• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Ryzen 5 3600 FCLK OC confusion

Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
1,557 (0.31/day)
Location
Kolkata, India
System Name Coffee | Maximus
Processor Intel Core i7 9700K @ 5.2 GHz with AVX/4.8 GHz cache | i7 9700KF @ 5.0 GHz/4.7 GHz cache
Motherboard ASUS Maximus X Formula | ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger (modded BIOS for Coffee Lake)+TPM2.0 module
Cooling Cooler Master ML240 Illusion | Cooler Master ML120L RGB
Memory 2*16 GB (32 GB) Kingston Fury Beast @3600 MHz CL17 | 4*8 GB (32 GB) HyperX Fury @3200 MHz CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070 8 GB Twin Edge OC | Galax RTX 2060 Super 8 GB
Storage Samsung PM981a 1TB+Crucial P5 1TB+480GB SATA SSD+2 TB HDD | Crucial P1 500GB+2.5TB HDDs
Display(s) LG OLED 55 G3, 4K 120 Hz, VRR, ALLM, GSync, FreeSync | Samsung 43AU9070 4K TV, VRR, ALLM
Case Corsair Crystal 460X RGB | Lianli Lancool 215
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z SE w 5.1 Home Theater | Realtek ALC1150 (Supreme FX) w 2.1 speakers
Power Supply ASUS ROG Strix 750G (80+ Gold) | Cooler Master MWE 650 V2 (80+ Bronze)
Mouse Cooler Master MM731 19000 DPI gaming mouse
Keyboard Cooler Master CK721 65% mechanical gaming keyboard (tactile)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64 |Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R20 MT 4200,ST 547 CPU-Z MT 4871, ST 620 | R20 MT - 4158, ST - 534, CPU-Z MT 4798, ST 603
Hello everyone, this is regarding overclocking on my primary system as on specs. As far as I read everywhere, it is recommended that the MCLK and FCLK should be in the 1:1 ratio for best performance. However, I tried playing with the FCLK and have set it at 1900 MHz at stock SOC voltage (anything above that results in failed POST) and for some reason, I have seen a bump in performance across benchmarks especially memory bandwidth intensive benchmarks (verified with AIDA 64). It is also worth noting that my RAMs are quite old from 2015, dual ranked with stock XMP at 2666 MHz. I have been able to overclock it 3266 MHz rock stable at 1.36V.

With the FCLK set to 1900 MHz, the latency creeps up by about 4 ns but at the same time, the memory write speed in AIDA also bumps up to 30400 MB/s from 25599 MB/s. The CPU Photoworxx benchmark which relies on memory bandwidth is also about 2500 points higher.

So my question is why is it that everyone recommends putting the FCLK and MCLK as 1:1? I am confused because my experience suggests otherwise. Any inputs are appreciated.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Messages
2,693 (2.26/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Sunk Cost Fallacy
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock B650E Steel Legend Wifi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 Rev. 7
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X
Storage WD Black SN850X 1TB + 2x 2TB, 2x 4TB Crucial MX500, 4TB Samsung 870 Evo.
Display(s) Alienware AW2723DF, LG 27GR93U, LG 27GN950-B
Case Lian Li O11 Air Mini
Audio Device(s) Bose Companion Series 2 III, Sennheiser GSP600 and HD599 SE - Creative Soundblaster X4
Power Supply bequiet! Dark Power Pro 12 1500w Titanium
Mouse Logitech GPRO X Superlight & G502 X
Keyboard Corsair K65 RGB Mini, Razer Black Widow V3 TKL
VR HMD Oculus Rift S
because your scenario is the exact opposite.

