2.12.0 released with fix for GDDR6 bandwidth. I'll think about the other proposed changes for next version
Much appreciated. all around.
As it stands, the difference between what NVIDIA reports as Pixel Fillrate GT/s and GPUz is confusing and a bit concerning. I would imagine that the software should report what the whitepaper does unless its some odd dubious method. Considering these cards will all hit base boost clock+ in 99% of situations, it doesn't make sense, to me, to list it based off the base clock and going against whitepapers. I don't understand why the deviation...
RE: Tensor/RT cores, those should also be listed was suggested when they came out. A suggestion on how to implement them without jamming up the first page of GPUz.... perhaps only have it on RTX cards. The software can load up those fields only when it detects an RTX card. If the software can figure out NV/AMD and put up their avatar, it should be able to scrape and figure out if its an RTX and add the fields for those cores and values. This way, if a GPUz user has an RTX card, it will know and use the proper fields, but older NV GPUs and AMD GPUs won't get those fields as it does not have the hardware.
Anyway, thanks for the time you spend supporting the software. Your work is appreciated.