• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

nice times ^ but L1 cache is miles away from X99.... ;)
 
you dare to shake the foundations of hardware hardcoreness?! ha! ;)
 
rampage5.png

I have not even started to stress this mobo.... Over 70K MB/s is WOW
 

Hi,

i got a question regarding my benchmark results, compared to other 6700k@ddr4 benches.
While my memory read stat is way better (as it should be when comparing ddr4-3000 to ddr4-3600 at almost same timings), my write and copy stats are way slower.
and i got no idea why!

could you take a look?
cachemem-4600.png


Edit: already figured it out.
if i use all 4x 8gb modules, it's slower
with 2x 8gb modules i get 48gb/s read, 52gb/s write and 45gb/s copy :(
 
Last edited:
Some small update.

read-56.png
 
Pass Super Pi 32m but not Hyper PI 32m.

super-pi-32m-5064-copy.png
 
Memory latency under 40ns:

aida64%20mem%20bench%207-27-16.jpg
 

Attachments

  • cache_memory_benchmark.png
    cache_memory_benchmark.png
    122.2 KB · Views: 893
That is normal for Skylake non K OC.
ok thanks. Is it a faulty measurement due to a bug in AIDA64 or is the L1 cache actually that low due to the BCLK overclock? I've attached a reference cache memory benchmark for the i5 6400 and the numbers are much higher, shouldn't it be the other way around.
 

Attachments

  • cache_memory_6400_stock.png
    cache_memory_6400_stock.png
    211.3 KB · Views: 874
Last edited:
ok thanks. Is it a faulty measurement due to a bug in AIDA64 or is the L1 cache actually that low due to the BCLK overclock? I've attached a reference cache memory benchmark for the i5 6400 and the numbers are much higher, shouldn't it be the other way around.

I don't sure. Probably there benchmark make use of AVX2. I try many benchmarks and score seem normal when compare to 6600k oc to same level. Except benchmark that utilize AVX2 instruction set like XTU and x265 where my i5-6500 @ 5ghz is much much slower than stock.
 
I don't sure. Probably there benchmark make use of AVX2. I try many benchmarks and score seem normal when compare to 6600k oc to same level. Except benchmark that utilize AVX2 instruction set like XTU and x265 where my i5-6500 @ 5ghz is much much slower than stock.
Yup you are right, the benchmarks are on par with a similarly clocked 6600K so the actual performance doesn't seem to be affected. It's possible that it is AVX related and since it's disabled upon BCLK overclock the AIDA64 benchmark results are skewed. Thanks for your input.
 
so memory performance also depends on what processor you'll pair it at?

cachemem3.png
 
so memory performance also depends on what processor you'll pair it at?

cachemem3.png

of course ! Try to OC your G4400 to 4.5Ghz (both core and cache) and see what happen !!
 
Back
Top