• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

i3-1215U

i3.jpg
 
i5-13500 in CPU-Z 2.09 (official site hasn't been updated yet, Edit : Now you can download CPU-Z 2.09 with official site)

All Cores : 780.2 / 8729.9 (MT slightly faster than TR 1950X)
P-Cores : 779.4 / 5685.4 (MT slightly faster than i7-10700)
E-Cores : 389.0 / 3104.8 (MT on a par with Ryzen 5 1600)
View attachment 330395


Intel Core i5 13500H (4P + 8E / 16T)
• All Cores : 753,4 / 6 737
• P-Cores : 754 / 3 821,7
• E-Cores : 399,3 / 3 015,8


CPU_Z_2_09_i5_13500H.jpg
 
1720980925902.png
1720980983141.png
1720981266177.png
 

Attachments

  • CPU@pbo+curve@auto;RAM@3733;16-20-16-16-38@1.41v.png
    CPU@pbo+curve@auto;RAM@3733;16-20-16-16-38@1.41v.png
    270.2 KB · Views: 80
Last edited:
I find it a bit freaky how some systems show Core VID, and others show Core Voltage.
EDIT: Aha! Sensor=0 shows VID, Sensor=1 shows Voltage. Inside cpuz.ini

cpuz.png
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Hi, Can you tested also the CPU-Z 2.09 benchmark on a single coreset/cluster ?

Single-Thread / Multi-Thread
• All Cores : 901 / 10 793
• P-Cores : ??? / ????
• E-Cores : ??? / ????


Thanks

There you go!

5.5GHz P-Core and 4.0 GHz E-Core. Decreased the speed on the E-Cores a tad bit. (I`m only using it for gaming) Been running like this for a while now, and pushed it with Prime95 for some hours.

All-Core.jpgP-Core.jpgE-Core.jpg

AVX-AllCore.jpgAVX-Pcore.jpgAVX-Ecore.jpg
 
1722316714871.png

Inaudible work machine :)
 

Caring1. Review man from diit.cz ask as what we want to testing (benchmarking) to review. I told him CPU-Z 2.09 (2.10) 17.01.64 benchmark witch can now be ran on a single coreset/cluster. My result is to compare Core i5 13500H.

 
A cheap and cheerful system for my younger brother to experience PC gaming, after playing on his tablet for many years.

Quite slow by today's standards, but absolutely fine for Minecraft and Fortnite, especially with the overclock.

Validation Link
 

Attachments

  • cpuz.png
    cpuz.png
    77.1 KB · Views: 126
A cheap and cheerful system for my younger brother to experience PC gaming, after playing on his tablet for many years.

Quite slow by today's standards, but absolutely fine for Minecraft and Fortnite, especially with the overclock.

Validation Link
Old good CPU.

I don't know why. But this result is better than ever on same CPU.

Screenshot 2024-08-01 195111.png
 
Just for giggles, I pulled out my old AM3+ gaming rig from yrs ago & cranked up the old FX-8350 for some fun. Ahh, the days of Vishera architecture. :laugh:
CPU_Z-bench@4.9GHz - Copy.JPG
 
Interesting, I totally would have thought that single core boosts would have been affected more with my new settings, since that is when the most voltage is used, as I understand. But it actually seems multicore was affected more. Though, its still acceptable I think, if it makes my chip a bit safer.

OLD:
1724039301391.png

NEW:
1724039317652.png


The differences are

OLD: Vid cap 1.7? NEW: Vid cap 1.5
OLD: I think 6000 cl32 but possibly 6400 cl30 NEW: 5600 CL36
OLD: AI AC/DC LL 110 NEW: AI AC/DC LL 90
OLD: Turbo 3 ON NEW: Turbo 3 OFF
OLD: CEP ON NEW: CEP OFF
OLD: Power profile: Gigabyte 'Spec enhancement' 253 pl1/pl2 511? iccmax? ( not sure) NEW: Intel Performance profile 253w pl1/pl2 307 iccmax

BTW I totally thought 'Spec enhancement' was a conservative power profile, since it was near the bottom of the list and the description said it was for air coolers/small aios, when the ones above it said they were for big AIOs. Though googling it now, it looks like thats not really the case... Damn it.... I really shouldn't have assumed that.
 
Mobile Sempron 3600+ "Keene" 1.2 V running in a Dell Latitude D531:

Validation link

keene_sempron3600_s1g1.png
 
Last edited:
Athlon TF-20 "Sherman" 1.0 V (validation), also running in the same machine.

sherman_tf20_s1g1.png



Athlon X2 L310 "Tyler" 0.875 V (validation) as well:

CPU-Z — AMD Athlon X2 L310 (Tyler).png
 
Last edited:
AMD Ryzen 7530U mobile. Came with nice RAM frequency, but the latency is something to be desired.

7530U cpu-z.png
 

1724903769891.png
cpuz_RA8xxMMz6R.png
cpuz_UVaQmkaIx3.png


The ST might be able to get a little higher, but the load isnt enough for those cores to boost to 4.8.
 
Last edited:

View attachment 361127
cpuz_RA8xxMMz6R.png
cpuz_UVaQmkaIx3.png


The ST might be able to get a little higher, but the load isnt enough for those cores to boost to 4.8.
Set energy default to high performance in control panel to lock the frequency and voltage on max

I wonder how it performs on games

wtf is this?
 
Set energy default to high performance in control panel to lock the frequency and voltage on max
Nah iv seen all the tricks. When you do that it prevents boosting all together. Balanced is the only way it will even attempt to pass 4ghz. The trick to these CPUs is modification of the min processor state. Besides locking all 112t to 4.8ghz isn’t happening without LN2
 
Back
Top