• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

ScienceMark thread (with score list)

Status
Not open for further replies.

_33

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
1,248 (0.18/day)
Location
Quebec
System Name BEAST
Processor Intel Core i7 920 C0 Quad Core Processor LGA1366 2.66GHZ Bloomfield 8MB LGA batch 3844A509
Motherboard ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 X58 ATX LGA1366 DDR3
Cooling CoolIt ECO A.L.C. 120mm radiator
Memory G.SKILL F3-12800CL8TU-6GBPI PC3-12800 6GB 3X2GB DDR3-1600 CL8-8-8-21
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 1GB 850MHZ 1GB 3.9GHZ GDDR5 PCI-E 2XDVI HDTV
Storage SAMSUNG SPINPOINT F1 750GB X 2, WD2500KS 250GB, WD15EARS 1.5TB, WD20EARS 2.0TB
Display(s) LG W2361V-PF Monitors 23” Widescreen LCD Monitor (23.0” diagonal)
Case Cooler Master CM 690 II Advanced
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 600W Power Supply ATX V2.2 20/24PIN EPS12V Qfan 140MM Fan Active PFC
Software Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Here are the latest scores found on ExtremeTech They might serve as a reference for your own performance score.

DOWNLOAD

Here is my score (first time bench):
 

Attachments

  • sciencemark 2.0.GIF
    sciencemark 2.0.GIF
    34.8 KB · Views: 2,450
Last edited:
Newer score, lower memory bandwidth thoe. Can't win them all.
 

Attachments

  • superPI.GIF
    superPI.GIF
    140.4 KB · Views: 1,425
BEWARE: Newb question a'comin! haha.

Whats this to benchmark for? Entire system? Sorry... :laugh:

Jd
 
Current ScienceMark 2.0 Benchmark Test Scores/Standings on 08-25-2006

UPDATED


**********************************************
SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 19/12/2006 "TOP 10" CLUB:
**********************************************

* 1.) dominick32 = 2386 (Intel Core2Duo E6700@4410mhz)

* 2.) sirrah = 2288.30 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@4166mhz)[/b]

* 3.) giorgos th. = 2224.21 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3903mhz)

* 4.) alpha0ne = 2223.24 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3900mhz)

* 5.) Devious = 2181.97 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3942mhz)

* 6.) OneCool = 2165.41 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3900mhz)

* 7.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 2154.27 (Intel Core 2 duo e6400@3824.5mhz)

* 8.) tigger69 = 2151.58 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3851.4mhz)

* 9.) Infrared = 2137.37 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3700mhz)

* 10.) IluvIntel = 2133.59 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3595.5mhz)

=================================================
TOP 10 AVERAGE RESULT =
=================================================

**************************************************
SCIENCEMARK 2.0 RESULTS 08/25/2006 (ALL outside TOP 10):
**************************************************

* 11.) HeavyH20 = 2122.43 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3600mhz)

* 12.) Boneface = 2100.29 (INTEL CORE2DUO E6400 @3850mhz)

* 13.) VOCCH = 1971.06 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3500mhz)

* 14.) g R 3 i F = 1944.00 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3402mhz)

* 15.) MikeLopez = 1934.6 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3290mhz)

* 16.) Bonerheimer_c = 1905.22 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3504.1mhz)

* 17.) Heavyh20 = 1900.66 (Intel Core2Duo QX6700@3600mhz)

* 18.) Chewy = 1897.74 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3150mhz)

* 19.) SixPack = 1862.31 Intel Core2Duo E6600@3300mhz)

* 20.) BigBadWolf = 1834.06 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3300mhz)

* 21.) Lt_JWS = 1821.18 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3400mhz)

* 22.) W2hCYK = 1813.82 (Intel Core2Duo E6600@3300mhz)

* 23.) LT Jws = 1799.60 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3304mhz)

* 24.) ixq = 1770.14 (Intel Core2Duo E6400@3640mhz)

* 25.) HeUeR = 1745.07 (Intel Core2Duo E6300@3010mhz)

* 26.) Pepsiaddict = 1736.57 (Athlon64 X2 5200+ @3000mhz)

* 27.) speedycpu = 1702.46 (AMD Opteron 165@ 3204.7mhz )

* 28.) mandelore = 1665.51 (Athlon64 4000+@3193.0mhz)

* 29.) trt740 = 1662.43 (AMD opteron 185@3064mhz)

* 30.) cadaceva = 1648.73 (AMD Opteron 170@ 3097.3mhz)

* 31.) Judas = 1638.38 (AMD Athlon 64x2 4600+@ 2884mhz)

* 32.) Ketxxx = 1622.16 (Athlon 3500+@2900mhz)

* 33.) stevorob = 1614.95 (AHTLON X2 4200+@2800mhz)

* 34.) _33 = 1584.73 (Opteron 165@2800mhz)

* 35.) Wolverine = 1553.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3ghz (300x10)

* 36.) Wile E = 1555.33 (AHTLON X2 3800+@2849mhz)

* 37.) AthlonX2 = 1541.87 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 3800+@2660mhz)

* 38.) giorgos.th = 1541.53 (A64 3700+ SD @ 3047.02mhz(275.49*11)

* 39.) Urlyin = 1537.93 (175 Dual Core Opteron @2800mhz)

* 40.) Tatty_One = 1521.08 (Athlon 4000+@3100mhz)

* 41.) DRDNA = 1504.98 (AMD Athlon 64 FX-57@3148mhz)

* 42.) trt740 = 1502.73 (AMD Opteron 175@2757mhz)

* 43.) pt = 1496.75 (AMD A64 3000+@2854.8mhz)

* 44.) RickDStik = 1489.45 (Athlon x2 4200 @ 2.70GHz)

* 45.) DRDNA = 1480.38 (AMD FX-57@3ghz)

* 46.) mikek75 = 1478.24 (Opteron 165 2700mhz)

* 47.) ace80 = 1467.87 (Intel Pentium 4 631@4957.1mhz)

* 48.) Dj Dn = 1461.97 (Opteron 165 2700mhz)

* 49.) X800 = 1459.10 (A64 x2 4800+ watercooled @2751mhz)

* 50.) g12rxz = 1456.09 (AMD A64x2 4200+ @ 2.6ghz)

* 51.) Tigger69 = 1448.51 (Pentium D930@4416.8mhz)

* 52.) Alec§taar = 1440.60 (AMD A64x2 4800+@ 11x 257 = 2827.2mhz)

* 53.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 1429.10 (Intel Pentium 4 520@4410mhz)

* 54.) lapenski = 1426.95 (AMD Opteron 148 @2860.4mhz)

* 55.) JNT Raptor = 1422.72 (AMD A64x2 3800+@2712.1mhz)

* 56.) 33 = 1395.99 (AMD A64 3000+@2856mhz)

* 57.) trt740 = 1378.89 (AMD A64x2 3800+@2500mhz)

* 58.) Ketxxx = 1374.96 (A64 3200+ @ 2.65GHz - VENICE

* 59.) Lekamies = 1371.23 (AMD A64 3000+@2700mhz)

* 60.) Steevo = 1360 (AMD 4000+ San Diego @ 3.0 1.65vcore)

* 61.) mrbudgie = 1348.42 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 4200+@2500mhz)

* 62.) sno.lcn = 1342.76(Intel Pentium D930@4056.8mhz)

* 63.) Greek = 1336.74 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 4200+@2640mhz)

* 64.) Ninkobwi = 1324.19 (AMD ATHLON 64 x2 3800+@2500mhz)

* 65.) .:{KC}:. = 1313.31 (AMD ATHLON 64 FX55@2800mhz)

* 66.) ace80 = 1290.8 (P4 630@4356.5GHz)

* 67.) PVTCaboose1337 = 1285.43 (AMD ATHLON 3800+@stock)

