• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Shadow Of The Tomb Raider - CPU Performance and general game benchmark discussions

Please forgive my ignorance here, but is this in the game itself or a benchmark I can download ?????
You can download a free demo from Steam that also includes the benchmark. It supposedly runs on an older engine and produces lower results. Since I don't own the full game, I can't confirm this myself.
 
Are all your power settings to max performance?
yup, I'm using the Ryzen power plan
yeah that's really weird I had an non XT 5700 and it got way better than what you are getting so there's definitely something fishy going on with your card like maybe it's not actually an RX5700XT
Card is about 2 years old already.
I've reinstalled it and now I'm getting about 70 FPS + the benchmark isn't stuttering anymore, crashes persist tho.

Friend of mine is running it with a 9600k+3070Ti and has twice as much FPS as me, weird.
 
yup, I'm using the Ryzen power plan

Card is about 2 years old already.
I've reinstalled it and now I'm getting about 70 FPS + the benchmark isn't stuttering anymore, crashes persist tho.

Friend of mine is running it with a 9600k+3070Ti and has twice as much FPS as me, weird.
what CPU do you have? and what RAM?
 
what CPU do you have? and what RAM?
5800X and G.Skill Trident Z 2x8 @3733MHz

I've disabled fullscreen optimizations and gained an additional 5 FPS overall, feel like I'm going places.
 
5800X and G.Skill Trident Z 2x8 @3733MHz

I've disabled fullscreen optimizations and gained an additional 5 FPS overall, feel like I'm going places.
That's really weird, seems your GPU is heavily underperforming, I would not rule out a faulty GPU, as in hardware problem, normally with a 5800x and G.Skill Trident Z @3773mhz it should be a lot faster. One thing to note, is that 3733mhz ram 100% stable? Is it clocked 1:1:1, as in, if the FCLK and UCLK running at 1886.5? You might want to run a couple of Y-Cruncher tests, all of the tests, that's very good at testing and finding stability issues. Could be that that 1886mhz FCLK is not a stable, and that can cause a lot of weirdness and random crashes, including degraded GPU performance.
 
That's really weird, seems your GPU is heavily underperforming, I would not rule out a faulty GPU, as in hardware problem, normally with a 5800x and G.Skill Trident Z @3773mhz it should be a lot faster. One thing to note, is that 3733mhz ram 100% stable? Is it clocked 1:1:1, as in, if the FCLK and UCLK running at 1886.5? You might want to run a couple of Y-Cruncher tests, all of the tests, that's very good at testing and finding stability issues. Could be that that 1886mhz FCLK is not a stable, and that can cause a lot of weirdness and random crashes, including degraded GPU performance.
hmm, memory is running at 1866 and FCLK is set to auto, ryzen master reports it as 1866 as well, could try manually setting everything on the BIOS setup, I don't like tinkering with the mobo via windows.
I'll try Y-cruncher, haven't heard of that program before, if something fails I'll set everything via BIOS and try again.

About the game, I was able to play for about an hour with no issues -at nearly 80 fps with dips to 50-60 in parts of the jungle- and decided to pause to get some water, when I came back (roughly 5 minutes) I found my desktop with an empty taskbar meaning the game had crashed.
 
@SuperMumrik
Maybe upload SotTR run here also ? :)

Fortsatt med ddr4 ? veldig bra min og 95% fps :toast:
Yes, DDR4@4000c15.
The D5's just arrived at the postal office. To bad they are micron chips :banghead:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (98).png
    Screenshot (98).png
    3.5 MB · Views: 260
so basically from rather early data, a top tuned 5950x (353) vs a top tuned 12900k (366) is ~3% difference in favor of the Alder Lake chip in this bench?

SOTTR is very much latency and ram limited. Alder lake actually has a bit higher latency, especially with E cores enabled -- so it doesn't do as well in this bench as others.
 
Last edited:
SOTTR is very much latency and ram limited. Alder lake actually has a bit higher latency, especially with E cores enabled -- so it doesn't do as well in this bench as others.
I said in this benchmark, did not say its a general difference :) (do not want to start a fanboy war :laugh:)
Anyone tested Alder Lake with a 6900xt in this benchmark?
 
