• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your AIDA 64 cache and memory benchmark here

any chance you could throw a table in the op dude?

only it would make comparisons much easier :)

just make sure everyone who gets in the table uses 3.00.25 and they will all be valid :)

I was thinking of that but how to do that? :p Never did that actually. :p
 
use google docs.
 
ino it's not much but it's working fine for me ^^

Aida64ExtremeEngineerEditionCacheampMemoryBenchmark_zpsf7770301.jpg
 
i have to find this version of aida! how much £ and where?
 
Well it's not to fast but gets the job done...

sorry for Trial version I'm very frugal hence the old hardware :D

Capture1238.jpg
 
Take into account IE8 is open and running 15 tabs

zg49.png
 
I was thinking of that but how to do that? :p Never did that actually. :p

[table="head"]Like|This | Bud|
..... | ........| .......| [/table]
 
thsi is my :)
 

Attachments

  • untitled.jpg
    untitled.jpg
    49.2 KB · Views: 1,103
@Everyone- I have made a table showing the first two entries. Please check the first post in this thread and tell if the format is ok and I will complete the rest then. :)
 
Looks good to me, but I would either seperate AMD and Intel or at least put the CPU/MB of each entry. Either or even better both would be very relevant imho. Great thread and here's my next submission. Just upgraded to a 4770k. Waiting on my new cooler to show up so I'm all stock, just loaded memory XMP settings (G.Skill Sniper 2133) and away we went. This system performs great! Sure it's not the fastest out there by far (my budget wasn't the greatest either! :D ), but so far I am happy with my upgrade.

Stock4770k2133MEMPERF.jpg
 
i would just do the ram scores dude, cache will be all over for each type of cpu imo :)

i would add which type of cpu it is thats used too so you can group them together. i mean we all know intel will beat amd at this but if you can tell which are like yours it will be better to compare notes with those on the same hardware :)
 
Right well I'm not saying do the cache scores, but I am saying when you put up peoples' scores to let people know what cpu/chipset/memory speed they were running to get those scores maybe? I mean unless high score is all this is about, it's interesting to see what different builds and combos are attaining. I'd just like to see a little more detail to the grid, I know it adds more work and it's more of a preference thing. I could be less lazy and scroll thru the pages to find that particular score and check the screenie to see what they're runnig too I suppose!

:toast:
 
Ran on one of the servers at my work - HP ML 350 G6

cachemem.png


:toast:
 
Table is updated. All entries in the first page are entered. Please check the info. As for the OC info, that thing is impossible atleast for me. :p
 
The 2 results from my laptop and work pc (i5 3230M and i5 2400) are right, but the i5 2400 is overclocked - the tables says "N" :)
 
The 2 results from my laptop and work pc (i5 3230M and i5 2400) are right, but the i5 2400 is overclocked - the tables says "N" :)

Just for confirmation, ain't the 2400 features turbo speed of 3400 MHz? ;)
 
Just for confirmation, ain't the 2400 features turbo speed of 3400 MHz?

it does. Mine turbos to 3.6GHz I think, changed the levels in the BIOS.
 
Back
Top