• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

Sony PlayStation 4 "Orbis" Kits Shipping to Developers, Powered by AMD A10 APU

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
1,228 (0.60/day)
Likes
608
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Phantom 820 v3.1
Processor Intel Core i7-6700k @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Formula OC (Bios: 7.40)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4 3000MHz
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GTX 1070 AMP! / EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2
Storage 512GB Crucial MX300 / 256GB OCZ Vertex 4 / 1TB Hitachi HDD
Display(s) 25" ASUS VX248 / 24'' LG DM2350D / 24" LG 24UD58-B 4K
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Ultra+ Tower
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software Windows 10 Pro Build 1703 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Folding PPD: 45,000~ / WCG PPD: 50,000~ (OLD) with HD 7970
its like this every year, some people get sick of it, but some people love to see others talk about things they don't know about.

here are the facts, im not wrong and its been said before, even in this thread, game consoles only need a fraction of the power a pc needs for gaming because there is no heavy multitasking, no os throttling, and devs get a dev kit that PROMISES 100% performance so the devs have time to work with what little they have without worrying about component upgrades. even today I bet any of you cant play gta iv with 256mb ram and even a hd7970 on windows xp and up with as good frames as a ps3 gets... lol and with a core i7 3770k.. I doubt gta iv will even open, it will just say fuck you im busy.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
2,680 (0.89/day)
Likes
693
Location
Reaching your left retina.
its like this every year, some people get sick of it, but some people love to see others talk about things they don't know about.
I'm actually a low profile game developer and I know that to be BS. Not 100% bullshit, but it's completely overblown. Console being a closed platform with very lightweight OS, helps increase performance, but not to the point where a console becomes 2x faster on the same hardware and let's not start talking about 8x hardware difference.

As a developer I also know that console games are heavily watered down (in much more ways than average guy can appreciate, i.e. in bit precision on internal buffers) so any comparison of performance is rather stupid, since you are never comparing apples to apples. GTA IV on PC is not the same as console versions. Plus it's horribly optimized, if at all.

I also know that they have to make almost miracles to "optimize" the console games to the point they run at 30 fps, whereas they are only allowed to spend a fraction of the time to optimize for PC. If they spent the same time and used the same tricks the performance would be really close to consoles. In fact early games like for example Gears of War, looked better and ran better on PC way back in 2006, despite the fact that the hardware difference was not as pronounced back then. Why was that posible is simple, it was "optimized" (read watered down + real optimization) almost as much as the console version.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 15, 2011
Messages
1,887 (0.86/day)
Likes
810
Location
Brisbane QLD, Australia
System Name Белая коробка | Alienware 13R3 | Asus T300 Chi | Synology DS416 w/ 4X6TB WD Red | Huawei P10
Processor Intel i7-7700k @ 4.8GHz | Intel i7-7700HQ
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix Z270G | Dell/Alienware thing
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S w/ A15 & F12 | Double fan
Memory G.Skill 2X8gb Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000mhz | DDR4 2X8GB 2400mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 500GB, Crucial MX200 500GB, 1X WD 4TB Black | 256gb M.2 SSD, 512GB Intel 600p M.2
Display(s) LG 27UD68 & BenQ FP241W (ANCIENT!) | 13" 1080p IPS & Sony X7000E 49" 4K HDR TV
Case InWin 301 (white) | Alienware 13R3
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Z | onboard sound -Onkyo 808 Receiver
Power Supply InWin Classic Series 900W | Dell 180W brick
Mouse Logitech G403 Wireless | Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G810 | Red Square OLD SCHOOL TKL - Gateron Blue
Software Windows 10 Home | Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Citroen DS3 THP155 DSport6-spd manual|
I'm actually a low profile game developer and I know that to be BS. Not 100% bullshit, but it's completely overblown. Console being a closed platform with very lightweight OS, helps increase performance, but not to the point where a console becomes 2x faster on the same hardware and let's not start talking about 8x hardware difference.

As a developer I also know that console games are heavily watered down (in much more ways than average guy can appreciate, i.e. in bit precision on internal buffers) so any comparison of performance is rather stupid, since you are never comparing apples to apples. GTA IV on PC is not the same as console versions. Plus it's horribly optimized, if at all.