* 68.) i_am_mustang_man = 1284.06 (AMD ATHLON X2 4200+ @2.5ghz)

* 69.) Wile E = 1251.20 (Intel Mobile core 2 duo T7600@2330mhz)

* 70.) KennyT772 = 1243.51 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2600mhz) (pending screesnhot)

* 71.) wazzledoozle = 1236.07 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2400mhz)

* 72.) insect111 = 1232.80 (Intel Pentium D945@4025mhz)

* 73.) zekrahminator = 1232.11 (AMD ATHLON 3800+@2699mhz)

* 74.) blacktruckryder = 1227.88 (AMD ATHLON 3200+@2650mhz)

* 75.) pt = 1216.14 (AMD AM2 Sempron 3000+@2500MHZ)

* 76.) Canuto = 1208.45 (Pentium D 930 @3720mhz)

* 77.) randomperson = 1208.27 (AMD ATHLONx2 3800+@2400mhz)

* 78.) Alcpone = 1208.08 (Pentium D 945 @3777mhz)

* 79.) Polaris573 = 1182.10 (P4 prescott@3.989GHz)

* 80.) ace80 = 1163.96 (P4 550@3870.5GHz)

* 81.) amd64skater = 1143.37 (AMD Athlon64 (NewCastle) 3500+@2420)

* 82.) Okt = 1134.24 (Intel E6300@1.8ghz)

* 83.) strick94u = 1123.30 (Pentium D820@3.6ghz)

* 84.) newmodder = 1119.29 (AMD Athlon64 3500+ 205fsb x 11 mult)

* 85.) cdawall = 1115.34 (AMD ATHLON64 3000+@2439mhz)

* 86.) oily_17 = 1104.22 (Amd Athlon 64 3200+@2290mhz)

* 87.) Thermopylae_480 = 1095.84 (P4 530@3699.9GHz)

* 88.) jiggamanjb = 1090.67 (AMD ATHLON64 3000+@2679mhz)

* 89.) Demos_sav = 1074.06 (Intel P4 519K@3.8ghz)

* 90.) Polaris573 = 1040.76 (P4 Northwood@3.2GHz)

* 91.) Polaris573 = 1016.19 (Amd Athlon 64 3000+@2350mhz)

* 92.) W2hCYK = 1011.54 (P4 Prescott@3400mhz)

* 93.) MikeLopez = 1000.03 (AMD ATHLON 3400+ (S754)

* 94.) ATIonion = 994.96 (Amd Athlon 64 3200+@2419.7mhz)

* 95.) Cdawall = 968.86 (Pentium D 930@3000MHz)

* 96.) Paradox = 958.22 (AMD Opteron 165@1800MHz)

* 97.) new_rez = 952.59 (Pentium 4 2.8 northwood@ 3.1ghz)

* 98.) Cdawall = 942.11 (Celeron 351@4032mhz)

* 99.) Cdawall = 939.94 (Pentium 4 ht @ 3.2ghz)

* 100.) DaMulta = 937.81 (AMD ATHLONXP@2203.4MHZ)

* 101.) Casheti = 931.40 (Pentium D 920@2800.80MHz)

* 102.) Solaris17 = 886.72 (AMD ATHLONXP@2340MHZ)

* 103.) Twinz = 852.66 (AMD ATHLON64 3700+@2532MHZ)

* 104.) badboy_2912 = 757.4 (P4 Northwood@2.8GHz)

* 105.) DOM_ATI_X800XL_PCI-E = 414.86 (Intel Celeron@1.7ghz)


=================================================
AverAge 95 non-top 10 testers =
=================================================
Post your scores on the wiki too:
http://reference.techpowerup.com/ScienceMark_2.0_Scores


Sciencemark was run on hundred and two computers and the comprovation screenshot posted here
105

P.S.=> Achilles from the film "TROY", said it best:

0009E6F2-85D7-115A-A19D80C328EC0000.jpg


"Is there NO ONE ELSE!?!"

