• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

U.S. DoD Partners with GlobalFoundries to Manufacture Chips at Fab 8, Upstate NY

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
40,648 (8.31/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
GLOBALFOUNDRIES (GF), the world's leading specialty foundry, today announced a strategic partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a secure and reliable supply of semiconductor solutions manufactured at GF's Fab 8 in Malta, New York—the company's most advanced semiconductor manufacturing facility. These semiconductor chips will be used in some of the DoD's most sensitive applications for land, air, sea, and space systems.

Under the agreement, GF will provide a supply of chips built at Fab 8 on its differentiated 45 nm SOI platform. The agreement is made possible by Fab 8's compliance with U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and highly restrictive Export Control Classification Numbers under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

The new supply agreement builds upon the longstanding partnership between the DoD and GF to provide chips for defense, aerospace, and other sensitive applications. GF currently supplies the DoD with chips manufactured at GF's other on-shore facilities, Fab 10 in East Fishkill, New York, and Fab 9 in Burlington, Vermont.

"GLOBALFOUNDRIES is a critical part of a domestic semiconductor manufacturing industry that is a requirement for our national security and economic competitiveness," said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who successfully passed new federal semiconductor manufacturing incentives in last year's National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). "I have long advocated for GLOBALFOUNDRIES as a key supplier of chips to our military and intelligence community, including pressing the new Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, to further expand the Department of Defense's business with GLOBALFOUNDRIES, which will help expand their manufacturing operations and create even more jobs in Malta."

In a supporting statement from the U.S. Department of Defense, "This agreement with GLOBALFOUNDRIES is just one step the Department of Defense is taking to ensure the U.S. sustains the microelectronics manufacturing capability necessary for national and economic security. This is a pre-cursor to major efforts contemplated by the recently passed CHIPS for America Act, championed by Senator Charles Schumer, which will allow for the sustainment and on-shoring of U.S. microelectronics capability."

"GLOBALFOUNDRIES thanks Senator Schumer for his leadership, his ongoing support of our industry, and his forward-looking perspective on the semiconductor supply chain," said Tom Caulfield, CEO of GF. "We are proud to strengthen our longstanding partnership with the U.S. government, and extend this collaboration to produce a new supply of these important chips at our most advanced facility, Fab 8, in upstate New York. We are taking action and doing our part to ensure America has the manufacturing capability it needs, to meet the growing demand for U.S. made, advanced semiconductor chips for the nation's most sensitive defense and aerospace applications."

The first chips from this new agreement are targeted to begin delivery in 2023. GF is in ongoing discussions with the DoD regarding Trusted Accreditation for Fab 8.

GF employs nearly 3,000 people at Fab 8, and has invested more than $13 billion in the facility. The company recently announced a land purchase option to provide additional flexibility to expand Fab 8's footprint to support growing demand from the U.S. government and industry customers. In total, GF employs more than 7,000 people across the U.S., and over the past 10 years has invested $15 billion in U.S. semiconductor development.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

destruya

New Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
5 (0.08/day)
Wonderful, so the fab that AMD dumped after they screwed them over so much and so often is the lowest bidder partner for a "strategic partnership" with DoD.

At least for most applications DoD won't mind 14nm or larger.
 

Toothless

Tech, Games, and TPU!
Supporter
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
7,095 (2.80/day)
Location
Washington, USA
System Name Veraltet
Processor 3700x
Motherboard AsRock Taichi Ultimate x470
Cooling NH-D15 Chromax
Memory G.Skill 2x16GB 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX1080 Ti Gaming X
Storage 2 NVME + 4 HDD
Display(s) LG 34UB88-P + 2x AOC 2425W
Case CoolerMaster NR600
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries Arctis 5
Power Supply Rosewill Fortress 750w
Mouse Corsair Scimitar Pro
Keyboard Corsair K55
Software Windows 10 Professional
Benchmark Scores Brrrrrrr
Working for the government, this is no surprise. I bet the contract was cheap and after seeing what's currently being used, yeah. Not surprised at all.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
581 (0.26/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i5-10400
Motherboard Asus Prime Z490M Plus
Cooling Air
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 F4-3200C16D-32GVK
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Ultra
Storage Inland Premium 256GB SSD 3D NAND M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 + WD Blue 1TB SATA SSD
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Lian Li 205M
Power Supply PowerSpec 650W 80+ Bronze Semi-Modular PS 650BSM
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
They were planning on this for some time :


"The company announced plans in May to implement U.S. export controls at its most advanced fab in Malta, N.Y. The $13 billion expansion of Fab 8 includes compliance with the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations. The company hopes to ultimately scale secure production to the 12-nm FinFET process node."
 

