• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Ryzen 3000 memory speed vs latency in gaming

Tuned Ram with AMD Ryzen Fabric Clock 1467Mhz (DDR4 2933Mhz) & Fabric Clock 1933Mhz (DDR4 3866Mhz)

Battlefield 5 & Grand Theft Auto V 1920x1080

Red Dead Redemption 2 and Sleeping dogs 1920x1080 and 2560x1440
 
Can you post the numbers in text? Even just avg fps is fine.
 
Tuned Ram with AMD Ryzen Fabric Clock 1467Mhz (DDR4 2933Mhz) & Fabric Clock 1933Mhz (DDR4 3866Mhz)

Battlefield 5 & Grand Theft Auto V 1920x1080

Red Dead Redemption 2 and Sleeping dogs 1920x1080 and 2560x1440
Not quite an apples to apples comparison, is it though? Not a lot of RAM is going to run at CAS12, even at 2933MHz.
 
So despite what people are saying here is my personal experience my 2 rigs that i built identicle. Both systems have a 3700x both have rtx 2080supers from evga same model and both have 32gbs tforce rgb 3200mhz cl14 4x8. Opened up modern warfare on both made a custom match put the game in 1080p turned settings to max with ray tracing and got 133fps on both but i saw that was 133fps if i looked anywhere with no dips so i decided to oc the ram. Well both computers were able to oc the ram to 3800mhz cl16. Again loaded up same map on both systems and got 255fps it would dip into the 230s based on explosions ect but thats a 92% fps increase so im not sure how anyone can justify 3200mhz over 3600 or 3800 because it makes a massive difference.
 
So despite what people are saying here is my personal experience my 2 rigs that i built identicle. Both systems have a 3700x both have rtx 2080supers from evga same model and both have 32gbs tforce rgb 3200mhz cl14 4x8. Opened up modern warfare on both made a custom match put the game in 1080p turned settings to max with ray tracing and got 133fps on both but i saw that was 133fps if i looked anywhere with no dips so i decided to oc the ram. Well both computers were able to oc the ram to 3800mhz cl16. Again loaded up same map on both systems and got 255fps it would dip into the 230s based on explosions ect but thats a 92% fps increase so im not sure how anyone can justify 3200mhz over 3600 or 3800 because it makes a massive difference.
You don't get a 90% increase from 600mhz oc on ram, your results are either wrong or there's something else going on that you haven't realised, are you sure you had raytracing enabled for the oc run?
 
something is wrong that impossible

So despite what people are saying here is my personal experience my 2 rigs that i built identicle. Both systems have a 3700x both have rtx 2080supers from evga same model and both have 32gbs tforce rgb 3200mhz cl14 4x8. Opened up modern warfare on both made a custom match put the game in 1080p turned settings to max with ray tracing and got 133fps on both but i saw that was 133fps if i looked anywhere with no dips so i decided to oc the ram. Well both computers were able to oc the ram to 3800mhz cl16. Again loaded up same map on both systems and got 255fps it would dip into the 230s based on explosions ect but thats a 92% fps increase so im not sure how anyone can justify 3200mhz over 3600 or 3800 because it makes a massive difference.
 
You don't get a 90% increase from 600mhz oc on ram, your results are either wrong or there's something else going on that you haven't realised, are you sure you had raytracing enabled for the oc run?
All settings were the same both pcs showed the same result. I made sure all settings were maxed with ray tracing when each custom match was started. If you have any doubt you can test it yourself and see. Im not here to get into any debate with anyone all i was doing is dropping a comment based on my hardware with controlled factors. Its repeatable amd if you wish to try it yourself you will find i am correct in my statment.
 
All settings were the same both pcs showed the same result. I made sure all settings were maxed with ray tracing when each custom match was started. If you have any doubt you can test it yourself and see. Im not here to get into any debate with anyone all i was doing is dropping a comment based on my hardware with controlled factors. Its repeatable amd if you wish to try it yourself you will find i am correct in my statment.
it just goes against every review out there testing different RAM speeds on Ryzen, and pretty much every RAM overclocking review I've ever read, tell me, have you ever read an overclocking guide that has shown such an increase from a fairly modest overclock on RAM? No, it's mainly 5-10% FPS at the very most in every single other review that is on the internet, not limited to Ryzen, so again, it's an anomaly or your methodologies are incorrect, sorry pal.
 
it just goes against every review out there testing different RAM speeds on Ryzen, and pretty much every RAM overclocking review I've ever read, tell me, have you ever read an overclocking guide that has shown such an increase from a fairly modest overclock on RAM? No, it's mainly 5-10% FPS at the very most in every single other review that is on the internet, not limited to Ryzen, so again, it's an anomaly or your methodologies are incorrect, sorry pal.
Dont get your panties in a bunch, you can easily test it yourself. Its not an anomaly when i replicated it on 2 computers. You know what they say there is not replacment for personal experience, in other words you learn the most when you do it yourself. Try it out you may find different results than what you read about.
 
3533 cl14 , lower v 1.42 ,less heat is the key , been as high as 3733 cl14 ,but heat is a problem with high v, not worth it for every day use.
 

Attachments

  • cachememsafe.png
    cachememsafe.png
    93.8 KB · Views: 458
  • 199.png
    199.png
    67.7 KB · Views: 452
Back
Top