Proud on my hard work and results :)

CPU: Ryzen 7 5800x -> PBO + CO optimized per core
RAM: G.SKILL 32 GB KIT DDR4 3200 MHz CL16 Ripjaws V CL16-18-18-38 1,35 V OCed to -> 3733 MHz - 16-19-14-32-48 1,45 V
GPU: Sapphire Pulse 5700 XT OC + UV - > Core Clock - 2032 MHz Memory Clock - 1864 MHz CV 1111 mV

Edit: in second SS is AA off, because I seen many SS here with it turned off ;)
 

Attachments

  • 1080p low 3733mhz 5800x.png
    1080p low 3733mhz 5800x.png
    3.1 MB · Views: 197
  • 1080p AA off 3733mhz 5800x.png
    1080p AA off 3733mhz 5800x.png
    3.3 MB · Views: 189
Last edited:
My old war horsey with memory at 2133 @11 12 12 36 1T (thanks intel for the huge WHOOPY delta temp and consumption whith the xmp profile on:mad:)

I'm expecting more, but thats it:ohwell:

1639621776177.png
 
My Old PC:
CPU: Intel i7 - 8700
RAM: Kingston FURY Beast 2 x 8 GB KIT DDR4 2666 MHz CL16 + Corsair Vengeance LPX 2 x 8 GB KIT DDR4 2666 MHz CL16 CL16-18-18-38 1,20 V OCed to -> 2666 MHz - 13-16-16-35 1,35 V
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming 8G - OC - > Core Clock + 135 MHz Memory Clock - 335 MHz
 

Attachments

  • 1080pLowest.jpg
    1080pLowest.jpg
    331 KB · Views: 137
Update with 4000cl16 vs 3800cl15. 5600X +200 PBO and curve optimizer, 88W max limit.

4000cl16:
SOTTR 4000cl16 1.png


3800cl15:
SOTTR 3800cl15 1.png
 
Even on my i5 8400 a bit of ram tuning can have great impact! I advice all of you stuck on crappy Intelboards with ram speed limits like B360, B460, H310, H410 to tweak a bit.

Since the motherboard is a B360 max speed is 2666. Running the 2 sticks XMP gave me 143fps avg\96 min on CPU-game. Running tuned gave me 168fps avg\114 min on CPU-game. That is an uplift of 17.5% on avg and 19% on min. For comparison: In aida stock gave 39, 38 34k and 55.5ns, tuned: 41, 41, 37k and 50.9ns.

Stock timings: 15-16-16-35 refi 8316 rfc 460, rrd 8-12, faw 34, wr 24, rtp 12, wtr 5-14
Tweaked timings: 12-16-16-28 refi 65535 rfc 380, rrd 4-6, faw 16, wr 12, rtp 6, wtr 3-6 rest of timings are unchanged

Stock:
sottr xmp.png


Tuned:
sottr tune.png
 
Even on my i5 8400 a bit of ram tuning can have great impact! I advice all of you stuck on crappy Intelboards with ram speed limits like B360, B460, H310, H410 to tweak a bit.

Since the motherboard is a B360 max speed is 2666. Running the 2 sticks XMP gave me 143fps avg\96 min on CPU-game. Running tuned gave me 168fps avg\114 min on CPU-game. That is an uplift of 17.5% on avg and 19% on min. For comparison: In aida stock gave 39, 38 34k and 55.5ns, tuned: 41, 41, 37k and 50.9ns.

Stock timings: 15-16-16-35 refi 8316 rfc 460, rrd 8-12, faw 34, wr 24, rtp 12, wtr 5-14
Tweaked timings: 12-16-16-28 refi 65535 rfc 380, rrd 4-6, faw 16, wr 12, rtp 6, wtr 3-6 rest of timings are unchanged

Stock:
View attachment 231522

Tuned:
View attachment 231521
Indeed, Ram tuning is forgotten by most these days, even if in most situations it gives really nice boosts in certain scenarios.
 
XMP enabled memory at 3200 15 17 17 37 good bost



1641571267641.png
 
XMP enabled memory at 3200 15 17 17 37 good bost



View attachment 231579
18fps boost on cpu game avg (that's what cpu outputs), try tuning other timings and you get 200+ fps. 3200cl15 is probably B-die so you can tune rfc a lot :)

Proud on my hard work and results :)

CPU: Ryzen 7 5800x -> PBO + CO optimized per core
RAM: G.SKILL 32 GB KIT DDR4 3200 MHz CL16 Ripjaws V CL16-18-18-38 1,35 V OCed to -> 3733 MHz - 16-19-14-32-48 1,45 V
GPU: Sapphire Pulse 5700 XT OC + UV - > Core Clock - 2032 MHz Memory Clock - 1864 MHz CV 1111 mV

Edit: in second SS is AA off, because I seen many SS here with it turned off ;)
Very good score for 5800X :)
 
Back
Top