Anone

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
2 (0.40/day)
Playing the game-politics triumphs over tech. With Democrats controlling the Senate, need to buy from a plant in the state with influential Democrat senator. Far more important than military having access to up to date technology.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
167 (0.08/day)
Location
North Dakota
System Name Oswald
Processor i5-8600K @ 4.2 GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling CM Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Patriot DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 470 8GB
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB, Toshiba DT01ACA200
Display(s) Sharp 46" TV
Case Antec Sonata SOLO
Power Supply Seasonic SSR-450RM
Mouse Logitech M185
Keyboard Some wireless Microsoft thing with a trackpad
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15: 998
Playing the game-politics triumphs over tech. With Democrats controlling the Senate, need to buy from a plant in the state with influential Democrat senator. Far more important than military having access to up to date technology.

There's no such thing as a U.S. senator who's not influential. This stuff happens regardless of party affiliation. I'm just happy to see additional investment in domestic semiconductor manufacturing at all.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
3,591 (2.63/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 2920X
Motherboard ASUS X399 STrix
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory ADATA D60 3600MHZ 32 GB
Video Card(s) MSI 6800XT Gaming Trio X
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) GIGABYTE 32QC
Case PHANTEKS ENTHOO PRO
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Playing the game-politics triumphs over tech. With Democrats controlling the Senate, need to buy from a plant in the state with influential Democrat senator. Far more important than military having access to up to date technology.
Talk about the effects about the power of propoganda. This is a tech site not political discourse forum.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
2,139 (2.89/day)
System Name Flavour of the month. I roll through hardware like it's not even mine (it often isn't).
Processor 3900X, 3600XT, 2700U
Motherboard Aorus X570 Elite, B550 DS3H
Cooling Alphacool CPU+GPU soft-tubing loop (Laing D5 360mm+140mm), AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 32GB Patriot 3600CL17, 32GB Corsair LPX 3200CL16, 16GB HyperX 2400CL14
Video Card(s) 2070S, 5700XT, Vega10
Storage 1TB WD S100G, 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro, 1TB MX500, 500GB Hynix 2242 bastard thing, 16TB of rust + backup
Display(s) Dell SG3220 165Hz VA, Samsung 65" Q9FN 120Hz VA
Case NZXT H440NE, Silverstone GD04 (almost nothing original left inside, thanks 3D printer!)
Audio Device(s) CA DacMagic+ with Presonus Eris E5, Yamaha RX-V683 with Q Acoustics 3000-series, Sony MDR-1A
Power Supply BeQuiet StraightPower E9 680W, Corsair RM550, and a 45W Lenovo DC power brick, I guess.
Mouse G303, MX Anywhere 2, Another MX Anywhere 2.
Keyboard CM QuickFire Stealth (Cherry MX Brown), Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
Software W10
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I don't see why AMD isn't backporting some GPU designs to GloFo 12nm anyway.
Sure, TSMC's 7nm allows AMD to build 2.5GHz large RDNA2 parts but surely given that AMD sells everything it makes as fast as it can make them, they can afford to shift mainstream products to GloFo - Navi14 (5500-series) is kind of pointless on TSMC 7nm as it has plenty of potential to be competitive even at only 1500MHz, and it can afford a 25% bump in power consumption that goes with the older process without impacting its market appeal too much. It's used in Desktops almost exclusively with no significant Laptop design wins.

The only direct comparison we have between GloFo 12nm and TSMC 7FF is Vega64 vs Radeon VII which basically showed TSMC's process to produce 200MHz higher clocks for the same power draw. So, deduct 200MHz from the 5500XT and you have a mass-market winner that's cheap to make and still absolutely annihilates the 1050Ti that Nvidia has restarted production on.

I don't see why AMD isn't backporting some GPU designs to GloFo 12nm anyway.
Sure, TSMC's 7nm allows AMD to build 2.5GHz large RDNA2 parts but surely given that AMD sells everything it makes as fast as it can make them, they can afford to shift mainstream products to GloFo - Navi14 (5500-series) is kind of pointless on TSMC 7nm as it has plenty of potential to be competitive even at only 1500MHz, and it can afford a 25% bump in power consumption that goes with the older process without impacting its market appeal too much. It's used in Desktops almost exclusively with no significant Laptop design wins.

