- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 354 (0.06/day)
System Name | The Browser |
---|---|
Processor | AMD FX-8350 |
Motherboard | Asus 90 Aura Gaming |
Cooling | Noctua D14 |
Memory | Crucial Balistix Slim 16gb |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire AMD 7950 3GB |
Storage | Crucial MX 240gb + 2X3TB WD Reds |
Display(s) | Dell 2515H 25" |
Case | Corsair Carbide 540 (piece of shit case) |
Power Supply | Seasonic G-650W Gold |
Mouse | Corsair M65 RGB |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 |
Software | Win 10 |
Hey there ! I was wondering if there is a difference in the reliability of the data cells on USB flash drives that use conventional chips, vs the ones that use "MLC" chips. For example, Sandisk Ultra, vs Corsair GS Voyager.
And beyond that, those with the actual SSD controllers such as the Corsair GTX, are they even more reliable ?
I always buy those 15 dollar Kingston ones and more than 5 of them were already ruined after 2 years of writing and reading. If I invest 100-150$ in a good MLC component flash USB, will they hold for much more than a couple years or is it a waste of money ?
And beyond that, those with the actual SSD controllers such as the Corsair GTX, are they even more reliable ?
I always buy those 15 dollar Kingston ones and more than 5 of them were already ruined after 2 years of writing and reading. If I invest 100-150$ in a good MLC component flash USB, will they hold for much more than a couple years or is it a waste of money ?