• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

THREAD CLOSED!!! Post Your AMD RyZen Blender Benchmarks at 200 Samples!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 50521
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
dyonoctis said:
Wich is matched by an haswell quad core i7 at 100 samples
Click to expand...
I come close to matching or beating the 3.4 GHz Ryzen sample with a 533 MHz overclock over a stock i7-4790K @ 4.2 GHz.
 
DeathtoGnomes said:
$300 chip vs $1100 chip.
Click to expand...
The point is, if this is true, then the demo was rigged. They showed a 8 cores 16 threads ryzen cpu being as fast as a 8 cores 16 threads cpu from intel, when the reality seem to be closer to an Intel 4 cores 8 threads. That would be the same story as bulldozer. "We can match an intel cpu in multithread application with twice the core count.... yay !" (that's even worse actually)
And what about the awfully close handbrake score ? There is something fishy here...
 
Last edited:
biffzinker said:
I come close to matching or beating the 3.4 GHz Ryzen sample with a 533 MHz overclock over a stock i7-4790K @ 4.2 GHz.
Click to expand...
Using the same blender version :confused:
48055

48054

I believe it's 2.77 in the presentation DEMO ;)
 
00:41.11
i7-4790K @ Stock clocks (4.2 GHz under full load,) and 100 Samples:
Untitled.jpg


Edit:
R0H1T said:
Using the same blender version :confused:
Click to expand...
Yes, I'm using the same Blender version 2.78a 64bit
 
01.32.06
200 samples
i ran the test at 3.4 ghz on my 6c/12 th Xeon X5670

blen.PNG
 
Last edited:
dyonoctis said:
The point is, if this is true, then the demo was rigged. They showed a 8 cores 16 threads ryzen cpu being as fast as a 8 cores 16 threads cpu from intel, when the reality seem to be closer to an Intel 4 cores 8 threads. That would be the same story as bulldozer. "We can match an intel cpu in multithread application with twice the core count.... yay !" (that's even worse actually)
And what about the awfully close handbrake score ? There is something fishy here...
Click to expand...
Check your blender version, & the one in the original demo, seems like 2.77 to me.
 
2:19.61
ryzen benchmark.JPG

 
1:04.67

RyzenGraphic.png
 
biffzinker said:
00:41.11
Yes, I'm using the same Blender version 2.78a 64bit
Click to expand...
Shouldn't it be 2.77, that or the tests were done on 2.78a but I can't see the blender version (except the 2.77) anywhere during the presentation?
 
Just letting you guys know I'm gonna run these on my i3 530 in a minute.

Should be able to post results tomorrow.......when it's finished :)
 
biffzinker said:
Well AMD is telling everyone to download 2.78a 64-bit.
untitled-jpg.81917
Click to expand...
Yes but in the presentation itself all I saw was 2.77, so either the demo was run with a different blender version (than the one shown) or that AMD just wants the users to run the latest version of blender to test their demo.

Checked the other images from sweclockers & you can easily see the blender run with version 2.77, though not the final scores!
48057

48056
 
Last edited:
50.81

untitled.png
 
00:49.17 sec i7 5930k @ 4.6Ghz
 

Attachments

  • Στιγμιότυπο οθόνης (9).png
    Στιγμιότυπο οθόνης (9).png
    696.2 KB · Views: 408
Last edited:
biffzinker said:
How is your NB Frequency higher than your Core Speed? Seems backwards.
Click to expand...

The BCLK is a bit OC'd because of my XMP 3000MHz memory profile and the CPU speed clocks down when idle, thats all I can tell you.
 
I think they kept their protocol.

They compared them at the same frequency !
 
Isn't it called BLENDER? Not blend? Let's get that right out of the gate... LOL! It would also be useful to note memory speeds, cache, etc without looking/trying to find the result...similar to a format like this: USER NAME/ CPU @ MHZ/Memory @ MHZ/SCORE.

Anyway, my results with a 4.2GHz 6950X

33.16s


tpublndrtest6950x42.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top