• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What is your AS SSD Benchmark score?

AS_SSD_Benchmark_3600_CL14.jpg
 
Wish ASUS BIOS gave more control or info over the M.2 slots but this is my benchmark results
 

Attachments

  • as-ssd-bench Sabrent Rocket 4 10.6.2020 11-49-50 PM.png
    as-ssd-bench Sabrent Rocket 4 10.6.2020 11-49-50 PM.png
    32.7 KB · Views: 282
Here's my little Samsung 970 EVO + boot drive.

as ssd.PNG
 
Replaced the 500GB PNY Cs2130 that came with my budget gaming rig (CyberPowerPC GMA1400A)

AS AAD PNY M2 NVMe.JPG


With a Samsung 970 EVO 1TB

AS AAD Samsung 970 EVI 1TB M2 NVMe.JPG


Pretty good stats for an inexpensive ASUS Prime B450M-A mobo.
Noticeably better benchmark with the EVO, but little impact on user experience, although the CAM module loads into my solid modeling software much quicker (5 seconds vs 20 on my old rig with Crucial SATA SSD).

Joe
 
ehhh fah doesn't care :D
yet i am going to upgrade anyway :p
Untitled-11 copy.jpg
 
This is my WD Black SN-750 on my Aorus Elite X570.

ASSSD_WD_1TB-SN750.png
 
Hello.
I dont get this. My Samsung SSD 850 EVO is faster then my WD m.2 drive. Anyone know why that is? The M.2 is using 4x, not 2x..
 

Attachments

  • samsung ssd.png
    samsung ssd.png
    125.7 KB · Views: 235
  • wd.png
    wd.png
    32.7 KB · Views: 211
Something is way off with that EVO 850 benchmark. If it's a SATA drive, it is limited by the interface to 600 MB/s.
The 4k-64thrd numbers are an order of magnitude off, like 10x normal.
The WD numbers are respectable for PCI 3.0 4x.

Joe
 
Hello.
I dont get this. My Samsung SSD 850 EVO is faster then my WD m.2 drive. Anyone know why that is? The M.2 is using 4x, not 2x..

You have properly activated Samsung rapid mode in Samsung magician software. This uses systems memory as cashe to SSD. AS SSD reads the speed of that cashed memory. Deaktivate rapid mode and you shut see the speed around the 500-600 mb/s maximum speed.
 
Hi,
That sure isn't as ssd posted I'm not a fan of it either CDM is more accurate but just main read/ write :-)
 
[Skylake i3-6100 2c/4t WD Black SN750 500GB (NTFS compression enabled 4KB unit allocation size)]

Screenshot (5).jpg


1GB file size
Screenshot (6).jpg


64KB file size
Screenshot (7).jpg
 
Acer Spin 5s ssd Will post desktop later

1614046604751.png
 
deleting posts????
Your posts goes through an IP screening and gets flagged if you have many blacklist hits.....not because we deleted them (and not because we're a-holes :rolleyes:)
 
512GB 970 Pro running on an MSI MEG Z390 ACE motherboard

1614295396909.png
 
Corsair MP 510 980GB and Samsung 980 series 250GB. Both should have read/write of 3000mb+. So why am I getting 1329mb on samsung in read? The best i have seen from them is 1500-1600 something, which is half of what i should get. I have 2 pci 3x ports, both disks are 3x too...

I have run the test on HP and MSI in windows with as ssd and kdiskmark and disks in Linux.

any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • as-ssd-bench Samsung SSD 980  2021-03-28 23-13-42.png
    as-ssd-bench Samsung SSD 980 2021-03-28 23-13-42.png
    32.9 KB · Views: 149
Last edited:
Back
Top