- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 350 (0.06/day)
- Location
- Valencia, Venezuela
System Name | Tropicaliente | A515-43-R19L |
---|---|
Processor | FX-6300 | R3 3200U |
Motherboard | ASRock 970 Extreme 4 | Grumpy_PK |
Cooling | EVGA CLC120 | Stock |
Memory | 16GB DDR3-1600 | 16GB DDR4-2666 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor RX-570 4GB Red Dragon | Vega 3 |
Storage | 256GB SSD (OS) + (512GB+256GB) SSD (Games) + 2TB HDD | 128GB NVME + 512GB SSD |
Display(s) | Asus VN247H-P | 15.6" FHD |
Case | Antec ONE |
Audio Device(s) | on board + Logitech Z623 | on board |
Power Supply | MSI MAG A600DN | Powerbrick ac/dc |
Mouse | MS Wired Desktop 600 |
Keyboard | MS Wired Desktop 600 |
Software | Win 11 x64 Pro | Win 10 x64 Home |
Hi every body.
Time ago I was working at some 3G/LTE site and I saw a BBU's routing table with:
1 route to /30 network.
4 routes to /32 networks.
Default route.
And same next hop for all routes.
What's the point of using a single host network?
I mean logic points out that single host doesn't send nor receive packets becuase it's totally isolated, or am I wrong?
I have done some GNS3 labs and I understand until /30 network (2 usable IPs, for example a link between 2 routers) but /31 and /32... No, I don't.
What would be the use (or benefit) of doing that in this case?
Thank a lot for your response.
Time ago I was working at some 3G/LTE site and I saw a BBU's routing table with:
1 route to /30 network.
4 routes to /32 networks.
Default route.
And same next hop for all routes.
What's the point of using a single host network?
I mean logic points out that single host doesn't send nor receive packets becuase it's totally isolated, or am I wrong?
I have done some GNS3 labs and I understand until /30 network (2 usable IPs, for example a link between 2 routers) but /31 and /32... No, I don't.
What would be the use (or benefit) of doing that in this case?
Thank a lot for your response.
Last edited: