• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

UK Computers Have Least Active Malware

zekrahminator

McLovin
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
9,066 (1.28/day)
Location
My house.
Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V)
Motherboard Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430
Cooling Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU
Memory 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800
Video Card(s) Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600
Storage WD 160 GB SATA hard drive.
Display(s) Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900
Case Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window).
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers).
Power Supply ThermalTake 430W TR2
Software XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1.
Anti-virus firm Panda Software recently conducted a survey among people who visited their site asking for a free virus scan, to determine who had the most malware and where. The United Kingdom came through with top colors, with only 8.1% having malware on their computers. France had the proud honor of owning 28.2% of the world's malware, followed by Mexico at 23.1%, Brazil, the United States of America at 17.8%, and Argentina at 17.4%.

Please keep in mind that these numbers are taken from a survey of people asking Panda to scan their computer for malware, meaning that there is a very good chance that malware is already installed. A more realistic number of how many PC's are really infected with Malware was taken by Microsoft, which found that approximately 1 in 300 computers with Windows installed have Malware.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
yay we actually came first in something good :D
 
redneck7.jpg
 
Perhaps its because people in the UK are the only ones to accept a free scan cause they dont scan their PCs in regular basis ? :)
 
Perhaps its because people in the UK are the only ones to accept a free scan cause they dont scan their PCs in regular basis ? :)

your point being? whats wrong with a free scan?

bit of a silly point really, to not accept a free scan? that would be silly,
either way, whatever we are doing is WORKING :slap:

Brits :pimp:
 
FREE Scans are beeing provided by EVERY Anti-Virus company online. They do nothing more than just SCAN your pc ( And try to sell their products to you ). They dont disinfect it so why do it in the first place ? Its silly to say the least....From my point of view.
People who ARE serious have Anti-Virus programs in their computers with which they scan and disinfect anything bad they find. That way you dont waste time with useless scans.
 
Yep...I'll have an explanation up in a couple minutes for you.
 
our slower internet connections play a big part in why we have less spyware
 
FREE Scans are beeing provided by EVERY Anti-Virus company online. They do nothing more than just SCAN your pc ( And try to sell their products to you ). They dont disinfect it so why do it in the first place ? Its silly to say the least....From my point of view.
People who ARE serious have Anti-Virus programs in their computers with which they scan and disinfect anything bad they find. That way you dont waste time with useless scans.


Absolutely incorrect !!:slap: Trend micro pccillin scans and removes any malware and is a top notch A/V:nutkick:
 
Perhaps...But even so this is PANDA :)
 
Do these results show per head of population? the UK is pretty small and therefore less computers to infect. saying that we have the lowest malware on our computers doesnt mean that we dont have it. i think these results need to be standardised as to reflect the population of the country of origin.

also this could also be bad - how many of the results where from the UK? it could have only have been 3 people and only one of them had malware where as the 90,000 americans who scanned, 60,000 people found out they did.

these types of things need to be looked at and taken into account
 
The figures are not obtained with infections per person, but per computer. Regardless UK has less population than other countries, the number of computers is much higher.

So, depending on the number of computers we give the figures.
 
but you dont get me - the amount of people who scanned their computer with the online scan, more may have been from the USA so therefore their figure is going to be worse off if they did have malware. a result per country would be better, as in such'n'such% for UK users against the such'n'such% for USA users.
 
The origing of the scanned computer is obtained for the IP. So, the IP coming from UK will be added to UK. If there are annonymous proxyes, or we cannot determine the origin of the IP, we will not count it.

Fernando
 
Back
Top