normally people run ram higher than the max stable FCLK and then it gets cut in half.
and faster RAM with a slower FCLK that is not 1:1 skips clocks and the overall performs falls off a cliff.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
1,557 (0.31/day)
Location
Kolkata, India
System Name Coffee | Maximus
Processor Intel Core i7 9700K @ 5.2 GHz with AVX/4.8 GHz cache | i7 9700KF @ 5.0 GHz/4.7 GHz cache
Motherboard ASUS Maximus X Formula | ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger (modded BIOS for Coffee Lake)+TPM2.0 module
Cooling Cooler Master ML240 Illusion | Cooler Master ML120L RGB
Memory 2*16 GB (32 GB) Kingston Fury Beast @3600 MHz CL17 | 4*8 GB (32 GB) HyperX Fury @3200 MHz CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070 8 GB Twin Edge OC | Galax RTX 2060 Super 8 GB
Storage Samsung PM981a 1TB+Crucial P5 1TB+480GB SATA SSD+2 TB HDD | Crucial P1 500GB+2.5TB HDDs
Display(s) LG OLED 55 G3, 4K 120 Hz, VRR, ALLM, GSync, FreeSync | Samsung 43AU9070 4K TV, VRR, ALLM
Case Corsair Crystal 460X RGB | Lianli Lancool 215
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z SE w 5.1 Home Theater | Realtek ALC1150 (Supreme FX) w 2.1 speakers
Power Supply ASUS ROG Strix 750G (80+ Gold) | Cooler Master MWE 650 V2 (80+ Bronze)
Mouse Cooler Master MM731 19000 DPI gaming mouse
Keyboard Cooler Master CK721 65% mechanical gaming keyboard (tactile)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64 |Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R20 MT 4200,ST 547 CPU-Z MT 4871, ST 620 | R20 MT - 4158, ST - 534, CPU-Z MT 4798, ST 603
because your scenario is the exact opposite.

normally people run ram higher than the max stable FCLK and then it gets cut in half.
and faster RAM with a slower FCLK that is not 1:1 skips clocks and the overall performs falls off a cliff.
I did not get you. I have seen people running 3200 MHz RAMs with 1600 MHz FCLK or just left it at auto (which essentially sets itself to half of whatever the effective DDR frequency is or equal to the value of MCLK). Even AMD Ryzen Master does not allow the FCLK to be set higher than the MCLK. But since the BIOS has the flexibility, I tried it and it has been a win.
While it's true that increasing the MCLK (if RAMs are capable) and setting the highest possible FCLK is guaranteed to increase performance, the other way round does not have much exposure and I am just wondering why since it has done wonders for my exact system at least.
I did try setting 1900 MHz FCLK as well on my friend's Ryzen 5 3600 based system with an MSI B450 motherboard and 3200 MHz TridentZ and he has got similar performance gains as well.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2022
Messages
15 (0.02/day)
System Name Custom Built
Processor Ryzen R5 3600 and Ryzen R7 2700X and FX8350
Motherboard ASUS TUF B550 and ASUS X370 Prime Pro and ASUS M5a99FX pro
Cooling Vetroo V5 RGB and Uphere White 180W and Shadow Rock 2 and Tuniq 120
Memory 16GB 2x 8GB Crucial Rev E and 16GB 2x8GB Crucial Rev E RGB and 16GB 4x4GB Ballistix tactical
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX980TI and 2x MSI GTX 660 and MSI GTX 660
Storage WD Blus SN550 NVME and WD green 120GB SSD and Crucial MX500 SSD and Seagate, Samsung and WD 1TB HDDs
Display(s) 46" 1080P Samsung panel and 27" iiYama 1080P panel and 24" Viewsonic 1080P panel
Case Coolermaster CM690II and Coolermaster CM690III White and Fractal Design Focus G white
Audio Device(s) Yamaha HTR-2866 Home cinema and TEAC Audio Amplifier and Roland Firewire interface
Power Supply XFX 850W SIlver Semi Mod and FSP 750W and Aerocool Integrator 750W and OCZ 550W
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard Logitech Wireless
Software Windows 10 and Windows 8.1
Benchmark Scores 2700X 1959 Cinebench r15 R5 3600 1806 Cinebench r15
Running FCLK as high as possible with lower memory clocks does boost performance indeed, however you are better at 1:1 ideally at 1:1 you get the best Latency AND the best performance for example i have 3600mhz ddr4 DIMMS, i have overclocked these to 3800Mhz and set the FCLK and MCLK to 1900mhz - about the highest you can expect on ryzen 3000 series, i believe some Ryzen 5000 series CPUs will do 2000Mhz FCLK however.

Buildzoid on Youtube has a good video comparing the effects of the FCLK - as has been said before running higher than FCLK memory is where it stumbles say 1900Mhz FCLK with 4000Mhz ram, or say you run 4200Mhz RAM and the FCLK halves itself again to 1050 FCLK and adds Latency, also memory timings play a big part, tightening your timings will help with your latency
 
Top