• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

stupid slow speeds with SSD drive

Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
3,559 (0.49/day)
Location
Canada
System Name Alienware R10 Rebuild
Processor Ryzen 5700X3D
Motherboard Alienware Mobo
Cooling AIO (Alienware)
Memory 2x16GB GSkill Ripjaws 3600MT/s
Video Card(s) Dell RTX 3080
Storage 1x 2TB NVME XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE
Display(s) LG 32" 1440p
Case Alienware R10
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply 1000W Dell PSU
Mouse Steelseries
Keyboard Blackweb Walmart Special Mechanical
Software Windows 11
SSD - Kingston 480gb SA400S37 Drive

All of a sudden, when copying files from within, the drive is running 100% but transfer speeds are as low as 2mb/s. WTF? This is between hard drives and within just the SSD itself.

XUPqfF7.jpg
 
how full is it ?
 
its near full. Was about 30gb till full.
 
Is that the A400 SSD? That's bottom of the barrel for kingston, it doesn't even have a DRAM cache IIRC.
 
Is that the A400 SSD? That's bottom of the barrel for kingston, it doesn't even have a DRAM cache IIRC.

Alright, recommend a cheap but effective SSD then please.
 
860 evo from samsung is good and kinda cheap
 
its near full. Was about 30gb till full.
there you go.
I remember once I stuffed up my 850 pro to almost full,it slowed down too, but still managed something like ~150MB/s transfers on a 100% full 250gb drive.
 
Last edited:
there you go.
I remember once I stuffed up my 850 pro to almost full (a 250gb drive almost 100% full) it slowed down too, but still managed something like ~150MB/s transfers.

And this kingston went down to 2mb/s.....
 
And this kingston went down to 2mb/s.....
cause it sucks.
We just had a discussion about those entry level ssd in another thread. People on a budget can't afford to buy cheap drives.
 
cause it sucks.
We just had a discussion about those entry level ssd in another thread. People on a budget can't afford to buy cheap drives.


I didn't even know this at the time I purchased it.

Oh well, will invest in better.
 
With no on-board DRAM to hold the NAND mapping table and filling the SSD near capacity the small buffer on the controller is overburden.

Also the added read/erase/write to if past writes have been committed by the controller to that block.
 
Don't mean to hijack your thread but my new 120gb WD Green SSD is slow as hell, always at 99 disk usage in task manager doing nothing, not looking for help just letting you know to avoid WD's Green SSD's
 
Alright, guess I will just spend the extra and get the Samsung.
 
Alright, guess I will just spend the extra and get the Samsung.
Look at Crucial, too. Sometimes they give you more bang for the buck and they're reliable. You'd want an MX500 or something like that.
 
to get list:

860 evo
mx500
wd blue 3d
sandisk ultra 3d
mx300
micron 1100
goodram iridium pro
sx950
su900

get either one, they're quality drives. I'g go with either the best gb/$ one that is mx300 with additional 25gb over 500gb drives or 860 evo, a well balanced drive all around. micron 1100 may come at a very nice price,check it out. The downside is 24 month warranty.


also,download InSpectre and disable the patches, then retest.
 
Last edited:
Go sammy or go home & wait....

for your slow-assed drive to finish whateva tasks you asked it to do...

And remember.... cheap is as cheap does
 
Since the big lie of th elate 90s, storage devices are no longer margeted with 'real numbers". Back then one manufacturer redefined a GB from 1,024 MB to 1,000 claiming to make it 'easier for consumers". Other argued this was misleading advertising for a while then stopped trying to beat them ... and joined them.

So your 480 GB device really only holds 446 GB of files... then set aside the recommended 15% of free space and you are down to 379. At that point, performance can start to be affected, tho will be greater as you get to 400 and further.
 
Alright, recommend a cheap but effective SSD then please.
I'd say - anything but Kingston. I hate this brand, it's product quality and customer support.

On the serious note, if you need something cheap - get Patriot Burst (3D NAND TLC, pretty much as fast as 860EVO).
Those are much more reliable than Kingston and got so low that I've started buying 120GB units in bulk for cheap customer upgrades (those are under $25/ea right now in my area).
Also I've never had problems with SanDisk/WD. Using an SD X400 512GB in my system for almost 3 years. Before that I had a 240GB SanDisk Ultra which had been exploited since 2013 and is still kicking in a laptop with 98% health and over 8 years estimated lifespan according to S.M.A.R.T.
 
I'd say - anything but Kingston. I hate this brand, it's product quality and customer support.

On the serious note, if you need something cheap - get Patriot Burst (3D NAND TLC, pretty much as fast as 860EVO).
Those are much more reliable than Kingston and got so low that I've started buying 120GB units in bulk for cheap customer upgrades (those are under $25/ea right now in my area).
Also I've never had problems with SanDisk/WD. Using an SD X400 512GB in my system for almost 3 years. Before that I had a 240GB SanDisk Ultra which had been exploited since 2013 and is still kicking in a laptop with 98% health and over 8 years estimated lifespan according to S.M.A.R.T.
damn right, kingston and hyperx ssds are major disappointments.
patriot burst is a decent cheap drive,but certainly falls behind the 850 evo-class ssds
https://www.purepc.pl/minirecenzje/patriot_burst_240gb_jeden_z_tanszych_ssd_dostepnych_na_rynku
 
Last edited:
Wow. The years have gone by for me. Back in the day, Kingston was the brand to go by for memory. Guess that all changed (just like when I noticed DFI stopped being a brand or OCZ).

Anyway, thanks for the input guys, really appreciate it.

I have a Crucial SSD in my Dell T3500. It is an MX300. So far it has been a solid SSD.

What you guys say about team group?

https://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820331115&ignorebbr=1
 
Wow. The years have gone by for me. Back in the day, Kingston was the brand to go by for memory.

For DRAM: maybe.
For NAND: no.

I can't find anything in the way of performance reviews on this drive. In the Newegg user reviews, 20% gave it a one-egg rating. I'd rather invest my money in a Crucial or Samsung drive.
 
team
group
suks
wallah
ballah
:D

Been there, done that, never again..... 11RMA's with 3 different drives failed/no workie, finally had to demand a full refund +30% for all of my time & trouble.....took like 14 weeks, 17 emails, 9 heated phone calls and 3 certified letters from my attorney to get it resolved, but it did eventually come :(:(
 
Back
Top