The only direct comparison we have between GloFo 12nm and TSMC 7FF is Vega64 vs Radeon VII which basically showed TSMC's process to produce 200MHz higher clocks for the same power draw. So, deduct 200MHz from the 5500XT and you have a mass-market winner that's cheap to make and still absolutely annihilates the 1050Ti that Nvidia has restarted production on. Hell, a 1250MHz 5500XT that consumed 175W is a very pessimistic worst-case scenario and it would still be ~50% faster than any 1050-series card.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
167 (0.08/day)
Location
North Dakota
System Name Oswald
Processor i5-8600K @ 4.2 GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling CM Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Patriot DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 470 8GB
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB, Toshiba DT01ACA200
Display(s) Sharp 46" TV
Case Antec Sonata SOLO
Power Supply Seasonic SSR-450RM
Mouse Logitech M185
Keyboard Some wireless Microsoft thing with a trackpad
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15: 998
I don't see why AMD isn't backporting some GPU designs to GloFo 12nm anyway.
Sure, TSMC's 7nm allows AMD to build 2.5GHz large RDNA2 parts but surely given that AMD sells everything it makes as fast as it can make them, they can afford to shift mainstream products to GloFo - Navi14 (5500-series) is kind of pointless on TSMC 7nm as it has plenty of potential to be competitive even at only 1500MHz, and it can afford a 25% bump in power consumption that goes with the older process without impacting its market appeal too much. It's used in Desktops almost exclusively with no significant Laptop design wins.

The only direct comparison we have between GloFo 12nm and TSMC 7FF is Vega64 vs Radeon VII which basically showed TSMC's process to produce 200MHz higher clocks for the same power draw. So, deduct 200MHz from the 5500XT and you have a mass-market winner that's cheap to make and still absolutely annihilates the 1050Ti that Nvidia has restarted production on.

That's honestly a pretty cool idea, but might be more risk than AMD is willing to take on. There's still upfront R&D time and cost, and there's no way to know when the crypto market will correct itself and make all that pointless. (It wouldn't likely affect Fab 8 anyway, which is the topic of this particular thread.)
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
581 (0.26/day)
System Name Legion
Processor i5-10400
Motherboard Asus Prime Z490M Plus
Cooling Air
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 32GB (2 x 16GB) DDR4-3200 F4-3200C16D-32GVK
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Ultra
Storage Inland Premium 256GB SSD 3D NAND M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 + WD Blue 1TB SATA SSD
Display(s) Acer K272HUL 1440p / 34" MSI MAG341CQ 3440x1440
Case Lian Li 205M
Power Supply PowerSpec 650W 80+ Bronze Semi-Modular PS 650BSM
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 25
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys
Software Lots
I don't see why AMD isn't backporting some GPU designs to GloFo 12nm anyway.
Sure, TSMC's 7nm allows AMD to build 2.5GHz large RDNA2 parts but surely given that AMD sells everything it makes as fast as it can make them, they can afford to shift mainstream products to GloFo - Navi14 (5500-series) is kind of pointless on TSMC 7nm as it has plenty of potential to be competitive even at only 1500MHz, and it can afford a 25% bump in power consumption that goes with the older process without impacting its market appeal too much. It's used in Desktops almost exclusively with no significant Laptop design wins.

The only direct comparison we have between GloFo 12nm and TSMC 7FF is Vega64 vs Radeon VII which basically showed TSMC's process to produce 200MHz higher clocks for the same power draw. So, deduct 200MHz from the 5500XT and you have a mass-market winner that's cheap to make and still absolutely annihilates the 1050Ti that Nvidia has restarted production on.

I think that is what Nvidia is doing with its widely panned move to start making 2060 GPUs again.

All this talk about lower nm numbers and new GPUs, while the top 4 GPUs on Steam are 1060, 1050 Ti, 1650, and 1050 which collectively hold around 27%. PC games won't advance much until the bulk of users are on newer gen GPUs (not necessarily 3xxx or 6xxx series), and a 2060 is way way faster than any of those top 4. 12nm still has a role to play.
 

Anone

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
2 (0.40/day)
Actually RX590 was last GF--slighly faster than 580 due to 12nm. Given manufacturing cost, this would only be competitive while better designs are out of stock. ALL foundries are backlogged and have enough to keep busy for now so not sure GF would offer AMD competitive pricing to make this worthwhile.
Porting RDNA design to a new foundry(RDNA was designed for TSMC) would take significant engineering rework. The work would have little long run value and divert engineers busy on coming out with next models. AMD does not have the redundant engineers to do this.
 
Top