I also know that they have to make almost miracles to "optimize" the console games to the point they run at 30 fps, whereas they are only allowed to spend a fraction of the time to optimize for PC. If they spent the same time and used the same tricks the performance would be really close to consoles. In fact early games like for example Gears of War, looked better and ran better on PC way back in 2006, despite the fact that the hardware difference was not as pronounced back then. Why was that posible is simple, it was "optimized" (read watered down + real optimization) almost as much as the console version.
Thanks for the insight, I suppose that makes sense for the older games to run better on PC vs. console compared to newer ones because of what you said being that the performance gap wasn't as large. I think the worst port I played on PC was 'Wheelman' where even the controls were all left as X360 controls (such as 'A' button, 'RT' etc) and that happened without any controllers plugged in as well D:
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
1,228 (0.60/day)
Likes
608
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Phantom 820 v3.1
Processor Intel Core i7-6700k @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Formula OC (Bios: 7.40)
Cooling Corsair H115i
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 16GB DDR4 3000MHz
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GTX 1070 AMP! / EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC2
Storage 512GB Crucial MX300 / 256GB OCZ Vertex 4 / 1TB Hitachi HDD
Display(s) 25" ASUS VX248 / 24'' LG DM2350D / 24" LG 24UD58-B 4K
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Ultra+ Tower
Audio Device(s) Logitech G933 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software Windows 10 Pro Build 1703 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Folding PPD: 45,000~ / WCG PPD: 50,000~ (OLD) with HD 7970
I'm actually a low profile game developer and I know that to be BS. Not 100% bullshit, but it's completely overblown. Console being a closed platform with very lightweight OS, helps increase performance, but not to the point where a console becomes 2x faster on the same hardware and let's not start talking about 8x hardware difference.

As a developer I also know that console games are heavily watered down (in much more ways than average guy can appreciate, i.e. in bit precision on internal buffers) so any comparison of performance is rather stupid, since you are never comparing apples to apples. GTA IV on PC is not the same as console versions. Plus it's horribly optimized, if at all.

I also know that they have to make almost miracles to "optimize" the console games to the point they run at 30 fps, whereas they are only allowed to spend a fraction of the time to optimize for PC. If they spent the same time and used the same tricks the performance would be really close to consoles. In fact early games like for example Gears of War, looked better and ran better on PC way back in 2006, despite the fact that the hardware difference was not as pronounced back then. Why was that posible is simple, it was "optimized" (read watered down + real optimization) almost as much as the console version.
I didn't mention anything about graphics, only fps, of course pc version is better in everyway except it requires more demanding hardware but for very good reason, the multi tasking and throttling. and consoles bring out the best in devs, there still isn't a pc racing game with better graphics than gt5, maybe better simulation... but not graphics, its peoples opinion on gameplay.. that in rare cases devs put more work into graphics for consoles then pcs and achieve success in doing so.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2011
Messages
79 (0.04/day)
Likes
17
I'm actually a low profile game developer and I know that to be BS. Not 100% bullshit, but it's completely overblown. Console being a closed platform with very lightweight OS, helps increase performance, but not to the point where a console becomes 2x faster on the same hardware and let's not start talking about 8x hardware difference.

As a developer I also know that console games are heavily watered down (in much more ways than average guy can appreciate, i.e. in bit precision on internal buffers) so any comparison of performance is rather stupid, since you are never comparing apples to apples. GTA IV on PC is not the same as console versions. Plus it's horribly optimized, if at all.

I also know that they have to make almost miracles to "optimize" the console games to the point they run at 30 fps, whereas they are only allowed to spend a fraction of the time to optimize for PC. If they spent the same time and used the same tricks the performance would be really close to consoles. In fact early games like for example Gears of War, looked better and ran better on PC way back in 2006, despite the fact that the hardware difference was not as pronounced back then. Why was that posible is simple, it was "optimized" (read watered down + real optimization) almost as much as the console version.
That's what I always try to explain.