Titan RTX Benchmarks

[Solaris17]

I did these on a normal everyday system, It's not a clean OS its a "Daily Driver" it has AV slack, skype etc running. The GPU was driving 3x 2k monitors in total during testing. (This shouldn't be confused with the test itself using 3 monitors.) All tests were ran using 3dmark defaults. I will add benchmarks as time permits.

Ambient temp: 22ºC

CPU-Z (It should be noted the System is not tuned for overclocking, All power save and C-State options are enabled, with that said the CPU will boost to 4.3ghz)

GPU-Z

Overclock

Max Values are a combination of Time Spy and Fire Strike tests, the machine was allowed to cool down between runs. It should be noted initial runs were ran with power limit at the default of 100% locking the TDP down, this resulted in the max temp of initial runs being 76ºC.

Fire Strike
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/17522315

Time Spy
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5478979

I do not overclock any longer and did so for these tests "Just Cause" I havent been serious with OC's since the 1366 1155 era, The holidays are here and their is alot scheduled, but If I have time and I feel like completing the request I will bench something specifically if you ask. This is more for fun, since the 2080ti already exists. I do not pretend to show these numbers thinking they are earth shattering or important to know.

Some may be interested.

I did notice though comparatively to the 2080TI it is harder to move this card to high clocks. Maybe its the lottery, but im banking on the extra stuff playing a roll. Of course more independent tests with different Titan cards are needed for a less skewed view.

 

[delshay]

I want to see superposition "1080p extreme" please. Download here https://benchmark.unigine.com/superposition

 

[Fouquin]

Very nice! I immediately had to see your score in comparison with a 1080 Ti SLI score I have from last year, and man that card closes the gap quite a bit! Titan RTX coming in just shy of a pair of 1080 Ti's at 2.05GHz turbo. (Looking at graphics test scores alone, obviously the CPUs are not even remotely comparable.)

 

[the54thvoid]

I don't care what some people will say, despite the price, it's a lust-worthy card.

 

[Solaris17]

I want to see superposition "1080p extreme" please. Download here https://benchmark.unigine.com/superposition

Sure the site is slow so it will take a few min to download but I can run that using those specs. As for comparisons, I will not be rebooting or modifying my system. It will runs with the same resources running and availible as the 3dmark tests, just FYI.

EDIT: Here you go

Very nice! I immediately had to see your score in comparison with a 1080 Ti SLI score I have from last year, and man that card closes the gap quite a bit! Titan RTX coming in just shy of a pair of 1080 Ti's at 2.05GHz turbo. (Looking at graphics test scores alone, obviously the CPUs are not even remotely comparable.)

Nice! It sure is a titan to move too, very hard to Oc. The "Max" displayed in GPU-Z for example was only held for a few seconds, I wish I could break the 2ghz barrier consistently, but boost rates generally hover around 1930 and 1980 when its giving serious muscle. The rest of the time its all over the place.

 

[Fluffmeister]

What a beast of a card, 24GB pushing over 739+ GB/s Sheesh.

I opened GPU-Z and cried.

 

[delshay]

Sure the site is slow so it will take a few min to download but I can run that using those specs. As for comparisons, I will not be rebooting or modifying my system. It will runs with the same resources running and availible as the 3dmark tests, just FYI.

EDIT: Here you go

View attachment 113067

View attachment 113068


View attachment 113069




Nice! It sure is a titan to move too, very hard to Oc. The "Max" displayed in GPU-Z for example was only held for a few seconds, I wish I could break the 2ghz barrier consistently, but boost rates generally hover around 1930 and 1980 when its giving serious muscle. The rest of the time its all over the place.

Notice it does not hit 100% GPU utilization. I suppose 99% is near enough. You may want to check the leaderboard on Unigine website. Impressive all the same.

 

[FreedomEclipse]

Apparently there are some bugs with the RTX Titan cards

 

[Solaris17]

Notice it does not hit 100% GPU utilization. I suppose 99% is near enough. You may want to check the leaderboard on Unigine website. Impressive all the same.

I dont think you can. 3dmark was the same. Take a look at the leaderboard you were talking about. When you hit detailed everyone hits 99%. The system needs some resources to do other stuff with the windows shell.

I think its normal.

https://benchmark.unigine.com/results/rid_b1569ca2ceb741ae98a0fe00e5a2066a

EDIT::

I upped my core clock a bit (200mhz) to 4.5 and got 2 personal bests using the card.

Time Spy: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5486186

Fire Strike: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/17528561

While the scores were good we can see that the old ones.

Time Spy: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5481168

Fire Strike: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/17524406

Did not differ alot in GPU score independently, while the score itself varied by thousands of points. With that said it looks like the card itself isnt being held back by the CPU, and thats just what I can expect given the core clock of the card and the processes im running in the background.

This was more about giving a realistic perspective on performance while not done in a professional manner, if I were to start playing shadow of the tomb raider, or skyrim someone with a similar system or card could probably expect similar performance given that they too will probably have all the everyday programs running in the background as they slay orcs.

What a beast of a card, 24GB pushing over 739+ GB/s Sheesh.

I opened GPU-Z and cried.

I ended up getting her to 768 at the end. I might be able to go further but I think im approaching the limit.

 

[Solaris17]

Broke 10k in superposition.

Not bad for having all of my gaming clients open and not boosting beyond 1995mhz on the GPU. Though honestly I think this is margin of error with my other scores ill take it.

 

[delshay]

Impressive.

Don't push to hard & break your card. Remember a number of those top scores on Ungine website are on LN2 or some other type of cooling solution.

 

[Solaris17]

Impressive.

Don't push to hard & break your card. Remember a number of those top scores on Ungine website are on LN2 or some other type of cooling solution.

Oh yeah of course. This is as far as she is going to go anyway. The card won’t push higher. I can probably get more out of her by pushing the cpu higher but it will require some tweaking and I just can’t spend that amount of time on OCs again.

 

[Hockster]

I think cooling is the limiting factor on these cards, especially on the Titan. On my regular 2080Ti I can only add 100-125MHz to the core depending on the application. For an extended test like Heaven or Valley boost clocks slowly drop from 2150 to 2025 for most of the test, with occasional dips under 2000. 3D mark usually fares better but there are a lot of breaks in those tests.