:)

==================================================
When you guys run the ScienceMark 2.0 test? Do it THIS way:
==================================================
A.) Remove as MANY BACKGROUND APPS RUNNING AS YOU CAN, & even stop your EXPLORER.EXE SHELL using taskmgr.exe!

* An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for BACKGROUND APPS CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?p=140138#post140138
---------------------------------------------------------------
B.) Stop as many services as you can using services.msc (or, via msconfig, whatever you are most comfortable with): You (@ least I can) can run with this MINIMUM SET OF SERVICES GOING (or just set ones you are NOT SURE OF, to MANUAL startup in services.msc):

  • DCOM Server Process (it may be possible to DISABLE this one, but some apps need it)
  • EventLog (may be possible to disable, but not 100% sure, because some security settings demand logging & if unable to log? System WILL shutdown!)
  • Plug and Play
  • Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - NEVER SHUT THIS DOWN or your system WILL LAG BAD!
  • Security Accounts Manager
(Some of those? You may not even HAVE on XP, not sure anymore, but point is there! ABOVE ALL - If you are NOT SURE what to do here? Ask, or just don't do anything @ all... it can be 'somewhat risky')

** An example post of someone doing this is here you can refer to & follow, has details, for SERVICES CUTOFFS OPTIMIZATIONS:

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?p=140048#post140048
---------------------------------------------------------------
C.) Lastly/Optionally, startup ScienceMark 2.0 (using its File Menu, Run Submenu to browse for it if need be on disk) & try it @ HIGH, or ABOVENORMAL CPU Priority!

(When you run it by rightclicking on it as you startup the program & it comes into taskmgr.exe's PROCESS tab view as visible, give the benchmark program THAT MUCH MORE CPU PRIORITY possible - then, RUN IT!).

NOTE: When you are @ highest o/c's possible for your rig? It can get "touchy" using HIGH cpu priority, SO, if you can't finish the test? Step down to AboveNormal or Normal CPU priority via taskmgr.exe on ScienceMark2.exe!
---------------------------------------------------------------
D.) When done: Restart services you need, via service.msc right-click popup menu or START/STOP command there WHILE IN THE PROCESSES TAB, & restart explorer.exe (your desktop GUI shell) using taskmgr.exe's File menu, RUN submenu item. Then, post your CPU-z 1.36 data & score in photos in this thread. Thanks!
==================================================

apk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
my stock amd athlon 64 w/ ddr266 gets a huge 874.65!!!
 
when i run it..it doesnt do the 1st 2 or 3 of them
 
See system specs in signature @ bottom of post &...

See my score here:

APKScienceMark1DefraggedOnRamDiskRun.jpg


:)

* There is my results from this benchmark, with the system makeup below in my signature &/or specs panel...

APK

P.S.=> All tests ran to full duration & iterations of default tests as well for your reference... apk
 
Last edited:
BRING 'EM ON!!! Break 1400...

I've got THE fastest one yet overall submitted here @ least!

:)

(LOL: Hey, I KNOW YOU'RE OUT THERE)...

* Bring on an Intel CONROE (Their highest-end one, preferably).

If you can't, is there ones faster that have broken 1400 overall score, etc.??

I don't know, I don't use this test typically!

APK

P.S.=> Coder built machine no less... I refuse to believe people here don't have one that scores better, there must be one - after all, you guys are the hardware nuts, not me! apk
 
Last edited:
Achilles said it best in the film, TROY:

0009E6F2-85D7-115A-A19D80C328EC0000.jpg


"Is there NO ONE ELSE!?!"

:)

APK

P.S.=> Come on now, if it comes down to me having to rib on you like that... break 1400! apk
 
Last edited:
Alec§taar said:
I've got THE fastest one yet overall submitted here @ least!

:)

(LOL: Hey, I KNOW YOU'RE OUT THERE)...

* Bring on an Intel CONROE (Their highest-end one, preferably).

If you can't, is there ones faster that have broken 1400 overall score, etc.??

I don't know, I don't use this test typically!

APK

P.S.=> Coder built machine no less... I refuse to believe people here don't have one that scores better, there must be one - after all, you guys are the hardware nuts, not me! apk

I broke it, 1446.18 I love my new system.
 

Attachments

  • science mark.JPG
    science mark.JPG
    110.3 KB · Views: 956
dj_dn said:
I broke it, 1446.18 I love my new system.

"Very good Danielsan"

:)

(What took you so long? LOL...)

EDIT PART - Now listening to Led Zeppelin's "Achilles Last Stand" lol, per the photos I used above...

APK

P.S.=> Hmmm, a ~56 point margin of error to beat, eh? I'll o/c when the heatwave stops, get out to near 2800mhz & beat that imo!

I know I can get to 2728.1 or so, & all is stable except once I had a F@H mishap, so I stepped down some...

I will try for my highest when it cools down ambient temps-wise... & try to once more O/C'd to that rate or more & try to beat YOUR score! Waiting out the heat & will try for more later... apk
 
Last edited:
Remember I Said I'd Beat You? Here Is The Evidence...

After a massive heatwave cooldown, I ran it, & this... was the unedited result:

APKUneditedResult.jpg


:)

* Talk about "Turning up the turbo-boost & adding NOS"...

APK

P.S.=> I swear to God on my life that I did not edit that above either, it IS how it came out... apk
 
First glance has me thinking your OC Isn't stable.
Or simply a glitch with the test on that run.
 
{JNT}Raptor said:
First glance has me thinking your OC Isn't stable.
Or simply a glitch with the test on that run.

It's a glitch on that run most likely, because it has not done a result like that since.

I've run it 4 more times, always 'batting in' @ around the same as my first result (1388-1390 & I can't beat my original score @ my current overclock - so dj dn's rig IS the fastest thusfar).

APK
 
Last edited:
Here are my latest results, overclock is higher than I have ever run it here thusfar:

APKFinalOCPg1CPU.jpg


APKFinalOCPg2RAM.jpg


:)

* Here is my score, JUST SHY of 1400 (can't break it, & weather's TOO HOT to try for a higher o/c imo, @ least for this summer (topping 100F today around here))

APKScienceMark1DefraggedOnRamDiskRun.jpg


APK

P.S.=> dj, I have to admit, you have a faster system than I do... that is, until I can try to pull off a still higher O/C, but I don't dare in this heat & to be blunt about it: I don't think I can 'take on' your Opteron 165 DualCore, no matter HOW far I o/c my rig... apk
 
that 165 is a denmark, right? My friend cant get it past 2.6GHz, and when he does that, it performs horribly.. ygpm. i need help. lol
 
why wont it do the first 2 test for mine?
 
No idea - does it feedback an error message, or do you system eventlogs show anything also?

(Only things I can think of that MIGHT shed some light on your situation...)

APK
 
no error just doesnt do the first 2





edit:tried again and its the same thing
 
Last edited:
Boneface said:
no error just doesnt do the first 2 or 3

If you look @ the last page, I did a screenprint of a "glitch" the test ran into over here, & when that happened?

The first test that does the spinning cube in black background & white borders as it rotates seemingly "hung up", but I still got a result from it on the molecular default test set... outrageous though it was!

Does yours just NOT give you a result, whatsoever?

There ARE "output files" from it as it runs, they are in .rst & .txt form & they are located under the ScienceMark folder itself!

I suggest looking thru them for clues as to WHY you may not be getting results @ all!

(Does your CPU do SSE2/SSE3 etc. as well as MMX/3dNow (if AMD the latter 2 should work no matter what, as well as x87 Assembly code streams)).

APK
 
ok when i try to do the first 2 seperatly it tell s me that sciencemark has encounted a problem and the whole thing about it having to close
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top