omiknight52
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 96 (0.02/day)
- Location
- NY
System Name | OMI SAGITTA X2 ////2009 RIG |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Windsor 3.2GHz(3330GHz |
Motherboard | Foxconn A7GM-S AM2+/AM2 AMD 780G |
Cooling | XIGMATEK HDT-S963 +120mm Blue & 120mm Silent Fan |
Memory | PNY OPTIMA 3GB DDR2 800MHz |
Video Card(s) | DIAMOND RADEON HD 4850 512MB GDDR3 |
Storage | WDC 320GB 7200RPM SATA//WDC GP OR Green 500G SATA |
Display(s) | DELL 20" HC WIDESCREEN LCD |
Case | RAIDMAX SAGITTA 2 ATX-928WB Black |
Audio Device(s) | WHY?:) MY BUILT IN HDMI + 7.1 DD IS ENOUGH |
Power Supply | Sunbeam PSU-HUSH680-US-BL 680W ATX 12V 2.0 |
Software | Microsoft Windows XP HOME//Windows 7 2010 |
Benchmark Scores | 10847 3DMarks@3300Mhz*220 |
mid-range benchmarks
Why is it that testers always use high end components to get results from benchmarks.
Why not use or compare all three; low-end, high-end and mid-range computers so people don't get discourage or put off because they can't afford or run a game without spending thousands of dollars. I mean seriously u can run crysis with a mid-range gpu on high and get decent fps without dropping $1000 on a pc. It would be nice to not see all test use core 2 extreme or quad, maybe a amd athlon 4400 or even an intel core 2 duo e4600.
Why is it that testers always use high end components to get results from benchmarks.
Why not use or compare all three; low-end, high-end and mid-range computers so people don't get discourage or put off because they can't afford or run a game without spending thousands of dollars. I mean seriously u can run crysis with a mid-range gpu on high and get decent fps without dropping $1000 on a pc. It would be nice to not see all test use core 2 extreme or quad, maybe a amd athlon 4400 or even an intel core 2 duo e4600.
Last edited: