• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

I have a hard time going over 700w lol..

Intense!
 
i5-14600K with DDR4 3733 CL 19, all P+E+HT ON.:) Love it and wait for the chance to swap for DDR5 MB:D
14600K-DDR4-3733.19.PNG
 
i9-14900KF with AIO cooling (not delidded)

KkGkbW1.png

pQSM2Iz.jpg
 
A Computer Guy said:
The more you process the more you save!
Click to expand...

I mean 56/112 golden cove cores at 4.7-5ghz at 800w isn’t bad imo. I think that puts its efficiency level at current better than the consumer chips.

Obviously at a load run. It’s not 800w all the time lol.
 
I cant imagine having a CPU alone that can do 1KW if I put a little effort in.. that is crazy lol!

I love it.
 
Found my P3 meter, whole system draw hovers around 1580 with spikes into but below 1650. Idle system draw is 320-330w.

Should be noted this isn't normal consumer stuff though, the board alone likely draws a shit ton. These wattages are on the balanced power plan, so it clocks down, cores get parked etc.

Worth noting, no E-cores here. This is all P cores.

Also on a fast and dirty OC.

1753387570178.png
 
Solaris17 said:
Also on a fast and dirty OC.
Click to expand...

If you turned off half your cores (28/56) could these cores clock higher to gain a better single thread score? Or are these cores maxed out @ 4.7Ghz no matter how many cores are running?

This test would be for single thread OC purposes only :)
 
Last edited:
Outback Bronze said:
If you turned off half your cores (32/64) could these cores clock higher to gain a better single thread score? Or are these cores maxed out @ 4.7Ghz no matter how many cores are running?

This test would be for single thread OC purposes only :)
Click to expand...

Some already clock to 5.1 and thats just what I have it set at. On this board its better to set clocks based on total cores under load 4.7 is my bottom end. I OC by configuring the boost settings, not setting multipliers on 112 logical cores or I would KMS.

So yes, if I disabled cores I could push it higher, but the only reason I cant do that with all of them is heattttttt and power.
 
Was already playing around, might as well give this a run too :)

Screenshot 2025-07-25 225248.png
 
BOOM!

cpuzscreen.jpg
 

Attachments

13700KF and 9700KF with AIO cooling, not delidded
Sin título.jpg


13700KF just P-cores no HT

13700KF.jpg


14900KS
14900Ks.jpg
 
Last edited:
No thanks on that amount of voltage. Good cooling with a 480, but long term that's a lot of damn voltage for modern nodes. Also yeah probably throttling. The lower voltage means you'll get more within power limits and thermal limits so I can see why the x64 outperforms. Excellent ST score btw for RL. That score is kind of funny though amazing ST, but the MT tragic for a 14900KS though that's also just P-cores enabled so I'm sure it's quite in line with that. It does go to show you how much the E-cores add to overall MT.
 
InVasMani said:
No thanks on that amount of voltage. Good cooling with a 480, but long term that's a lot of damn voltage for modern nodes. Also yeah probably throttling. The lower voltage means you'll get more within power limits and thermal limits so I can see why the x64 outperforms. Excellent ST score btw for RL. That score is kind of funny though amazing ST, but the MT tragic for a 14900KS though that's also just P-cores enabled so I'm sure it's quite in line with that. It does go to show you how much the E-cores add to overall MT.
Click to expand...

I could have probably added in HT for more MT with little penalty on voltage, but this is just P cores only. Pretty sure these scores are with untuned memory sticks too.
 
I found a lil more single core.. might still have a bit left.. but not 1000 points.. dammit!

:laugh:

Screenshot 2025-07-26 233548.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top