click to expand...
That's why I said I'd do at least a surface check every now and then.
 
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with me.

You said that just turning on the HDD does not remagnetize the magnetic disks and you recommended a surface scan. Does this surface scan need to be a full scan or can Quickscan be used to magnetize the entire HDD?

Does the surface scan need to be performed once every two months or once a year?

When there is a loss of magnetization on a 2.5" HDD, is this loss permanent or can it be recovered with a surface scan? For example, if a new HDD has 100% magnetization, if it remains without power for a few years and loses 20%, can the 20% that was lost be recovered with a surface scan?
 
A surface scan will check for bad sectors, but I don't see how it will help with magnetization.
 
nandobadam said:
Thank you for sharing your knowledge with me.

You said that just turning on the HDD does not remagnetize the magnetic disks and you recommended a surface scan. Does this surface scan need to be a full scan or can Quickscan be used to magnetize the entire HDD?

Does the surface scan need to be performed once every two months or once a year?

When there is a loss of magnetization on a 2.5" HDD, is this loss permanent or can it be recovered with a surface scan? For example, if a new HDD has 100% magnetization, if it remains without power for a few years and loses 20%, can the 20% that was lost be recovered with a surface scan?
Click to expand...
There is no hard rule here. I'd do the full surface scan just to be on the safe side.

Shrek said:
A surface scan will check for bad sectors, but I don't see how it will help with magnetization.
Click to expand...
I've read somewhere that if a bit is starting to lose its charge, but is still readable, then the drive can correct it to a full 0 or 1 again. (someone prove me right or wrong)
 
Maybe so, I'd be interested to know.
 
Reading the whole drive will not rewrite it.

Drives reallocate sectors only if they're in an explicitly bad state. These are reflected in SMART's 0x05 Reallocated Sector Count.
Suspect sectors are 0xC5 Pending Sector Count, and probably won't be reallocated until they're rewritten by the host.
Other than reallocating, I don't think drives rewrite sectors automatically.

The situation is different in SSDs, but the topic here is HDDs.

AusWolf said:
Here is a random article
Click to expand...
That's just a vague marketing article from a UK PC repair biz.
Looks like a random composition of an answer from superuser.com (the link is referenced there), and LLM-style text (maybe from another random source: a data recovery biz in the UK).
It also provides as "reference" a NY Times article from 2004...

That looks like a great tool! Is there a Linux equivalent by any chance? :)
Click to expand...
I don't know. I'm not a Linux user, but my impression is that it's still surprisingly lacking in many basic GUI tools.
For PAR I'm mainly finding old and limited-looking ones like gpar2 or Kpar.

Perhaps WINE + one of the Windows tools is an alternative.

Capture-GPar2 0.3.png

114195-1.png
 
Last edited:
nandobadam said:
When there is a loss of magnetization on a 2.5" HDD, is this loss permanent or can it be recovered with a surface scan? For example, if a new HDD has 100% magnetization, if it remains without power for a few years and loses 20%, can the 20% that was lost be recovered with a surface scan?
Click to expand...

At this point you need to read the Wikipedia article on hard drives because that question is just too nonsensical.

The answer to your original question is that how easily a HDD loses data depends on when it was made. From the late 90' through the 2000s drives get progressively worse with data retention. Until a change in the late 2000s early 2010s in how HDDs are made fixed that issue. The way to ensure you don't lose data is to do integrity checks and copy the data to another drive. A modern HDD will keep your data intact for at least a decade but you should do the checks every year so that you don't forget.
 
Is rewriting what maintains the HDD's magnetism? Does surface testing rewrite?

Is there a big difference between the magnetism of old HDDs and modern HDDs from 2010 onwards?

Does Winrar's "test" mode, which performs a corruption test, activate and restore magnetism?
 
Thread closed. OP is abusing the good nature of the forum. I've no idea what they want, why they constantly recycle the same question, or why they feel they need to ask multiple questions with each post.

OP - you have been given plenty of responses, and they have answered your question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top