we need tk to get in this mix he can match hellas word for word
I'm here
Anyways, about the HD2950XT/PRO. Keep dreaming guys. It wont be out for a long time. Nevertheless I blame the poor performance in DX10 on the bad driver coding that afflicts both AMD and Nvidia. At this moment I am leaning towards buying the 8800GTS 320MB for DX9; put it this way, anything faster than an 8800GTS 320MB can be called overkill for DX9.
Anyways about the drivers, AMD and Nvidia both have non-DX10 ready drivers I mean, they don't like DX10; they are geared more towards the DX9 applications.
The HD2900XT is an excellent graphics card. Yes the cooling is shitty and it isnt the fastest graphics card on earth but as some guys already said, it has potential. Not only are the drivers really boggling down the potential (theoretically the HD2900XT > 8800GTX on Paper) for the HD2900XT the memory too. As we saw from the HD2900XT 1GB GDDR4, the HD2900XT due to its super scalar architecture, responds better to better memory.
The cooler could do with a redesign , even though its copper, really, AMD should use an IHS instead of the shim! It will help heaps with cooling. The cooler's copper array could do with more surface area as well, not having more copper but having heatpipes which DONT flatten out as they contact the copper plate; I mean it doesnt really cost more to produce heatpipes; why not have more of them? Why not use thermalright's heapipes for an example? (but keeping it two slot).
The power consumption is not that humongous though, as I would expect, "normal" enthusiasts (yes I just demoted you guys to becoming average joes sorry) would expect the need for power supplies of what... 850W? Just to power one HD2900XT. Well lets just step into reality and realize that most TPU users are using only 50% of what their PSU offers at load, the HD2900XT should only take it up to 70~75% load and most modern PSUs do fine with that. Any NeoHE 550 or Corsair 520 or iGreen 500 could take the HD2900XT without any problems.
(Though at this moment it would be better to purchase a TT toughpower 600W for one HD2900XT).
Now back on topic. HD2950XT? Well lets "expect"
I would expect the following changes to the cooling
-Better cooler design that optimizes the vents beside the GPU slot
-More heatpipes, like at LEAST 6
-Cooler casing manufactured from aluminium (< a bit of a premium though)
-Proper fan using bearings which remain quiet; i.e. PAPST server fans which arent usually used (I have one, moves a heck of a lot of air and is silent; only 80mm).
-Copper fins that are designed logically to provide most surface area WITHOUT trapping heat; I would say that rather than having that crappy grille at the expansion slot, the copper fins should be extruded FROM the slot, transferring heat onto the case and furthering heat dissipation
Now onto the GPU itself
-45/65nm PLZ
-Higher stream processor speeds please
-Faster GDDR4
-More ROPs (amd can be called the king of shaders )
With that heatsink i dont see how you're gonna be able to run SLI. More of a 3-4 slot cooler then 2...
Blame the people who designed the ATX specification for being so short sighted. I would run 8800GTXs in SLI with water cooling though...not air cooling.
EEEEDDDIIIT:
lol anyway about the HR-03 PLUS. Its a great cooler, I find that is the only viable safe way to design a cooler which does better than stock. There is almost no way that you can outperform stock cooling these days on the 8800GTX/HD2900XT without doing some thing like that. Yes its better but I would invest in water cooling for overclocking. The HR-03 plus for stock usage is excellent, I dont know why you think its so ugly; it looks like a gem to me. Aesthetically and Practically its perfect. I would really want one of those on my X1950PRO atm.
Last edited: